Skip to main content
Log in

Equivalent testimonies as a touchstone of coherence measures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past years, a number of probabilistic measures of coherence have been proposed. As shown in the paper, however, many of them do not conform to the intuitition that equivalent testimonies are highly coherent, regardless of their prior probability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartelborth T. (1996). Begründungsstrategien. Ein Weg durch die analytische Erkenntnistheorie. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens L., Hartmann S. (2003a). Solving the riddle of coherence. Mind 112, 601–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens L., Hartmann S. (2003b). Bayesian epistemology. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens L., Olsson E.J. (2000). Coherentism, reliability and Bayesian networks. Mind 109, 685–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens L., Olsson E.J. (2002). Believing more, risking less: On coherence, truth and non-trivial extensions. Erkenntnis 57, 137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap R. (1950). Logical foundations of probability. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen D. (1999). Measuring confirmation. The Journal of Philosophy 96, 437–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douven, I., & Meijs, W. (2007). Measuring coherence. Synthese (Forthcoming), DOI: 10.1007/s11229-006-9131-z.

  • Eells E., Fitelson B. (2002). Symmetries and asymmetries in evidential support. Philosophical Studies 107, 129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch H.A. (1960). Confirming power of observations metricized for decisions among hypotheses. Philosophy of Science 27, 293–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitelson B. (1999). The plurality of Bayesian measures of confirmation and the problem of measure sensitivity. Philosophy of Science, 66 (Proceedings), S362–S378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitelson, B. (2001). Studies in Bayesian confirmation theory. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin at Madison. Online: http://fitelson.org/thesis.pdf.

  • Fitelson B. (2003). A probabilistic theory of coherence. Analysis 63, 194–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitelson, B. (2004). Two technical corrections to my coherence measure. Online: http://fitelson.org/ coherence2.pdf.

  • Gillies D. (1986). In defense of the Popper-Miller argument. Philosophy of Science 53, 110–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good I.J. (1984). The best explicatum for weight of evidence. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 19, 294–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, P. (1998). Wittgensteinian Bayesianism. In: Curd M., Cover J.A. (eds). Philosophy of science: The central issues. Norton, New York and London, pp. 607–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey R. (1992). Probability and the art of judgement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny J., Oppenheim P. (1952). Degrees of factual support. Philosophy of Science 19, 307–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein P., Warfield T.A. (1994). What price coherence? Analysis 54, 129–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg H.E., Jr. (1983). Recent work in inductive logic. In: Machan T., Lucey K. (eds). Recent work in philosophy. Rowman & Allanheld, Totowa/NJ, pp. 87–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi I. (1962). Corroboration and rules of acceptance. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13, 307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. I. (1946). An analysis of knowledge and valuation. Chicago: Open Court.

  • Milne P. (1996). log[p(h/eb)/p(h/b)] is the one true measure of confirmation. Philosophy of Science 63, 21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti L., Akiba K. (2007). Probabilistic measures of coherence and the problem of belief individuation. Synthese 154, 73–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozick R. (1981). Philosophical explanations. Harvard University Press, Cambridge/MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson E.J. (2002). What is the problem of coherence and truth?. The Journal of Philosophy 94, 246–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson E.J. (2005). Against coherence. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson E.J., Shogenji T. (2004). Can we trust our memories? C. I. Lewis’s coherence argument. Synthese 142, 21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper K.R. (1954). Degree of confirmation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5, 143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N. (1958). Theory of evidence. Philosophy of Science 25, 83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkrantz R. (1994). Bayesian confirmation: Paradise regained. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45, 467–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger G. (1995). Measuring degrees of confirmation. Analysis 55, 208–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shogenji T. (1999). Is coherence truth conducive? Analysis 59, 338–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebel M. (2005a). Against probabilistic measures of coherence. Erkenntnis 63, 335–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebel, M. (2005b). Thagard’s measure of coherence: Corrected and compared with probabilistic accounts. Manuscript.

  • Thagard P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard P., Verbeurgt K. (1998). Coherence as constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science 22, 1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Siebel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siebel, M., Wolff, W. Equivalent testimonies as a touchstone of coherence measures. Synthese 161, 167–182 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9155-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9155-4

Keywords

Navigation