Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Various Adhesive Systems with Cavity Cleaning Techniques on Microtensile Bond Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth

  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

This paper investigated the effect of cavity cleaning methods on the bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin after removing zinc-oxide eugenol (ZOE) temporary material. Coronal parts of 96 extracted third molar teeth were removed, and occlusal access cavities were prepared. After root canal treatment, cavities were filled with ZOE and stored in distilled water for seven days at 37°C. After ZOE was removed, teeth were randomly divided into three groups according to cavity cleaning methods (control, 2% chlorhexidine, and ethanol), and five subgroups (3-step total-etch, 2-step self-etch, 1-step self-etch, universal adhesive, and chlorhexidine containing universal adhesive). After restoration with composite resin, the specimens were sectioned into 1 mm2 surface area beams. A microtensile bond strength (μTBS) test was performed. Failure modes were determined under a stereomicroscope and analyzed with a scanning electron microscope. The highest μTBS was observed in chlorhexidine-containing universal adhesive after applying ethanol for 30 s. Ethanol application for 30 s created cleaner dentin surfaces and could increase the adhesive penetration by removing the ZOE residues better than the control and 2% chlorhexidine application for 30 s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Alaçam. Endodonti [in Turkish], Özyurt Printing, Ankara (2012).

  2. C. N. Carvalho, J. R. de Oliveira Bauer, A. D. Loguercio, and A. Reis, “Effect of ZOE temporary restoration on resin-dentin bond strength using different adhesive strategies,” J Esthet Restor Dent, 19, No. 3, 144–153 (2007).

  3. T. Koch, A. Peutzfeldt, V. Malinovskii, et al., “Temporary zinc oxide-eugenol cement: eugenol quantity in dentin and bond strength of resin composite,” Eur J Oral Sci, 121, No. 4, 363–369 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Köroğlu, O. Ekren, and C. Kurtoğlu, “Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması,” J Dent Fac Atatürk Univ, 22, No. 2, 205–216 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. M. Kielbassa, T. Attin, and E. Hellwig, “Diffusion behavior of eugenol from zinc oxide-eugenol mixtures through human and bovine dentin in vitro,” Oper Dent, 22, No. 1, 15–20 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Ganss and M. Jung, “Effect of Eugenol-containing temporary cements on bond strength of composite to dentin,” Oper Dent, 23, No. 2, 55–62 (1998).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Peutzfeldt and E. Asmussen, “Influence of eugenol containing temporary cement on efficacy of dentin-bonding systems,” Eur J Oral Sci, 107, No. 1, 65–69 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. E. M. Carvalho, C. N. Carvalho, A. D. Loguercio, et al., “Effect of temporary cements on the microtensile bond strength of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cement, ” Acta Odontol Scand, 72, No. 8, 762–769 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. C. Ribeiro, P. G. Coelho, M. N. Janal, et al., “The influence of temporary cements on dental adhesive systems for luting cementation,” J Dent, 39, No. 3, 255–262 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. K. T. Pinto, R. Stanislawczuk, A. D. Loguercio, et al., “Effect of exposure time of zinc oxide eugenol restoration on microtensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin,” Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentaria e Cirurgia Maxilofacial, 55, No. 2, 83–88 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Kölpin, G. Sterzenbach, and M. Naumann, “Composite filling or single crown? The clinical dilemma of how to restore endodontically treated teeth,” Quintessence Int, 45, No. 6, 457–466 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Van Meerbeek, M. Vargas, S. Inoue, et al., “Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry,” Oper Dent Supplement, 6, 119–144 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Masarwa, A. Mohammed, I. Abou-Rabii, et al., “Longevity of self-etch dentin bonding adhesives compared to etch-and-rinse dentin bonding adhesives: a systematic review,” J Evid Base Dent Pract, 16, No. 2, 96–106 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. L. Erickson, W. W. Barkmeier, and M. A. Latta, “The role of etching in bonding to enamel: A comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems,” Dent Mater, 25, No. 11, 1459–1467 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. T. J. Hilton, J. L. Ferracane, and J. C. Broome, Sumitt’s Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry, Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc. (2013).

  16. W. L. Rosa, E. Piva, A. F. Silva, “Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” J Dent, 43, No. 7, 765–776 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Liu, L. Tjaderhane, L. Breschi, et al., “Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation,” J Dent Res, 90, No. 8, 953–968 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. K. Hosaka, Y. Nishitani, J. Tagami, et al., “Durability of resin-dentin bonds to water-vs. ethanol-saturated dentin,” J Dent Res, 88, No. 2, 146–151(2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. E. Kuhn, P. Farhat, A. P. Teitelbaum, et al., “Ethanol wet bonding technique: Clinical versus laboratory findings,” Dent Mater, 31, No. 9, 1030–1037 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. K. Ayar, “A review of ethanol wet-bonding: Principles and techniques,” Eur J Dent, 10, No. 1, 155–159 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. V. Aggarwal, M. Singla, R. Sharma, et al., “Effects of simplified ethanol wet bonding technique on immediate bond strength with normal versus caries-affected dentin,” J Conserv Dent, 19, No. 5, 419–423 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. J. D. Bronzato, D. Cecchin, D. C. Miyagaki, et al., “Effect of cleaning methods on bond strength of self-etching adhesive to dentin,” J Conserv Dent, 19, No. 1, 26–30 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. E. K. Watanabe, H. Yatani, K. Ishikawa, et al., “Pilot study of conditioner/primer effects on resin-dentin bonding after provisional cement contamination using SEM, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and bond strength evaluation measures,” J Prosthet Dent, 83, No. 3, 349–355 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Erkut, B. Yilmaz, B. Bagis, et al., “Effect of different surface-cleaning techniques on the bond strength of composite resin restorations,” J Prosthet Dent, 112, No. 4, 949–956 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. O. Alıcı and İ. Hubbezoğlu, “The efficacy of four cavity disinfectant solutions and two different types of laser on the micro-shear bond strength of dentin adhesives,” Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 21, No. 1 (2018).

  26. D. W. Elkassas, E. M. Fawzi, and A. El Zohairy, “The effect of cavity disinfectants on the micro-shear bond strength of dentin adhesives,” Eur J Dent, 8, No. 2, 184–190 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. F. Faul, E. Erdfelder, A.-G. Lang, and A. Buchner, “G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences,” Behav Res Methods, 39, 175–191 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. F. Faul, E. Erdfelder, A. Buchner, and A.-G. Lang, “Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses,” Behav Res Methods, 41, 1149–1160 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. S. Scherrer, P. F. Cesar, and M. V. Swain, “Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: A critical literature review,” Dent Mater, 26, No. 2, 78–93 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. A. D. Loguercio, V. Hass, M. F. Gutierrez, et al., “Five-year effects of chlorhexidine on the in vitro durability of resin/dentin interfaces,” J Adhes Dent, 18, 35–42 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. N. Wongsorachai, O. Thanatvarakorn, T. Prasansuttiporn, et al., “Effect of polymerization accelerator on bond strength to eugenol-contaminated dentin,” J Adhes Dent, 20, No. 6, 541–547 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Wagner, M. Wendler, A. Petschelt, et al., “Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes,” J Dent, 42, No. 7, 800–807 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. M. A. Muñoz, I. Luque-Martinez, P. Malaquias, et al., “In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin,” Oper Dent, 40, No. 3, 282–292 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. D. Pei, X. Huang, C. Huang, et al., “Ethanol-wet bonding may improve root dentine bonding performance of hydrophobic adhesive,” J Dent, 40, No. 5, 433–441 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Y. E. Chang and D. H. Shin, “Effect of chlorhexidine application methods on microtensile bond strength to dentine in class I cavities,” Oper Dent, 35, No. 6, 618–623 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. B. R. Kim, M. H. Oh, and D. H. Shin, “Effect of cavity disinfectants on antibacterial activity and microtensile bond strength in class I cavity,” Dent Mater J, 36, No. 3, 368–37 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. D. M. S. Simѳes, R. T. Basting, F. L. B. Amaral, et al., “Influence of chlorhexidine and/or ethanol treatment on bond strength of an etch-and-rinse adhesive to dentine: an in vitro and in situ study,” Oper Dent, 39, No. 1, 64–71 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. S. Wei, Y. Shimada, A. Sadr, and J. Tagami, “Effect of double-application of three single-step self-etch adhesives on dentin bonding and mechanical properties of resin-dentin area,” Oper Dent, 34, No. 6, 716–724 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. M. Taschner, M. Kümmerling, U. Lohbauer, et al., “Effect of double-layer application on dentin bond durability of one-step self-etch adhesives,” Oper Dent, 39. No. 4, 416–426 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. F. C. F. A. Silva, V. P. Feitosa, and V. P. A. Saboia, “Ethanol as dentin pretreatment on the bonding performance of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive: an in vivo study,” Eur J Dent, 13, No. 2, 137–142 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. D. Saraç, B. Bulucu, Y. S. Saraç, and S. Kulunk, “The effect of dentin-cleaning agent on resin cement bond strength to dentin,” J Am Dent Assoc, 139, No. 6, 751–758 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. L. De Barros, F. M. Apolonio, A. D. Loguercio, and V. de Saboia, “Resin-dentin bonds of etch-and-rinse adhesives to alcohol-saturated acid-etched dentin,” J Adhes Dent, 15, No. 4, 333–340 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. F. T. Sadek, A. Mazzoni, L. Breschi, et al., “Six-month evaluation of adhesives interface created by a hydrophobic adhesive to acid etched ethanol-wet bonded dentine with simplified dehydration protocols,” J Dent, 38, No. 4, 276–283 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. M. Hashimoto, S. Fujita, and K. Endo, “Bonding of self-etching adhesives on dehydrated dentin,” J Adhes Dent, 13, No. 1, 49–54 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  46. N. Niyomsujarit, P. Senawongse, and C. Harnirattisai, “Bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dentin surface after smear layer removal with ultrasonic brushing,” Dent Mater J, 38, No. 2, 287–294 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. N. Tekçe, M. Demirci, and S. Tuncer, “Dentin bağlayıcı sistemlerin bağlanma dayanıklılığı değerlendirme yöntemleri,” Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, 47, No. 1, 73–91 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  48. J. Zhou, J. Tan, X. Yang, et al., “MMP-inhibitory effect of chlorhexidine applied in a self-etching adhesive,” J Adhes Dent, 13, No. 2, 111–115 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  49. C. Sabatini, “Effect of a Chlorhexidine-containing adhesive on dentin bond strength stability,” Oper Dent, 38, No. 6, 609–617 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. R. Stanislawczuk, F. Pereira, M. A. Muῆoz, et al., “Effects of chlorhexidine-containing adhesives on the durability of resin–dentine interfaces,” J Dent, 42, No. 1, 39–47 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. R. Stanislawczuk, A. Reis, and A. D. Loguercio, “A 2-year in vitro evaluation of a chlorhexidine-containing acid on the durability of resin–dentin interfaces,” J Dent, 39, No. 1, 40–47 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. P. Malaquias, M. F. Gutierrez, V. Hass, et al., “Two-year effects of chlorhexidine containing adhesives on the in vitro durability of resin-dentin interfaces and modeling of drug release,” Oper Dent, 43, No. 2, 201–212 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. M. Caderona, D. H. Pashley, G. Marchesi, et al., “Influence of chlorhexidine on the degree of conversion and E- modulus of experimental adhesive blends,” Dent Mater, 25, No. 10, 1269–1274 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The present study was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Committee of Gazi University with grant number 03/2015-06.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey

    F. Alkan Aygor & H. D. Arisu

Authors
  1. F. Alkan Aygor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. D. Arisu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Alkan Aygor.

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Mitsnosti, No. 4, p. 124, July – August, 2023.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aygor, F.A., Arisu, H.D. Effects of Various Adhesive Systems with Cavity Cleaning Techniques on Microtensile Bond Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth. Strength Mater 55, 864–876 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-023-00577-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-023-00577-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation