Abstract
In the past few decades, Chinese families have experienced unprecedented economic growth. In addition to growth, public policies have changed and developed, internal migration has rapidly increased, and social conditions have generally evolved. Living arrangements in particular have transformed, which likely affects the expectations and preferences of older parents to rely on their children. We use the first two waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), a nationally representative sample of older adults in China, to examine the relationship between intergenerational support and life satisfaction in both rural and urban China. In rural villages, we find that living with grandchildren is associated with a higher level of life satisfaction; this is true even in households without parents (i.e., skip-generation households). Higher life satisfaction is also attributable to receiving instrumental support (i.e., help with self-care and household tasks) from children and exchanging financial and emotional support with them. In urban neighborhoods, in contrast, living in a skip-generation household is associated with a lower level of life satisfaction, and only one type of functional support from children is beneficial for older parents’ life satisfaction—instrumental support. Our findings indicate that there is a rural–urban divide in the relationships between life satisfaction and intergenerational support in contemporary China and suggest that development has weakened historical relationships in both rural and urban areas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The terms “life satisfaction” and “happiness” are used interchangeably in this paper and refer to satisfaction with life as a whole.
The hukou (household registration) system has been established since 1950s as the main way to identify rural or urban identity and to control migration from rural to urban areas.
The national rural pension pilot (New Rural Social Pension Scheme) was announced in 2009 and started in late 2009 with an aim to achieve full geographic coverage no later than 2013 (State Council 2009b).
The basic pension level is 55 yuan (less than $10) per month, which is below the rural poverty line.
Family planning policies in China are primarily designed for Han families, who constitute about 92 percent of the overall population in mainland China. Han families are almost the majority in every province, municipality, and autonomous region except for the autonomous regions of Xinjiang and Tibet Autonomous Region. Non-Han families are covered in more relaxed forms of family planning policies.
There are, in general, three dimensions of SWB, namely, life evaluations, affect and eudaimonia. Affect, which is defined as a person’s feelings or emotional state, is measured with reference to one point in time. Eudaimonia considers a person’s meaning and purpose in life.
For instance, according to Chen and Silverstein (2000), the parent–child relationship has become less hierarchical over time.
Institutionalized middle-aged and elderly individuals are not sampled, but the wave 1 respondents who later enter into an institution are followed.
Tibet is excluded.
Without any sample selection criteria, for older adults aged 60 years and above, there are 14,737 observations in two waves, with 78 percent living in rural villages. With less-restricted selection criteria, the information on basic demographic and socioeconomic characteristics should be available, and there are 11,406 observations in total and 79 percent who live in rural villages. By comparing the descriptive statistics of the basic demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the 11,406 observations and those of our analytic sample with 8,004 observations, we do not observe any significant differences.
Only the respondents with non-coresident children were asked about financial transfers and the frequency of seeing children.
Only the respondents with grandchildren under 16 years of age were asked about whether they take care of grandchildren or not.
Similar to what Silverstein and colleagues (2006) find, summing across all children produces weaker results in our models. This suggests that the amount of assistance received from a main provider or the amount of assistance given to a main receiver matters more than the total transfer amount.
ADLs include dressing, bathing or showering, eating, getting into or out of bed, using the toilet, and controlling urination and defecation.
IADLs include doing household chores, preparing hot meals, shopping for groceries, managing money, and taking medications.
We also constructed a variable named “seeing children at least once a month”, and this variable takes the value of 1 if a respondent lives with his or her children or sees non-coresident children at least once a month. We tried replacing “seeing non-coresident children at least once a month” with this variable, and the results appeared to be very similar.
This variable has to be omitted when the instrumental support measures are in the model.
Public pension enrolment and work status have not been highly related in contemporary China. For our sample of older parents, the correlation between work status and public pension enrollment is pretty low: correlation coefficients are 0.033 and -0.039 for rural and urban parents, respectively.
Consumption expenditures can be measured with less noise than income and provide a more accurate measure of long-term resources than income does.
We do not consider whether living with parents or parents-in-law to be an independent variable of interest because only approximately 1 percent of older parents live with their parents or parents-in-law.
One exception is that the marginally significant coefficient on “have three children and above” becomes insignificant after the addition of the functional support variables.
A few coefficients are less significant than the coefficients for the entire urban sample in the main analysis potentially because of the small-cell-size problem.
References
Ahn, T., & Choi, K. D. (2019). Grandparent caregiving and cognitive functioning among older people: evidence from Korea. Review of Economics of the Household, 17(2), 553–586.
Antonucci, T. (1990). Social supports and social relationships. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (3rd ed., pp. 205–226). New York: Academic Press.
Bian, Y., Hao, M., & Li, Y. (2018). Social networks and subjective well-being: A comparison of Australia, Britain, and China. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(8), 2489–2508.
Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7), 1359–1386.
Chang, C. F., & England, P. (2011). Gender inequality in earnings in industrialized East Asia. Social Science Research, 40(1), 1–14.
Chang, W. C. (2013). Family ties, living arrangement, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 215–233.
Chen, F., & Short, S. E. (2008). Household context and subjective well-being among the oldest old in China. Journal of Family Issues, 29(10), 1379–1403.
Chen, X., & Silverstein, M. (2000). Intergenerational social support and the psychological well-being of older parents in China. Research on Aging, 22(1), 43–65.
Chou, K. L., Ho, A. H. Y., & Chi, I. (2006). Living alone and depression in Chinese older adults. Aging and Mental Health, 10(6), 583–591.
Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. The Economic Journal, 104(424), 648–659.
Davis-Friedmann, D. (1991). Long lives: Chinese elderly and the communist revolution. . Stanford University Press.
Doty, P. (1986). Family care of the elderly: The role of public policy. The Milbank Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/3350005.
Dwyer, J. W., & Coward, R. T. (1991). A multivariate comparison of the involvement of adult sons versus daughters in the care of impaired parents. Journal of Gerontology, 46(5), S259–S269.
Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27(1), 35–47.
Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111(473), 465–484.
Felton, B. J., & Berry, C. A. (1992). Do the sources of the urban elderly’s social support determine its psychological consequences? Psychology and Aging, 7(1), 89.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2010). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. . Princeton University Press.
Goldstein, M. C., Ku, Y., & Ikels, C. (1990). Household composition of the elderly in two rural villages in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 5(2), 119–130.
Gow, A. J., Pattie, A., Whiteman, M. C., Whalley, L. J., & Deary, I. J. (2007). Social support and successful aging: Investigating the relationships between lifetime cognitive change and life satisfaction. Journal of Individual Differences, 28(3), 103–115.
Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2012). World happiness report [2012].
Kang, S. M., Shaver, P. R., Sue, S., Min, K. H., & Jing, H. (2003). Culture-specific patterns in the prediction of life satisfaction: Roles of emotion, relationship quality, and self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(12), 1596–1608.
Kim, I. K., & Kim, C. S. (2003). Patterns of family support and the quality of life of the elderly. Social Indicators Research, 62(1–3), 437–454.
Knight, J., & Gunatilaka, R. (2010). The rural–urban divide in China: Income but not happiness? The Journal of Development Studies, 46(3), 506–534.
Knight, J., Song, L., & Gunatilaka, R. (2009). Subjective well-being and its determinants in rural China. China Economic Review, 20(4), 635–649.
Kotlikoff, L. J., & Morris, J. N. (1990). Why don’t the elderly live with their children? A new look. In D. A. Wise (Ed.), Issues in the economics of aging. (pp. 149–172). University of Chicago Press.
Krause, N., & Liang, J. (1993). Stress, social support, and psychological distress among the Chinese elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 48(6), P282–P291.
Ku, L. J. E., Stearns, S. C., Van Houtven, C. H., & Holmes, G. M. (2012). The health effects of caregiving by grandparents in Taiwan: An instrumental variable estimation. Review of Economics of the Household, 10(4), 521–540.
Lei, X., Strauss, J., Tian, M., & Zhao, Y. (2015). Living arrangements of the elderly in China: Evidence from the CHARLS national baseline. China Economic Journal, 8(3), 191–214.
Liao, P. S., Fu, Y. C., & Yi, C. C. (2005). Perceived quality of life in Taiwan and Hong Kong: An intra-culture comparison. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(1), 43–67.
Lin, N., Woelfel, M. W., & Light, S. C. (1985). The buffering effect of social support subsequent to an important life event. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136756.
Lou, V. W. (2010). Life satisfaction of older adults in Hong Kong: The role of social support from grandchildren. Social Indicators Research, 95(3), 377–391.
Martin, L. G. (1989). Living arrangements of the elderly in Fiji, Korea, Malaysia, and the Philippines. Demography, 26(4), 627–643.
Meng, X., & Luo, C. (2008). What determines living arrangements of the elderly in urban China. In B. A. Gustafsson & S. Li (Eds.), Inequality and Public Policy in China. (pp. 267–286). Cambridge University Press.
Mutchier, J. E., & Burr, J. A. (1991). A longitudinal analysis of household and nonhousehold living arrangements in later life. Demography, 28(3), 375–390.
Oxman, T. E., & Hull, J. G. (1997). Social support, depression, and activities of daily living in older heart surgery patients. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 52(1), P1–P14.
Palmer, E., & Deng, Q. (2008). What has economic transition meant for the well-being of the elderly in China. In B. A. Gustafsson & S. Li (Eds.), Inequality and Public Policy in China. (pp. 182–203). Cambridge University Press.
Ren, Q., & Treiman, D. J. (2015). Living arrangements of the elderly in China and consequences for their emotional well-being. Chinese Sociological Review, 47(3), 255–286.
Requena, F. (1995). Friendship and subjective well-being in Spain: A cross-national comparison with the United States. Social Indicators Research, 35(3), 271–288.
Schwarz, B., Albert, I., Trommsdorff, G., Zheng, G., Shi, S., & Nelwan, P. R. (2010). Intergenerational support and life satisfaction: A comparison of Chinese, Indonesian, and German elderly mothers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110372197.
Sicular, T., Ximing, Y., Gustafsson, B., & Shi, L. (2007). The urban–rural income gap and inequality in China. Review of Income and Wealth, 53(1), 93–126.
Silverstein, M., & Bengtson, V. L. (1994). Does intergenerational social support influence the psychological well-being of older parents? The contingencies of declining health and widowhood. Social Science and Medicine, 38(7), 943–957.
Silverstein, M., Cong, Z., & Li, S. (2006). Intergenerational transfers and living arrangements of older people in rural China: Consequences for psychological well-being. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61(5), S256–S266.
Umberson, D. (1992). Relationships between adult children and their parents: Psychological consequences for both generations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54(3), 664.
Wang, F., Zhao, L., & Zhao, Z. (2017). China’s family planning policies and their labor market consequences. Journal of Population Economics, 30(1), 31–68.
Wang, J., Chen, T., & Han, B. (2014). Does co-residence with adult children associate with better psychological well-being among the oldest old in China? Aging and Mental Health, 18(2), 232–239.
Xie, Y., & Zhu, H. (2009). Do sons or daughters give more money to parents in urban China? Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(1), 174–186.
Yang, H., & Chandler, D. (1992). Intergenerational relations: Grievances of the elderly in rural China. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 23, 431–453.
Yeung, G. T., & Fung, H. H. (2007). Social support and life satisfaction among Hong Kong Chinese older adults: Family first? European Journal of Ageing, 4(4), 219–227.
Yi, Z., & Wang, Z. (2003). Dynamics of family and elderly living arrangements in China: New lessons learned from the 2000 census. China Review, 3(2), 95–119.
Zeng, Y., Brasher, M. S., Gu, D., & Vaupel, J. W. (2016). Older parents benefit more in health outcome from daughters’ than sons’ emotional care in China. Journal of Aging and Health, 28(8), 1426–1447.
Zhang, L. (2015). Living arrangements and subjective well-being among the Chinese elderly. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3(03), 150.
Zhang, W., & Liu, G. (2007). Childlessness, psychological well-being, and life satisfaction among the elderly in China. Journal of cross-Cultural Gerontology, 22(2), 185–203.
Zhou, M., & Qian, Z. (2008). Social support and self-reported quality of life: China’s oldest old. In Z. Yi, D. L. Poston, D. A. Vlosky, & D. Gu (Eds.), Healthy longevity in China. (pp. 357–376). Springer.
Zimmer, Z., & Kwong, J. (2003). Family size and support of older adults in urban and rural China: Current effects and future implications. Demography, 40(1), 23–44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, F. Intergenerational Support and Life Satisfaction of Older Parents in China: A Rural–Urban Divide. Soc Indic Res 160, 1071–1098 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02672-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02672-0