Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does Your Neighborhood’s Income Distribution Matter? A Multi-scale Study of Financial Well-Being in the U.S.

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New research reveals spatial variation in a number of subjective measures like happiness and well-being. Yet, scholars remain divided over the geographic scale and attributes that matter. This paper examines how “geographic context”—one’s relative income position and the level of income inequality—is associated with individual financial well-being (FWB) at various geographic scales in the U.S. Drawing on data from the 1995 Midlife in the United States survey and the 1990 Census, I identify four major findings: (1) the geographic context is more likely to influence FWB as household income increases, as low-income individuals tend to report poorer FWB regardless of where they live; (2) high-income individuals tend to report greater FWB as their relative income position rises; (3) differences in FWB across income rankings are more pronounced as income inequality increases; and (4) geographic context has the greatest effect on FWB when measured at the extralocal level (labor market area), followed by the context at the local level (Census tract). These findings provide new insight into the salient attributes, as well as scale, of the geographic context that may help shape individual financial well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Rounded estimates from the 2012–2016 American Community Survey.

  2. These statistics reflect my analytic sample (n = 5632).

  3. I convert U.S. counties into LMAs using 1990 crosswalks from the Missouri Census Data Center’s Geographic Correspondence Engine.

  4. This effect remains significant whether or not I control for the interaction between respondent’s household income and the LMA Gini coefficient.

References

  • Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 2009–2042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., & Morse, A. (2016). Trickle-down consumption. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(5), 863–879.

  • Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodeur, A., & Fléche, S. (2018). Neighbors’ income, public goods, and well-being. Review of Income and Wealth, 65(2), 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callan, M. J., Shead, N. W., & Olson, J. M. (2011). Personal relative deprivation, delay discounting, and gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 955–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M., & Lundy, J. D. (2013). The local Joneses: Household consumption and income inequality in large metropolitan areas. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 34, 14–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., & Crawford, C. A. G. (2012). The role of geographic scale in testing the income inequality hypothesis as an explanation of health disparities. Social Science and Medicine, 75(6), 1022–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Jones, M.R., & Porter, S.R. (2018). Race and economic opportunity in the United States: An intergenerational perspective. NBER Working Paper no. 24441.

  • Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., & Saez, E. (2014). Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 1553–1623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, F., & Lucas, R. E. (2016). Income inequality is associated with stronger social comparison effects: The effect of relative income on life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 332–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cojocaru, A. (2016). Does relative deprivation matter in developing countries: Evidence from six transition economies. Social Indicators Research, 125(3), 735–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruces, G., Pérez-Truglia, R., & Tetaz, M. (2013). Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 98, 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cynamon, B. Z., & Fazzari, S. M. (2016). Inequality, the Great Recession and slow recovery. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(2), 373–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, R. E., & Firebaugh, F. M. (1981). Family resource management: Principles and applications. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2013). Two happiness puzzles. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 103(3), 591–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePianto, D. E. (2011). Financial satisfaction and perceived income through a demographic lens: Do different race/gender pairs reap different returns to income? Social Science Research, 40(3), 773–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euteneuer, F. (2014). Subjective social status and health. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 27(5), 337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. D. R., & Kelley, J. (2004). Subjective social location: Data from 21 nations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(1), 3–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 997–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firebaugh, G., & Schroeder, M. B. (2009). Does your neighbor’s income affect your happiness? American Journal of Sociology, 115(3), 805–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N., Hastings, O. P., & Goldstein, A. (2017). Keeping up with the Joneses: How households fared in the era of high income inequality and the housing price bubble, 1999–2007. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 3, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (1999). Luxury fever: Why money fails to satisfy in an era of excess. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M. W. (2014). A new state-level panel of annual inequality measures over the period 1916–2005. Journal of Business Strategies, 31(1), 241–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H., Levine, A. S., & Dijk, O. (2014). Expenditure cascades. Review of Behavioral Economics, 1, 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R. (2000). Social comparisons of income in one’s community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 764–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, O. P. (2019). Who feels it? Income inequality, relative deprivation, and financial satisfaction in U.S. States, 1973–2012. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 60, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, K. (2017). A relational analysis of top incomes and wealth: Economic evaluation, relative (dis)advantage and the service to capital. LSE International Inequalities Institute Working Paper no. 11.

  • Heffetz, O. (2011). A test of conspicuous consumption: Visibility and income elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(4), 1101–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifcher, J., Zarghamee, H., & Graham, C. (2018). Local neighbors as positives, regional neighbors as negatives: Competing channels in the relationship between others’ income, health, and happiness. Journal of Health Economics, 57, 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, C. (2015). Americans define ‘rich’ as anyone who makes more money than they do. Washington Post.

  • Kim, H., Callan, M. J., Gheorghiu, A. I., & Matthews, W. J. (2017). Social comparison, personal relative deprivation, and materialism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(2), 373–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, J. (1996). Consuming because others consume. Social Theory and Practice, 22(3), 273–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. (2002). The influence of income on health: Views of an epidemiologist. Health Affairs, 21(2), 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1972). Wage, labour, and capital. In R. Tucker (Eds.), The Marx–Engels reader. New York City: W.W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1847).

  • Moller, S., Alderson, A. S., & Nielsen, F. (2009). Changing patterns of income inequality in U.S. Counties, 1970–2000. American Journal of Sociology, 114(4), 1037–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, W., & Diener, E. (2014). What matters to the rich and the poor? Subjective well-being, financial satisfaction, and postmaterialist needs across the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(2), 326–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, K. (2017). The broken ladder: How inequality affects the way we think, live, and die. New York: Viking Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rözer, J., & Kraaykamp, G. (2013). Income inequality and subjective well-being: A cross-national study on the conditional effects of individual and national characteristics. Social Indicators Research, 113(3), 1009–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, R. (2017). Uneasy street: The anxieties of affluence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M. (2018). The 9.9 percent is the new American aristocracy. The Atlantic, May 19.

  • Tay, L., Batz, C., Parrigon, S., & Kuykendall, L. (2017). Debt and subjective well-being: The other side of the income-happiness coin. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18, 903–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (2017). CFPB Financial Well-Being Scale: Scale development technical report. Retrieved from https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/201705_cfpb_financial-well-being-scale-technical-report.pdf.

  • Walasek, L., & Brown, G. D. A. (2016). Income inequality, income, and internet searches for status goods: A cross-national study of the association between inequality and well-being. Social Indicators Research, 129(3), 1001–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. G. (1997). Comment: Income, inequality, and social cohesion. American Journal of Public Health, 87(9), 1504–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. (2009). Income inequality and social dysfunction. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support for this research was provided by the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education with funding from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, as well as by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Grant No. P2C HD047873 and T32 HD007014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA

    Tiffany S. Neman

Authors
  1. Tiffany S. Neman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiffany S. Neman.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neman, T.S. Does Your Neighborhood’s Income Distribution Matter? A Multi-scale Study of Financial Well-Being in the U.S.. Soc Indic Res 152, 951–970 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02458-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02458-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation