Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Multicriteria Approach to the Human Development Index Classification

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a new Human Development Index (HDI) classification method using as a basis the same dimensions and weights used by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), however, avoiding the compensatory effect and misclassification that can occur when UNDP approach is applied. The proposed approach also allows working with any set of dimensions and weights. The classification was performed by the Elimination Et Choix Traidusaint la Realite (ELECTRE TRI), a multicriteria method, in which classes were defined with the visual aid of a non-parametrically tool, the Kernel Density Estimation and the class profiles were calculated by the Jenks Natural Breaks algorithm. The proposed classification method achieved better results than the one adopted by the UNDP, because the countries could be classified accurately in their natural classes without occurring the compensation effect. However, when comparing with the HDI index we have obtained an accuracy of 76.60% for the first proposed model and 78.72% for the second one. Our proposal purely used the same dimensions and weights adopted by UNDP. The proposed method is more robust, closer to reality and can eliminate the compensatory effect between dimensions, thus it can provide more credibility to the HDI. The combination of the ELECTRE TRI method with statistical tools to define classes and class profiles for the HDI is unprecedented in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alkire, S. (2002). Dimensions of human development. World Development, 30(2), 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berenger, V., & Chouchane, A. V. (2007). Multidimensional measures of well-being: Standard of living and quality of life across countries. World Development, 35(7), 1259–1276. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.10.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilbao-Ubillos, J. (2012). Another approach to measuring human development: The composite dynamic human development index. Social Indicator Research, 111(i.2), 473–484. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0015-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluszcz, A. (2015). Classification of the European Union Member states according to the relative level of sustainable development. Quality & Quantity. doi:10.1007/s11135-015-0278-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booysen, F. (2002). An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development. Social Indicator Research, 59, 115–151. doi:10.1023/A:1016275505152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherchye, Y., Ooghe, E., & Puyenbroeck, T. (2008). Robust human development rankings. Journal of Economy Inequality, 6, 287–321. doi:10.1007/s10888-007-9058-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, H. G., Mansur, A. F. U., Freitas, A. L. P., & de Carvalho, R. A. (2007). ELECTRE TRI applied to costumers satisfaction evaluation. Produção, 17(2), 230–245. doi:10.1590/S0103-65132007000200002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craveirinha, J., & Clímaco, J. (2012). Multidimensional evaluation of the quality of life—A new non-compensatory interactive system. Relatório de Investigação Nº 6/2012, ISSN 1645-2631. INESC Coimbra.

  • Dowrick, S., Dunlop, Y., & Quiggin, J. (2003). Social indicators and comparisons of living standards. Journal of Development Economics, 70, 501–529. doi:10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00107-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B. S., & Torsten, H. (2006). A handbook of statistical analyses using R. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, M., Hattgen, K., Klasen, S., & Misselhorn, M. (2008). A human development index by income groups. World Development, 36(12), 2527–2546. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (2013). From capabilities to contentment: testing the links between human development and life satisfaction. In J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report 2013. New York: UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatefi, S. M., & Torabi, S. A. (2010). A common weight MCDA-DEA approach to construct composite indicators. Ecological Economics, 70, 114–120. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.08.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2015). World happiness report 2015. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, G. F., & Caspall, F. G. (1971). Error on choropleth maps: definition, measurement, reduction. Annals (Association of American Geographers), 61, 217–244. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1971.tb00779.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klugman, J., Rodríguez, F., & Choi, H. J. (2011). The HDI 2010: New controversies, old critiques. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(2), 249–288. doi:10.1007/s10888-011-9178-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, E. (2013). Social and economic wellbeing in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin: Building an enlarged human development indicator. Social Indicator Research, 111, 527–547. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0018-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2015). Comparing two non-compensatory composite indices to measure changes over time: A case study. Statistika: Statistics and Economy Journal, 95(2), 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, S. (2003). For better or for worse, till the human development index do us part? Ecological Economics, 45, 281–296. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00085-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau, V., & Slowinski, R. (1998). Inferring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples. Journal of Global Optimization, 12(2), 157–174. doi:10.1023/A:1008210427517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noorbakhsh, F. (1998). A modified human development index. World Development, 26(3), 517–528. doi:10.1080/135048596355925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parzen, E. (1962). On estimation of a probability density function and mode. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33(3), 1065–1076. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177704472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, M., Thanasis, S., & Topaloglou, N. (2012). Measuring human development: A stochastic dominance approach. Journal of Economic Growth, 18(i.1), 69–108. doi:10.1007/s10887-012-9083-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, M. (1956). Remarks on some nonparametric estimates of a density function. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27(3), 832–837. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagar, A. D., & Najam, A. (1998). The human development index: A critical review. Ecological Economics, 25, 249–264. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00168-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas-Bourgoin, M. A. (2014). A proposal for a modified human development index. CEPAL Review, pp. 29–44.

  • Smet, Y. D., Nemery, P., & Selvaraj, R. (2012). An exact algorithm for multicriteria ordered clustering problem. Omega, 40(6), 861–869. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2012.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. J., Goodchild, M. F., & Longley, P. A. (2015). A comprehensive guide to principles, techniques and software tools (5th ed.). Leicester: Troubador Publishing Ltd. ISBN-13: 978-1906221522.

  • Tervonen, T., Lahdelma, R., Almeida Dias, J., Figueira, J., & Salminen, P. (2007). SMAA-TRI: A parameter stability analysis method for ELECTRE TRI. NATO Security through Science Series. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5802-8_15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trosset, M. W. (2011). An introduction to statistical inference and its applications with R. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP—United Nations Development Programme. (2016). Human Development Report 2015—Technical Notes. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr14_technical_notes.pdf. Accessed 15 February 2016.

  • Wu, P. C., Wen, C., & Pan, S. C. (2013). Does human development index provide rational development rankings? Evidence from efficiency rankings in super efficiency model. Social Indicator Research, 116(2), 647–658. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0285-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, B., & Zheng, C. (2015). Fuzzy ranking of human development: A proposal. Mathematical Social Sciences, 78, 39–47. doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou et al. (2010). Weighting and aggregation in composite indicator construction: A multiplicative optimization approach. Social Indicator Research, 96, 169–181. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-1157-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raquel Lourenço do Carvalhal Monteiro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

do Carvalhal Monteiro, R.L., Pereira, V. & Costa, H.G. A Multicriteria Approach to the Human Development Index Classification. Soc Indic Res 136, 417–438 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1556-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1556-x

Keywords

Navigation