Skip to main content
Log in

Residents’ Perception of Cultural Activities as Quality of Life in Istanbul

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Residents’ perception of cultural activities is an important aspect of quality of life. This paper explores the association between the residents’ perception of quality of life and their attendance in cultural activities. Firstly, we investigate the effect of the spatial distribution of existing cultural facilities on the level of attendance to cultural activities, and secondly, explore the relationship between the people’s socio-economic structure and their level of attendance to culture related activities. A dataset of 1,635 dwelling units was selected through a systematic random sampling method for face-to-face interviews. Using surface modeling technique, a close relationship between the socio-economic structure and attendance to culture related activities was observed and the results show a need for a balanced spatial distribution of cultural facilities in the city. In addition, attendance to culture related activities should be increased and be more widespread through a balanced distribution of accessible activity nodes. This may help to improve the quality of life in Istanbul.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, D. A., & Palmer, R. J. (2006). Examining the effects of perceptions of community and recreation participation on quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 75(3), 395–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beggs, B. A., & Elkins, D. J. (2010). The influence of leisure motivation on leisure satisfaction. LARNet; The Cyber Journal of Applied Leisure and Recreation Research. Retrieved March 3, 2013, from http://larnet.org/2010-02.html.

  • Berger-Schmitt, R., & Jankowitsch, B. (1999). System of social indicators and social reporting: System of the art. EuReporting Working Paper No. 1.

  • Bowling, A., & Gabriel, Z. (2004). An integrational model of quality of life in older age: A comparison of analytic and lay models of quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 69(1), 1–36.

  • Chan, N., Xiao, H., Chau, C. Y., & Ma, H. T. (2012). The meaning of leisure for residents in Hong Kong. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 21(3), 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F. S. (1971). Free time activities and quality of urban life. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 37(6), 411–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, C. (2004). Interpolating surfaces in ArcGIS spatial analyst. ArcUser, July–September, pp. 32–35.

  • Council of Europe. (2012). Assembly debate on January 24, 2012, from http://assembly.coe.int/.

  • Dallal, G. E. (1999). The little handbook of statistical practice, from http://www.tufts.edu/~gdallal/LHSP.HTM.

  • De Smith, M. J., Goodchild, M. F., & Longley, P. (2007). Geospatial analysis: A comprehensive guide to principles, techniques and software tools. Leicester, UK: Troubador Publishing Ltd.

  • Enlil, Z. M., Evren, Y., & Dincer, I. (2011). Cultural triangle and beyond: A spatial analysis of cultural industries in Istanbul. Planning, Practice & Research, 26(2), 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertürk, E. (2010). İstanbul’da Gösteri Sanatları: Temel Yapısal Özellikler, Eğilimler, Sorunlar ve Öneriler. Ankara: T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı ve Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi.

  • ESRI. (2013). Spatial autocorrelation (Morans I). Retrieved Februrary 2, 2013, from http://resources.esri.com/help/9.3/arcgisengine/java/Gp_ToolRef/spatial_statistics_tools/spatial_autocorrelation_morans_i_spatial_statistics_.htm.

  • Galloway, S. (2006). Cultural participation and individual quality of life: A review of research findings. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1, 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, S., Bell, D., Hamilton, C., & Scullion, A. (2006). Well-being and quality of life: Measuring the benefits of culture and sport—A literature review and thinkpiece. Series: Education (Scotland. Social Research). Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Government.

  • Giannias, D. A. (1998). A quality of life based ranking of Canadian Cities. Urban Studies, 35, 2241–2251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (1986). Spatial autocorrelation (Vol. 47). Norwich: Geo Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodach, C., & Sideris, A. L. (2007). Cultural development strategies and urban revitalization. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(4), 349–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossi, E., Sacco, P., Blessi, G. T., & Cerutti, R. (2011). The impact of culture on the individual subjective well-being of the Italian population: An exploratory study. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(4), 387–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate analysis. Englewood: Prentice Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth, J., Hoehn, T., & Tiwari, A. (2009). Which are the largest city economies in the world and how might this change by 2025? PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers), UK Economic Outlook November, 2009, pp. 20–34.

  • Hoynes, W. (2003). The arts, social health, and the development of cultural indicators. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(7), 773–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hribrenik, J., & Mussap, A. (2010). Research note: Leisure satisfaction and subjective wellbeing. Annals of Leisure Research, 13(4), 701–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. Y., & Carleton, B. (2003). The relationships among leisure participation, leisure satisfaction, and life satisfaction of college students in Taiwan. Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness, 1(2), 129–132.

  • Hunnicutt, B. (2011). The history of western leisure. In C. Rojek, S. M. Shaw, & A. J. Veal (Eds.), A handbook of leisure studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMP. (2006). İstanbul İl bütünü çevre düzeni planı raporu. Istanbul: İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi, Istanbul Metropoliten Planlama ve Tasarım Merkezi.

  • Iwasaki, Y. (2007). Leisure and quality of life in an international and multicultural context: What are major pathways linking leisure to quality of life? Social Indicators Research, 82(2), 233–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, E. L. (1982). Recreational activity preferences reasons for participating and the satisfaction of needs executive summary. Alberta Recreation and Parks Recreation Development Division Planning Support BranchWorking Paper.

  • Jenkins, J. M., & Young, T. (2008). Urban development and the leisure dilemma: A case study of leisure and recreation in urban residential estates in the Lower Hunter, New South Wales. Annals of Leisure Research, 11(1–2), 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A., & Backman, K. F. (2010). Leisure and community type as indicators of overall quality of life. World Leisure Journal, 52(2), 104–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juniu, S. (2009). The transformation of leisure. Leisure/Loisir, 33(2), 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2006). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (Vol. 2): Asil Yayın Dağıtım.

  • Kim, B., Lee, Y., & Chun, S. (2010). An exploratory study examining the relationships between the leisure-related variables and subjective well-being of community residents. Annals of Leisure Research, 13(4), 613–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kish, L. (1949). A procedure for objective respondent selection within the household. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44(247), 380–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. J. (2008). Subjective quality of life measurement in Taipei. Building and Environment, 43, 1205–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, K. M., & Auld, C. J. (2002). The role of leisure in determining quality of life: Issues of content and measurement. Social Indicators Research, 57(1), 43–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, K., & Auld, C. (2003). Leisure, public space and quality of life in the urban environment. Urban Policy and Research, 21(4), 339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maggino, F., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Measuring the quality of life and the construction of social indicators. In K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research. New York: Springer.

  • Marans, R. W. (2003). Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: The 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1), 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marans, R. W. (2011). Quality of urban life studies: An overview and implications for environment-behaviour research. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marans, R. W., & Cooper, M. (2000). Measuring the quality of community life: a program for longitudinal and comparative international research. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the second international conference on quality of life in cities, Singapore.

  • Marans, R. W., & Kweon, B. (2011). The quality of life in metro Detroit at the beginning of the millennium. In R. W. Marans & R. Stimson (Eds.), Investigating quality of urban life. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marans, R. W., & Mohai, P. (1991). Leisure resources, recreation activity, and the quality of life. In B. L. Driver, P. Brown, & G. L. Peterson (Eds.), The benefits of leisure. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayor of London. (2012). World cities culture report. London: Mayor of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, D., & Hurd, A. (2011). Kraus’ recreation and leisure in modern society. London: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (2005). Arts and the quality of life: An exploratory study. Social Indicators Research, 71, 11–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C., & Kahlke, P. M. (2008). Impact of arts-related activities on the perceived quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 89, 193–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C., & Zumbo, B. D. (2000). Criminal victimization and the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 50(3), 245–295.

  • NIST/SEMATECH. (2003). Engineering statistics handbook, e-handbook of statistical methods, from http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/.

  • Noll, H. (2002). Social Indicators and quality of life research: Background, achievements and current trends. In N. Genov (Ed.), Advances in sociological knowledge over half a century. Paris: International Social Science Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, D., & Unwin, D. (2003). Geographic information analysis. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing—A social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, M. G., & Lashua, B. D. (2005). Students’ perceptions of leisure, leisure professionals and the professional body of knowledge. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 4(2), 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrucci, A., & Andrea, S. S. (2002). Quality of life in Europe: Objective and subjective indicators a spatial analysis using classification techniques. Social Indicators Research, 60, 55–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, B. D. (1981). Spatial statistics. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, A. (2011). Leisure and relationship to quality-of-life satisfaction. In M. Budruk & R. Phillips (Eds.), Quality-of-life community indicators for parks, recreation and tourism management. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, A., Latkova, P., & Sun, Y. (2008). The relationship between leisure and life satisfaction: Application of activity and need theory. Social Indicators Research, 86, 163–175. Community Indicators for Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolandsen, U. M. (2011). Leisure and power in China. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, L. D., & Martins, I. (2007). Monitoring urban quality of life: The porto experience. Social Indicators Research, 80, 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., & Willits, F. K. (1998). Adolescent and adult leisure patterns: A re-assessment. Journal of Leisure Research, 30, 319–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seik, F. T. (2000). Subjective assessment of urban quality of life in Singapore (1997–1998). Habitat International, 24(1), 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. (1995). Applied multivariate techniques. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J., Gao, T., & Young, R. F. (2008). How does residents’ satisfaction with community services influence quality of life (QOL) outcomes? Applied Research Quality Life, 3, 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J., Michalos, A. C., Ferriss, A. L., Easterlin, R. A., Patrick, D., & Pavot, W. (2006). The quality-of-life (Qol) research movement: Past, present, and future. Social Indicators Research, 76, 343–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spatial Deconcentration of Economic Land Use and Quality of Life in European Metropolitan Areas (SELMA). (2004). Deliverable D02 WP2, quality of life indicators. SELMA.

  • Terzi, F., & Bölen, F. (2012). The potential effects of spatial strategies on urban sprawl in Istanbul. Urban Studies, 49(6), 1229–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzi, F., & Dökmeci, V. (2011). An estimation of retail potential of Istanbul. In G. Newell, S. E. Roulac, & M. J. Seiler (Eds.), Research issues in real estate: Essays in honor of James R. Webb (pp. 111–126). Michigan: American Real Estate Society and Precision Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzi, F., Mutlu, H., & Dökmeci, V. (2006). Retail potential of districts of Istanbul. Journal of Retail and Leisure Property, 5(4), 314–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torjman, S. (2004). Culture and recreation: Links to well-being. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.

  • Torkildsen, G. (2005). Leisure and recreation management. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Statistical Institute. (2010). Population census from Turkish Statistical Institute. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/.

  • Türkoğlu, H., Bölen, F., & Baran, P. K. (2006). Istanbul Metropoliten Alanında Yaşam Kalitesinin Araştırılması- Istanbul: İTÜ- Döner Sermaye İşletmeleri & İBB- Bimtaş.

  • Türkoğlu, H., Bölen, F., Baran, P. K., & Terzi, F. (2011). Measuring quality of urban life in Istanbul. In R. W. Marans & R. J. Stimson (Eds.), Investigating quality of urban life: Theory, methods, and empirical research series (Vol. 44, pp. 209–232). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ülengin, B., Ülengin, F., & Güvenç, Ü. (2001). A multidimensional approach to urban quality of life: The case of Istanbul. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 361–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & Hollander, A. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being. Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life ordering concepts and measures of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendel-Vos, G., Schuit, A., Tijhuis, M., & Kromhout, D. (2004). Leisure time physical activity and health-related quality of life: Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations. Quality of Life Research, 13(3), 667–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žganec, A. B., Merkaš, M., & Šverko, I. (2011). Quality of life and leisure activities: How do leisure activities contribute to subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 102(1), 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere thanks to Hüma Şahin for contribution in updating database of culture related facilities in Istanbul.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatih Terzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Terzi, F., Türkoğlu, H.D., Bölen, F. et al. Residents’ Perception of Cultural Activities as Quality of Life in Istanbul. Soc Indic Res 122, 211–234 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0688-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0688-5

Keywords

Navigation