Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Perceived Role of ICTs in Quality of Life in Three Chinese Cities

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assesses the perceived role of information and communication technologies (ICTs) including the Internet, mobile telephone, CD/MD/MP3, television and VCR/VCD/DVD in raising quality of life (QoL). A comparison is made between three Chinese cities, namely, Beijing, Taipei and Hong Kong, to see if differences exist in the perceived value of various forms of ICTs in the three cities, which share Chinese culture but different levels of development. Household interviews with probability samples were conducted in the three cities in 2002–2003. The findings show that the Internet and mobile phone are considered as the most and second most important medium respectively in raising quality of life in all three cities, while television ranks third and other ICTs trail behind. Based on the findings, the authors advance four propositions for the perceived role of ICTs in QoL. First, there are four basic needs related to ICT’s role in QoL. These “ICT-QoL” needs are the need for interaction, need for being in touch, need for instantaneous communication, and need for entertainment. Second, people’s assessment of an ICT’s value in raising their QoL varies with the penetration rate of that ICT—the higher the penetration, the more positive is the assessment of that ICT’s role in QoL. Third, the perceived value of an ICT in QoL declines with time—the longer the ICT has been around after reaching full penetration rate, the lower the value is attached to its contribution to QoL. Finally, education has strong influences on the assessment of the Internet’s role in QoL. Highly educated people tend to value the Internet most as a QoL raiser irrespective of the city they reside in. As a QoL raiser, the Internet is favored more by highly educated while mobile and fixed phone are favored more by lowly educated people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, B., & Tracey, K. (2001). Digital living: The impact (or otherwise) of the Internet on everyday life. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 456–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: America’s perception of life quality. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S. (1991). Measurement of quality of life in the frail elderly. In J. Birren, J. Lubben, J. Rowe, & D. Deutchman (Eds.), The concept and measurement of quality of life in the frail elderly (pp. 50–73). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aureli, E., & Baldazzi, B. (2002). Unequal perceived quality of life among elderly Italians: Different satisfaction levels in selected spheres of life. Social Indicators Research, 60, 309–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L. (2005). February, ‘Income gap grows wider in Beijing’, China Daily. Retrieved October 21, 2006, from http://www.chinadaily.com.cnenglish/doc/2005-02/22/

  • Clark, P., & Bowling, A. (1989). Observational study of quality of life in NHS nursing homes and a long-stay ward for the elderly. Ageing & Society, 9, 123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Budget, Accounting & Statistics, Taipei Government (2005). Taipei city statistical abstract. Retrieved October 21, 2006, from http://www.dbas.taipei.gov.tw/NEWS_WEEKLY/summeng/41.pdf

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eng, T. (2005). Emerging technologies for cancer prevention and other population health challenges. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7(3), e30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni A., & Du Bow F. (Eds.). (1970). Comparative perspectives: Theories and methods. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, M. (1994). Doing more for less. Advances in Medical Sociology, 5, 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, M. (1995), Elderly people’s definition of quality of life. Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1439–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, D., McTavish, F., & Stengle, W. (2005). Reducing the digital divide for low-income women with breast cancer: A feasibility study of a population-based intervention. Journal of Health Communication, 10(Suppl 1), 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, C. (2001). How the Internet is changing our lives. Futurist, 35(4), 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong Government (2004). Hong Kong in brief. Retrieved October 21, 2006, from http://www.info.gov.hk/info/hkbrief/eng/fact.htm#employ

  • Hall, U. (1976). Subjective measures of quality of life in Britain: 1971 to 1975, some developments and trends. Social Trends, 7, 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger, Y., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2000). The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 441–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, D., & Harp, D. (2002). New hope or old power: Democracy, pornography and the Internet. Howard Journal of Communication, 13(4), 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, P., & Argye, M. (2003). Uses of the Internet and their relationships with individual differences in personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, B. (1993). A model for the comprehensive assessment of older people and their carers. British Journal of Social Work, 23, 345–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L., Ervin, S., Gardner, P., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44(5/6), 363–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavanaugh, A., Reese, D., & Carroll, J. (2005). Weak ties in networked communities. Information Society, 21(2), 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kernan, J., & Unger, L. (1987). Leisure, quality of life, and marketing. In A. Samli (Ed.), Marketing and the quality of life interface (pp. 236–252). New York: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R., & Dunlop, C. (1993). Controversies about computerization and the character of white collar worklife. Information Society, 9(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubey, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Television and the quality of life: how viewing shapes everyday experience. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. (2002). April, ‘Hong Kong people’s reception of foreign television in the narrative of globalization. In Conference on International Relations and Cross-cultural Communication (sponsored by the Beijing Broadcasting Institute, Beijing, China).

  • Leung, L. (2004). Societal, organizational and individual factors in the adoption of telework. In P. Lee, L. Leung, & C. Y. K. So (Eds.), Impact and issues in news media: Toward intelligent societies (pp. 149–171). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, L., & Lee, P. (2005). Multiple determinants of life quality: The roles of Internet activities, use of new media, social support, and leisure activities. Telematics and Informatics, 22(3), 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling, R., Yttri, B., Anderson, B., & Diduca, D. (2002). E-living D7.4—age, gender and social capital: A cross-sectional analysis, e-living: Life in a digital Europe, an EU Fifth Framework Project (IST-20000-25409).

  • Lundberg, O., & Thorslund, M. (1996). Fieldwork and measurement consideration in surveys of the oldest old. Social Indicators Research, 37, 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPheat, D. (1996). Technology and life-quality. Social Indicators Research, 38(1), 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, C. (1994). Assessing livability: From statistical indicators to policy benchmarks. In C. Mercer (Ed.), Urban and regional quality of life indicators (pp. 3–12). Brisbane: Institute for Cultural Policy Studies, Griffith University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. (2005). Arts and the quality of life: An exploratory study. Social Indicators Research, 71, 11–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A., Hubley, A., Zumbo, B., & Hemingway, D. (2001). Health and other aspects of the quality of life of older people. Social Indicators Research, 54, 239–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A., Zumbo, B., & Hubley, A. (2000). Health and the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 51, 245–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moller, V. (1992). Spare time use and perceived well-being among black South African youth. Social Indicators Research, 26, 309–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. (1984). Heavy television viewing and perceived quality of life. Journalism Quarterly, 61(3), 499–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundlorf, N. (1994). Families, information technologies, and the quality of life: German research finding. Telematics and Informatics, 11(1), 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naroll, R. (1968). Some thoughts on comparative method in cultural anthropology. In H. Blalock Jr., & A. Blalock (Eds.), Methodology in social research New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenshaw, P. J. (1994). Good life images and brand name associations: Evidence from Asia, America, and Europe. In C. Allen, & D. R. John (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 21, pp. 496–500). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raban, Y., Soffer, T., Mihnev, P., & Ganev, K. (2002). E-living D7.1—ICT uptake and usage: A cross-sectional analysis, e-living: Life in a digital Europe, an EU Fifth Framework Project (IST-2000-25409).

  • Sandberg, K., Gardelli, A., & Stubbs, J. (2005). The use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the rehabilitation of individuals with severe functional impairments in a municipal care service system. Work, 24(3), 229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalock, R., Keith, K., Hoffman, K., & Karan, O. (1989). Quality of life: its measurement and use. Mental Retardation, 27, 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shek, D. (2004). A proposal for the establishment of the Centre for Quality of Life at The Chinese University of Hong Kong (submitted by Faculty of Social Science to the Hong Kong Jockey Club for funding, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong).

  • Shek, D. (2005). Economic stress, emotional quality of life, and problem behavior in Chinese adolescents with and without economic disadvantage. Social Indicators Research, 71, 363–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shek, D., Chan, Y., & Lee, P. (2005). Quality of life in the global context: A Chinese response. Social Indicators Research, 71(1–3), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, C. C., & Johnson, D. M. (1978). Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5, 475–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. (1998). Does television viewership play a role in the perception of quality of life? Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H. (2004). Informational family and its relations to quality of life. Wuhan University of Technology Journal (Social Science Edition), 17(6), 740–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, X. (2004). The impact of internet development on the quality of life of urban families. Social Scientist, 106, 77–79 (in chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Sell, M., & Jacobs, S. (1994), Telecommuting and quality of life: a review of the literature and a model for research. Telematics and Informatics, 11(1), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, R., & Leung, L. (1998). Owning and using new media technology as predictors of quality of life. Telematics and Informatics, 15(4), 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, R. (2005). An investigation of the leisure life quality of the jobless group. Urban Studies, 12(3), 22–25, 37 (in chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick D., Osherson S. (Eds.) (1973). Comparative research methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was coordinated by the Centre for Quality of Life at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Part of this research was supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (RGC Ref: CUHK 4315/01H).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Journalism and Communication, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong

    Paul S. N. Lee & Louis Leung

  2. School of Communication, National Chengchi University, Taiwan, P.R. China

    Venhwei Lo

  3. School of Communication, Tsinghua University, Beijing, P.R. China

    Chengyu Xiong

Authors
  1. Paul S. N. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Louis Leung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Venhwei Lo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chengyu Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul S. N. Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, P.S.N., Leung, L., Lo, V. et al. The Perceived Role of ICTs in Quality of Life in Three Chinese Cities. Soc Indic Res 88, 457–476 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9214-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9214-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation