Skip to main content
Log in

Allowable bearing pressure in soils and rocks through dynamic wave velocities

  • Published:
Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Aims and scope

Based on a variety of case histories of site investigations, including extensive bore hole data, laboratory testing and geophysical prospecting at more than 550 construction sites, an empirical formulation is proposed for the rapid determination of allowable bearing pressure of shallow foundations. The proposed expression corroborates consistently with the results of the classical theory and is proven to be rapid and reliable. Plate load tests have also been carried out at three different sites to further confirm the validity of the proposed method. It consists of only two soil parameters, namely, the in situ measured shear wave velocity and the unit weight. The unit weight may also be determined with sufficient accuracy by means of another empirical expression proposed, using the P-wave velocity. It is indicated that once the shear and P-wave velocities are measured in situ by an appropriate geophysical survey, the allowable bearing pressure as well as the coefficient of subgrade reaction and many other elasticity parameters may be determined rapidly and reliably, not only for soils but also for rocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schulze W.E., "Grundbau," Technical University of Istanbul, Issue 48, No DK624-15, Ucler Printing House, Istanbul, Turkey, 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coates D.F. Rock Mechanics Principles: Mines Branch Monographs, No. 874, 1970.

  3. Hardin B. O. and Black W.L., Vibration modulus of normally consolidated clays, J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, Vol.94, No. SM2, pp.353–369, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hardin B.O. and Drnevich V.P., Shear modulus and damping in soils. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. ASCE, Vol. 98, No. SM7, pp.667–692, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ohkubo T. and Terasaki A., Physical property and seismic wave velocity of Rocks. OYO Corporation, Japan, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Imai T. and Yoshimura M., The relation of mechanical properties of soils to P and S-Wave velocities for soil ground in Japan. Urana Research Institue, OYO Corporation, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tatham R.H., Vp /Vs and lithology. Geophysics, 47:336-344, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Willkens R., Simmons G. & Caruso, L. The ration Vp /Vs as a discriminant of composition for siliceous limestones. Geophysics, 49(11) 1850–1860, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Phillips D. E., Han D. H. & Zoback M. D., Empirical relationships among seismic velocity, effective pressure, porosity and clay content in sandstone. Geophysics, 54:(1) 82–89, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Keceli A. D., Determination of bearing capacity of soils by means of seismic methods, Geoph. J., Ankara, Turkey, 4, 83–92, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jongmans D., The application of seismic methods for dynamic characterization of soils. Bull. Int. Assoc. Eng. Geol. 46:63–69, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sully J. P. & Campanella R.G., Evaluation of in situ anisotropy from crosshole and downhole shear wave velocities measurements. Geotechnique, 45(2):267–282, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pyrak-Nolte L. J., Roy S. & Mullenbach B., Interface waves propagated along a fracture. J. Appl. Geoph., 35:79–87, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Campanella R.G. and Stewart W.P., "Seismic cone analysis using digital signal processing for dynamic site characterization," Can. Geotech. J., Vol.29, No.3, June 1992, pp.477–486, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Butcher A.P. and Powell J.J., Practical considerations for field geophysical techniques to used assess ground stiffness. Proc. Int. Conf. on Advances in Site Investigation Practice, ICE London, March 1995, pp 701–714.

  16. Abd El-Rahman M.M, Setto I., and El-Werr A., Inferring mechanical properties of the foundation material from geophysical measurements. Egyptian Geophysical Society, Proc. of the 9th Annual Meeting, pp. 206–228, 1992.

  17. IRTP, ISSMGE Technical Committee TC16 Ground Property Characterization from In-situ Testing, International Reference Test Procedure (IRTP) for the Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and the Cone Penetration Test with pore pressure (CPTU). Proc. XIIth ECSMGE Amsterdam. Balkema. pp 2195–2222, 1999.

  18. Sieffert J. G. and Bay-Gress Ch., Comparison of the European bearing capacity calculation methods for shallow foundations. Geotech. Eng., Vol. 143, pp. 65–74, England, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Turker E., Computation of ground bearing capacity from shear wave velocity, Continuum Models and Discrete Systems, Eds. D. Bergman, et. al., Netherlands, pp. 173–180, 2004.

  20. Massarsch K. R., Deformation properties of fine-grained soils from seismic tests. Keynote lecture, Int. Conf. on Site Characterization, ISC'2, 19-22 Sept. 2004, Porto, 133–146, 2004.

  21. Tezcan S. S., Ozdemir Z., and Keceli A., Allowable bearing capacity of shallow foundations based on shear wave velocity, J. Geotech.Geol. Eng., 24: pp. 203-218, DOI 10.1007/s.10706-004-1748-4, Netherlands, Springer, www.springerlink.com, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stokoe K. H. and Woods R.D., Insitu shear wave velocity by cross-hole method, J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, Vol. 98, No.SM5, pp.443–460, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tezcan S. S., Erden S. M. and Durgunoglu H. T., Insitu measurement of shear wave velocity at Bogazici University Campus, Proc. of the International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 2, April 1975, pp. 157–164, Istanbul Technical University.

  24. Butcher A.P., Campanella R.G., Kaynia A.M., and Massarsch K. R., Seismic cone downhole procedure to measure shear wave velocity. A guideline prepared by ISSMGE TC10: Geophysical Testing in Geotechnical Engineering. Proc. of the XVIth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, May 2006, 5p., Osaka, Japan.

  25. Terzaghi K., and Peck R.B., Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. 2nd ed., Wiley, London, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Richart F.E., Hall J.R., and Woofs R.D. Vibrations of Soils and Foundations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kramer L.K., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall international Series in Civil Engineering Mechanics, Upper Saddle River, N.J., USA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Santamarina J.C., Klein A. K., and Fam M.A., Soils and Waves, Wiley, New York, N.Y., USA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hunt R.E., Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Manual, McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bieniawski Z.T., Engineering Rock Mass Classification, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Osnovaniya, Fundamenty i Mekhanika Gruntov, No. 4, pp. 19-23, July-August, 2010.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tezcan, S.S., Keceli, A. & Ozdemir, Z. Allowable bearing pressure in soils and rocks through dynamic wave velocities. Soil Mech Found Eng 47, 143–152 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-010-9102-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-010-9102-8

Keywords

Navigation