Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

School Gender Culture and Student Subjective Well-Being

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores the impact of school gender culture in the United States on boys’ and girls’ attachment to school and symptoms of depression. We consider multiple dimensions of school gender culture and hypothesize that student subjective well-being is lower in schools with a lower percentage of females, stronger orientations toward marriage, more prevalent contact sports, and a student body that engages more often in fighting and drinking. xThe hypotheses are derived from theories of gendered organizations, heteronormativity, and hypermasculinity. Analyses of a national sample of middle and high school students in the U.S. (5,847 girls, 5,347 boys) from the 1994–95 National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health show considerable variation in school gender cultures, and regression analyses yield some support for the hypotheses. A higher proportion of female students is associated with fewer depressive symptoms among girls as predicted, but weaker school attachment for boys. The results more consistently supported the hypotheses that student well-being suffers in schools where more classmates get into fights or get drunk. Finally, we find no evidence that student subjective well-being is affected by contexts in which marital plans are more prevalent or greater proportions of students play collision contact sports. We find some evidence that school gender composition and school contexts of fighting and drinking are consequential for student subjective well-being. We reject the hypothesis that school levels of marriage orientations and contact sports participation undermine student well-being. Overall, more work is needed in the conceptualization and measurement of school gender cultures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139–158. doi:10.1177/089124390004002002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, N. G., & Bettis, P. J. (2003). Cheerleader! Cheerleader! An American icon. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. A., Kless, S. J., & Adler, P. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Sociology of Education, 65, 169–187. doi:10.2307/2112807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, K. L., & Eckland, B. (1974). Sex differences in the educational attainment process. American Sociological Review, 39, 668–682. doi:10.2307/2094313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class: Girls, race, and identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, S. R. (2003). Sex composition, masculinity stereotype dissimilarity and the quality of men’s workplace social relations. Gender, Work & Organization, 10, 579–604. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. H., Bishop, M., Gelbwasser, L., Green, S., & Zuckerman, A. (2003). Nerds and freaks: A theory of student culture and norms. Brookings Papers on Educational Policy 141–213. doi:10.1353/pep.2003.0002

  • Bowen, F. (2012, June 12). Title IX has helped encourage many girls to play sports. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com .

  • Broh, B. A. (2002). Linking extracurricular programming to academic achievement: Who benefits and why? Sociology of Education, 75, 69–95. doi:10.2307/3090254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann, C., & DiPrete, T. A. (2006). The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of parental resources and academic achievement. American Sociological Review, 71, 515–541. doi:10.1177/000312240607100401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chantala, K., & Tabor, J. (2010). Strategies to perform a design-based analysis using the Add Health data. Retrieved from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/files/weight1.pdf.

  • Coleman, J. S. (1960). The adolescent subculture and academic achievement. The American Journal of Sociology, 65, 337–347. doi:10.1086/222722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, L., Shope, J. T., & Waller, P. F. (1996). Factors in adolescent drinking/driving: Binge drinking, cigarette smoking, and gender. Journal of School Health, 66, 254–260. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.1996.tb06281.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Czopp, A. M., Lasane, T. P., Sweigard, P. N., Bradshaw, S. D., & Hammer, E. D. (1998). Masculine styles of self-presentation in the classroom: Perceptions of Joe Cool. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 13, 281–294. doi:10.3149/jms.2202.105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, N. (1983). Sex-related differences in the aspirations of high school students. Sex Roles, 9, 683–695. doi:10.1007/BF00289797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demanet, J., Vanderwegen, P., Vermeersch, H., & Van Houtte, M. (2013). Unraveling gender composition effects on rule-breaking at school: A focus on study attitudes. Gender and Education, 25, 466–485. doi:10.1080/09540253.2013.772567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, N., Schur, L., Kruse, D., & Blasi, J. (2010). Worksite segregation and performance-related attitudes. Work and Occupations, 37, 45–72. doi:10.1177/0730888409357312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • East, P. L. (1998). Racial and ethnic differences in girls’ sexual, marital, and birth expectations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 150–162. doi:10.2307/353448.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eder, D., & Parker, S. (1987). The cultural production and reproduction of gender: The effect of extracurricular activities on peer-group culture. Sociology of Education, 60, 200–213. doi:10.2307/2112276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezzell, M. B. (2009). ‘Barbie dolls’ on the pitch: Identity work, defensive othering, and inequality in women’s rugby. Social Problems, 56, 111–131. doi:10.1525/sp.2009.56.1.111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, A. (2000). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of black masculinity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassanov, M. A., Nicholson, L. M., & Koch-Turner, A. (2008). Expectations to marry among American youth: The effects of unwed fertility, economic activity, and cohabitation. Youth & Society, 40, 265–288. doi:10.1177/0044118X08314260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (1995). Gender, symbolism and organizational cultures. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodkind, S. (2013). Single-sex public education for low-income youth of color: A critical theoretical review. Sex Roles, 69, 393–402. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0219-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, A., & Schneider, B. (2003). Adolescents’ extracurricular participation in context: The mediating effects of schools, communities, and identity. Sociology of Education, 76, 89–109. doi:10.2307/3090271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., Eliot, L., Bigler, R. S., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., Hyde, J., Martin, C. L. (2011). The pseudoscience of single-sex schooling. Science, 333, 1706–1707. doi:10.1126/science.1205031.

  • Harker, K. (2001). Immigrant generation, assimilation, and adolescent psychological well-being. Social Forces, 79, 969–1004. doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. M. (2013). The Add Health study: Design and accomplishments. Retrieved from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/data/guides/DesignPaperWIIV.pdf.

  • Haynie, D. L., Petts, R. J., Maimon, D., & Piquero, A. R. (2009). Exposure to violence in adolescence and precocious role exits. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 269–286. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9343-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heyder, A., & Kessels, U. (2013). Is school feminine? Implicit gender stereotyping of school as a predictor of academic achievement. Sex Roles, 69, 605–617. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0309-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D. A., & Eisenhart, M. C. (1990). Educated in romance: Women, achievement and college culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyge, E., Van Maele, D., & Van Houtte, M. (2015). Does students’ machismo fit in school? Clarifying the implications of traditional gender role ideology for school belonging. Gender and Education, 27, 1–18. doi:10.1080/09540253.2014.972921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 264–285. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00078.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2001). Students’ attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74, 318–340. doi:10.2307/2673138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Thaden, L. L. (2006). Gendered patterns in adolescents’ school attachment. Social Psychological Quarterly, 69, 284–295. doi:10.1177/019027250606900305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M., & Mahler, M. (2003). Adolescent masculinity, homophobia, and violence: Random school shootings, 1982–2001. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 1439–1458. doi:10.1177/0002764203046010010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreager, D. A. (2007). Unnecessary roughness? School sports, peer networks, and male adolescent violence. American Sociological Review, 72, 705–724. doi:10.1177/000312240707200503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, V., & Schlosser, S. (2011). Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3, 1–33. doi:10.1257/app.3.2.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. E., Bryk, A. S., & Smith, J. B. (1993). The organization of effective secondary schools. Review of Research in Education, 19, 171–267. doi:10.2307/1167343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legewie, J., & DiPrete, T. A. (2012). School context and the gender gap in educational achievement. American Sociological Review, 77, 463–485. doi:10.1177/0003122412440802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, J. (1995). Ain’t no makin it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini, M. M., & Greenberger, E. (1978). Sex-differences in educational aspirations and expectations. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 67–79. doi:10.1177/009392857852001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. A. (1998). Becoming a gendered body: Practices of preschools. American Sociological Review, 63, 494–511. doi:10.2307/2657264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y. (2003). ‘Said and done’ versus ‘saying and doing’: Gendering practices, practicing gender and work. Gender & Society, 17, 342–366. doi:10.1177/0891243203017003002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeal, R. B., Jr. (1995). Extracurricular activities and high school dropouts. Sociology of Education, 68, 62–80. doi:10.2307/2112764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, M. (1990). Boyhood, organized sports, and the construction of masculinities. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18, 416–444. doi:10.1177/089124190018004003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. S. (2009). Schools and the social control of sexuality. In T. E. Ore (Ed.), The social construction of difference and inequality: Race, class, gender and sexuality (pp. 344–353). NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickelson, R. A. (1989). Why does Jane read and write so well? The anomaly of women’s achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 47–63. doi:10.2307/2112823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikel-Brown, L. (2003). Girlfighting: Betrayal and rejection among girls. NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, E. W. (2008). ‘Rednecks’, ‘rutters’, and ‘rithmetic: Social class, masculinity, and schooling in rural context. Gender & Society, 22, 728–751. doi:10.1177/0891243208325163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. L., & Serkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 150–163. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(84)90026-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. (2013). Effects of single-sex schooling in the final years of high school: A comparison of analysis of covariance and propensity score matching. Sex Roles, 69, 404–422. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0261-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahlke, E., Hyde, J. S., & Allison, C. M. (2014). The effects of single-sex compared with coeducational schooling on students’ performance and attitudes: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1042–1072. doi:10.1037/a0035740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renna, F. (2008). Teens’ alcohol consumption and schooling. Economics of Education Review, 27, 69–78. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J. R., & Burge, S. (2008). Educational expectations and the rise in women’s post-secondary attainments. Social Science Research, 37, 485–499. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.09.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (1997). Interaction and conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. American Sociological Review, 62, 218–235. doi:10.2307/2657301.

  • Risman, B. J., & Seale, E. (2009). Betwixt and between: Gender contradictions among middle schoolers. In B. J. Risman (Ed.), Families as they really are (pp. 340–361). NY: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, C. A., & Martin, S. S. (1993). Gender, styles of deviance, and drinking problems. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34, 302–321. doi:10.2307/2137369.

  • Rosen, B. C., & Aneshensel, C. S. (1978). Sex-differences in educational-occupational expectation process. Social Forces, 57, 164–186. doi:10.1093/sf/57.1.164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America’s schools cheat girls. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrock, D., & Schwalbe, M. (2009). Men, masculinity, and manhood acts. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 277–295. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. H., Hauser, R. M., & Wolf, W. C. (1980). Sex, schooling, and occupational status. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 551–583. doi:10.1086/227281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu, X., & Marini, M. M. (1998). Gender-related change in occupational aspirations. Sociology of Education, 71, 43–67. doi:10.2307/2673221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikora, J. (2014). Gender gap in school science: Are single-sex schools important? Sex Roles, 70, 400–415. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0372-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, T., Morash, M., & Park, S. (2011). Late adolescent delinquency: Risks and resilience for girls differing in risk at the start of adolescence. Youth and Society, 43, 1433–1458. doi:10.1177/0044118X10386078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B. (1993). Gender at play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, K. (2011). Integration interrupted: Tracking, black students, and acting white after brown. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ueno, K., & McWilliams, S. (2010). Gender-typed behaviors and school adjustment. Sex Roles, 63, 580–591. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9839-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtte, M. (2004a). Why boys achieve less at school than girls: The difference between boys’ and girls’ academic culture. Educational Studies, 30, 159–173. doi:10.1080/0305569032000159804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtte, M. (2004b). Gender context of the school and study culture, or how the presence of girls affects the achievements of boys. Educational Studies, 30, 409–423. doi:10.1080/0305569042000310336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, L. M. (2011). “Girls are worse”: Drama queens, ghetto girls, tomboys, and the meaning of girl fights. Youth and Society, 43, 1298–1334. doi:10.1177/0044118X10382031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, A. S., & Baron, J. N. (1987). So happy together? The impact of gender segregation on men at work. American Sociological Review, 52, 574–587. doi:10.2307/2095595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, A. S., & Baron, J. N. (1991). Satisfaction? The psychological impact of gender segregation on women at work. The Sociological Quarterly, 32, 365–387. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1991.tb00164.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L., & Pearson, J. (2009). School culture and the well-being of same-sex-attracted youth. Gender & Society, 23, 542–568. doi:10.1177/0891243209339913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Reynolds.

Appendices

Appendix A

Table 4 Bivariate correlations among dependent and independent variables by gender (girls below the diagonal, boys above). National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health; N = 5,347 boys and 5,847 girls

Appendix B

Table 5 Regression of school attachment on school gender culture. National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health; N = 5,347 boys and 5,847 girls. Slope coefficients with robust standard errors in parentheses

Appendix C

Table 6 Regression of depressive symptoms on school gender culture. National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health; N = 5,347 boys and 5,847 girls. Slope coefficients with robust standard errors in parentheses

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reynolds, J.R., Bamford, M.J. School Gender Culture and Student Subjective Well-Being. Sex Roles 74, 62–77 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0557-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0557-y

Keywords

Navigation