Abstract
This research presents two studies examining scripts for the actual initial romantic encounters of young heterosexual Hispanic adults in the Southeastern U.S. In Study 1, 242 Hispanic undergraduates were asked to describe their most recent first romantic encounter using a cognitive script methodology, and then to classify the encounter as being a date, hangout, hookup, one-night stand, or other type of encounter. Encounters were most frequently classified as a date, followed by hangouts; very few individuals indicated that their most recent encounter was a hookup or one-night stand. Dates were described as highly gender stereotypic, with men performing significantly more actions overall than women. The date script also included more gender-typed actions, was more structured, and was considered more ideal than a hangout. In Study 2, a checklist of 60 actions derived from Study 1 was used to assess the most recent initial romantic encounters of 217 Hispanic undergraduates. Dates were reported most frequently, followed by hangouts. Dates continued to be highly gender stereotyped with men being responsible for more actions than women, and the date script continued to include more gender-typed actions than the hangout. A date was also more structured and rated as more ideal and satisfying than a hangout. The predominance of and preference for dates, the most gender-typed way for young adults to get together romantically, was consistent with Hispanic cultural norms that support traditional gender roles.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelson, R. P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36, 715–729. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.36.7.715.
Ahrold, T. K., & Meston, C. M. (2010). Ethnic differences in sexual attitudes of U.S. college students: Gender, acculturation, and religiosity factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 190–202. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9406-1.
Bailey, B. L. (1988). From front porch to back seat: Courtship in twentieth-century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Belsey, C. (1994). Desire: Love stories in western culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
Billy, J. O. G., Transfer, K., Grady, W. R., & Keplinger, D. H. (2008). The sexual behavior of men in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives, 25, 52–60. doi:10.2307/2136206.
Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.
Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177–220. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(79)90009-4.
Bradshaw, C., Kahn, A. S., & Saville, B. K. (2010). To hook up or date: Which gender benefits? Sex Roles, 62, 661–669. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9765-7.
Cabassa, L. (2003). Measuring acculturation: Where we are and where we need to go. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 5, 127–146. doi:10.1177/0739986303025002001.
Campbell, A. (2008). The morning after the night before: Affective reactions to one-night stands among mated and unmated women and men. Human Nature, 19, 157–173. doi:10.1007/s12110-008-9036-2.
U.S. Census Bureau (2000). Data Center Results – Miami, Florida. Modern Language Association. Retrieved from http://www.mla.org/map_data_results&state_id=12&county_id=&mode=&zip=&place_id=45000&cty_id=&ll=&a=&ea=&order=r.
U.S. Census Bureau (2012). State & County QuickFacts: Miami, Florida. Retrieved from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/12/12086.html.
Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. The Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26. doi:10.1080/00224490309552163.
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (1998). On the nature of contemporary prejudice: The causes, consequences, and challenges of aversive racism. In J. Eberhardt & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 3–32). Newbury Park: Sage.
Eaton, A. A., & Rose, S. (2011). Has dating become more egalitarian? A 35 year review using Sex Roles. Sex Roles, 64, 843–862. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9957-9.
Espin, O. M. (1986). Cultural and historical influences on sexuality in Hispanic/Latin women. In J. B. Cole (Ed.), All American women: Lines that divide, ties that bind (pp. 272–284). New York: The Free Press.
Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1105–1119. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fry, R. (2011). Hispanic college enrollment spikes, narrowing gaps with other groups. Washington, D.C.: Pew Hispanic Center.
Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., & Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16, 161–176. doi:10.1037/a0027911.
Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on dating and mating today. New York: Institute for American Values.
Gowan, M., & Treviño, M. (1998). An examination of gender differences in Mexican-American attitudes toward family and career roles. Sex Roles, 38, 1079–1093.
Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. The Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267. doi:10.1080/00224490609552324.
Grimstead, O. A., Faigeles, B., Binson, D., & Eversley, R. (1993). Sexual risk for human immunodeficiency virus infection among women in high-risk cities. Family Planning Perspectives, 25, 252–277. doi:10.2307/2136141.
Hogg, M. A. (2001). Social categorization, depersonalization, and group behavior. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 56–85). Oxford: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch3.
Holman, A., & Sillars, A. (2011). Talk about “Hooking Up”: The influence of college student social networks on nonrelationship sex. Health Communication, 27, 205–216. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.575540.
Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 87–100. doi:10.1080/00224490309552169.
Knudson-Martin, C., & Mahoney, A. R. (2009). Couples, gender, and power: Creating change in intimate relationships. New York: Springer.
Kreeft, P. (2001). Catholic Christianity: A complete catechism of Catholic Church beliefs based on the Catechism of the Catholic Church. San Francisco. CA: Ignatuis Press.
Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S., & Apple, K. J. (2003). Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 129–133. doi:10.1080/00224490309552174.
Laner, M. R., & Ventrone, N. A. (1998). Egalitarian daters/traditionalist dates. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 468–477. doi:10.1177/019251398019004005.
Laner, M. R., & Ventrone, N. A. (2000). Dating scripts revisited. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 488–500. doi:10.1177/019251300021004004.
Lenton, A. P., & Bryan, A. (2005). An affair to remember: The role of sexual scripts in perceptions of sexual intent. Personal Relationships, 12, 483–498. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2005.00127.x.
Liskin, L. (1985, November-December). Youth in the 1980s: Social and health concerns. Population Reports, XIII(5), M350–M388.
Macrae, C. N., Milne, A. B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 37–47. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.66.1.37.
Mauss, I. B., Butler, E. A., Roberts, N. A., & Chu, A. (2010). Emotion control values and responding to an anger provocation in Asian-American and European-American individuals. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1026–1043. doi:10.1080/02699930903122273.
Mayo, Y. Q., & Resnick, R. P. (1996). The impact of machismo on Hispanic women. Journal of Women & Social Work, 11, 257–277.
Morr Serewicz, M. C., & Gale, E. (2008). First-date scripts: Gender roles, context, and relationship. Sex Roles, 58, 149–164. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9283-4.
Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The causalities of “casual” sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661.
Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. doi:10.1080/00224490009552023.
Pew Hispanic Center (2011). 2011 National survey of Latinos. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2012/04/04/v-politics-values-and-religion.
Pew Hispanic Center. (2009). Between two worlds: How young Latinos come of age in America. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/files/reports/117.pdf.
Raffaelli, M. (2005). Adolescent dating experiences described by Latino college students. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 559–572. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.04.001.
Raffaelli, M., & Ontai, L. L. (2004). Gender socialization in Latino/a families: Results from two retrospective studies. Sex Roles, 50, 287–299. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000018886.58945.06.
Raffaelli, M., & Suarez-al-Adam, M. (1998). Reconsidering the HIV prevention needs of Latino women in the United States. In N. L. Roth & L. K. Fullers (Eds.), Women and AIDS: Negotiating safer practices, care, and representation (pp. 7–41). New York: Haworth.
Raffaelli, M., Zamboanga, B. L., & Carlo, G. (2005). Acculturation status and sexuality among female Cuban American college students. Journal of American College Health, 54, 7–13. doi:10.3200/JACH.54.1.7-13.
Regan, P. C., Durvasula, R., Howell, L., Ureno, O., & Rea, M. (2004). Gender, ethnicity, and the developmental timing of first sexual and romantic experiences. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 667–676. doi:10.2224/sbp.2004.32.7.667.
Reid, J. A., Elliott, S., & Webber, G. R. (2011). Casual hookups to formal dates: Refining the boundaries of the sexual double standard. Gender & Society, 25, 545–568. doi:10.1177/0891243211418642.
Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1989). Young singles’ scripts for a first date. Gender & Society, 3, 258–268. doi:10.1177/089124389003002006.
Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles’ contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28, 499–509. doi:10.1007/BF00289677.
Sprecher, S., & McKinney, K. (1993). Sexuality. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
Upchurch, D. M., Levy-Storms, L., Sucoff, C. A., & Aneshensel, C. S. (1998). Gender and ethnic differences in the timing of first sexual intercourse. Family Planning Perspectives, 30, 121–127. doi:10.2307/2991625.
Upchurch, D. M., Aneshensel, C. S., Sucoff, C. A., & Levy-Storms, L. (1999). Neighborhood and family contexts of adolescent sexual activity. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 920–933. doi:10.2307/354013.
Verb. (2012). In Merriam Webster. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/verb.
Wright, C. L. (2011). Intimate relationship behaviors of Cuban male college students. Journal of Men, Masculinities and Spirituality, 5, 97–113.
Wright, M. O., Norton, D. L., & Matusek, J. A. (2010). Predicting verbal coercion following sexual refusal during a hookup: Diverging gender patterns. Sex Roles, 62, 647–660. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9763-9.
Zavella, P., & Xóchitl, C. (2005). Sexuality and risks: Gendered discourses about virginity and disease among young women of Mexican origin. Latino Studies, 3, 226–245. doi:10.1057/palgrave.lst.8600139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eaton, A.A., Rose, S.M. Scripts for Actual First Date and Hanging-Out Encounters Among Young Heterosexual Hispanic Adults. Sex Roles 67, 285–299 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0190-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0190-y