Abstract
This paper comments on Heflick and Goldenberg (2010) and examines the evidence cited to support their claim that the objectification of Sarah Palin undermined her performance and voters’ perceptions of her competence. Drawing on evidence related to U.S. media and U.S. political elections, I discuss the conflicting images of Sarah Palin and how they may have contributed to a greater focus on her appearance. I review evidence of how Sarah Palin and other female political candidates have been treated by the media and conclude the evidence for objectification by the media is weak. While the experimental evidence of the objectification of Sarah Palin is intriguing, it does not eliminate plausible alternative explanations for judgments of her competence. Particular attention is paid to the problem of operationally defining objectification, whether in analyses of the media or in laboratory studies. More empirical research on the objectification of others is encouraged, and directions for future experimental research in this area are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banwart, M. C., Bystrom, D. G., & Robertson, T. (2003). From the primary to the general election. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 658–676.
Bartholet, J. &, Breslau, K. (2008, September 15). An apostle of Alaska. Newsweek, 152(11), 24-36. Retrieved from http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic/?shr=t&csi=5774&sr=HLEAD(An+Apostle+Of+Alaska.)+and+date+is+September,%202008
Budesheim, T. L., & DePaola, S. J. (1994). Beauty or the beast? The effects of appearance, personality, and issue information on evaluations of political candidates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 339–348. doi:10.1177/0146167294204001.
Bystrom, D. G., Robertson, T. A., & Banwart, M. C. (2001). Framing the fight: An analysis of media coverage of female and male candidates in primary races for governor and U.S. senate in 2000. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 1999–2013.
Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. K. (2011). Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions. Washington: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12304-000.
Chiao, J. Y., Bowman, N. E., & Gill, H. (2008). The political gender gap: Gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior. Plos One, 3(10), e3666. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003666.
Dilanian, K. (2008, September 12). Palin 'governed from the center,' went after big oil. USA Today, Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-09-11-palin-cover_N.htm
Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2010). Watching the hourglass: Eye tracking reveals men’s appreciation of the female form. Human Nature, 21, 355–370. doi:10.1007/s12110-010-9100-6.
Dolan, K. (2004). The impact of candidate sex on evaluations of candidates for the U.S. house of representatives. Social Science Quarterly (Blackwell Publishing Limited), 85, 206–217. doi:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08501015.x.
Dowd, M. (2007, April 21). Running with scissors. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://select.nytimes.com/2007/04/21/opinion/21dowd.html?_r=1.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.
Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.269.
Gervais, S. J., Vescio, T. K., & Allen, J. (2011). When what you see is what you get: The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 5–17. doi:10.1177/0361684310386121.
Givhan, R. (2007, December 14). Waiving the flag. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2007/12/13/AR2007121301787.html
Gold, R. (2008, August 30). Palin has long experience dealing with big oil in home state. Wall Street Journal - Eastern Edition, 252(52), A7. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122005404357685123.html
Gourevitch, P. (2008, September 22). The state of Sarah Palin. New Yorker, 84(29), 64-73. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/09/22/080922fa_fact_gourevitch
Gruenfeld, D. H., Inesi, M. E., Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111–127. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.111.
Heflick, N. A., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2009). Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 598–601. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.008.
Heflick, N. A., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2010). Sarah Palin, a nation object(ifie)s: The role of appearance focus in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Sex Roles, this issue. doi:10.107/s11199-010-9901-4
Heflick, N. A., Goldenberg, J. L., Cooper, D. P., & Puvia, E. (2011). From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 572–581. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020.
Herrnson, P. S., Lay, J. C., & Stokes, A. K. (2003). Women running “as women”: Candidate gender, campaign issues, and voter–targeting strategies. Journal of Politics, 65, 244–255.
Huddy, L., & Capelos, T. (2002). Gender stereotyping and candidate evaluation: Good news and bad news for women politicians. In V. C. Ottati, R. S. Tindale, J. Edwards, F. B. Bryant, L. Heath, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, & E. J. Posavac (Eds.), The social psychology of politics (pp. 29–53). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Jamieson, K. H. (1996). Packaging the presidency: A history and criticism of presidential campaign advertising (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kahn, K. F. (1996). The political consequences of being a woman: How stereotypes influence the conduct and consequences of political campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press.
Krupp, D. (2008). Through evolution’s eyes: Extracting mate preferences by linking visual attention to adaptive design. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 57–63. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9273-1.
Lammers, J., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2009). Iron ladies, men of steel: The effects of gender stereotyping on the perception of male and female candidates are moderated by prototypicality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 186–195. doi:10.1002/ejsp.505.
Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Jones, B. C., & Roberts, S. C. (2007). Facial appearance affects voting decisions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 18–27. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.09.002.
Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2001). Social cognition: Categorical person perception. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 239–255. doi:10.1348/000712601162059.
Mattes, K., Spezio, M., Kim, H., Todorov, A., Adolphs, R., & Alvarez, R. M. (2010). Predicting election outcomes from positive and negative trait assessments of candidate images. Political Psychology, 31, 41–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00745.x.
Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 24, 249-291. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2961930
Olivola, C. Y., & Todorov, A. (2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 83–110. doi:10.1007/s10919-009-0082-1.
Ottati, V. C., & Deiger, M. (2002). Visual cues and the candidate evaluation process. In V. C. Ottati, R. S. Tindale, J. Edwards, F. B. Bryant, L. Heath, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, & E. J. Posavac (Eds.), The social psychology of politics (pp. 75–87). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Papadaki, L. (2010). What is objectification? Journal of Moral Philosophy, 7, 16–36. doi:10.1163/174046809X12544019606067.
Poutvaara, P., Jordahl, H., & Berggren, N. (2009). Faces of politicians: Babyfacedness predicts inferred competence but not electoral success. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1132–1135. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.007.
Quinn, D. M., Kallen, R. W., Twenge, J. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). The disruptive effect of self-objectification on performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 59–64. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00262.x.
Rosenberg, S. W., Kahn, S., & Tran, T. (1991). Creating a political image: Shaping appearance and manipulating the vote. Political Behavior, 13(4), 345–367. doi:10.1007/BF00992868.
Shapiro, R. Y., & Mahajan, H. (1986). Gender differences in policy preferences: A summary of trends from the 1960s to the 1980s. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 42–61. doi:10.1086/268958.
Sigelman, L., & Wahlbeck, P. J. (1997). The "veepstakes": Strategic choice in presidential running mate selection. The American Political Science Review, 91, 855-864. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2952169
Stanley, A. (2008, September 25). A question reprised, but the words come none too easily for Palin. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/26/us/politics/26watch.html
Strelan, P., & Hargreaves, D. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification? Sex Roles, 52, 707–712. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3737-3.
Sui, J., & Liu, C. H. (2009). Can beauty be ignored? Effects of facial attractiveness on covert attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 276–281. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.276.
Suschinsky, K. D., Elias, L. J., & Krupp, D. B. (2007). Looking for Ms. Right: Allocating attention to facilitate mate choice decisions. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 428-441. Retrieved from http://www.epjournal.net/filestore/ep05428441.pdf
Thompson, A. (2011, January 28). TNT offers apology for Tracy Morgan's Palin remarks. USA Today. Retrieved from http://content.usatoday.com/communities/entertainment/post/2011/01/tnt-offers-apology-for-tracy-morgans-palin-remarks-/1
Tiggemann, M., & Kuring, J. K. (2004). The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 299–311. doi:10.1348/0144665031752925.
Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308, 1623–1626. doi:10.1126/science.1110589.
Ulbig, S. G. (2010). The appeal of second bananas: The impact of vice presidential candidates on presidential vote choice, yesterday and today. American Politics Research, 38, 330–355. doi:10.1177/0891988709358950.
Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36–51. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.36.
Weisskopf, M., & Thornburgh, N.. (2008, October 13). Pipeline to nowhere? Time, 172(15) 50-52. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1846731,00.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Budesheim, T.L. Going Out on a Limb in an Underdeveloped Branch of Objectification Research. Sex Roles 65, 165–172 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9999-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9999-z