Skip to main content
Log in

The Rating of Sexist Humor Under Time Pressure as an Indicator of Spontaneous Sexist Attitudes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spontaneous vs. more controlled indicators of sexist attitudes were assessed in a laboratory experiment with 131 male German undergraduates. Participants rated the funniness of sexist and nonsexist jokes either with or without time pressure, and completed self-report measures of sexism and related constructs. With time pressure, participants showed greater liking for sexist jokes than without. No such effect was found for nonsexist jokes. Both with and without time pressure, sexist joke ratings showed meaningful correlations with standard self-report measures, which attests to the joke measure’s high reliability and construct validity. Directions for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Athenstaedt, U. (2002). Normative Geschlechtsrollenorientierung: Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens [Normative Gender Role Attitudes: The development and validation of a new questionnaire]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 21, 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banse, R., & Gawronski, B. (2003). Die Skala Motivation zu vorurteilsfreiem Verhalten: Psychometrische Eigenschaften und Validität [The scale Motivation to Act Without Prejudice: Psychometric properties and validity]. Diagnostica, 49, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohner, G., Jarvis, C. I., Eyssel, F., & Siebler, F. (2005). The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men’s rape proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 819–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunton, B. C., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckes, T., & Six-Materna, I. (1998). Leugnung von Diskriminierung: Eine Skala zur Erfassung des modernen Sexismus [Denial of discrimination: A scale measuring modern sexism]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 29, 224–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckes, T., & Six-Materna, I. (1999). Hostilität und Benevolenz: Eine Skala zur Messung des ambivalenten Sexismus [Hostility and benevolence: A scale measuring ambivalent sexism]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 30, 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyssel, F., & Bohner, G. (2006). Impliziter ambivalenter Sexismus: Erste Ergebnisse zur Entwicklung eines reaktionszeitbasierten Forschungsinstruments [Implicit ambivalent sexism: First results on the development of a reaction-time based research instrument]. In H. Hecht, S. Berti, G. Meinhardt, & M. Gamer (Eds.), Beiträge zur 48. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyssel, F., Bohner, G., & Siebler, F. (2006). Perceived rape myth acceptance of others predicts rape proclivity: Social norm or judgmental anchoring? Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H., & Towles-Schwen, T. (1999). The MODE model of attitude–behavior processes. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, T. E., & Ferguson, M. A. (2004). Social consequences of disparagement humor: A prejudiced norm theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 79–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, T. E., Wentzel, E. R., & Lorion, J. (2001). Effects of exposure to sexist humor on perceptions of normative tolerance of sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 677–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friese, M., Hoffmann, W., & Wänke, M. (2007, in press). When impulses take over: Moderated predictive validity of explicit and implicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerger, H., Kley, H., Bohner, G., & Siebler, F. (2007). The Acceptance of Modern Myths About Sexual Aggression (AMMSA) Scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 420–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D., & Isbell, L. M. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and the dumb blonde: Men’ s and women’s reactions to sexist jokes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, B., & Fish, J. M. (1986). Gender and personality differences in the appreciation of cartoon humor. Journal of Psychology, 120, 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, W., Rauch, W., & Gawronski, B. (2007). And deplete us not into temptation: Automatic attitudes, dietary restraint, and self-regulatory resources as determinants of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 497–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klonis, S. C., Ashby Plant, E., & Devine, P. G. (2005). Internal and external motivation to respond without sexism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1237–1249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Musch, J., Brockhaus, R., & Bröder, A. (2002). Ein Inventar zur Erfassung von zwei Faktoren sozialer Erwünschtheit [An inventory for the assessment of two factors of social desirability]. Diagnostica, 48, 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Manual for the balanced inventory of desirable responding. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, K. M., & Kanjorski, J. (1998). The enjoyment of sexist humor, rape attitudes and relationship aggression in college students. Sex Roles, 38, 743–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabelus, S. (2004). Sexual harassment: Feminist attitude and physical attractiveness as risk factors. Unpublished Diploma Thesis, University of Bielefeld, Germany.

  • Sev’er, A., & Ungar, S. (1997). No laughing matter: Boundaries of gender-based humour in the classroom. Journal of Higher Education, 68, 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebler, F., Sabelus, S., & Bohner, G. (2007, in press). A refined computer harassment paradigm: Validation, and test of hypotheses about target characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly.

  • Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stöber, J. (1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17). Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität [The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17): Development and first results on reliability and validity]. Diagnostica, 45, 173–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. A., & Esses, V. M. (2004). Individual differences in reactions to sexist humor. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., & Cantor, J. R. (1976). A disposition theory of humor and mirth. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research and applications. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research and the preparation of this manuscript was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BO 1248/4-3) to Gerd Bohner and Frank Siebler.

We thank Paul Schreiber and Philipp Süssenbach for their help in conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friederike Eyssel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eyssel, F., Bohner, G. The Rating of Sexist Humor Under Time Pressure as an Indicator of Spontaneous Sexist Attitudes. Sex Roles 57, 651–660 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9302-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9302-5

Keywords

Navigation