Skip to main content
Log in

Determination and Comparison of Sexual Dysfunctions of Women With and Without Infertility Problems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality and Disability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to define and compare sexual dysfunctions of women with and without infertility problems. This descriptive and comparative study was conducted between February 2014 and February 2016. The population of the study were women with and without infertility problems that applying to infertility and gynecology outpatient clinics of Atatürk University Research Hospital in Erzurum city center of Turkey. 137 women with infertility problems and 142 women without infertility problems were included in the study. Questionnaire and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) were used to collect the data of the study. It was determined that while total mean score of FSFI of the women without infertility problems was 17.86 ± 6.41, FSFI of the women with infertility problems was 17.49 ± 7.20. The difference between FSFI sub-scale and total mean score of women with and without infertility problems was not statistically significant. When it was evaluated in terms of cut-off point of FSFI, it was found that except for subscale of Satisfaction among its subscales, difference between all other subscales was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). It was found that 76.8% of the women without infertility problems and 78.8% of the women with infertility problems had sexual dysfunctions and the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). As a result of FSFI scores of the women with and without infertility problems, it was concluded that both groups had sexual dysfunctions and there was no statistically significant difference between them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vayena, E., Rowe, P.J., Griffin, P.D.: Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. Report of a meeting on “Medical, Ethical and Social Aspects of Assisted Reproduction” held at WHO Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland 2001. World Health Organization Geneva. 15–75 (2002). http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/drzeinab/PublishingImages/report.pdf Accessed 10 Jan 2016

  2. Brugo-Olmedo, S., Chillik, C., Kopelman, S.: Definition and causes of infertility. Reprod Biomed Online. 2(1), 41–53 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alibaşoğlu, H.: Gender differences in infertilitiy for emotional sympyoms, marital adjustment and sexual function. Expertise Thesis, İstanbul (2010)

  4. Tashbulatova, D.: Influencing factors on the sexual function in infertile women. Expertise Thesis, Çukurova University, Adana (2007) http://library.cu.edu.tr/tezler/6549.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2016

  5. Oğuz, H.D.: Effects of mental health, marital relations and sexual life of infertility in women being treated for infertility. Expertise Thesis, İstanbul (2004). http://www.istanbulsaglik.gov.tr/w/tez/pdf/ruh_sag_hast/dr_havva_deniz_oguz.pdf Accessed 4 Jan 2016

  6. Perry, G.A., Potter, P.A.: Basic Nursing-Theory and Practice. Mosby Year Book, St Louis (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Basson, R., Berman, J., Burnett, A., Derogatis, L., Ferguson, D., Fourcroy, J.: Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: definitions and classifications. J. Urol. 163(3), 888–893 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karakoyunlu, F.: The prevalence of sexual dysfunction in married women. Master Thesis, Akdeniz University, Antalya (2007)

  9. Khetarpal, A., Singh, S.: Infertility: why can’t we classify this inability as disability? Australas. Med. J. 5(6), 334–339 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sternke, E.: Unruly bodies: infertility as a disability. ResearchGate (2010) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254638812_Unruly_bodies_Infertility_as_a_disability. Accessed 29 Nov 2016

  11. Hamilton, A.B.: Psychological aspects of ovarian cancer. Cancer Invest. 17, 335–341 (1999)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nusbaum, M., Hamilton, C., Lenahan, P.: Chronic illness and sexual functioning. Am. Fam. Phys. 67(2), 347–354 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sandra, L., Welner, M.D.: Infertility and management approaches for women with disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 17(3), 233–236 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Severson, B.: Sexual dysfunction and multiple sclerosis. http://www.va.gov/MS/Veterans/symptom_management/Sexual_Dysfunction_and_Multiple_Sclerosis.asp Accessed 29 Nov 2016

  15. Christopherson, J.M., Moore, K., Foley, F.W., Warren, K.G.: A comparison of written materials vs. materials and counselling for women with sexual dysfunction and multiple sclerosis. J. Clin. Nurs. 15(6), 742–750 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hulter, B.M., Lundberg, P.O.: Sexual function in women with advanced multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 59, 83–86 (1995)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sandel, M.E., Williams, K.S., Dellapietra, L., et al.: Sexual functioning following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 10, 719–728 (1996)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oskay, Ü.Y., Beji, N.K.: Kadın cinsel fonksiyon bozukluğu sınıflandırılması, son dönemde yapılan değişiklikler ve yeni sınıflama için öneriler. Androloji Bülteni. 32, 79–82 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Önal, S.: The prevalence of female sexual dysfunction and potential risk factors. Expertise Thesis, Dicle University, Diyarbakır (2010)

  20. Frank, E., Anderson, C., Rubenstein, D.: Frequency of sexual dysfunction in “normal” couples. N. Engl. J. Med. 299(3), 111–115 (1978)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Laumann, E.O., Paik, A., Rosen, R.C.: Sexual dysfunction in the united states, prevalence and predictors. JAMA 281(6), 537–544 (1999)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Millheiser, L.S., Helmer, A.E., Quintero, R.B., Westphal, L.M., Milki, A.A., Lathi, R.B.: Is infertility a risk factor for female sexual dysfunction? A case-control study. Fertil. Steril. 94(6), 2022–2025 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.fertnsttert.2010.01.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moghadam, A., Delphisheh, A., Moghadam, A.: Effect of infertility on sexual function: a cross-sectional study. J. Clin. Dıagn. Res. 9(8), 3 (2015). doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/11148.5934

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ranjbar, F., Abbasalizadeh, F., Teimory, P., Alizadeh, A.: The comparison of sexual function and infertility in fertile and infertile couples. Eur. Psychol. 26(1), 1106 (2011). doi:10.1016/S0924-9338(11)72811-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tanha, D.F., Mohseni, M., Ghajarzadeh, M.: Sexual function in women with primary and secondary infertility in comparison with controls. Int. J. Imp. Res. 26, 132–134 (2014). doi:10.1038/ijir.2013.51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Drosdzol, A., Skrzypulec, V.: Quality of life and sexual functioning of polish infertile couples. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 13(3), 271–281 (2008). doi:10.1080/13625180802049187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bahrami, N., Sattarzadeh, N., Koochaksariie, R.F., Ghojazadeh, M.: Comparing depression and sexual satisfaction in fertile and infertile couples. J. Repr. Infertil. 8(1), 52–59 (2007). doi:10.1155/2014/964087

    Google Scholar 

  28. Güvel, S., Yaycıoğlu, Ö., Bağış, T., Savaş, N., Bulgan, E., Özkardeş, H.: Factors associated with sexual function in married women. Türk Üro. Derg. 29(1), 43–48 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Volpe, E., Wertheımer, J.: Exploring Sexuality Attitudes and Knowledge in Nursing: An Education Program. http://www.esextherapy.com/dissertations/Eileen%20M%20Volpe%20MSN%20ARNP%20CST%20and%20Joyce%20C%20Wertheimer%20MSW%20CST%20Exploring%20Sexuality%20Attitudes%20and%20Knowledge%20in%20Nursing%20An%20Education%20Program.pdf (2004). Accessed 29 Nov 2016

  30. Balcı, H.: Determine the sexual behaviour in the pregnancy. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Hacettepe University Ankara (2004)

  31. Rosen, R., Brown, C., Heiman, J., Leiblum, S., Meston, C., Shabsigh, R., Ferguson, D., D’Agostino Jr., R.: The female sexual function ındex (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J. Sex Marital Ther. 26, 191–208 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Aygin, D., Aslan, F.E.: The Turkish adaptation of the female sexual function index. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci. 25(3), 393–399 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Çayan, S., Akbay, E., Bozlu, M., Canpolat, B., Acar, D., Ulusoy, E.: The prevalence of female dysfunction and potential risk factors that may impair sexual function in Turkish women. Urol. Intern. 72(1), 52–57 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Orhan, E.: Symptoms of anxiety and depression, marital adjustment and sexual dysfunction in couples diagnosed with male factor infertility. Master Thesis. Maltepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul (2010)

  35. Ege, E., Akın, B., Arslan, S., Bilgili, N.: Sağlıklı kadınlarda cinsel fonksiyon bozukluğu sıklığı ve risk faktörleri. Tubav Bil. Derg. 3(1), 137–144 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. İncesu, C.: Cinsel işlevler ve cinsel işlev bozuklukları. Klin. Psik. Derg. 3, 3–13 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participants that spared their time to participate and assist with recruitment in the study. Thanks also to The Management Unit Scientific Research Projects at Atatürk University for financial support.

Funding

This study was funded by The Management Unit Scientific Research Projects at Atatürk University (Project No. 2015/83).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elif Yağmur Ozorhan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Approval was taken from Atatürk University Faculty of Health Sciences Ethics Committee for the study and written permission from the hospital in which the study would be conducted was taken. In order for the women’s rights to be protected, ethical principles were realized as follows; by informing the women about the aim of the study before starting data collection for “Informed Consent” principle, by indicating that the data would be kept confidential for “Confidentiality and Privacy Protection” principle, and by including only voluntary participants for “Respect for Autonomy”.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alihocagil Emec, Z., Ejder Apay, S. & Ozorhan, E.Y. Determination and Comparison of Sexual Dysfunctions of Women With and Without Infertility Problems. Sex Disabil 35, 59–72 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-016-9471-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-016-9471-7

Keywords

Navigation