Abstract
Women with fertility problems have utilized the Americans with Disabilities Act to sue to gain insurance coverage for fertility treatments and additional paid time away from work, thus requesting that the relatively invisible but stigmatizing condition (infertility) be acknowledged by society as a disability. This provides a seemingly paradoxical situation given the generally negative connotation of disability in our society. Twenty-three in-depth interviews were completed with women who belonged to infertility support groups to examine their experiences of infertility, stigma and the notion of constructing infertility as a disability. We took a constructivist grounded theory approach to the data by engaging in free coding of themes. Being a mother was something respondents assumed would happen naturally for them, within the realm of a normative life course. The discussion of infertility as a disabling condition brought forth issues of stigma from respondents in terms of a feeling of non-normalcy and discredited social status surrounding the childless state. A primary issue that arose in discussion with respondents was resource allocation, and the potential for a label such as ‘disability’ to afford more generous reimbursement and workplace support for infertility treatments. There is an interesting juxtaposition between the individual problem of infertility and the social consequences of a childless state. Legal discourse reveals that simply being labeled disabled does not necessarily increase access to treatment if treatment is sought. Further study is needed to assess the potential social, medical and legal ramifications for all stakeholders of labeling infertility a disability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Assisted reproductive technology surveillance. Surveillance summaries, 2006. 12 June 2009. MMWR 2009, 58, SS–S5 (2009) http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss5805.pdf. Retrieved 20 Jan 2014
Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Reproductive health: infertility FAQs. http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/Infertility/Index.htm. Retrieved 20 Jan 2014
van der Berch, K.: Courts’ struggle with infertility: the impact of hall v. Nalco on infertility-related employment discrimination. Univ. Colo. Law Rev. 81(2), 545–578 (2010)
Witcraft v Sundstrand Health and Dis. Gr. 420 N.W.2d 785 (IA: Supreme Court 1988) available at: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2530105393114779270&q=Witcraft+v.+Sundstrand+Health+and+Disability+Group+Benefit+Plan+(1988)&hl=en&as_sdt=800006
Ralston v Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. 617 So.2d 1379 (LA: Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit 1993) available at: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4500563994473517280&q=Ralston+v.+Connecticut+General+Life+Insurance+Company+(1993)&hl=en&as_sdt=800006
Bragdon v Abbott 524 US 624 (Supreme Court 1998) available at: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11295524924367699420&q=Bragdon+v.+Abbott+(1998)&hl=en&assdt=800006
Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc. 527 US 471 (Supreme Court 1999) available at: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18389776619126544360&hl=en&as_sdt=800006
Saks v Franklin Covey: Saks v. Franklin Covey Co., 316 F. 3d 337 (Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2003) available at: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4321304919063399039&q=Saks+v.+Franklin+Covey+(2003)&hl=en&as_sdt=800006 (2003)
Chandra, A., Martinez, G.M., Mosher, W.D., Abma, J.C., Jones, J.: Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 23(25) (2005) available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_025.pdf
Becker, G., Nachtigall, R.D.: Born to be a mother—the cultural construction of risk in infertility treatment in the United States. Soc. Sci. Med. 39(4), 507–518 (1994)
McQuillan, J., Greil, A.L., White, L., Jacob, M.C.: Frustrated fertility: infertility and psychological distress among women. J. Marriage Fam 65(4), 1007–1018 (2003)
Reddy, U.M., Wapner, R.J., Rebar, R.W., Tasca, R.J.: Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop. Obstet. Gynecol. 109(4), 967–977 (2007)
American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Frequently Asked Questions About Infertility. http://www.reproductivefacts.org/awards/index.aspx?id=3012. Retrieved 20 Jan 2014
National Conference of State Legislatures: CSL state laws related to insurance coverage for infertility treatment. (2008; Updated March 2012) http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/insurance-coverage-for-infertility-laws.aspx, Retrieved 20 Jan 2014
Usha Ranji, U., Salganicoff, A., Stewart, A.M., Cox, M., Doamekpor, L.: State medicaid coverage of family planning services: summary of state findings. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park (2009)
White, L., McQuillan, J., Greil, A.L.: Explaining disparities in treatment seeking: the case of infertility. Fertil. Steril. 85(4), 853–857 (2006)
Greil, A.L.: Not yet pregnant: infertile couples in contemporary America. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick (1991)
Greil, A.L.: A secret stigma: the analogy between infertility and chronic illness and disability. In: Albrecht, G.L., Levy, J.A. (eds.) Advances in medical sociology: a research annual, pp. 17–38. JAI Press, Greenwich (1991)
Greil, A.L.: Infertile bodies: medicalization, metaphor, and agency. In: Inhorn, M., van Balen, F. (eds.) Infertility around the globe: new thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies, pp. 101–118. University of California Press, Berkeley (2002)
Loftus, J.: Women’s infertility and the self. Indiana University, Bloomington (2004)
Ginsburg, F., Rapp, R.: The politics of reproduction. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 20, 311–343 (1991)
Heinamaa, S.: What is a woman: Butler and beauvoir on the foundations of the sexual difference. Hypatia 12(1), 20–39 (1997)
Letherby, G.: Other than mother and mothers as others: the experience of motherhood and non-motherhood in relation to ‘infertility’ and ‘involuntary childlessness. Women’s Stud. Int. Forum 22(3), 359–372 (1999)
Sandelowski, M.J.: Failures of volition—female agency and infertility in historical-perspective. Signs 15(3), 475–499 (1990)
Matthews, R., Matthews, A.M.: Infertility and involuntary childlessness: the transition to nonparenthood. J. Marriage Fam. 48, 641–649 (1986)
Denny, E.: New reproductive technologies: the views of women undergoing treatment. In: Williams, S.J., Calnan, M. (eds.) Modern medicine: lay perspectives and experiences, pp. 207–229. Routledge, London (1996)
McQuillan, J., Greil, A.L., Scheffler, K.M., Tichenor, V.: The importance of motherhood among women in the contemporary United States. Gend. Soc. 22(4), 477–496 (2008)
Crawley, S.L., Foley, L.J., Shehan, C.L.: Gendering bodies. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham (2008)
Onat, G., Beji, N.: Marital relationship and quality of life among couples with infertility. Sex. Disabil. 30(1), 39–52 (2012)
Peterson, B.D., Newton, C.R., Rosen, K.H.: Examining congruence between partners’ perceived infertility-related stress and its relationship to marital adjustment and depression in infertile couple. Fam. Process 42(1), 59–70 (2003)
Greil, A.L., McQuillan, J.: “Trying’ times. Med. Anthropol. Q. 24(2), 137–156 (2010)
Hancock, P., Hughes, B., Jagger, E., Patterson, K., Russell, R., Tulle-Winton, E., Tyler, M.: The body, culture and society: an introduction. Open University Press, Philadelphia (2000)
Williams, S.J., Calnan, M.: Modern medicine: lay perspectives and experiences. UCL Press, London (1996)
Denny, E.: I never know from one day to another how i will feel”: pain and uncertainty in women with endometriosis. Qual. Health Res. 19(7), 985–995 (2009)
Ha’elyon, H., Gross, C.: The “lived pain” experience: the case of women undergoing IVF treatments. Indo Pac. Phenomenol. 11(1), 1–10 (2011)
Malin, M.: Good, bad and troublesome: infertility physicians’ perceptions of women patients. Eur. J. Womens Stud. 10(3), 301–319 (2003)
King, R.B.: Managing pregnancy disclosures: understanding and overcoming the challenges of expectant motherhood at work. Hum. Resour. Manag. R. 19(4), 314–323 (2009)
DeVries, N.: Conceiving equality: infertility-related illness under the pregnancy discrimination act. Ga. State Univ. Law Rev. 26(4), 1361–1387 (2010)
Link, B.G., Phelan, J.C.: Conceptualizing stigma. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27, 363–385 (2001)
Corrigan, P.W., Watson, A.C.: The paradox of self-stigma and mental illness. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 9(1), 35–53 (2002)
Corrigan, P., Matthews, A.: Stigma and disclosure: implications for coming out of the closet. J. Ment. Health 12(3), 235–248 (2003)
Greil, A.L., McQuillan, J., Slauson-Blevins, K.: The social construction of infertility. Soc. Compass 5(8), 736–746 (2011)
Frank, A.W.: For a sociology of the body: an analytic review. In: Featherstone, M., Hepworth, M., Turner, B.S. (eds.) The body: social process and cultural theory, pp. 36–102. Sage, London (1991)
Miall, C.E.: The stigma of involuntary childlessness. Soc. Probl. 33(4), 268–282 (1986)
Schmidt, L.: Social and psychological consequences of infertility and assisted reproduction–what are the research priorities? Hum. Fertil. 12(1), 14–20 (2009)
Whiteford, L.M., Gonzalez, L.: Stigma: the hidden burden of infertility. Soc. Sci. Med. 40(1), 27–36 (1995)
Goffman, E.: Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Touchstone Books, New York ([1963] 1986)
Green, S., Davis, C., Karshmer, E., Marsh, P., Straight, B.: Living stigma: the impact of labeling, stereotyping, separation, status loss, and discrimination in the lives of individuals with disabilities and their families. Sociol. Inq. 75(2), 197–215 (2005)
Stefan, S.: “Discredited” and discreditable”: the search for political identity by people with psychiatric diagnoses. Wm. Mary Law Rev. 44, 1341–1383 (2003)
Johnson, K.M., Fledderjohann, J.: Revisiting, “her” infertility: medicalized embodiment, self-identification and distress. Soc. Sci. Med. 75(5), 883–891 (2012)
Conrad, P., Schneider, J.W.: Deviance and medicalization: from badness to sickness. Temple University Press, Philadelphia ([1980] 1992)
Thoits, P.A.: Resisting the stigma of mental illness. Soc. Psychol. Q. 74(1), 6–28 (2011)
Karger, H., Rose, S.R.: Revisiting the Americans with disabilities act after two decades. J. Soc. Work Disabil. Rehabil. 9(2–3), 73–86 (2010)
Moser, I.: On becoming disabled and articulating alternatives: the multiple modes of ordering disability and their inferences. Cult. Stud. 19(6), 667–700 (2005)
Thoits, P.A.: Differential labeling of mental illness by social status: a new look at an old problem. J. Health Soc. Behav. 46, 102–119 (2005)
Hamilton, R.J., Bowers, B.J.: Internet recruitment and e-mail interviews in qualitative studies. Qual. Health Res. 16(6), 821–835 (2006)
Hamilton, R.J., Bowers, B.J., Williams, J.K.: Disclosing genetic test results to family members. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 37(1), 18–24 (2005)
Murray, C.D., Sixsmith, J.: E-mail: a qualitative research medium for interviewing? Int. J. Soc. Res. Methods 1(2), 103–121 (1998)
Smith, M.A., Leigh, B.: Virtual subjects: using the Internet as an alternative source of subjects and research environment. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comp. 29(4), 496–505 (1997)
Wallace, P.: The psychology of the internet. Cambridge University Press, New York (1999)
Kvale, S.: Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1996)
Charmaz, K.: Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2006)
Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)
Cahill, S.E., Eggleston, R.: Reconsidering the stigma of physical disability: wheelchair use and public kindness. Soc. Q. 36(4), 681–698 (1995)
Taub, D.E., McLorg, P.A., Fanflik, P.L.: Stigma management strategies among women with physical disabilities: contrasting approaches of downplaying or claiming a disability status. Deviant Behav. 25(2), 169–190 (2004)
Bloomfield, B.P., Vurdubakis, T.: Disrupted boundaries: new reproductive technologies and the language of anxiety and expectation. Soc. Stud. Sci. 25(3), 533–551 (1995)
Conolloy, M.P., Hoorens, S., Chambers, G.M.: The costs and consequences of assisted reproductive technology: an economic perspective. Hum. Reprod. Update. 16(1), 603–613 (2010)
Henne, M.B., Bundorf, M.K.: Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments. Fertil. Steril. 89(1), 66–73 (2008)
Khetarpal, A., Singh, S.: Infertility: why can’t we classify this inability as disability? Australas. Med. J. 5(6), 334–339 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sternke, E.A., Abrahamson, K. Perceptions of Women with Infertility on Stigma and Disability. Sex Disabil 33, 3–17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-014-9348-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-014-9348-6