Abstract
An article recently published in Scientometrics sheds light on the way ResearchGate works in calculating its RG score, which seems to be affected primarily by the members’ engagement in the social network environment, and only secondarily by publications. Here we show that the will to understand the rationale behind the score should also consider the ratio between full-text sources uploaded to the repository and publications. The finding supports the claim that the RG score is not a reliable indicator of scientific and academic reputation. Instead, it appears to be much more a tool to implement the entrepreneurial strategy of the RG’s owner company.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bornmann, L. (2016). Scientific revolution in scientometrics: The broadening of impact from citation to societal. In C. R. Sugimoto (Ed.), Theories of informetrics and scholarly communication (pp. 347–359). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110308464-020.
Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2017). Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact? Scientometrics, 110(2), 937–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2200-2.
Borrego, Á. (2017). Institutional repositories versus ResearchGate: The depositing habits of Spanish researchers. Learned Publishing, 30(3), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1099.
De Silva, P. U. K., & Vance, C. K. (2017). Scientific scholarly communication. Scientific scholarly communication: The changing landscape. Cham: Springer.
Dewett, T., & Denisi, A. S. (2004). Exploring scholarly reputation: It’s more than just productivity. Scientometrics, 60(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027796.55585.61.
Erdt, M., Nagarajan, A., Sin, S. C. J., & Theng, Y. L. (2016). Altmetrics: An analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media. Scientometrics, 109(2), 1117–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2077-0.
Gumpenberger, C., Glänzel, W., & Gorraiz, J. (2016). The ecstasy and the agony of the altmetric score. Scientometrics, 108(2), 977–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1991-5.
Haustein, S. (2016). Grand challenges in altmetrics: Heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies. Scientometrics, 108(1), 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1910-9.
Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D., Holmberg, K., Tsou, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Larivière, V. (2016). Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated “bot” accounts on Twitter. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(1), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23456.
Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2014). Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1145–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3.
Hoffmann, C. P., Lutz, C., & Meckel, M. (2016). A relational altmetric? Network centrality on ResearchGate as an indicator of scientific impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 765–775. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23423.
Jamali, H. R. (2017). Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articles. Scientometrics, 112(1), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2291-4.
Jamali, H. R., & Nabavi, M. (2015). Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1635–1651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1642-2.
Jamali, H. R., Nicholas, D., & Herman, E. (2016). Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms. Research Evaluation, 25(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv032.
Jordan, K. (2015). Exploring the ResearchGate score as an academic metric: Reflections and implications for practice. Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web (ASCW’15), 1–3. http://ascw.know-center.tugraz.at/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ASCW15jordanresponsekraker-lex.pdf%5CnCopyright. Accessed 13 June 2017.
Kraker, P., & Lex, E. (2015). A critical look at the ResearchGate score as a measure of scientific reputation. In ASCW’15 Workshop at Web Science 2015, (May), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.35401.
Kuo, T., Tsai, G. Y., Jim Wu, Y. C., & Alhalabi, W. (2017). From sociability to creditability for academics. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 975–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.044.
Meishar-Tal, H., & Pieterse, E. (2017). Why do academics use academic social networking sites? International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2643.
Nentwich, M., & König, R. (2014). Academia goes Facebook? The potential of social network sites in the scholarly realm. Opening science (pp. 107–124). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_7.
Nicholas, D., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Rodríguez-Bravo, B., Xu, J., Watkinson, A., Abrizah, A., et al. (2017). Where and how early career researchers find scholarly information. Learned Publishing, 30(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1087.
Nicholas, D., Clark, D., & Herman, E. (2016). ResearchGate: Reputation uncovered. Learned Publishing, 29(3), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1035.
Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Jamali, H. R., Bravo, B. R., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Dobrowolski, T., et al. (2015). New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation. Learned Publishing, 28(3), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150303.
Orduna-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2017). Do ResearchGate scores create ghost academic reputations? Scientometrics, 112(1), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2396-9.
Ortega, J. L. (2015). Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC’s members. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.004.
Ortega, J. L. (2016). Social network sites for scientists (1st ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Shrivastava, R., & Mahajan, P. (2015). Relationship amongst ResearchGate altmetric indicators and Scopus bibliometric indicators. New Library World, 116(9/10), 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-03-2015-0017.
Sud, P., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Evaluating altmetrics. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1131–1143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2.
Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and Ten other social web services. PLoS ONE, 8(5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064841.
Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015). ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 876–889. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23236.
Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2017). ResearchGate articles: Age, discipline, audience size and impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(2), 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23675.
Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature, 512(7513), 126–129. https://doi.org/10.1038/512126a.
Wang, X., Wang, Z., & Xu, S. (2013). Tracing scientist’s research trends realtimely. Scientometrics, 95(2), 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0884-5.
Winter, R. (2015). Interview with Ijad Madisch on “The future of publishing and discussing research”. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 57(2), 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0368-2.
Wouters, P., & Costas, R. (2012). Users, narcissism and control? Tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on science and technology indicators (pp. 847–857).
Yu, M. C., Wu, Y. C. J., Alhalabi, W., Kao, H. Y., & Wu, W. H. (2016). ResearchGate: An effective altmetric indicator for active researchers? Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1001–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.007.
Acknowledgements
Here we make use of some data that, for brevity’s sake, are not included in the text. Since we aim to improve our RG score, these data are freely available in our RG pages.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Copiello, S., Bonifaci, P. A few remarks on ResearchGate score and academic reputation. Scientometrics 114, 301–306 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2582-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2582-9