Skip to main content
Log in

The emerging dynamic structure of national innovation studies: a bibliometric analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The state is still the significant unit for innovative studies during the age of R&D globalization and innovation regionalization. Using the bibliometric method, this paper attempts to provide a comprehensive picture of national innovation studies based on data derived from the Web of Knowledge. In particular, we identify the most significant countries and institutions, major journals, seminal contributions and contributors, and clusters in the network of citations in the field of national innovation studies. The results are useful for understanding and promoting the field of national innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this paper, the term of national innovation system is equal to the term national system of innovation.

  2. The code corresponds to the literature in Appendix Table 8.

  3. A suggestion from Naubahar Sharif, Associate Professor, Division of Social Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

References

  • Archibugi, D., & Michie, J. (1995). The globalization of technology—A new taxonomy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Smith, A. J., & Luce, R. (2005). Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data. Information Processing and Management, 41(6), 1419–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, V. (1945). Science, the endless frontier: A report to the president. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35(1), 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B. (2007). Innovation systems: A survey of the literature from a Schumpeterian perspective. In H. Hanusch & A. Pyka (Eds.), Elgar companion to Neo-Schumpeterian economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31(3), 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365–382.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., & Morgan, K. (1994). The regional innovation system in Baden–Württemberg. International Journal of Technology Management, 9(3–4), 394–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4–5), 475–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1998). Regional systems of innovation: An evolutionary perspective. Environment and Planning A, 30(9), 1563–1584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P. (2007). Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorta-González, P., & Dorta-González, M. I. (2013). Comparing journals from different fields of science and social science through a JCR subject categories normalized impact factor. Scientometrics, 95(2), 645–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C. (2004). Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenges. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (2004). Innovation: A guide to the literature. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J., & Sapprasert, K. (2011). National innovation systems: The emergence of a new approach. Science and Public Policy, 38(9), 669–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, J. L., & Hayes, R. (2004). Catching up or standing still? National innovative capacity among ‘follower’ countries, 1978–1999. Research Policy, 33(9), 1329–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (2009). From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E., Pudovkin A. I., & Istomin, V. S. (2002). Algorithmic citation-linked historiography—Mapping the literature of science. Presented the ASIS&T 2002: Information, Connections and Community. 65th Annual Meeting of ASIST in Philadelphia, PA. November 18–21, 2002.

  • Garfield, E., Paris, S., & Stock, W. G. (2006). HistCite: A software tool for informetric analysis of citation linkage. Information Wissenschaft und Praxis, 57(8), 391–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, B. (2009). National innovation system: The system approach in historical perspective. Science Technology Human Values, 34(4), 476–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goto, A., & Wakasugi, R. (1987). Technology policy in Japan: A short review. Technovation, 5(4), 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, M. C., & Mathews, J. A. (2005). National innovation capacity in East Asia. Research Policy, 34(9), 1322–1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, M. C., & Mathews, J. A. (2008). China’s national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 37(9), 1465–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2006). Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue. Research Policy, 35(9), 1441–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Van den Besselaar, P. (Eds.). (1994). Evolutionary economics and chaos theory: New directions in technology studies. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, J. D. (2006). Ranking of technology and innovation management journals. Technovation, 26(1), 285–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucio-Arias, D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Main-path analysis and path-dependent transitions in HistCite™-based historiograms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1948–1962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. A. (1985). Product innovation and user-producer interaction. Industrial Development Research Series No. 31. Aalborg University Press. http://www.globelicsacademy.org/2011_pdf/Lundvall%20user-producer.pdf.

  • Lundvall, B. A. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. A. (2007). National innovation systems: From List to Freeman. In H. Hanusch & A. Pyka (Eds.), Elgar companion to Neo-Schumpeterian economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. A., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, 31(2), 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, F. H., & Van Leeuwen, N. T. (1995). Improving the accuracy of Institute for Scientific Information’s journal impact factors. Journal of The American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 461–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative study. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niosi, J. (2002). National systems of innovations are “x-efficient” (and x-effective): Why some are slow learners. Research Policy, 31(3), 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niosi, J., & Bellon, B. (1994). The global interdependence of national innovation systems: Evidence, limits and implications. Technology in Society, 16(2), 173–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (1992). Why do some societies invent more than others? Journal of Business Venturing, 7(7), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (1993). Cultural influences on national differences in rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (1995). Uncertainty avoidance and the preference for innovation championing roles. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(1), 27–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharif, N. (2006). Emergence and development of the national innovation systems concept. Research Policy, 35(5), 745–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sombatsompop, N., & Markpin, T. (2005). Making an equality of ISI impact factors for different subject fields. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(7), 676–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez-Villa, L. (1990). Invention, inventive learning, and innovative capacity. Behavioral Science, 35(4), 290–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., & Liu, F. (2010). A regional perspective on the structural transformation of China’s national innovation system since 1999. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1311–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, A. A. C. (2014). Evolution, roots and influence of the literature on national system of innovation: A bibliometric account. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(1), 181–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, N. T. (2009). Strength and weakness of national science systems: A bibliometric analysis through cooperation patterns. Scientometrics, 79(2), 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, N. T. (2012). Discussing some basic critique on Journal Impact Factors: Revision of earlier comments. Scientometrics, 92(2), 443–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, N. T., & Moed, F. H. (2005). Characteristics of journal impact factors: The effects of uncitedness and citation distribution on the understanding of journal impact factors. Scientometrics, 63(2), 335–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, N. T., Moed, F. H., Tijssen, J. W. R., Visser, S. M., & Van Raan, F. J. A. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51(1), 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, D. G. (2011). The citation life cycle of articles published in 13 American psychological association journals: A 25-year longitudinal analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1629–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under the Grant No. 71203020, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT15ZD111), and the EU 7th Framework Programme-Marie Curie International Incoming Fellowships (MC IIF) and Yu-tao SUN truly appreciates the supports from Dr. Cong Cao—Professor at the University of Nottingham Ningbo China; Dr. Naubahar Sharif, Associate Professor, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yutao Sun.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 8.

Table 8 A reference between code and literature in Fig. 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Y., Grimes, S. The emerging dynamic structure of national innovation studies: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 106, 17–40 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1778-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1778-0

Keywords

Navigation