Abstract
Based on papers indexed in the Web of Science, we investigated publication activities of China, Japan, USA and EU with special focus on journals publishing most papers of the four economies. Both overall situation and activities in physics have been analyzed. The results show that world science is still led by the West represented by USA and EU. USA and EU share the most in selecting journals for publishing papers, capability of publishing in high-JIF values. China and Japan publish heavily in local MISC journals, but Japan performs slightly better in publishing in MISC journals with relatively higher-JIF values. Japan is closer to the West and share least with China in selecting journals to publish papers. All the four economies are most productive in physics, and with overlaps in other fields. Similar results are found in publication activities in physics.
Notes
The data were retrieved in September 2013.
References
Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Macro-indicators of citation impacts of six prolific countries: Incites data and the statistical significance of trends. PLoS One, 8(2), e56768.
Fu, H. Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2013). Independent research of china in science citation index expanded during 1980–2011. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 210–222.
Glanzel, W., Debackere, K., & Meyer, M. (2008). ‘Triad’ or ‘tetrad’? On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics, 74(1), 71–88.
ISTIC. (2013). 中国科技论文统计结果 2013 (Statistical Data of Chinese S&T Papers). Beijing: Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China.
Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals: An online mapping exercise. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 25–38.
Leydesdorff, L. (2011). When can the cross-over between China and the USA be expected using Scopus data? Research trends, 25. http://www.researchtrends.com/issue25-November-2011/is-science-in-your-country-declining-or-is-your-country-becoming-a-scientific-super-power-and-how-quickly/. Retrieved on 08 Feb 14.
Leydesdorff, L., & Cozzens, S. E. (1993). The delineation of specialties in terms of journals using the dynamic journal set of the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 26, 133–154.
Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2012). Interactive overlays: A new method for generating global journal maps from Web-of-Science data. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 318–332.
Leydesdorff, L., Rafols, I., & Chen, C. M. (2013). Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal–journal citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(12), 2573–2586.
Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2009). Macro-level indicators of the relations between research funding and research output. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 353–362.
Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C. & Bornmann, L. (2014). The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently-cited publications: Competition and collaborations. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 606–617.
Moed, H. F., Plume, A., Aisati, M, & Berkvens, P. (2011). Is science in your country declining? Or is your country becoming a scientific super power, and how quickly? Research trends, 25. http://www.researchtrends.com/issue25-November-2011/is-science-in-your-country-declining-or-is-your-countrybecoming-a-scientific-super-power-and-how-quickly/. Retrieved 08 Feb 14.
NSB (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/index.cfm/chapter-4/c4h.htm#s2.
Shelton, R. D., & Foland, P. (2009). The race for world leadership of science and technology: status and forecasts. In B. Larsen & J. Larsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (Vol. 1, pp. 369–380). Brazil: Rio de Janeiro (July 14–17, 2009).
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSViewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
Zhou, P. (2013). The growth momentum of China in producing international scientific publications seems to have slowed down. Information Processing and Management, 49(5), 1049–1051.
Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83–104.
Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2007a). A comparison between the China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations Database and the Science Citation Index in terms of journal hierarchies and inter-journal citation relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 223–236.
Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2007b). The citation impacts and citation environments of Chinese journals in mathematics. Scientometrics, 72(2), 180–200.
Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2008). China ranks second in scientific publications since 2006. ISSI Newsletter, 13, 7–9.
Zhou, Ping, Xinning, Su, & Leydesdorff, Loet. (2010). A comparative study on communication structures of Chinese journals in the social sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1360–1376.
Acknowledgments
The authors are supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) with Grant Numbers 71473219 and 71273225, and the Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Sciences of Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, with Grant Number B14TD02. We are grateful to Thomson Reuters for access to the JCR and WoS data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, P., Pan, Y. A comparative analysis of publication portfolios of selected economies. Scientometrics 105, 825–842 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1707-2
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1707-2