Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring recent research performance for Chinese universities using bibliometric methods

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on measuring the academic research performance of Chinese universities by using Scopus database from 2007 to 2010. We have provided meaningful indicators to measure the research performance of Chinese universities as compared to world class universities of the US and the European region. Using these indicators, we first measure the quantity and quality of the research outcomes of the universities and then examine the internationalization of research by using international collaborations, international citations and international impact metrics. Using all of this data, we finally present an overall score called research performance point to measure the comprehensive research strength of the universities for the selected subject categories. The comparison identifies the gap between Chinese universities and top-tier universities from selected regions across various subject areas. We find that Chinese universities are doing well in terms of publication volume but receive less citations from their published work. We also find that the Chinese universities have relative low percentage of publications at high impact venues, which may be the reason that they are not receiving more citations. Therefore, a careful selection of publication venues may help the Chinese universities to compete with world class universities and increase their research internationalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.jos.org.cn/ch/index.asp.

  2. http://www.scopus.com/.

  3. http://portal.isiknowledge.com/.

  4. The data snapshots of selected universities and their numbers of publication can be found online at http://www.intelligentforecast.com/scim/.

  5. Sources: Enrolment data from the UNESCO Institute for Statistics.

  6. http://planetmath.org/CityBlockMetric.

  7. http://scholar.google.com/.

  8. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/.

References

  • Cao, Y., Tong, H., Yu, J., Chen, D., Huang, M., Zhang, X., Luo, L., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2010). Performance evaluation of universities in China based on ESI database. In Proceedings of PICMET’10, (pp. 1–8).

  • De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the Science citation index to cybermetrics. (p. 417), Scarecrow Press: Lanham. ISBN 0-8108-6713-3.

  • Ding, Z., Ge, P., Wu, X., & Zheng, X. (2013). Bibliometrics evaluation of research performance in pharmacology/pharmacy: China relative to ten representative countries. Journal of Scientometrics, 96, 829–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, Y. (2003). The Oxford dictionary of statistical terms, OUP: Oxford. ISBN 0-19-920613-9.

  • Falagas, M., Malietzis, E., & Pappas, G. (2007). Comparison of pubmed, scopus, web of science, and google scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, H. Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2013). Comparison of independent research of China’s top universities using bibliometric indicators. Journal of Scientometrics, 96, 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, H. Z., Long, X., & Ho, Y. S. (2014). China’s research in chemical engineering journals in Science Citation Index Expanded: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Scientometrics, 98, 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilln, M. (Ed.). (2003). Multinationals, ideology, and organized labor. In The Limits of Convergence. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-69-111633-4.

  • Hassan, S., & Haddawy, P. (2013). Measuring international knowledge flows and scholarly impact of scientific research. Journal of Scientometrics, 94, 163–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. J. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. PNAS, 102, 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F., Tussen, W., Visser, S., & Raan, A. F. J. (2001). Language biases in the converage of the science citation index and its consequences for international comparisions of national research performance. Journal of Scientometrics, 53, 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L., & Wu, Y. (2001). Selection of databases, indicators and models for evaluating research performance of chinese universities. Research Evaluation, 10(2), 105–113.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. (2002). Measuring china’s research performance using the science citation index. Journal of Informetrics, 53(3), 281–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H., Burger, W., Frankfort, J., & Raan, A. V. (1985). The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy, 14, 131–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raan, A. (1996). Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Journal of Scientometrics, 38, 396–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tijssen, J., Leeuwen, T., & Wij, E. (2009). Benchmarking university-industry research cooperation worldwide: Performance measurements and indicators based on co-authorship data for the world’s largest universities. Journal of Research Evaluation, 18, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, K. (2008). The structure and measurement of chinese university leadership. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3315788).

  • Yang, L., Chen, Z. L., Liu, T., Wan, R., Wang, J., & Xie, W. G. (2013). Research output analysis of municipal solid waste: A case study of Chin. Journal of Scientometrics, 96, 641–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (1998). nternationalization of scientific journals: A measurement based on publication and citation scope”. Journal of Scientometrics, 41, 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China

    Jia Zhu

  2. Information Technology University- Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

    Saeed-Ul Hassan

  3. Department of Computer Science, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Lahore, 54700, Punjab, Pakistan

    Hamid Turab Mirza

  4. Division of CEMSE, KAUST, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia

    Qing Xie

Authors
  1. Jia Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saeed-Ul Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hamid Turab Mirza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qing Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia Zhu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 555 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, J., Hassan, SU., Mirza, H.T. et al. Measuring recent research performance for Chinese universities using bibliometric methods. Scientometrics 101, 429–443 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1389-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1389-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation