Skip to main content
Log in

The structure and evolution of scientific collaboration in Serbian mathematical journals

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts.

  2. The ComSIS Consortium is a group of leading scientific institutions from universities in Serbia including the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, who jointly publish the ComSIS journal.

  3. Due to our familiarity with the Serbian mathematics scene it was quite reasonable to assume that the majority of eLib authors are male.

  4. http://alias-i.com/lingpipe/.

  5. http://www.originlab.com/.

  6. The article "Serbian Virtual Observatory" published in "Review of the National Center for Digitization" in 2009 is the article with the highest number of authors per paper.

  7. The last joint eLib paper of Ranko Bojanić and Miloš Tomić is dedicated to the memory of Slobodan Aljančić with whom they co-authored their first eLib paper.

  8. The paper has title ”Une simple méthode pour obtenir la décomposition effective de Wold dans le cas des chaines de Markoff de corélations stationnaires“, and is published in ”Matematički Vesnik”.

  9. http://www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu/.

References

  • Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthélémy, M., & Stanley, H. E. (2000). Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 97(21), 11,149–11,152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A, 311, 590–614.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2000). Some analyses of Erdős collaboration graph. Social Networks, 22(2), 173–186.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, L. M. A., Kaiser, D. I., & Kaur, J. (2009). Scientific discovery and topological transitions in collaboration networks. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 210–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börner, K., Maru, J. T., & Goldstone, R. L. (2004). The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 101(Suppl 1), 5266–5273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, J.C., Fassino, S., McInnes, A., Narayan, M., Richardson, B., Franck, C., Ion, P., & Laubenbacher, R. (2012). Evolutionary Events in a Mathematical Sciences Research Collaboration Network. arXiv:1203.5158.

  • Cunningham, S., & Dillon, S. (1997). Authorship patterns in information systems. Scientometrics, 39(1), 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Solla Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Foo, S., & Chowdhury, G. (1998). A bibliometric analysis of collaboration in the field of information retrieval. International Information and Library Review, 30(4), 367–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dravec Braun, J. (2012). Effects of war on scientific production: Mathematics in Croatia from 1968 to 2008. Scientometrics, 93(3), 931–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E., & Sher, I. H. (1963). New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation, 14(3), 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(12), 7821–7826. doi:10.1073/pnas.122653799.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gollapalli, S. D., Mitra, P., & Giles, C. L. (2011). Ranking authors in digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM/IEEE joint conference on Digital libraries (pp. 251–254) New York, NY, USA: ACM, JCDL ’11.

  • Grossman, J. (2002a). The evolution of the mathematical research collaboration graph. Congressus Numerantium, 158, 201–212.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, J. (2002b). Patterns of collaboration in mathematical research. SIAM News, 35(9), 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, J. W., & Ion, P. D. F. (1995). On a portion of the well known collaboration graph. Congressus Numerantium, 108, 129–131.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., & Liu, Z. (2008). The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 75(2), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanović, D., Surla, D., & Racković, M. (2012). Journal evaluation based on bibliometric indicators and the CERIF data model. Computer Science and Information Systems, 9(2), 791–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmukov, Y. (2012). Describing papers and reviewers’ competences by taxonomy of keywords. Computer Science and Information Systems, 9(2), 763–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liben-Nowell, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2003). The link prediction problem for social networks. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 556–559) New York, NY, USA: ACM, CIKM ’03.

  • Lindsey, D. (1980). Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: The problem of multiple authorship. Social Studies of Science, 10(2), 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson, M. L., & Van de Sompel, H. (2005). Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing and Management, 41(6), 1462–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific production. Journal of Washington Academy of Science, 16, 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mijajlović, Ž., Ognjanović, Z., & Pejović, A. (2010). Digitization of mathematical editions in Serbia. Mathematics in Computer Science, 3(3), 251–263.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mimno, D., & McCallum, A. (2007). Mining a digital library for influential authors. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries (pp. 105–106) New York, NY, USA: ACM JCDL ’07.

  • Nascimento, M. A., Sander, J., & Pound, J. (2003). Analysis of SIGMOD’s co-authorship graph. SIGMOD Record, 32(3), 8–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2004a). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(1), 5200–5205.

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks I: Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(016), 131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks II: Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64(016), 132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2004b). Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific coauthorship networks. In E. Ben-Naim, H. Frauenfelder, & Z. Toroczkai (Eds.), Complex networks (Vol. 650, pp. 337–370). Lecture Notes in Physics Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2005). Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics, 46(5), 323–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pao, M. L. (1986). An empirical examination of Lotka’s law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(1), 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perc, M. (2010). Growth and structure of Slovenia’s scientific collaboration network. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 475–482.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, M.A., Bollen, J. (2008). An algorithm to determine peer-reviewers. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 319–328) New York, NY, USA: ACM, CIKM ’08.

  • Voos, H. (1974). Lotka and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 25(4), 270–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Miloš Savić, Mirjana Ivanović and Miloš Radovanović gratefully acknowledge the support of this work by the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development through project Intelligent techniques and their integration into wide-spectrum decision support, No. OI174023. Zoran Ognjanović, Aleksandar Pejović and Tatjana Jakšić Krüger gratefully acknowledge the support of this work by the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development through project Development of new information and communication technologies, based on advanced mathematical methods, with applications in medicine, telecommunications, power systems, protection of national heritage and education, No. III44006.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miloš Savić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Savić, M., Ivanović, M., Radovanović, M. et al. The structure and evolution of scientific collaboration in Serbian mathematical journals. Scientometrics 101, 1805–1830 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1295-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1295-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation