Skip to main content
Log in

Geographical distance in bibliometric relations within epistemic communities

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scientists collaborate increasingly on a global scale. Does this trend also hold for other bibliometric relations such as direct citations, cocitations and shared references? This study examines citation-based relations in publications published in the journal Scientometrics from 1981 to 2010. Different measures of Mean Geographical Distance (MGD) are tested. If we take all citation links into consideration, there is no indication of MGD increase, but when we look at maximum distances of each relation, a weak tendency of increasing MGD could be observed. One major factor behind the lack of growth of mean distances is the form of the distribution of citation links over distances. Our data suggest that the interactions might grow simultaneously for both short and long distances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The number of shared references between two publications is equal to the bibliographic coupling strength for the two publications (Kessler 1963).

  2. The following query was used: SO = (SCIENTOMETRICS) AND PY = 19782010 AND Document Types = (Article OR Proceedings Paper).

  3. For the max approach, regardless of bibliometric relation, if there is more than one maximum distance, it is possible that the distances are associated with different pairs of countries. Therefore, in cases with more than one maximum distance, one of the distances was randomly selected, together with its associated pair of countries.

References

  • Allen, T. J. (1984). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., Walch-Solimena, C., & Ettl, C. (2011). Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 537–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K., Hardeman, S., & Hoekman, J. (2009). Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 222–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennemann, S., Rybski, D., & Liefner, I. (2012). The myth of global science collaboration–Collaboration patterns inepistemic communities. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. W. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39(5), 662–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Brownstein, J.S., Mills, R.G., & Kohane, I.S. (2010). Does collocation inform the impact of collaboration? Plos One, 5(12).

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 317–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 17(1), 101–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. S. (1991). Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21(3), 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O., & Ellegård, K. (2012). Torsten Hägerstrand in the citation time web. The Professional Geographer, 64(X), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott, R. W. (1984). Virtues of the haversine. Sky and Telescope, 68(2), 159.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tijssen, R. J. W., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2011). Collaborations span 1,553 kilometres. Nature, 473(7346), 154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltman, L., Tijssen, R. J. W., & van Eck, N. J. (2011). Globalisation of science in kilometres. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 574–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, E. J., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2011). Institutional interactions: Exploring social, cognitive, and geographic relationships between institutions as demonstrated through citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1498–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per Ahlgren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahlgren, P., Persson, O. & Tijssen, R. Geographical distance in bibliometric relations within epistemic communities. Scientometrics 95, 771–784 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0819-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0819-1

Keywords

Navigation