Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mapping the dynamics of knowledge base of innovations of R&D in Bangladesh: triple helix perspective

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Triple helix (TH) collaborations involving university, industry and government provide a networked infrastructure for shaping the dynamic fluxes of knowledge base of innovations locally and these fluxes remain emergent within the domains. This study maps these emergence dynamics of the knowledge base of innovations of Research & Development (R&D) by exploring the longitudinal trend of systemness within the networked research relations in Bangladesh on the TH model. The bibliometric data of publications collected from the Science Citation Index (SCI), the social sciences and the arts and humanities for analysis of science indicators and the patent data collected from the US Patent Office to analyze the patent success ratio as a measure of innovation within TH domains. The findings show that the network dynamics have varied considerably according to the R&D policies of the government. The collaboration patterns of co-authorship relations in the SCI publications prominently increased, with some variation, from 1996 to 2006. Nevertheless, inter-institutional collaboration negatively influenced by the national science and technology (S&T) research policies in the last 5 years due to their evaluation criteria. Finally, the findings reveal that the R&D system of Bangladesh is still undergoing a process of institutionalizing S&T and has failed to boost its research capacity for building the knowledge base of innovations by neglecting the network effects of TH dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, N. (1963). Information theory and coding. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung (BTI 2010). Bangladesh country report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2009.

  • Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35(1), 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatziparadeisis, A. (2003). The R&D indicators in the knowledge-based economy: The research paradox, at http://www.urenio.org/wp-content/The_Research_Paradox.pdf.

  • Dzisah, J., & Etzkowitz, H. (2009). Triple helix circulation: The heart of innovation and development. In: A theme paper presented at the 2009 triple-helix annual conference. Glasgow, UK, 16–18 June, 2009.

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Brisolla, S. N. (1999). Failure and success: The fate of industrial policy in Latin America and South East Asia. Research Policy, 28, 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdoref, L. (Eds.). (1997). Universities in the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university–industry–government relations. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(22), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M. (2004). R&D-cooperation and the efficiency of regional innovation activities. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28, 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand, O. (1999). The economics and management of intellectual property: Towards intellectual capitalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H., Grilliches, Z., & Hausman, J. (1986). Patents and R&D: Is there a lag? International Economic Review, 27, 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, M. M., & Islam, M. N. N. (1997). Promoting industrial competitiveness through technological capability building in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Y.-S., Kim, S.-S., Byun, B.-M., Lee, K.-H., & Lee, H. (2004). Strategies of promoting industry-academia-research institute R&D partnerships to cope with new technologies-focusing on industry–research institute, interfirm R&D partnerships. In: Policy research report R03-25. STEPI (Science & Technology Policy Institute), Seoul, written in Korean.

  • Iqbal, Muhammed Zafar ‘Only 1000 PhD’. (2011). (Prothom Alo (Banglaseshi daily Newspaper), Dhaka, Monday, 6 June, 2011.

  • Islam, K. N. (2001). Strengthening technological capability for industrial competitiveness in Bangladesh. Science, Technology and Society, 6(1), 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, V. V. (2006). Mapping research systems in developing countries: Country report: The science and technology system in Bangladesh. Published with the support of UNESCO Forum for higher education, research and knowledge by CREST. France: South Africa and IRD.

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2001). Indicators of innovation in a knowledge-based economy. Cybermetrics, 5(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2003). The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the triple helix dynamics. Scientometrics, 58(2), 445–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Fritsch, M. (2006). Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a triple helix dynamics. Research Policy, 35(10), 1538–1553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Scharnhorst, A. (2003). Measuring the knowledge base: A program of innovation studies. Report to the “Förderinitiative science policy studies” of the German Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. Berlin: Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften; at http://sciencepolicystudies.de/Leydesdorff&Scharnhorst.pdf.

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Sun, Y. (2009). National and international dimensions of the triple helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international Co-authorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 778–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2005). Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics, 63(3), 617–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Dolfsma, W., & van der Panne, G. (2006). Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple-helix relations among technology, organization, and territory. Research Policy, 35(2), 181–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1998). Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349–369) London: Pinter.

  • Mahbuba, D., & Rousseau, R. (2010). Scientific research in the indian subcontinent: Selected trends and indicators 1973–2007 comparing Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka with India, the local giant. Scientometrics, 84, 403–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmud, I. (2006). Science and technology development in Bangladesh: Failure in policy implementation, http://www.bdiusa.org/Publications/JBS/Volumes/Volume8/jbs8.2-1-comm3.pdf.

  • Mcaleer, M., & Slottje, D. (2005). A new measure of innovation: The patent success ratio. Scientometrics, 63(3), 421–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Momtaz, U. A. (2004). Promoting business and technology incubation for improved competitiveness of small and medium-sized industries through application of modern and efficient technologies in Bangladesh. proceedings and papers presented at the national workshops on promoting business and technology incubation for improved competitiveness of small and medium-sized industries through application of modern and efficient technologies, New York, United Nations.

  • Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university–industry–government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39, 640–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. W., Hong, H. D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using triple helix indicators. Scientometrics, 65(1), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). Amathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423 and 623–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. (2007). The triple helix paradigm in Korea: A test for new capital. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 6(3), 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., & Negishi, M. (2010). Measuring the relationships among university, industry and other sectors in Japan’s national innovation system: A comparison of new approaches with mutual information indicators. Scientometrics, 82, 677–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1972). Statistical decomposition analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, I. I. R. T., Briody, E. K., Sengir, G. H., & Meerwarth, T. L. (2008). The life cycle of collaborative partnerships: Evolution of structure and roles in industry-university research networks. Connections, 28(1), 40–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S. (2008). The new invisible college. Washington: Brookings Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the research fund of Hanyang University (HY-2011-N).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Program in Regional Information, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, San 56-1 Sillim-dong, Seoul, 151-742, Republic of Korea

    Md. Dulal Hossain, Junghoon Moon & Sung Chul Lee

  2. Department of Finance, Hanyang University School of Business, 17 Haengdang-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 133-791, Republic of Korea

    Hyoung Goo Kang

  3. Research Institute for Agriculture & Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Gwanak-599, Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 151-742, Republic of Korea

    Young Chan Choe

Authors
  1. Md. Dulal Hossain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Junghoon Moon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hyoung Goo Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sung Chul Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Young Chan Choe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyoung Goo Kang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hossain, M.D., Moon, J., Kang, H.G. et al. Mapping the dynamics of knowledge base of innovations of R&D in Bangladesh: triple helix perspective. Scientometrics 90, 57–83 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0507-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0507-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation