Abstract
Patents are the manifestation of the industry’s research and development (R&D) endeavor; therefore, this paper studies the industry evolution of and key technologies in China from the perspective of patent analysis. Patents in six types of industries, including Chemical (excluding Drugs), Computers and Communications, Drugs and Medical, Electrical and Electronics (E&E), Mechanical, and Others are analyzed in this study. Findings from the analysis show a steady increase of US granted utility patents in China as well as percentage of these patents in the world over the period between 2003 and 2008. All the above industries in China have been growing rapidly during this period, which is very different from the global industry development. Despite the rapid development, the citation rates of these patents have been low, reflecting a need for improvement in the quality of patents and R&D performance for these six industries in China in order to exert more influence in the industry world. The analysis on patents also reveals China’s industry distribution to be similar to the global industry distribution, with the exception of E&E industry which weights over one third of the total patents in technologies. The E&E industry is also the field with largest economic growth which rises more rapidly after 2006 with a sudden increase of patents in USPC 361. Detailed tracking of the key technology evolution reveals that 90% of the newly issued patents in USPC 361 after 2006 are owned by Foxconn Technology Co., Ltd, pointing to an unbalanced R&D environment in China’s E&E industry sector. By providing the insight into the evolution of China’s industrial and technological development through the perspective of patent analysis, this paper hopes to provide an objective statistic reference for future policy directions and academic researches.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhattacharya, S. (2004). Mapping inventive activity and technological change through patent analysis: A case study of India and China. Scientometrics, 61, 361–381.
Chen, D. R., Chang, H. W., Huang, M. H., & Fu, F. C. (2005). Core technologies and key industries in Taiwan from 1978–2002: A perspective from patent analysis. Scientometrics, 64, 31–53.
Chen, Y., Huang, Y. Y., & Fang, J. G. (2006). Patent information collection and analysis. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press. (In Chinese).
“Examiner’s handbook chapter one: Organization of”. (2010). Retrieved September 30, 2010, from World Wide Web, http://www.uspto.gov/patents/resources/classification/handbook/one.jsp.
“Fiscal Year 2006: A record-breaking year for the USPTO”. (2010). Retrieved September 30, 2010, from World Wide Web http://www.uspto.gov/about/stratplan/ar/2006/3020100_patentperfrm.jsp.
Guan, J. C., & Ying, H. (2007). Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science-technology linkages. Scientometrics, 72, 403–425.
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B. & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). “The NBER patent citations data file: Lessions, insights and methodological tools,” National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper 9498.
Hinze, S., & Schmoch, U. (2004). Opening the black box. In H. F. Moed, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lacasa, I. D., Grupp, H., & Schnoch, U. (2003). Tracing technological change over long periods in Germany in chemicals using patent statistics. Scientometrics, 57, 175–195.
Mendonca, S. (2009). Brave old world: Accounting for ‘high-tech’ knowledge in ‘low-tech’ industries. Research Policy, 38, 470–482.
Meyer, M. (2007). What do we know about innovation in nanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors. Scientometrics, 70, 779–810.
Narin, F. (1991). Globalization of research, scholarly information and patents—ten years trend. In Proceedings of the North American Serials Interest Group (NASIG) 6th Annual Conference, The Serials Librarian 21, (pp.2–3) San Antonio: Trinity University.
Patents by country, state, and year—utility patents (2008, December). Retrieved January 12, 2010, from World Wide Web http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/cst_utl.htm.
“Patents counts by class by year”. (2010). Retrieved January 12, 2010, from World Wide Web, http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/cbcby.htm.
“Patent performance for the year 2006”. (2010). Retrieved September 30, 2010, from World Wide Web http://www.uspto.gov/about/stratplan/ar/2006/3020100_patentperfrm.jsp.
Pavitt, K., & Patel, P. (1988). The international distribution of determinants of technological activities. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 4, 35–55.
Ramani, S. V., & Looze, M. A. D. (2002). Country-specific characteristics of patent applications in France, Germany and the UK in the biotechnology sectors. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 14, 457–480.
Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard UP.
Soete, L. G., & Wyatt, S. M. E. (1983). The use of foreign patenting as an international comparable science and technology output indicator. Scientometrics, 5, 31–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, J., Zhao, Zy., Zhang, X. et al. Industry evolution and key technologies in China based on patent analysis. Scientometrics 87, 175–188 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0316-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0316-3