Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the evaluation process of the research performance: An empirical case

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In this paper we analyze the objectivity of the peer review process of research performance by research groups in the scientific and technological Valencian system, over the period 1998-2002. For that purpose, we use qualitative and quantitative indicators to assess which of them are the most important to determine a research group as excellent one, based on peer review evaluation methodology. The results show that excellence appears to be driven only by publications in SCI/SSCI and the number of sexenios, and suggest that the peer review process is not as objective as we expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García-Aracil, A., Gracia, A. & Pérez-Marín, M. Analysis of the evaluation process of the research performance: An empirical case. Scientometrics 67, 213–230 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0095-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0095-z

Keywords

Navigation