Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Shining Light on Language for, in, and as Science Content

  • Article
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work of science is a linguistic act. However, like history and philosophy of science, language has frequently been isolated from science content due to factors such as school departmentalization and narrow definitions of what it means to teach, know, and do science. This conceptual article seeks to recognize and recognize—to understand and yet rethink—science content in light of the vision of science expected by academic standards. Achieving that vision requires new perspectives in science teaching and teacher education that look into the role that science language expectations play in science content. These perspectives reposition attention to language from a hidden, overlooked, or outsourced aspect of science teaching, to one at its core. To help bring teachers and teacher educators into this integrative view of science content, this article offers a mirror, a prism, and a lens as three metaphorical tools to explore the essential roles that language plays for, in, and as science content. The reflection, refraction, and refocusing of science content reveal complex science language expectations that function alongside facts, figures, and formulas of science as gatekeeping mechanisms that, once noticed, cannot be ignored or marginalized in science teaching and science teacher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This format is used to denote specific standards within the Common Core State Standards. Citations include references to CCSS, the content area, the curricular focus, grade level, and standard number.

  2. This format is used to denote specific standards within the Next Generation Science Standards. Citations include references to NGSS, discipline, grade level, and standard number.

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Nature of science in science education: toward a coherent framework for synergistic research and development. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (Vol. 2, pp. 1041–1060). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anyon, J. (1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education, 162(1), 67–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1971). The hidden curriculum and the nature of conflict. Interchange, 2(4), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, C., Little, J., Bethel, L., Chavkin, T., Fouquette, D., & Garufis, J. (2005). Reference guide to writing across the curriculum. West Lafayette: Parlor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. A. (2006). “It isn’t no slang that can be said about this stuff”: language, identity, and appropriating science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 96–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2017). About the standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/.

  • Content. (2018). Online Etymology Dictionary. Douglas Harper. Retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=Content.

  • Ding, D. D. (2002). The passive voice and social values in science. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 32(2), 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. (2013). Two views about explicitly teaching nature of science. Science & Education, 22(9), 2109–2139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galili, I., & Tseitlin, M. (2003). Newton’s First Law: Text, translations, interpretations and physics education. Science & Education, 12(1), 45–73.

  • Giroux, H. A., & Purpel, D. E. (1983). The hidden curriculum and moral education: deception or discovery? Berkeley: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, R., & Willey, K. (2016). How can the development of writing practices in the engineering curriculum be enabled? Paper presented at the 27th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Coffs Harbour.

  • Golinski, J. (2012). Is it time to forget science? Reflections on singular science and its history. Osiris, 27(1), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2014). Disciplinary discourses: writer stance in research articles. In C. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: texts, processes and practices (pp. 99–121). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, E. J., & Harper, C. A. (2005). Preparing mainstream teachers for English-language learners: is being a good teacher good enough? Teacher Education Quarterly, 3(2), 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leden, L., Hansson, L., Redfors, A., & Ideland, M. (2015). Teachers’ ways of talking about nature of science and its teaching. Science & Education, 24(9–10), 1141–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: language, learning, and values. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, S., Shouse, A. W., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2008). Ready, set, science!: Putting research to work in K-8 science classrooms. Washington: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutanen, A. (2014). Questioning and experimentation. Science & Education, 23(8), 1567–1582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Endothermic / exothermic. Retrieved from www.nextgenscience.org/commonly-searched-terms/endothermic-exothermic.

  • Peters, E. E. (2012). Developing content knowledge in students through explicit teaching of the nature of science: influences of goal setting and self-monitoring. Science & Education, 21(6), 881–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: a functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarone, E., Dwyer, S., Gillette, S., & Icke, V. (1981). On the use of the passive in two astrophysics journal papers. English for Specific Purposes, 1(2), 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D., & Lederman, N. G. (1989). The effect of teachers’ language on students’ conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(9), 771–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meghan Odsliv Bratkovich.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bratkovich, M.O. Shining Light on Language for, in, and as Science Content. Sci & Educ 27, 769–782 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9998-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9998-3

Navigation