Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Why Everyday Experience? Interpreting Primary Students’ Science Discourse from the Perspective of John Dewey

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purposes of this study were, based on John Dewey’s ideas on experience, to examine how primary students used their own everyday experience and were affected by own and others’ experience in science discourse, and to illuminate the implications of experience in science education. To do these, science discourses by a group of six fourth-graders were observed, where they talked about their ideas related to thermal concepts. The data was collected through interviews and open-ended questions, analyzed based on Dewey’s perspective, and depicted as the discourse map which was developed to illustrate students’ transaction and changing process of students’ ideas. The results of the analysis showed typical examples of Dewey’s notions of experience, such as the principles of continuity and of transaction and of different types of experience, examples of ‘the expanded continuity and transaction’, and science discourse as inquiry. It was also found that students’ everyday experiences played several roles: as a rebuttal for changing their own ideas or others’, backing for assurance of their own ideas in individual students’ inner changes after discourse with others, and backing for other’s ideas. Based on these observations, this study argues that everyday experience should be considered as a starting point for primary students’ science learning because most of their experience comes from everyday, not school science, contexts. In addition, to evoke educative experience in science education, it is important for teachers to pay more attention to Dewey’s notions of the principles of continuity and of transaction and to their educational implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See for instance: Alexopoulou and Driver (1996), Hogan et al. (1999), Mason and Santi (1998).

  2. Citations on Dewey’s works usually refer to the collected works published by Southern Illinois University Press, citing the series (Early Works, Middle Works, Later Works), the volume, and the page number: e.g., LW 13, p. 25.

References

  • Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). A cultural perspective on the structure of student interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Small-group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1099–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. W. (2007). Perspectives on science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 3–30). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avraamidou, L., & Osborne, J. (2009). The role of narrative in communicating science. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1683–1707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. J. (1966). John Dewey. New York: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, S. K., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, P. W. C. (2007). Decolonizing methodologies and indigenous knowledge: The role of culture, place and personal experience in professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1247–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works, 9. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and Nature. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 8 (pp. 105–352). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934). Art as Experience. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 10. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938a). Logic: The theory of inquiry. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 12. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938b). Experience and Education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 13 (pp. 1–62). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1948). Knowing and the Known. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 16 (pp. 1–294). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enghag, M., Gustafsson, P., & Jonsson, G. (2007). From everyday life experiences to physics understanding occurring in small group work with context rich problems during introductory physic work at university. Research in Science Education, 37, 449–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., & Adelman, L. M. (2003). Investigating the impact of prior knowledge and interest on aquarium visitor learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego, M. A. (2001). Is experience the best teacher? The potential of coupling classroom and community-based field experiences. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(4), 312–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J. W., & Bentley, M. L. (1990). Science education, conceptual change and breaking with everyday experience. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 10, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glassman, M. (2001). Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, experience, and inquiry in educational practice. Educational Researcher, 30(4), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, S., & Hill, M. (2010). Researching children’s experience: Methods and methodological issues. In S. Greene & D. Hogan (Eds.), Researching children’s experience (pp. 1–21). London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. S. (2006). Inquiry and education: John Dewey and the quest for democracy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. S. (2009). Deweyan inquiry: From education theory to practice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. S. (in press). John Dewey and science education. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching. Amsterdam: Springer.

  • Koosimile, A. T. (2004). Out-of-school experiences in science classes: Problems, issues and challenges in Botswana. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruckeberg, R. (2006). A Deweyan perspective on science education: Constructivism, experience, and why we learn science. Science & Education, 15(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., & Santi, M. (1998). Discussing the greenhouse effect: Children’s collaborative discourse reasoning and conceptual change. Environmental Education Research, 4(1), 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayoh, K., & Knutton, S. (1997). Using out-of-school experience in science lessons: Reality or rhetoric? International Journal of Science Education, 19(7), 849–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). New York: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H. (1963). Transaction: Dewey’s last contribution to the theory of learning. Education Theory, 13(1), 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E. F., Scott, P., & El-Hani, C. N. (2012). The heterogeneity of discourse in science classrooms: The conceptual profile approach. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 231–246). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. J. (1983). Towards modifying children’s ideas about electric current. Research in Science and Technological Education, 1, 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, K. J., & Bergin, D. A. (2010). The effect of schooling on students’ out-of-school experience. Educational Researcher, 34(9), 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivard, L. P., & Straw, S. B. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 84(5), 566–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2008). Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students’ prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., Lucas, K. B., & McRobbie, C. J. (2001). Students’ talk about rotational motion within and across contexts, and implications for future learning. International Journal of Science Education, 23(2), 151–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Leach, J. (2007). Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 31–56). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. (2007). Making (electrical) connections: Exploring student agency in a school in India. Science Education, 92(2), 297–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. B., & Marshall, J. C. (2012). Interactions between classroom discourse, teacher questioning, and student cognitive engagement in middle school science. Journal of Science Teacher Education,. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9297-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprod, T. (1997). ‘Nobody really knows’: The structure and analysis of social constructivist whole class discussions. International Journal of Science Education, 19(8), 911–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L. H. T. West & A. L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 211–231). Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D., Pugh, K., & The Dewey Ideas Group at Michigan State University. (2001). Learning science: A Deweyan perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics Education, Seoul National University, 13-315, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Korea

    Jiyeon Na

  2. Department of Physics Education, Seoul National University, 13-317, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Korea

    Jinwoong Song

Authors
  1. Jiyeon Na
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinwoong Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinwoong Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Na, J., Song, J. Why Everyday Experience? Interpreting Primary Students’ Science Discourse from the Perspective of John Dewey. Sci & Educ 23, 1031–1049 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9637-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9637-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation