Abstract
Governmental policies tend to support and boost entrepreneurship in peripheral regions in many countries. This research revives the debate about specific regional policies designed to foster local new business creation, and the entrepreneurial framework conditions needed at the regional level for emerging regions such as Latin America. We applied one of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor’s methodologies, the National Experts Survey, to a sample of 695 key informants in Chile at eight regions of which six are classified as peripheral. Using non-parametric statistics we compared the differences between peripheral and core regions. The main results indicate that peripherally located entrepreneurship experts perceive their regions as in a worse position than centrally located experts in terms of finance access and physical infrastructure. On the other hand, the results indicate that peripheral entrepreneurship experts detect more market dynamism in their regions and surprisingly perceive general policy and government programs as supporting entrepreneurship although the Chilean government had not promoted many regional policies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For NES results and linkage of EFCs with other international measurements see Bosma et al. (2008).
Also see Reynolds et al. (2005) for an extended explanation of GEM’s NES questions.
Alfa was development originally to test reliability of psychometric tests (Cronbach 1951). Actually is used in many social sciences to test the reliability of scales that come from standard surveys.
Alfa calculus procedures are continually improved (Zinbarg et al. 2005) and the most common statistical software use the latest procedures. In our case we used SPSS V. 17.
PCA was mainly developed by Hotelling (1933) but like many multivariate methods, it was not widely used until the advent of statistical computer software. In our case we use SPSS V. 17.
For comprehensive technical explanations, mathematical proofs and PCA linear algebra see Shlens (2009).
It is highly desirable to have at least three (and preferably more) variables loading on each retained component when the PCA is complete. In our case no items were dropped during the course of the analysis because we calculated only one component for each EFC, but it is generally good practice to write at least five items for each construct. For this research we only “violate” this rule with Internal Market: dynamics EFC that only contains two items (see Table 2). The recommendation of the three items per scale should be viewed as an absolute minimum, and certainly not as an optimal number of items per scale. In practice it is common to see that the tests have more than just three items to measure a given construct. On the other hand it is not unusual to see individual scales that include 10, 20, or even more items to assess a single construct. Related to the Cronbach’s alpha, the more items in the scale, the more reliable it will be. For more information on scale construction, see Spector (1992).
The complete total variance explained tables, component matrix and component score coefficient matrix are available on request from the authors.
The events of the earthquake in Chile in February 2010 highlighted the differences that still exist in terms of physical infrastructure and telecommunications comparing the largest magnitude of the damage in the southern regions of the country versus the less damaged Santiago metropolitan region.
The survey asks the experts for their specific responses to the statement that “The markets for consumer (or business-to-business) goods and services change dramatically from year to year”.
According to GEM methodology (Bosma and Levie 2010), opportunity-based entrepreneurs are those individuals involved in early-stage entrepreneurial activity (percentage of 18-64 population who are currently nascent entrepreneurs, i.e., actively involved in setting up a business or an owner-manager of a running business that has paid salaries, wages, or any other payments to the owners for not more than 42 months) who (i) claim to be driven by opportunity as opposed to finding no other option for work, and (ii) who indicate the main driver for being involved in this opportunity is being independent or increasing their income, rather than just maintaining their income.
References
Acs, Z. J., & Amorós, J. E. (2008). Entrepreneurship and competitive dynamics in Latin America. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 305–322.
Acs, Z. J., Amorós, J. E., Bosma, N., & Levie, J. (2009). From entrepreneurship to economic development: Celebrating ten years of Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 29(16), Article 1. http://digitalknowledge.babson.edu/fer/vol29/iss16/1.
Acs, Z. J., & Armington, C. (2006). Entrepreneurship, geography and American economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Amorós, J. E., Bustamente, C., Echecopar, G., & Ortega, D. (2010). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, Reporte Nacional de Chile 2009. Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Universidad del Desarrollo.
Amorós, J. E., & Guerra, M. (2009). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, Reporte Nacional de Chile 2008. Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Universidad del Desarrollo.
Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, B. (1999). The industry component of regional new firm formation processes. Review of Industrial Organization, 15, 239–252.
Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.
Bosma, N., Acs, Z., Autio, E., Coduras, A., & Levie, J. (2009). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2008 executive report. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
Bosma, N., Jones, E., Autio, & Levie, J. (2008). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2007 executive report. Wellesley, MA, London, UK: Babson College and London Business School.
Bosma, N., & Levie, J. (2010). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2009 global report. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
Burke, A. E., Fitzroy, F. R., & Nolan, M. A. (2009). Is there a north–south divide in self–employment in England? Regional Studies, 43(4), 529–544.
Cannarella, C., & Piccioni, V. (2006). Dysfunctions and sub-optimal behaviours of rural development networks. International Journal of Rural Management, 2(1), 29–57.
Central Bank of Chile. (2010). Statistical database. http://si2.bcentral.cl/Basededatoseconomicos/951_portada.asp?idioma=I. Accessed 16 July 2011.
Chrisman, J., Gatewood, E., & Donlevy, L. (2002). A note on the efficiency and effectiveness of outsider assistance programs in rural versus non-rural states. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 26, 67–80.
Christaller, W. (1966). Central places in Southern Germany. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall, Inc.
Conover, W. J. (1998). Practical nonparametric statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, p. 16.
Cooper, A. C. (1993). Challenges in predicting new firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 241–253.
CORFO (Corporación de Fomento a la Producción). (2007). Resultado de la Gestión 2006. Santiago: CORFO.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
Davelaar, E., & Nijkamp, P. (1987). The urban incubator hypothesis—old wine in new bottles. In M. M. Fischer & M. Sauberer (Eds.), Gesellschaft–Wirtschaft–Raum, Festschrift fur Karl Stiglbauer (pp. 198–213). Wien: AMR Mitteilungen.
De Clercq, D., & Arenius, P. (2006). The role of knowledge in business start-up activity. International Small Business Journal, 24(4), 339–358.
Dunteman, G. H. (1994). Principal component analysis. In M. S. Lewis-Beck (Ed.), Factor analysis and related techniques (pp. 157–245). London: Sage.
European Commission. (2003). Green paper: Entrepreneurship in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
Felzensztein, C., Gimmon, E., & Carter, S. (2010). Geographical co-location, social networks and inter-firm marketing cooperation: The case of the salmon industry. Long Range Planning, 43(5–6), 675–690.
Florida, R. (2003). Entrepreneurship, creativity, and regional economic growth. In D. M. Hart (Ed.), The emergence of entrepreneurship policy (pp. 39–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Frederick, H., & Monsen, E. (2009). New Zealand‘s perfect storm of entrepreneurship and economic development. Small Business Economics. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9234-2.
Frenkel, A., Shefer, D., & Roper, S. (2003). Public policy, locational choice and the innovation capability of high-tech firms: A comparison between Israel and Ireland. Papers in Regional Science, 82, 203–221.
Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2004). Effects of new business formation on regional development over time. Regional Studies, 38(8), 961–975.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis: With readings (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice–Hall Inc.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929–964.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Headd, B. (2003). Redefining business success: Distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Business Economics, 21(1), 51–61.
Henrekson, M., & Johansson, D. (2008). Gazelles as job creators: A survey and interpretation of the evidence. Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Stockholm Working Paper 733.
Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24(6), 417–441.
INE (National Statistics Institute, Chile). (2010). Informe económico regional: Octubre–Diciembre de 2009. Santiago, Chile: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas.
Johnson, P. (2004). Differences in regional firm formation rates: A decomposition analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(5), 431–445.
Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Kalantaridis, C. (2009). SME strategy, embeddedness and performance in East Cleveland, North East England. International Small Business Journal, 27(4), 496–521.
Klagge, B., & Martin, R. (2005). Decentralized versus centralized financial systems: Is there a case for local capital markets? Journal of Economic Geography, 5, 387–421.
Lagona, F., & Padovano, F. (2007). A nonlinear principal component analysis of the relationship between budget rules and fiscal performance in the European Union. Public Choice, 130, 401–436.
Lanjouw, P. (2001). Nonfarm employment and poverty in rural El Salvador. World Development, 29(3), 529–547.
Lerner, J. (2009). Boulevard of broken dreams: Why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital have failed—and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2008). A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 235–263.
Marshall, A. (1895). Principles of economics (3rd ed.). London: Macmillan.
Mueller, P., Van Stel, A., & Storey, D. (2008). The effects of new firm formation on regional development over time: The case of Great Britain. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 59–71.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw–Hill.
OECD. (1998). Fostering entrepreneurship. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co–Operation and Development.
Polese, M., & Shearmur, R. (2006). Growth and location of economic activity: The spatial dynamics of industries in Canada 1971–2001. Growth and Change, 7(3), 362–395.
Psaltopoulos, D., Stathopoulou, S., & Skuras, D. (2005). The location of markets, perceived entrepreneurial risk, and start-up capital of micro rural firms. Small Business Economics, 25(2), 147–158.
Reynolds, P. D., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., Bono, N. D., Servais, I., et al. (2005). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data collection design and implementation1998–2003. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 205–231.
Reynolds, P. D., Hay, M., & Camp, S. M. (1999). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 1999 executive report. Kansas City, MO: Kauffman Foundation.
Roberts, M. J., & Barley, L. (2004). How venture capitalists evaluate potential venture opportunities, publication no. 9-805-019. Boston: Harvard Business School.
Romani, G., Atienza, M., & Amorós, J. E. (2009). Financing entrepreneurial activity in Chile: Scale and scope of public support programs. Venture Capital, 11(1), 55–70.
Saxenian, A. (2006). The new argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shlens, J. (2009). A tutorial on principal component analysis. Version 3.01 Systems Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies on line: http://www.snl.salk.edu/~shlens/
Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated rating scale construction: An introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Sternberg, R., & Wennekers, S. (2005). Determinants and effects of new business creation using Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 193–203.
Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Storey, D., & Tether, B. S. (1998). New technology-based firms in the European union: An introduction. Research Policy, 26, 933–946.
Thurik, R., & Wennekers, S. (2004). Entrepreneurship, small business and economic growth. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(1), 140–149.
Todling, F., & Wanzenbock, H. (2003). Regional differences in structural characteristics of start-ups. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15, 351–370.
United Nations. (2006). World urbanization prospects. The 2005 revision. New York: United Nations.
Van Stel, A., & Suddle, K. (2008). The impact of new firm formation on regional development in the Netherlands. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 31–47.
Verheul, I., Carree, M., & Santarelli, E. (2009). Regional opportunities and policy initiatives for new venture creation. International Small Business Journal, 27(5), 608–625.
Weber, A. (1909). Über den Standort des Industrien. Tübingen: University of Tübingen. English Translation: Alfred Weber‘s Theory of the Location of Industries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1929.
West, P, III, Bamford, C., & Marsden, W. (2008). Contrasting entrepreneurial economic development in emerging Latin American economies: Applications and extensions of resource-based theory. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 32(1), 15–36.
Zinbarg, R., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach‘s, Revelle‘s, and McDonald‘s: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123–133.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and to Prof. Sharon Matusik for her valuable review of the manuscript. This publication would not have been possible without the efforts made by all the members of GEM Chile Regional Teams and the persons and institutions across the world that have helped GEM project. Thanks to the support of Concicyt-PBCT SOC 30 Research Network on Industry Clusters. Especially acknowledgment to Alicia Coduras who has been managed the international NES procedures in the last years. The usual disclaimer applies. An early version has been read at the Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, IMD and EPFL, Lausanne Switzerland, 9–12 June 2010 and appears on 2010 Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Chilean geography and demography indicators
2009 population and economic indicators in Chile by selected regions
Male | Female | Total | Regional GDPa | % National GDP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peripheral | |||||
Región de Arica y Parinacota | 64,615 | 65,915 | 130,530 | 1,005,615 | 1.75 |
Región de Antofagasta | 175,586 | 160,253 | 335,839 | 3,977,533 | 6.94 |
Región de Coquimbo | 197,546 | 209,499 | 407,045 | 1,451,801 | 2.53 |
Región del Bío- Bío | 617,054 | 657,319 | 1,274,373 | 5,586,218 | 9.74 |
Región de la Araucanía | 284,412 | 298,792 | 583,204 | 1,548,006 | 2.70 |
Región de los Ríos | 119,906 | 122,183 | 242,089 | 1,134,975 | 1.98 |
Total | 1,459,119 | 1,513,961 | 2,973,080 | 14,704,148 | 25.65 |
Central | |||||
Región de Valparaíso | 519,991 | 566,009 | 1,086,000 | 4,993,682 | 8.71 |
Región Metropolitana | 2,016,093 | 2,232,285 | 4,248,378 | 27,731,486 | 48.37 |
Total | 2,536,084 | 2,798,294 | 5,334,378 | 32,725,168 | 57.08 |
Appendix 2: Experts characteristics and numbers per region
Some examples of people that can act (or be adequate) as an expert in each EFC:
-
1.
Financing: bankers, public managers of financial programs or subsides, venture capitalists, business angels, entrepreneurs or business people in general.
-
2.
Policies: public charges related to economics and enterprises environment, with taxes, development agencies or entrepreneurs subject to these policies.
-
3.
Programs: public charges related to government programs, public agencies, business associations, development agencies, entrepreneurs and people to whom the programs are addressed.
-
4.
Education: all types of professors/teachers (school, college, university, professional or vocational education), public charges related with education or entrepreneurs.
-
5.
R&D transfer: personnel of industry, innovation, development and growth public or private agencies, scientific parks personnel, university researchers, engineers, some types of entrepreneurs.
-
6.
Commercial and business services: lawyers, accountants, advisors/consultants, economists, market analysts, survey vendors, entrepreneurs that need them, providers of them in general.
-
7.
Market openness: market analysts, some researchers at universities or business schools, business associations, chambers of commerce, government agencies related to the economy and its development, entrepreneurs.
-
8.
Physical infrastructure: all types of businesses and enterprises providers (gas, water, phone, electrics…), engineering, real estate, government agencies related to infrastructure, industrial parks, entrepreneurs.
-
9.
Cultural and social norms: business associations, press, media in general, customers, providers, sociologists, entrepreneurs, foundations, trade unions.
Primary entrepreneurial framework condition specializations sub-samples by region.
Region | Financial support | Government policies | Government programs | Education and training | R&D transfer | Commercial and professional infrastructure | Market openness | Access to physical infrastructure | Cultural and social norms | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antofagasta | 16 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 15 | 15 | 14 | 16 | 139 |
Coquimbo | 9 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 81 |
Valparaíso | 9 | 7 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 28 | 21 | 7 | 6 | 111 |
Bío- Bío | 13 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 8 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 12 | 109 |
Araucanía | 5 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 63 |
Metropolitana | 12 | 10 | 8 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 11 | 9 | 11 | 100 |
De Los Ríos | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 31 |
Arica y Parinacota | 5 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 61 |
Total | 72 | 64 | 71 | 85 | 74 | 107 | 83 | 65 | 74 | 695 |
Appendix 3: Description of GEM entrepreneurial framework conditions and principal component analysis
This appendix contains a brief description of the nine different entrepreneurial framework conditions (EFCs) recognized by the GEM Consortium Research Committee (based on Bosma et al. 2008, p. 41; Bosma et al. 2009, p. 33). After each description there are the specific questions modified for regional approach for each of the EFCs that should be answered by a five-point Likert scale where 1 is “complete false” to 5 that is “complete true” and the principal component analyses results (communalities extraction, component matrix and total variance explained) for each EFC.
EFC1 Financial support: the availability of financial resources, equity, and debt, for new and growing firms including grants and subsidies.
Statement | Communalities extraction | Component matrix |
---|---|---|
In my region, there is sufficient equity funding available for new and growing firms | 0.583 | 0.763 |
In my region, there is sufficient debt funding available for new and growing firms | 0.537 | 0.733 |
In my region, there are sufficient government subsidies available for new and growing firms | 0.429 | 0.655 |
In my region, there is sufficient funding available from private individuals (other than founders) for new and growing firms | 0.436 | 0.660 |
In my region, there is sufficient venture capitalist funding available for new and growing firms | 0.573 | 0.757 |
In my region, there is sufficient funding available through initial public offerings (IPOs) for new and growing firms | 0.326 | 0.571 |
Total variance explained
Component | Initial eigenvalues | Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 2.883 | 48.051 | 48.051 | 2.883 | 48.051 | 48.051 |
2 | 1.007 | 16.778 | 64.829 | |||
3 | 0.715 | 11.912 | 76.741 | |||
4 | 0.554 | 9.231 | 85.973 | |||
5 | 0.439 | 7.319 | 93.291 | |||
6 | 0.403 | 6.709 | 100.000 |
EFC2 Government policies: the extent to which government policies reflected in taxes or regulations or the application of both are either size-neutral or encourage new and growing firms. Subsequent empirical studies have shown that there are two distinct dimensions, or sub-divisions of this EFC. The first covers the extent to which new and growing firms are prioritized in government policy in general.
Statement | Communalities extraction | Component matrix |
---|---|---|
In my region, government policies (e.g. public procurement) consistently favour new firms | 0.628 | 0.792 |
In my region, the support for new and growing firms is a high priority for policy at the local government level | 0.751 | 0.867 |
In my region, the support for new and growing firms is a high priority for policy at the national government level | 0.794 | 0.891 |
Total variance explained
Component | Initial eigenvalues | Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 2.173 | 72.423 | 72.423 | 2.173 | 72.423 | 72.423 |
2 | 0.529 | 17.641 | 90.064 | |||
3 | 0.298 | 9.936 | 100.000 |
The second refers to regulations for new and growing firms:
Statement | Communalities extraction | Component matrix |
---|---|---|
In my region, taxes and other government regulations are applied to new and growing firms in a predictable and consistent way | 0.397 | 0.630 |
In my region, the amount of taxes is NOT a burden for new and growing firms | 0.520 | 0.721 |
In my region, new firms can get most of the required permits and licenses in about a week | 0.351 | 0.593 |
In my region, coping with government bureaucracy, regulations, and licensing requirements it is not unduly difficult for new and growing firms | 0.566 | 0.752 |
Total variance explained
Component | Initial eigenvalues | Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 1.834 | 45.860 | 45.860 | 1.834 | 45.860 | 45.860 |
2 | 0.967 | 24.172 | 70.031 | |||
3 | 0.645 | 16.119 | 86.150 | |||
4 | 0.554 | 13.850 | 100.000 |
EFC3 Government programs: the presence and quality of direct programs to assist new and growing firms at all levels of government (national, regional, municipal).
Statement | Communalities extraction | Component matrix |
---|---|---|
In my region, a wide range of government assistance for new and growing firms can be obtained through contact with a single agency | 0.272 | 0.521 |
In my region, science parks and business incubators provide effective support for new and growing firms | 0.309 | 0.556 |
In my region, there are an adequate number of government programs for new and growing businesses | 0.508 | 0.712 |
In my region, the people working for government agencies are competent and effective in supporting new and growing firms | 0.516 | 0.718 |
In my region, almost anyone who needs help from a government program for a new or growing business can find what they need | 0.607 | 0.779 |
In my region, government programs aimed at supporting new and growing firms are effective | 0.628 | 0.792 |
Total variance explained
Component | Initial eigenvalues | Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 2.839 | 47.309 | 47.309 | 2.839 | 47.309 | 47.309 |
2 | 0.855 | 14.252 | 61.561 | |||
3 | 0.779 | 12.991 | 74.552 | |||
4 | 0.605 | 10.086 | 84.638 | |||
5 | 0.490 | 8.164 | 92.803 | |||
6 | 0.432 | 7.197 | 100.000 |
EFC4 Education and training: the extent to which training in creating or managing small, new, or growing business is incorporated within the educational and training system at all levels. There are two distinct sub-dimensions to this EFC: Primary and secondary school level entrepreneurship education and training:
Statement | Communalities extraction | Component matrix |
---|---|---|
In my region, teaching in primary and secondary education encourages creativity, self-sufficiency and personal initiative | 0.687 | 0.829 |
In my region, teaching in primary and secondary education provides adequate instruction in market economic principles | 0.746 | 0.864 |
In my region, teaching in primary and secondary education provides adequate attention to entrepreneurship and new firm creation | 0.779 | 0.883 |
Total variance explained
Component | Initial eigenvalues | Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 2.211 | 73.704 | 73.704 | 2.211 | 73.704 | 73.704 |
2 | 0.460 | 15.332 | 89.036 | |||
3 | 0.329 | 10.964 | 100.000 |
The second dimension includes post-school (vocational-professional, college or university) entrepreneurship education and training:
Statement | Communalities extraction | Component matrix |
---|---|---|
In my region, the vocational, professional, and continuing education systems provide good and adequate preparation for starting up and growing new firms | 0.676 | 0.822 |
In my region, colleges and universities provide good and adequate preparation for starting up and growing new firms | 0.654 | 0.809 |
In my region, the level of business and management education provide good and adequate preparation for starting up and growing new firms | 0.756 | 0.869 |
Total variance explained
Component | Initial eigenvalues | Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 2.086 | 69.538 | 69.538 | 2.086 | 69.538 | 69.538 |
2 | 0.532 | 17.739 | 87.277 | |||
3 | 0.382 | 12.723 | 100.000 |
EFC5 Research and development transfer: the extent to which national research and development will lead to new commercial opportunities and whether or not these are available for new, small and growing firms.
Statement | Communalities extraction | Component matrix |
---|---|---|
In my region, new technology, science, and other knowledge are efficiently transferred from universities and public research centers to new and growing firms | 0.529 | 0.727 |
In my region, new and growing firms have just as much access to new research and technology as large, established firms | 0.524 | 0.724 |
In my region, new and growing firms can afford the latest technology | 0.449 | 0.670 |
In my region, there are adequate government subsidies for new and growing firms to acquire new technology | 0.471 | 0.686 |
In my region, the science and technology base efficiently supports the creation of world-class new technology-based ventures in at least one area | 0.408 | 0.639 |
In my region, there is good support available for engineers and scientists to have their ideas commercialized through new and growing firms | 0.399 | 0.632 |
Total variance explained
Component | Initial eigenvalues | Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 2.779 | 46.319 | 46.319 | 2.779 | 46.319 | 46.319 |
2 | 0.960 | 16.000 | 62.319 | |||
3 | 0.795 | 13.253 | 75.572 | |||
4 | 0.565 | 9.422 | 84.995 | |||
5 | 0.501 | 8.352 | 93.346 | |||
6 | 0.399 | 6.654 | 100.000 |
EFC6 Commercial, professional infrastructure: the presence of commercial, accounting, and other legal services and institutions that allow or promote the emergence of new, small, or growing businesses.
Statement | Communalities extraction | Component matrix |
---|---|---|
In my region, there are enough subcontractors, suppliers, and consultants to support new and growing firms | 0.413 | 0.643 |
In my region, new and growing firms can afford the cost of using subcontractors, suppliers, and consultants | 0.519 | 0.720 |
In my region, it is easy for new and growing firms to get good subcontractors, suppliers, and consultants | 0.690 | 0.830 |
In my region, it is easy for new and growing firms to get good, professional legal and accounting services | 0.667 | 0.817 |
In my region, it is easy for new and growing firms to get good banking services (checking accounts, foreign exchange transactions, letters of credit, and the like) | 0.414 | 0.643 |
Total variance explained
Component | Initial eigenvalues | Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 2.703 | 54.051 | 54.051 | 2.703 | 54.051 | 54.051 |
2 | 0.852 | 17.050 | 71.100 | |||
3 | 0.608 | 12.158 | 83.258 | |||
4 | 0.514 | 10.275 | 93.533 | |||
5 | 0.323 | 6.467 | 100.000 |
EFC7 Internal market openness: The extent to which commercial arrangements undergo constant change and redeployment as new and growing firms compete and replace existing suppliers, subcontractors, and consultants. There are two distinct sub-dimensions to this EFC: market change or dynamisms, that is, the extent to which markets change dramatically from year to year:
Statement | Communalities extraction | Component matrix |
---|---|---|
In my region, the markets for consumer goods and services change dramatically from year to year | 0.905 | 0.951 |
In my region, the markets for business-to-business goods and services change dramatically from year to year | 0.905 | 0.951 |
Total variance explained
Component | Initial eigenvalues | Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 1.810 | 90.503 | 90.503 | 1.810 | 90.503 | 90.503 |
2 | 0.190 | 9.497 | 100.000 |
The second is market openness, or the extent to which new firms are free to enter existing markets.
Statement | Communalities extraction | Component matrix |
---|---|---|
In my region, new and growing firms can easily enter new markets | 0.660 | 0.813 |
In my region, the new and growing firms can afford the cost of market entry | 0.710 | 0.843 |
In my region, new and growing firms can enter markets without being unfairly blocked by established firms | 0.515 | 0.717 |
Total variance explained
Component | Initial eigenvalues | Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 1.885 | 62.848 | 62.848 | 1.885 | 62.848 | 62.848 |
2 | 0.674 | 22.475 | 85.323 | |||
3 | 0.440 | 14.677 | 100.000 |
EFC8 Access to physical infrastructure: Ease of access to available physical resources—communication, utilities, transportation, land or space—at a price that does not discriminate against new, small or growing firms.
Statement | Communalities extraction | Component matrix |
---|---|---|
In my region, the physical infrastructure (roads, utilities, communications, waste disposal) provides good support for new and growing firms | 0.393 | 0.627 |
In my region, it is not too expensive for a new or growing firm to get good access to communications (phone, Internet, etc.) | 0.591 | 0.769 |
In my region, a new or growing firm can get good access to communications (telephone, Internet, etc.) in about a week | 0.603 | 0.776 |
In my region, new and growing firms can afford the cost of basic utilities (gas, water, electricity, sewer) | 0.622 | 0.789 |
In my region, new or growing firms can get good access to utilities (gas, water, electricity, sewer) in about a month | 0.452 | 0.672 |
Total variance explained
Component | Initial eigenvalues | Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 2.661 | 53.226 | 53.226 | 2.661 | 53.226 | 53.226 |
2 | 0.819 | 16.386 | 69.612 | |||
3 | 0.648 | 12.965 | 82.577 | |||
4 | 0.460 | 9.196 | 91.773 | |||
5 | 0.411 | 8.227 | 100.000 |
EFC9 Cultural, social norms: The extent to which existing social and cultural norms encourage, or do not discourage, individual actions that may lead to new ways of conducting business or economic activities and may, in turn, lead to greater dispersion in personal wealth and income.
Statement | Communalities extraction | Component matrix |
---|---|---|
In my region, the national culture is highly supportive of individual success achieved through own personal efforts | 0.538 | 0.733 |
In my region, the national culture emphasizes self-sufficiency, autonomy, and personal initiative | 0.725 | 0.851 |
In my region, the national culture encourages entrepreneurial risk-taking | 0.700 | 0.837 |
In my region, the national culture encourages creativity and innovativeness | 0.625 | 0.790 |
In my region, the national culture emphasizes the responsibility that the individual (rather than the collective) has in managing his or her own life | 0.437 | 0.661 |
Total variance explained
Component | Initial eigenvalues | Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 3.024 | 60.486 | 60.486 | 3.024 | 60.486 | 60.486 |
2 | 0.721 | 14.417 | 74.902 | |||
3 | 0.663 | 13.260 | 88.162 | |||
4 | 0.309 | 6.171 | 94.333 | |||
5 | 0.283 | 5.667 | 100.000 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amorós, J.E., Felzensztein, C. & Gimmon, E. Entrepreneurial opportunities in peripheral versus core regions in Chile. Small Bus Econ 40, 119–139 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9349-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9349-0
Keywords
- Entrepreneurship framework conditions
- Regional policy
- Global Entrepreneurship Monitor
- Chile
- Entrepreneurship