Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Entrepreneurial opportunities in peripheral versus core regions in Chile

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Governmental policies tend to support and boost entrepreneurship in peripheral regions in many countries. This research revives the debate about specific regional policies designed to foster local new business creation, and the entrepreneurial framework conditions needed at the regional level for emerging regions such as Latin America. We applied one of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor’s methodologies, the National Experts Survey, to a sample of 695 key informants in Chile at eight regions of which six are classified as peripheral. Using non-parametric statistics we compared the differences between peripheral and core regions. The main results indicate that peripherally located entrepreneurship experts perceive their regions as in a worse position than centrally located experts in terms of finance access and physical infrastructure. On the other hand, the results indicate that peripheral entrepreneurship experts detect more market dynamism in their regions and surprisingly perceive general policy and government programs as supporting entrepreneurship although the Chilean government had not promoted many regional policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For NES results and linkage of EFCs with other international measurements see Bosma et al. (2008).

  2. Also see Reynolds et al. (2005) for an extended explanation of GEM’s NES questions.

  3. Alfa was development originally to test reliability of psychometric tests (Cronbach 1951). Actually is used in many social sciences to test the reliability of scales that come from standard surveys.

  4. Alfa calculus procedures are continually improved (Zinbarg et al. 2005) and the most common statistical software use the latest procedures. In our case we used SPSS V. 17.

  5. PCA was mainly developed by Hotelling (1933) but like many multivariate methods, it was not widely used until the advent of statistical computer software. In our case we use SPSS V. 17.

  6. For comprehensive technical explanations, mathematical proofs and PCA linear algebra see Shlens (2009).

  7. It is highly desirable to have at least three (and preferably more) variables loading on each retained component when the PCA is complete. In our case no items were dropped during the course of the analysis because we calculated only one component for each EFC, but it is generally good practice to write at least five items for each construct. For this research we only “violate” this rule with Internal Market: dynamics EFC that only contains two items (see Table 2). The recommendation of the three items per scale should be viewed as an absolute minimum, and certainly not as an optimal number of items per scale. In practice it is common to see that the tests have more than just three items to measure a given construct. On the other hand it is not unusual to see individual scales that include 10, 20, or even more items to assess a single construct. Related to the Cronbach’s alpha, the more items in the scale, the more reliable it will be. For more information on scale construction, see Spector (1992).

  8. The complete total variance explained tables, component matrix and component score coefficient matrix are available on request from the authors.

  9. The events of the earthquake in Chile in February 2010 highlighted the differences that still exist in terms of physical infrastructure and telecommunications comparing the largest magnitude of the damage in the southern regions of the country versus the less damaged Santiago metropolitan region.

  10. The survey asks the experts for their specific responses to the statement that “The markets for consumer (or business-to-business) goods and services change dramatically from year to year”.

  11. According to GEM methodology (Bosma and Levie 2010), opportunity-based entrepreneurs are those individuals involved in early-stage entrepreneurial activity (percentage of 18-64 population who are currently nascent entrepreneurs, i.e., actively involved in setting up a business or an owner-manager of a running business that has paid salaries, wages, or any other payments to the owners for not more than 42 months) who (i) claim to be driven by opportunity as opposed to finding no other option for work, and (ii) who indicate the main driver for being involved in this opportunity is being independent or increasing their income, rather than just maintaining their income.

References

  • Acs, Z. J., & Amorós, J. E. (2008). Entrepreneurship and competitive dynamics in Latin America. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Amorós, J. E., Bosma, N., & Levie, J. (2009). From entrepreneurship to economic development: Celebrating ten years of Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 29(16), Article 1. http://digitalknowledge.babson.edu/fer/vol29/iss16/1.

  • Acs, Z. J., & Armington, C. (2006). Entrepreneurship, geography and American economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amorós, J. E., Bustamente, C., Echecopar, G., & Ortega, D. (2010). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, Reporte Nacional de Chile 2009. Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Universidad del Desarrollo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amorós, J. E., & Guerra, M. (2009). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, Reporte Nacional de Chile 2008. Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Universidad del Desarrollo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, B. (1999). The industry component of regional new firm formation processes. Review of Industrial Organization, 15, 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, N., Acs, Z., Autio, E., Coduras, A., & Levie, J. (2009). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2008 executive report. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, N., Jones, E., Autio, & Levie, J. (2008). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2007 executive report. Wellesley, MA, London, UK: Babson College and London Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, N., & Levie, J. (2010). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2009 global report. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, A. E., Fitzroy, F. R., & Nolan, M. A. (2009). Is there a north–south divide in self–employment in England? Regional Studies, 43(4), 529–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannarella, C., & Piccioni, V. (2006). Dysfunctions and sub-optimal behaviours of rural development networks. International Journal of Rural Management, 2(1), 29–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Bank of Chile. (2010). Statistical database. http://si2.bcentral.cl/Basededatoseconomicos/951_portada.asp?idioma=I. Accessed 16 July 2011.

  • Chrisman, J., Gatewood, E., & Donlevy, L. (2002). A note on the efficiency and effectiveness of outsider assistance programs in rural versus non-rural states. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 26, 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christaller, W. (1966). Central places in Southern Germany. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, W. J. (1998). Practical nonparametric statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. C. (1993). Challenges in predicting new firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 241–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CORFO (Corporación de Fomento a la Producción). (2007). Resultado de la Gestión 2006. Santiago: CORFO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davelaar, E., & Nijkamp, P. (1987). The urban incubator hypothesis—old wine in new bottles. In M. M. Fischer & M. Sauberer (Eds.), Gesellschaft–Wirtschaft–Raum, Festschrift fur Karl Stiglbauer (pp. 198–213). Wien: AMR Mitteilungen.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D., & Arenius, P. (2006). The role of knowledge in business start-up activity. International Small Business Journal, 24(4), 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunteman, G. H. (1994). Principal component analysis. In M. S. Lewis-Beck (Ed.), Factor analysis and related techniques (pp. 157–245). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2003). Green paper: Entrepreneurship in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felzensztein, C., Gimmon, E., & Carter, S. (2010). Geographical co-location, social networks and inter-firm marketing cooperation: The case of the salmon industry. Long Range Planning, 43(5–6), 675–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2003). Entrepreneurship, creativity, and regional economic growth. In D. M. Hart (Ed.), The emergence of entrepreneurship policy (pp. 39–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, H., & Monsen, E. (2009). New Zealand‘s perfect storm of entrepreneurship and economic development. Small Business Economics. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9234-2.

  • Frenkel, A., Shefer, D., & Roper, S. (2003). Public policy, locational choice and the innovation capability of high-tech firms: A comparison between Israel and Ireland. Papers in Regional Science, 82, 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2004). Effects of new business formation on regional development over time. Regional Studies, 38(8), 961–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis: With readings (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice–Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headd, B. (2003). Redefining business success: Distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Business Economics, 21(1), 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrekson, M., & Johansson, D. (2008). Gazelles as job creators: A survey and interpretation of the evidence. Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Stockholm Working Paper 733.

  • Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24(6), 417–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INE (National Statistics Institute, Chile). (2010). Informe económico regional: Octubre–Diciembre de 2009. Santiago, Chile: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (2004). Differences in regional firm formation rates: A decomposition analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(5), 431–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantaridis, C. (2009). SME strategy, embeddedness and performance in East Cleveland, North East England. International Small Business Journal, 27(4), 496–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klagge, B., & Martin, R. (2005). Decentralized versus centralized financial systems: Is there a case for local capital markets? Journal of Economic Geography, 5, 387–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagona, F., & Padovano, F. (2007). A nonlinear principal component analysis of the relationship between budget rules and fiscal performance in the European Union. Public Choice, 130, 401–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, P. (2001). Nonfarm employment and poverty in rural El Salvador. World Development, 29(3), 529–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. (2009). Boulevard of broken dreams: Why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital have failed—and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2008). A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 235–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1895). Principles of economics (3rd ed.). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, P., Van Stel, A., & Storey, D. (2008). The effects of new firm formation on regional development over time: The case of Great Britain. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw–Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1998). Fostering entrepreneurship. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co–Operation and Development.

  • Polese, M., & Shearmur, R. (2006). Growth and location of economic activity: The spatial dynamics of industries in Canada 1971–2001. Growth and Change, 7(3), 362–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psaltopoulos, D., Stathopoulou, S., & Skuras, D. (2005). The location of markets, perceived entrepreneurial risk, and start-up capital of micro rural firms. Small Business Economics, 25(2), 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., Bono, N. D., Servais, I., et al. (2005). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data collection design and implementation1998–2003. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 205–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., Hay, M., & Camp, S. M. (1999). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 1999 executive report. Kansas City, MO: Kauffman Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. J., & Barley, L. (2004). How venture capitalists evaluate potential venture opportunities, publication no. 9-805-019. Boston: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romani, G., Atienza, M., & Amorós, J. E. (2009). Financing entrepreneurial activity in Chile: Scale and scope of public support programs. Venture Capital, 11(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (2006). The new argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlens, J. (2009). A tutorial on principal component analysis. Version 3.01 Systems Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies on line: http://www.snl.salk.edu/~shlens/

  • Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated rating scale construction: An introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R., & Wennekers, S. (2005). Determinants and effects of new business creation using Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D., & Tether, B. S. (1998). New technology-based firms in the European union: An introduction. Research Policy, 26, 933–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurik, R., & Wennekers, S. (2004). Entrepreneurship, small business and economic growth. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(1), 140–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todling, F., & Wanzenbock, H. (2003). Regional differences in structural characteristics of start-ups. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15, 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2006). World urbanization prospects. The 2005 revision. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Stel, A., & Suddle, K. (2008). The impact of new firm formation on regional development in the Netherlands. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verheul, I., Carree, M., & Santarelli, E. (2009). Regional opportunities and policy initiatives for new venture creation. International Small Business Journal, 27(5), 608–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. (1909). Über den Standort des Industrien. Tübingen: University of Tübingen. English Translation: Alfred Weber‘s Theory of the Location of Industries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1929.

  • West, P, III, Bamford, C., & Marsden, W. (2008). Contrasting entrepreneurial economic development in emerging Latin American economies: Applications and extensions of resource-based theory. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 32(1), 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinbarg, R., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach‘s, Revelle‘s, and McDonald‘s: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and to Prof. Sharon Matusik for her valuable review of the manuscript. This publication would not have been possible without the efforts made by all the members of GEM Chile Regional Teams and the persons and institutions across the world that have helped GEM project. Thanks to the support of Concicyt-PBCT SOC 30 Research Network on Industry Clusters. Especially acknowledgment to Alicia Coduras who has been managed the international NES procedures in the last years. The usual disclaimer applies. An early version has been read at the Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, IMD and EPFL, Lausanne Switzerland, 9–12 June 2010 and appears on 2010 Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Ernesto Amorós.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Chilean geography and demography indicators

figure a

2009 population and economic indicators in Chile by selected regions

 

Male

Female

Total

Regional GDPa

% National GDP

Peripheral

 Región de Arica y Parinacota

64,615

65,915

130,530

1,005,615

1.75

 Región de Antofagasta

175,586

160,253

335,839

3,977,533

6.94

 Región de Coquimbo

197,546

209,499

407,045

1,451,801

2.53

 Región del Bío- Bío

617,054

657,319

1,274,373

5,586,218

9.74

 Región de la Araucanía

284,412

298,792

583,204

1,548,006

2.70

 Región de los Ríos

119,906

122,183

242,089

1,134,975

1.98

 Total

1,459,119

1,513,961

2,973,080

14,704,148

25.65

Central

 Región de Valparaíso

519,991

566,009

1,086,000

4,993,682

8.71

 Región Metropolitana

2,016,093

2,232,285

4,248,378

27,731,486

48.37

 Total

2,536,084

2,798,294

5,334,378

32,725,168

57.08

  1. aMillions of Chilean pesos (2003 constant prices)

Appendix 2: Experts characteristics and numbers per region

Some examples of people that can act (or be adequate) as an expert in each EFC:

  1. 1.

    Financing: bankers, public managers of financial programs or subsides, venture capitalists, business angels, entrepreneurs or business people in general.

  2. 2.

    Policies: public charges related to economics and enterprises environment, with taxes, development agencies or entrepreneurs subject to these policies.

  3. 3.

    Programs: public charges related to government programs, public agencies, business associations, development agencies, entrepreneurs and people to whom the programs are addressed.

  4. 4.

    Education: all types of professors/teachers (school, college, university, professional or vocational education), public charges related with education or entrepreneurs.

  5. 5.

    R&D transfer: personnel of industry, innovation, development and growth public or private agencies, scientific parks personnel, university researchers, engineers, some types of entrepreneurs.

  6. 6.

    Commercial and business services: lawyers, accountants, advisors/consultants, economists, market analysts, survey vendors, entrepreneurs that need them, providers of them in general.

  7. 7.

    Market openness: market analysts, some researchers at universities or business schools, business associations, chambers of commerce, government agencies related to the economy and its development, entrepreneurs.

  8. 8.

    Physical infrastructure: all types of businesses and enterprises providers (gas, water, phone, electrics…), engineering, real estate, government agencies related to infrastructure, industrial parks, entrepreneurs.

  9. 9.

    Cultural and social norms: business associations, press, media in general, customers, providers, sociologists, entrepreneurs, foundations, trade unions.

Primary entrepreneurial framework condition specializations sub-samples by region.

 Region

Financial support

Government policies

Government programs

Education and training

R&D transfer

Commercial and professional infrastructure

Market openness

Access to physical infrastructure

Cultural and social norms

Total

Antofagasta

16

14

15

17

17

15

15

14

16

139

Coquimbo

9

8

9

10

9

9

8

9

10

81

Valparaíso

9

7

11

11

11

28

21

7

6

111

Bío- Bío

13

12

12

13

8

13

13

13

12

109

Araucanía

5

5

7

10

6

10

6

7

7

63

Metropolitana

12

10

8

12

13

14

11

9

11

100

De Los Ríos

3

4

3

4

3

4

3

3

4

31

Arica y Parinacota

5

7

7

8

7

8

6

5

8

61

Total

72

64

71

85

74

107

83

65

74

695

Appendix 3: Description of GEM entrepreneurial framework conditions and principal component analysis

This appendix contains a brief description of the nine different entrepreneurial framework conditions (EFCs) recognized by the GEM Consortium Research Committee (based on Bosma et al. 2008, p. 41; Bosma et al. 2009, p. 33). After each description there are the specific questions modified for regional approach for each of the EFCs that should be answered by a five-point Likert scale where 1 is “complete false” to 5 that is “complete true” and the principal component analyses results (communalities extraction, component matrix and total variance explained) for each EFC.

EFC1 Financial support: the availability of financial resources, equity, and debt, for new and growing firms including grants and subsidies.

Statement

Communalities extraction

Component matrix

In my region, there is sufficient equity funding available for new and growing firms

0.583

0.763

In my region, there is sufficient debt funding available for new and growing firms

0.537

0.733

In my region, there are sufficient government subsidies available for new and growing firms

0.429

0.655

In my region, there is sufficient funding available from private individuals (other than founders) for new and growing firms

0.436

0.660

In my region, there is sufficient venture capitalist funding available for new and growing firms

0.573

0.757

In my region, there is sufficient funding available through initial public offerings (IPOs) for new and growing firms

0.326

0.571

Total variance explained

Component

Initial eigenvalues

Extraction sums of squared loadings

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

1

2.883

48.051

48.051

2.883

48.051

48.051

2

1.007

16.778

64.829

   

3

0.715

11.912

76.741

   

4

0.554

9.231

85.973

   

5

0.439

7.319

93.291

   

6

0.403

6.709

100.000

   

EFC2 Government policies: the extent to which government policies reflected in taxes or regulations or the application of both are either size-neutral or encourage new and growing firms. Subsequent empirical studies have shown that there are two distinct dimensions, or sub-divisions of this EFC. The first covers the extent to which new and growing firms are prioritized in government policy in general.

Statement

Communalities extraction

Component matrix

In my region, government policies (e.g. public procurement) consistently favour new firms

0.628

0.792

In my region, the support for new and growing firms is a high priority for policy at the local government level

0.751

0.867

In my region, the support for new and growing firms is a high priority for policy at the national government level

0.794

0.891

Total variance explained

Component

Initial eigenvalues

Extraction sums of squared loadings

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

1

2.173

72.423

72.423

2.173

72.423

72.423

2

0.529

17.641

90.064

   

3

0.298

9.936

100.000

   

The second refers to regulations for new and growing firms:

Statement

Communalities extraction

Component matrix

In my region, taxes and other government regulations are applied to new and growing firms in a predictable and consistent way

0.397

0.630

In my region, the amount of taxes is NOT a burden for new and growing firms

0.520

0.721

In my region, new firms can get most of the required permits and licenses in about a week

0.351

0.593

In my region, coping with government bureaucracy, regulations, and licensing requirements it is not unduly difficult for new and growing firms

0.566

0.752

Total variance explained

Component

Initial eigenvalues

Extraction sums of squared loadings

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

1

1.834

45.860

45.860

1.834

45.860

45.860

2

0.967

24.172

70.031

   

3

0.645

16.119

86.150

   

4

0.554

13.850

100.000

   

EFC3 Government programs: the presence and quality of direct programs to assist new and growing firms at all levels of government (national, regional, municipal).

Statement

Communalities extraction

Component matrix

In my region, a wide range of government assistance for new and growing firms can be obtained through contact with a single agency

0.272

0.521

In my region, science parks and business incubators provide effective support for new and growing firms

0.309

0.556

In my region, there are an adequate number of government programs for new and growing businesses

0.508

0.712

In my region, the people working for government agencies are competent and effective in supporting new and growing firms

0.516

0.718

In my region, almost anyone who needs help from a government program for a new or growing business can find what they need

0.607

0.779

In my region, government programs aimed at supporting new and growing firms are effective

0.628

0.792

Total variance explained

Component

Initial eigenvalues

Extraction sums of squared loadings

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

1

2.839

47.309

47.309

2.839

47.309

47.309

2

0.855

14.252

61.561

   

3

0.779

12.991

74.552

   

4

0.605

10.086

84.638

   

5

0.490

8.164

92.803

   

6

0.432

7.197

100.000

   

EFC4 Education and training: the extent to which training in creating or managing small, new, or growing business is incorporated within the educational and training system at all levels. There are two distinct sub-dimensions to this EFC: Primary and secondary school level entrepreneurship education and training:

Statement

Communalities extraction

Component matrix

In my region, teaching in primary and secondary education encourages creativity, self-sufficiency and personal initiative

0.687

0.829

In my region, teaching in primary and secondary education provides adequate instruction in market economic principles

0.746

0.864

In my region, teaching in primary and secondary education provides adequate attention to entrepreneurship and new firm creation

0.779

0.883

Total variance explained

Component

Initial eigenvalues

Extraction sums of squared loadings

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

1

2.211

73.704

73.704

2.211

73.704

73.704

2

0.460

15.332

89.036

   

3

0.329

10.964

100.000

   

The second dimension includes post-school (vocational-professional, college or university) entrepreneurship education and training:

Statement

Communalities extraction

Component matrix

In my region, the vocational, professional, and continuing education systems provide good and adequate preparation for starting up and growing new firms

0.676

0.822

In my region, colleges and universities provide good and adequate preparation for starting up and growing new firms

0.654

0.809

In my region, the level of business and management education provide good and adequate preparation for starting up and growing new firms

0.756

0.869

Total variance explained

Component

Initial eigenvalues

Extraction sums of squared loadings

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

1

2.086

69.538

69.538

2.086

69.538

69.538

2

0.532

17.739

87.277

   

3

0.382

12.723

100.000

   

EFC5 Research and development transfer: the extent to which national research and development will lead to new commercial opportunities and whether or not these are available for new, small and growing firms.

Statement

Communalities extraction

Component matrix

In my region, new technology, science, and other knowledge are efficiently transferred from universities and public research centers to new and growing firms

0.529

0.727

In my region, new and growing firms have just as much access to new research and technology as large, established firms

0.524

0.724

In my region, new and growing firms can afford the latest technology

0.449

0.670

In my region, there are adequate government subsidies for new and growing firms to acquire new technology

0.471

0.686

In my region, the science and technology base efficiently supports the creation of world-class new technology-based ventures in at least one area

0.408

0.639

In my region, there is good support available for engineers and scientists to have their ideas commercialized through new and growing firms

0.399

0.632

Total variance explained

Component

Initial eigenvalues

Extraction sums of squared loadings

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

1

2.779

46.319

46.319

2.779

46.319

46.319

2

0.960

16.000

62.319

   

3

0.795

13.253

75.572

   

4

0.565

9.422

84.995

   

5

0.501

8.352

93.346

   

6

0.399

6.654

100.000

   

EFC6 Commercial, professional infrastructure: the presence of commercial, accounting, and other legal services and institutions that allow or promote the emergence of new, small, or growing businesses.

Statement

Communalities extraction

Component matrix

In my region, there are enough subcontractors, suppliers, and consultants to support new and growing firms

0.413

0.643

In my region, new and growing firms can afford the cost of using subcontractors, suppliers, and consultants

0.519

0.720

In my region, it is easy for new and growing firms to get good subcontractors, suppliers, and consultants

0.690

0.830

In my region, it is easy for new and growing firms to get good, professional legal and accounting services

0.667

0.817

In my region, it is easy for new and growing firms to get good banking services (checking accounts, foreign exchange transactions, letters of credit, and the like)

0.414

0.643

Total variance explained

Component

Initial eigenvalues

Extraction sums of squared loadings

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

1

2.703

54.051

54.051

2.703

54.051

54.051

2

0.852

17.050

71.100

   

3

0.608

12.158

83.258

   

4

0.514

10.275

93.533

   

5

0.323

6.467

100.000

   

EFC7 Internal market openness: The extent to which commercial arrangements undergo constant change and redeployment as new and growing firms compete and replace existing suppliers, subcontractors, and consultants. There are two distinct sub-dimensions to this EFC: market change or dynamisms, that is, the extent to which markets change dramatically from year to year:

Statement

Communalities extraction

Component matrix

In my region, the markets for consumer goods and services change dramatically from year to year

0.905

0.951

In my region, the markets for business-to-business goods and services change dramatically from year to year

0.905

0.951

Total variance explained

Component

Initial eigenvalues

Extraction sums of squared loadings

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

1

1.810

90.503

90.503

1.810

90.503

90.503

2

0.190

9.497

100.000

   

The second is market openness, or the extent to which new firms are free to enter existing markets.

Statement

Communalities extraction

Component matrix

In my region, new and growing firms can easily enter new markets

0.660

0.813

In my region, the new and growing firms can afford the cost of market entry

0.710

0.843

In my region, new and growing firms can enter markets without being unfairly blocked by established firms

0.515

0.717

Total variance explained

Component

Initial eigenvalues

Extraction sums of squared loadings

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

1

1.885

62.848

62.848

1.885

62.848

62.848

2

0.674

22.475

85.323

   

3

0.440

14.677

100.000

   

EFC8 Access to physical infrastructure: Ease of access to available physical resources—communication, utilities, transportation, land or space—at a price that does not discriminate against new, small or growing firms.

Statement

Communalities extraction

Component matrix

In my region, the physical infrastructure (roads, utilities, communications, waste disposal) provides good support for new and growing firms

0.393

0.627

In my region, it is not too expensive for a new or growing firm to get good access to communications (phone, Internet, etc.)

0.591

0.769

In my region, a new or growing firm can get good access to communications (telephone, Internet, etc.) in about a week

0.603

0.776

In my region, new and growing firms can afford the cost of basic utilities (gas, water, electricity, sewer)

0.622

0.789

In my region, new or growing firms can get good access to utilities (gas, water, electricity, sewer) in about a month

0.452

0.672

Total variance explained

Component

Initial eigenvalues

Extraction sums of squared loadings

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

1

2.661

53.226

53.226

2.661

53.226

53.226

2

0.819

16.386

69.612

   

3

0.648

12.965

82.577

   

4

0.460

9.196

91.773

   

5

0.411

8.227

100.000

   

EFC9 Cultural, social norms: The extent to which existing social and cultural norms encourage, or do not discourage, individual actions that may lead to new ways of conducting business or economic activities and may, in turn, lead to greater dispersion in personal wealth and income.

Statement

Communalities extraction

Component matrix

In my region, the national culture is highly supportive of individual success achieved through own personal efforts

0.538

0.733

In my region, the national culture emphasizes self-sufficiency, autonomy, and personal initiative

0.725

0.851

In my region, the national culture encourages entrepreneurial risk-taking

0.700

0.837

In my region, the national culture encourages creativity and innovativeness

0.625

0.790

In my region, the national culture emphasizes the responsibility that the individual (rather than the collective) has in managing his or her own life

0.437

0.661

Total variance explained

Component

Initial eigenvalues

Extraction sums of squared loadings

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of variance

Cumulative %

1

3.024

60.486

60.486

3.024

60.486

60.486

2

0.721

14.417

74.902

   

3

0.663

13.260

88.162

   

4

0.309

6.171

94.333

   

5

0.283

5.667

100.000

   

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amorós, J.E., Felzensztein, C. & Gimmon, E. Entrepreneurial opportunities in peripheral versus core regions in Chile. Small Bus Econ 40, 119–139 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9349-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9349-0

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation