Skip to main content
Log in

Distributive effervescence: emotional energy and social cohesion in secularizing societies

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research suggests that societies are becoming more materially secure, less intensely religious and that social interactions are increasingly computer mediated. However, sociological theorists have not yet developed robust mechanistic theories explaining how social cohesion might be generated under these new conditions. This is a notable omission because scholars have demonstrated empirically that materially secure, non-religious, people tend to be more individualistic, have more diverse networks, and are less socially engaged than traditionally religious individuals (Zuckerman et al., The nonreligious: Understanding secular people and societies, Oxford University Press, 2016). Does the secularization of societies necessarily imply societal instability, anomie, or isolation? If not, why not? Here, we posit the existence of a continuum of modes of social cohesion that are characterized by a suite of historically contingent variables which impact the volume, scope, and rate of human interactions. This novel theory of “distributive effervescence” specifies how emotional energy might be generated via punctuated interactions with heterogeneous others across diverse settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abascal, M., & Baldassarri, D. (2015). Love Thy Neighbor? Ethnoracial diversity and trust reexamined. American Journal of Sociology, 121(3), 722–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abend, G. (2016). The moral background: An inquiry into the history of business ethics. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aral, S. (2016). The future of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 121(6), 1931–1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aral, S., & Van Alstyne, M. (2011). The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. American Journal of Sociology, 117(1), 90–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audet, J.-N., Ducatez, S., & Lefebvre, L. (2016). The town bird and the country bird: Problem solving and immunocompetence vary with urbanization.". Behavioral Ecology, 27(2), 637–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S. (2005). Atheism. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 1, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, N. (2013). Country religiosity declines as material security increases. Cross-Cultural Research, 47(1), 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumard N. (2019) Psychological origins of the industrial revolution. Behav. Brain Sci. 42, e189. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1800211X

  • Becker, J., Porter, E., & Centola, D. (2019). The wisdom of partisan crowds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(22), 10717–10722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V. L. (2013). Families and faith: How religion is passed down across generations. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L. (1967). The social reality of religion. Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessi, A. (2016). Personality traits and echo chambers on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 319–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M., & Schwartz, J. E. (1984). Crosscutting social circles. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodovski, K., & Farkas, G. (2008). Concerted cultivation’ and unequal achievement in elementary school. Social Science Research, 37(3), 903–919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research”. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulianne, S. (2018). Twenty years of digital media effects on civic and political participation. Communication Research, 47(7), 947–966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulianne, S., & Theocharis, Y. (2020). Young people, digital media, and engagement: A meta-analysis of research. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutyline, A., & Willer, R. (2017). The social structure of political echo chambers: Variation in ideological homophily in online networks.". Political Psychology, 38(3), 551–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brashears, M. E. (2010). Anomia and the sacred canopy: Testing a network theory. Social Networks, 32(3), 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brint, S. (2001). Gemeinschaft revisited: A critique and reconstruction of the community concept. Sociological Theory, 19(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, S. (2011). Secularization: In defense of an unfashionable theory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruggeman, J. (2016). The strength of varying tie strength: Comment on Aral and Van Alstyne. American Journal of Sociology, 121(6), 1919–1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro, R. L. (1970). A theory of the origin of the state: Traditional theories of state origins are considered and rejected in favor of a new ecological hypothesis. Science, 169(3947), 733–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C., & Hooijberg, R. (2000). Ambiguity intolerance and support for valuing-diversity interventions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(11), 2392–2408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, A., Maréchal, M. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Zünd, C. L. (2019). Civic honesty around the globe. Science, 365(6448), 70–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colasante, T., Lin, L., De France, K., & Hollenstein, T. (2020). Any time and place? American Psychologist Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000708

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. ([1830–1842] 1975). Social statics, or theory of the spontaneous order of human society.” Pp. 263–278 in Auguste Comte and Positivism: The Essential Writings, edited by Gertrude Lenzer. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

  • Coser, L. A. (1997). Men of Ideas. Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cragun, R. T., Kosmin, B., Keysar, A., Hammer, J. H., & Nielsen, M. (2012). On the receiving end: Discrimination toward the non-religious in the United States.". Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27(1), 105–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currarini, S., & Mengel, F. (2016). Identity, homophily and in-group bias. European Economic Review, 90, 40–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVries, A. C., Glasper, E. R., & Detillion, C. E. (2003). Social modulation of stress responses. Physiology & Behavior, 79(3), 399–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinesen, P. T., & Sønderskov, K. M. (2018). Ethnic diversity and social trust: a critical review of the literature and suggestions for a research agenda. Pp. 175–204 in The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust Eric M. Uslaner Eds. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 729–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. (2016). Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks? Royal Society Open Science, 3(1), 150292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, E. W., Biesanz, J. C., Human, L. J., & Finn, S. (2007). Misunderstanding the affective consequences of everyday social interactions: The hidden benefits of putting one’s best face forward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 990–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. ([1893] 1984). The division of labor in society. New York, NY: The Free Press.

  • Durkheim, E. ([1897] 1997). Suicide. New York, NY: The Free Press.

  • Durkheim, E. ([1912] 2001). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. New York, NY: Oxford Press.

  • Elias, N. (2000). The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, G., Kao, S., & Grant, A.-M. (2004). Mattering: Empirical validation of a social-psychological concept. Self and Identity, 3(4), 339–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (2001). For a soft moral culture. The Kettering Review, 19(2), 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fokides, E. (2020). My avatar and I. A study on avatars, personality traits, self-attributes, and their perceived importance. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12, 359–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. (2019). Rule makers, rule breakers: Tight and loose cultures and the secret signals that direct our lives. Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., Duan, L., et al. (2011). Differences between tight and loose Cultures: A 33-nation study.". Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A. S., Netto, K., & Peneaux, C. (2017). Neophilia, innovation and learning in an urbanized world: A critical evaluation of mixed findings. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 16, 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guess, A., Nyhan, B., Lyons, B., & Reifler, J. (2018). Avoiding the echo chamber about echo chambers. Technical Report. Knight Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagewen, K. J., & Morgan, S. P. (2005). Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970–2002. Population and Development Review, 31(3), 507–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanel, P., Maio, G. R., & Manstead, A. (2019). A new way to look at the data: Similarities between groups of people are large and important. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(4), 541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The conditions of postmodernity: an inquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazır, I. K., & Warde, A. (2015). The cultural omnivore thesis Pp. 77–89 in Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Art and Culture Laurie Hanquinet Mike Savage Eds. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J. (2017). The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J. (2020). The weirdest people in the world: how the west became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitlin, S., & Harkness, S. K. (2018). Unequal foundations: Inequality, morality, and emotions across cultures. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & Wagoner, J. A. (2017). Uncertainty–identity theory In The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication. In Young Yun (Ed.), Kim. Wiley and Blackwell: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M., Reeskens, T., Stolle, D., & Trappers, A. (2009). Ethnic diversity and generalized trust in Europe: A cross-national multilevel study.". Comparative Political Studies, 42(2), 198–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooi, R., & Cho, H. (2014). Avatar-driven self-disclosure: The virtual me is the actual me. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (2018). Cultural Evolution: People’s Motivations are Changing and Reshaping the World. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasny, L., Waggle, J., & Fisher, D. R. (2015). An empirical examination of echo chambers in US climate policy networks. Nature Climate Change, 5(8), 782–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2), 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardas, M., Kumar, A., & Epley, N. (2021). Overly shallow?: Miscalibrated expectations create a barrier to deeper conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000281

  • Kelly, R. L. (2013). The lifeways of hunter-gatherers: The foraging spectrum. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesler, C., & Bloemraad, I. (2010). Does immigration erode social capital? The conditional effects of immigration-generated diversity on trust, membership, and participation across 19 countries, 1981–2000. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 43(2), 319–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, R., & Veit, S. (2014). Ethnic diversity, trust, and the mediating role of positive and negative interethnic contact: A priming experiment. Social Science Research, 47, 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasnow, M., Delton, A. W., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2013). Meeting now suggests we will meet again: Implications for debates on the evolution of cooperation.". Scientific Reports, 3(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugelmass, H., & Garcia, A. (2015). Mental disorder among nonreligious adolescents. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 18(5), 368–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapiedra, O., Chejanovski, Z., & Kolbe, J. (2017). Urbanization and biological invasion shape animal personalities. Global Change Biology, 23(2), 592–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2003). Concerted cultivation and the accomplishment of natural growth. In A. Lareau (Ed.), Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life (pp. 1–13). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2009). Social commitments in a depersonalized world. Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazer, D., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., et al. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Chung, J. E., & Park, N. (2016). Network environments and well-being: An examination of personal network structure, social capital, and perceived social support. Health Communication, 33(1), 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeFebvre, L. (2017). Ghosting as a Relationship Dissolution Strategy in the Technological Age Pp. 219–235 in The Impact of Social Media in Modern Romantic Relationships. In Narissra M. Punyanunt-Carter & Jason S. Wrench (Eds.), New York. NY: Lexington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A., & Schroeder, J. (2020). Two social lives: How differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnell, K. J., Caparos, S., de Fockert, J. W., & Davidoff, J. (2013). Urbanization decreases attentional engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1232–1247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, H., Lill, A., & Wong, B. B. (2013). Behavioural responses of wildlife to urban environments. Biological Reviews, 88(3), 537–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukaszewski, A. W., Lewis, D., Durkee, P. K., Sell, A. N., Sznycer, D., & Buss, D. M. (2020). An adaptationist framework for personality science. European Journal of Personality, 34(6), 1151–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. J., Thomas, S. A., Long, J. M., Malinow, K. L., Friedmann, E., & Katcher, A. H. (1982). Blood pressure changes while talking. Israel Journal of Medical Sciences, 18(5), 575–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. ([1932] 1964). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. New York, NY: International Publishers.

  • Matera, C., Bosco, N., & Meringolo, P. (2020). Perceived mattering to family and friends, self-esteem, and well-being. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 25(5), 550–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, P. L., Lobel, S. A., & Cox, T. H., Jr. (1996). Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups.". Small Group Research, 27(2), 248–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J. M., & Ranger-Moore, J. R. (1991). Evolution on a dancing landscape: Organizations and networks in dynamic Blau space.". Social Forces, 70(1), 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M. (2004). A Blau space primer: Prolegomenon to an ecology of affiliation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(1), 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 353–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meer, T., & Tolsma, J. (2014). Ethnic diversity and its effects on social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 459–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Hermida, R. (2010). A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 36(1), 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffett, M. W. (2019). The human swarm: How our societies arise, thrive, and fall. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molm, L. D. (2003). Theoretical comparisons of forms of exchange. Sociological Theory, 21(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, I. (2017). Foragers, farmers, and fossil fuels: How human values evolve. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, D. A., Hoyer, D., Collins, C., Currie, T., Feeney, K., François, P., Savage, P. E., Whitehouse, H., & Turchin, P. (2018). A systematic assessment of ‘Axial Age’ proposals using global comparative historical evidence. American Sociological Review, 83(3), 596–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshannikova, E., Olsson, T., Huhtamäki, J., Paasovaara, S., & Kärkkäinen, H. (2020). From Chance to Serendipity: Knowledge Workers’ Experiences of Serendipitous Social Encounters. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2020, 1–18

  • Paik, A., & Sanchagrin, K. (2013). Social isolation in America: An artifact. American Sociological Review, 78(3), 339–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, P. S., Blumenstock, J. E., & Macy, M. W. (2018). The strength of long-range ties in population-scale social networks. Science, 362(6421), 1410–1413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B., van der Zee, K. I., & Kenworthy, J. (2016). Cultural diversity and team creativity Pp. 57–76 in The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture Research. In Vlad Petre (Ed.), Glăveanu. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, A. (2015). Social media usage: 2005–2015. Pew Research Center (http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/10/PI_2015-10-08_Social-NetworkingUsage-2005-2015_FINAL.pdf)

  • Peterson, R. A., & Kern, R. M. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 900–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickard, M. D., Roster, C. A., & Chen, Y. (2016). Revealing sensitive information in personal interviews: Is self-disclosure easier with humans or avatars and under what conditions?". Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Vickstrom, E. (2011). Diversity, social capital, and cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 461–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century: The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 137–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, L., & Leonardi, P. M. (2018). Which pathway to good ideas? An attention-based view of innovation in social networks. Strategic Management Journal, 39(4), 1188–1215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roser, M., & Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2020). Global Extreme Poverty. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from: https://ourworldindata.org/extreme-poverty[Online Resource]

  • Sandstrom, G. M., & Dunn, E. W. (2014). Is efficiency overrated? Minimal social interactions lead to belonging and positive affect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(4), 437–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasahara, K., Chen, W., Peng, H., Ciampaglia, G. L., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2019). On the Inevitability of Online Echo Chambers, arXiv:1905.03919 [J. Computat. Soc. Sci.(to be published)].

  • Scott, C. F., Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Prince, M. A., Nochajski, T. H., & Collins, R. L. (2017). Time spent online: Latent profile analyses of emerging adults’ social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 311–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (2017). Against the grain: A deep history of the earliest states. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilthuizen, M. (2019). Darwin comes to town: how the urban jungle drives evolution. New York, NY: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, K., Al Ramiah, A., & Hewstone, M. (2014). Neighborhood ethnic diversity and trust: The role of intergroup contact and perceived threat. Psychological Science, 25(3), 665–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel, L. (2021). Opiate of the masses? Inequality, religion, and political ideology in the United States”. Social Forces, 99(3), 979–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G. L., Varol, O., Yang, K.-C., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2018). The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, E., & Mitchell, A. (2021). News Use across Social Media Platforms in 2020; Pew Research Center: Washington, DC, USA. https://www.journalism.org/2021/01/12/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-in-2020/

  • Sherkat, D. (2003). Religious socialization: sources of influence and influences of agency Pp. 151–163 in Handbook of the Sociology of Religion. In Michelle Dillion (Ed.), Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, F., Teplitskiy, M., Duede, E., & Evans, J. A. (2019). The wisdom of polarized crowds. Nature Human Behavior, 3(4), 329–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shults, F. L., Wildman, W. J., Lane, J. E., Lynch, C. J., & Diallo, S. (2018). Multiple axialities: A computational model of the Axial Age. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 18(5), 537–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smaldino, P. (2019). The evolution of the social self: multidimensionality of social identity solves the coordination problems of a society Pp. 445–469 in Beyond the Meme: Dynamical Structures in Cultural Evolution. In C. Alan (Ed.), Love and William Wimsatt. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil, V. (2017). Energy and civilization: A history. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L. (2020). Cities: The first 6,000 years. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K. (2018). Religion re-explained. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 8(4), 406–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storm, I. (2017). Does economic insecurity predict religiosity? Evidence from the european social survey 2002–2014. Sociology of Religion, 78(2), 146–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of health and social behavior, 52(2), 145–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tönnies, F. (1887 [1912]). Gemeinschaft Und Gesellschaft. Leipzig, Germany: Fues’s Verlag.

  • Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (2002). Face to face: Toward a sociological theory of interpersonal behavior. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (2010). Theoretical principles of sociology: volume 1 on macrodynamics. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (2020). On human nature: The biology and sociology of what made us human. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H., & Maryanski, A. (2015). On the origin of societies by natural selection. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaisey, S. (2007). Structure, culture, and community: The search for belonging in 50 urban communes. American Sociological Review, 72(6), 851–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange, P. A., & Columbus, S. (2021). Vitamin S: Why Is Social Contact, Even With Strangers, So Important to Well-Being? Current Directions in Psychological Science

  • van Leeuwen, F., & Petersen, M. B. (2018). The behavioral immune system is designed to avoid infected individuals, not outgroups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(2), 226–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrana, S. R., & Rollock, D. (1998). Physiological response to a minimal social encounter: Effects of gender, ethnicity, and social context. Psychophysiology, 35(4), 462–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. ([1922]1978). Economy and society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  • West, G. B. (2017). Scale: The universal laws of Growth, innovation, sustainability, and the pace of life in organisms, cities, economies, and companies. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, H. (2004). Modes of Religiosity: A Cognitive Theory of Religious Transmission. AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, H., Francois, P., Savage, P. E., Currie, T., Feeney, K., Cioni, E., Purcell, R., et al. (2019). Complex societies precede moralizing gods throughout world history. Nature, 568(7751), 226–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, W. J., Shults, F. L., Diallo, S., Gore, R., & Lane, J. E. (2020). Post-supernatural cultures: There and back again. Secularism and Nonreligion, 9, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolleback, D., Karlsen, R., Steen-Johnsen, K., & Enjolras, B. (2019). Anger, fear, and echo chambers: the emotional basis for online behavior. Social Media Society, 5(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149(3681), 269–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, P., Galen, L. W., & Pasquale, F. L. (2016). The nonreligious: Understanding secular people and societies. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin McCaffree.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McCaffree, K., Shults, F.L. Distributive effervescence: emotional energy and social cohesion in secularizing societies. Theor Soc 51, 233–268 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09470-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09470-0

Keywords

Navigation