Abstract
Decades of increase in external aid programs sparked a wide range of criticisms pointing to misaligned interests, lack of accountability, and the reproduction of developmental traps. The success of development from without is more likely if it generates domestic developmental agency. In this article, we contribute by conceptualizing and measuring dimensions of developmental agency. Our research analyzes the strategic case of European Union regional development programs in Eastern Europe, where this external organization spent nearly a decade on establishing local developmental agency. We collected survey data of 1200 local organizations from two regions each in Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland. We examine the post-accession position of organizations that participated in pre-accession assistance programs. We test a hypothesis of marginalization in the framework of recentralized developmental governance, and we examine links between patterns of pre-accession involvement and post-accession developmental agency. We identify factors that might make external developmental programs more likely to foster local developmental agency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barca, F. (2009). An Agenda for Reformed Cohesion Policy -A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy.
Bebbington, A., Guggenheim, S., Olson, E., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Exploring social capital debates at the World Bank. Journal of Development Studies, 40(5), 33–64.
Börzel, T. A. (2009). New modes of governance and enlargement. The paradox of double weakness. In T. A. Börzel (Ed.), New modes of governance and enlargement. London: Palgrave.
Börzel, T. A and Buzogany, A. (2009). Greening the East: Weak States and Even Weaker Societies? Paper prepared for the EUSA Eleventh Biennial International Conference Los Angeles, California, April 23–25.
Brown, L., Khagram, S., Moore, M, and Frumkin, P. (2001). Globalization, NGOs, and Multi-Sectoral Relations. In J. S. Nye, Jr., and J. D. Donohue (Eds.), Governance in a Globalizing World. Brookings Institution.
Bruszt, L. (2008). Multi-level governance—the Eastern versions: emerging patterns of regional developmental governance in the new member states. Regional and Federal Studies, 18(5), 607–627.
Bruszt, L., & Holzhacker, R. (2009). Three converging literatures of transnationalization and the varieties of transnationalization. In L. Bruszt & R. Holzhacker (Eds.), The transnationalization of economies, states and civil societies new challenges for governance in Europe. New York: Springer.
Bruszt, L., & McDermott, G. A. (2009). Transnational integration regimes as development programs. In L. Bruszt & R. Holzhacker (Eds.), The transnationalization of economies, states and civil societies new challenges for governance in Europe. New York: Springer.
Bruszt, L., & Stark, D. (2003). Who counts? Supranational norms and societal needs. East European Politics and Societies, 17, 74–82.
Djelic, M. L., & Quack., S. (2003). Theoretical building blocks for a research agenda linking globalization and institutions. In M.-L. Djelic & S. Quack (Eds.), Globalization and institutions: redefining the rules of the economic game. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Djelic, M. L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006). Transnational governance. Institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Easterly, W. R. (2006). The white man’s burden: why the West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York: Penguin Press.
Easterly, W. R. (2008). Reinventing foreign aid. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on non-governmental organizations. World Development, 24, 961–974.
European Commission (2007). Supporting enlargement—what does evaluation show? Ex post evaluation of Phare support allocated between 1999–2001, with a brief review of post-2001 allocations July 2007.
Evans, P. (2000). Fighting marginalization with transnational networks: counter-hegemonic mobilization. Contemporary Sociology, 29(1), 230–241.
Evans, P. (2004). Development as Institutional change: the Pitfalls of monocropping and the potentials of deliberation. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(4), 30–52.
Gerstenberg, O., & Sabel, C. F. (2002). Directly deliberative polyarchy: an Institutional ideal for Europe? In C. Joerges & R. Dehousse (Eds.), Good Governance in Europe’s integrated market (pp. 289–341). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goetz, K. (2008). Governance as a path to Government. West European Politics, 31(1–2), 258–279.
Gregersen, B., & Johnson, B. (1997). Learning economies, innovation systems and european integration. Regional Studies, 31(5), 479–490.
Henderson, S. (2002). Selling civil society—Western aid and the nongovernmental organization sector in Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 35(2), 139–167.
Hirschman, A. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Jacoby, W. (2004). The enlargement of the European Union and NATO: ordering from the menu in Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jacoby, W. (2008). Minority traditions and postcommunist politics: how do IGO’s matter. In M. Orenstein, S. Bloom, & N. Lindstrom (Eds.), Transnational actors in central and East European transitions. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Keating, M. (2006). Territorial government in the new member states. In A. Sadurski, J. Ziller, & K. Zurek (Eds.), Apre` s enlargement: legal and political responses in Central and Eastern Europe. Florence: EUI-RSCAS.
Keating, M. (2008). Thirty years of territorial politics. West European Politics, 31(1–2), 60–81.
Koslinski, M. C., & Reis, E. (2008). Transnational and domestic relations of NGOs in Brazil. World Development, 37(3), 714–725.
Lundvall, B. (1992). National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
Magnatti, P., Ramella, F., Trigilia, C., & Viesti, G. (2005). Patti territoriali. Lezioni per lo sviluppo. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Moss, T. J., Pettersson, Gunilla, and V. Walle. (2006). An Aid-Institutions Paradox? A review essay on aid dependency and State building in Sub-Saharan Africa. (January 2006). Center for Global Development Working Paper No. 74; Mario Einaudi Center for International Studies Working Paper No. 11–05.
Orenstein, M., & Schmitz, H. P. (2006). The new transnationalism and comparative politics. Comparative Politics, 38(4).
Pregibon, D. (1980). Goodness of link tests for generalized linear models. Applied Statistics, 29(1), 15–24.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rodrik, D. (1999a). The new global economy and developing countries: making openness work. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Rodrik, D. (1999b). Where did all the growth go? External shocks, social conflicts, and growth collapses. Journal of Economic Growth, 4(4), 385–412.
Sabel, C. (1993). Studied trust: building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy. Human Relations, 46(9).
Sabel, C. (1994). Learning by monitoring: the institutions of economic development. In S. Neil & S. Richard (Eds.), Handbook of economic sociology (pp. 137–165). Princeton: Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
Sabel, Ch. (1996). Ireland: local partnerships and social innovation. OECD Publications.
Sabel, Ch., and Zeitlin, J. (2007). Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the European Union.” European Governance (EUROGOV) Papers.
Safford, S. (2009). Why the garden club couldn’t save Youngstown. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sedelmeier, U., & Epstein, R. (2008). Beyond conditionality: international institutions in postcommunist Europe after enlargement. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6), 795–805.
Sissenich, B. (2007). Building states without society: European union enlargement and social policy transfer to Poland and Hungary. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Stallings, B. (1990). The role of foreign capital in economic development. In G. Gereffi & D. L. Wyman (Eds.), Manufacturing miracles. Paths of industrialization in Latin America and East Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Stark, D., Vedres, B., & Bruszt, L. (2006). Rooted transnational publics: integrating foreign ties and civic activism. Theory and Society, 35(3), 323–349.
Stiglitz, J. (1999). Wither reform? Ten years of transition. Keynote Address, World Bank Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, April 28–30, 1999.
Streeck, W., & Schmitter, P. C. (1985). Community, market, state—and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. In Streeck & Schmitter (Eds.), Private interest government. Beyond market and state. London: Sage Publications.
Tallberg, J. (2002). Paths to compliance: enforcement, management, and the European Union. International Organization, 56(3), 609–643.
The World Bank. (2007). Results-based National Development Strategies Assessment and challenges ahead.
Trigilia, C. (2001). Social capital and local development. European Journal of Social Theory, 4(4), 427–442.
Vedres, B., & Stark, D. (2010). Structural folds: generative disruption in overlapping groups. The American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1150–1190.
Woolcock, M. (2001). Using social capital: getting the social relations right in the theory and practice of economic development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Acknowledgments
Insightful comments and suggestions by Wade Jacoby, Jonathan Zeitlin, and the Theory and Society Editors and reviewers are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bruszt, L., Vedres, B. Associating, mobilizing, politicizing: local developmental agency from without. Theor Soc 42, 1–23 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-012-9183-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-012-9183-7