Abstract
This paper presents a research-based teaching-learning sequence (TLS) that focuses on the notion of interaction in teaching Newton’s third law (N3 law) which is, as earlier studies have shown, a challenging topic for students to learn. The TLS made systematic use of a visual representation tool—an interaction diagram (ID)—highlighting interactions between objects and addressing the learning demand related to N3 law. This approach had been successful in enhancing students’ understanding of N3 law in pilot studies conducted by teacher-researchers. However, it was unclear whether teachers, who have neither been involved with the research nor received intensive tutoring, could replicate the positive results in ordinary school settings. To address this question, we present an empirical study conducted in 10 Finnish upper secondary schools with students (n = 261, aged 16) taking their mandatory physics course. The study design involved three groups: the heavy ID group (the TLS with seven to eight exercises on IDs), the light ID group (two to three exercises on IDs) and the no ID group (no exercises on IDs). The heavy and light ID groups answered eight ID questions, and all the students answered four questions on N3 law after teaching the force concept. The findings clearly suggest that systematic use of the IDs in teaching the force concept significantly fostered students’ understanding of N3 law even with teachers who have no intensive tutoring or research background.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: a conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198.
Bao, L., Zollman, D., Hogg, K., & Redish, E. F. (2002). Model analysis of fine structures of student models: an example with Newton’s third law. Physics Education Research: A Supplement to the American Journal of Physics, 70(7), 766–778.
Brown, D. E. (1989). Students’ concept of force: the importance of understanding Newton’s third law. Physics Education, 24, 353–358.
Bryce, T., & MacMillan, K. (2005). Encouraging conceptual change: the use of bridging analogies in the teaching of action-reaction forces and the “at rest” condition in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 737–763.
Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography—STCSE students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Online at http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html. Accessed March 22, 2014.
Giancoli, D. (2005). Physics—principles with applications (6th ed.). Englewood, Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Halloun, I., Hake, R. R., Mosca, E. P., & Hestenes, D. (1995). Force concept inventory. Online (password protected) at http://modeling.asu.edu/R&E/Research.html. Accessed March 22, 2014.
Hatakka, J., Saari, H., Sirviö, J., Viiri, J., & Yrjänäinen, S. (2004). Physica 1. Porvoo: Werner Söderström Oy.
Henderson, C. (2002). Common concerns about the force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 40, 542–547.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141–158.
Hinrichs, B. (2005). Using the system schema representational tool to promote student understanding of Newton’s third law. In J. Marx, P. Heron, & S. Franklin (Eds.), AIP Conference Proceedings—2004 Physics Education Research Conference, 790 (pp. 117–120). New York: Melville.
Hoellwarth, C., & Moelter, M. J. (2011). The implications of a robust curriculum in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 79(5), 540–545.
Huber, P., Russel, T., & Haslam, F. (2010). Teaching and learning about force with representational focus: pedagogy and teacher change. Research in Science Education, 40, 5–28.
Jauhiainen, J., Koponen, I. T., & Lavonen, J. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs about the role of interaction in teaching Newtonian mechanics and its influence on students’ conceptual understanding of Newton’s third law. Science education international: the journal of the International Council of Associations for Science Education (ICASE), 17(3), 149–160.
Jiménez, J. D., & Perales, F. J. (2001). Graphic representation of force in secondary education: analysis and alternative educational proposals. Physics Education, 36, 227–235.
Kariotoglou, P., Spyrtou, A., & Tselfes, V. (2009). How student teachers understand distance force interactions in different contexts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 851–873.
Kohl, P., Rosengrant, D., & Finkelstein, N. (2007). Strongly and weakly directed approaches to teaching multiple representation use in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research,3(1), 010108.
Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2002). Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: an approach drawing upon the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning. Studies in Science Education, 38, 115–142.
Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2003). Individual and sociocultural views of learning in science education. Science and Education, 12(1), 91–113.
McGrath, R. E., & Meyer, J. M. (2006). When effect sizes disagree: the case of r and d. Psychological Methods, 11(4), 386–401.
Maloney, D. P. (1984). Rule-governed approaches to physics—Newton’s third law. Physics Education, 19(1), 37–42.
Meheut, M., & Psillos, D. (2004). Teaching-learning sequences: aims and tools for science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 515–535.
Meltzer, D. E. (2005). Relation between students’ problem-solving performance and representational format. American Journal of Physics, 73(5), 463–478.
Meltzer, D. E., & Thornton, R. K. (2012). Resource letter ALIP-1: active-learning instruction in physics. American Journal of Physics, 80(6), 478.
Montanero, M., Suero, M. I., Perez, A. L., & Pardo, P. J. (2002). Implicit theories of static interactions between two bodies. Physics Education, 37, 318–323.
Nieminen, P., Savinainen A. & Viiri, J. (2012). Relations between representational consistency, conceptual understanding of the force concept, and scientific reasoning. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 8, 010123.
Nurkka, N., Mäkynen, A., Viiri, J., Savinainen, A. & Nieminen, P. (2012). Classroom discourse types and students’ learning of an interaction diagram and Newton’s third law. In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien & P. Clément (Eds.), E-Book proceedings of the ESERA 2011 conference: science learning and citizenship (coeds. Manuela Wenzel-Breuer and Conxita Marquez) (pp. 58–64). Lyon, France: European Science Education Research Association.
Palmer, D. (1997). The effect of context on students’ reasoning about forces. International Journal of Science Education, 6, 681–696.
Savinainen, A., Scott, P., & Viiri, J. (2005). Using a bridging representation and social interactions to foster conceptual change: designing and evaluating an instructional sequence for Newton’s third law. Science Education, 89(2), 175–195.
Savinainen, A., Mäkynen, A., Nieminen, P., & Viiri, J. (2013). Does using a visual-representation tool foster students’ ability to identify forces and construct free-body diagrams? Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 9(1), 010104.
Steinberg, R., & Sabella, M. (1997). Performance on multiple-choice diagnostics and complementary exam problems. The Physics Teacher, 35, 150–155.
Tiberghien, A., Vince, J., & Gaidioz, P. (2009). Design-based research: case of a teaching sequence on mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2275–2314.
Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2009). Multiple perspectives of conceptual change in science and the challenges ahead. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 32(2), 89–104.
Wilson, D. B. (2010). Practical meta-analysis effect size calculator. The Campbell Collaboration. Online at http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/resources/effect_size_input.php. Accessed March 22, 2014.
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the Academy of Finland (Project no. 132316) and the Finnish Cultural Foundation—South Ostrobothia Regional Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Savinainen, A., Mäkynen, A., Nieminen, P. et al. The Effect of Using a Visual Representation Tool in a Teaching-Learning Sequence for Teaching Newton’s Third Law. Res Sci Educ 47, 119–135 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9492-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9492-8