Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Present status of fisheries in Turkey

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Turkey’s natural and ecological situations are very suitable for aquaculture. Turkey also has a wide variety of freshwater and marine species comprising trout, carp, sea bass, sea bream, turbot, mussel, crayfish, etc. The total production of fish and shellfish was 646,310 tons in 2008. The contribution of freshwater catch to total fishery production is relatively small. Capture fisheries production amounted to 494,124 tons whilst aquaculture production was 152,186 tons in the same year. In Turkey, Engraulis encrasicholus (anchovy) is the main caught sea fish species. Fisheries in the Black Sea are the most important fishery by far and show the greatest variations in total catch. Alburnus tarichii (a local species belonging to Cyprinidae) and Cyprinus carpio (the common carp) are the most important species caught from freshwaters. Aquaculture is going to play an increasingly important role in the Turkish economy, as fishery products are the only products of animal origin that can be exported to the EU. There has been a fast increase in the aquaculture production in Turkey with the implementation of scientific and technological modernization. For example, total aquaculture production for 1986 and 2008 was 3,075 and 152,186 tons, respectively. The percentage of aquaculture in total fish production has been rising every year. The ratio of cultured fish production to total fish production was 1.5% in 1990 s, 13.57% in 2000 and more than 20% in 2005. It was 23.55% in 2008. Trouts are the main cultured freshwater fish species. Raceways and floating cages are employed in culture of trout. Carps are also important cultured freshwater fish species. Sea bass and gilthead sea bream are grown marine fish species. Floating cages, off-shore and earthen ponds are used for marine fish species culture. There has been an increase in fishery exports and imports in recent years. It was more than US$ 500 million in 2008, but that of 2004 was just over US$ 233 million. However, aquaculture production is still far away from the production targets and fisheries sector is not an important part of the economy at present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akyol O, Ertosluk O (2009) Fishing near sea-cage farm along the coast of the Turkish Aegean Sea. J Appl Ichthyol 20:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1977–2008) Yearly fishery statistics. Prime Ministry of Turkey, Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT), Ankara, Turkey

  • Anonymous (2006) Statistics of water products production, cost and economic value. General Directory of Agriculture Production and Development, Agriculture and Rural Affairs Ministry, Ankara, 127p

  • Aydın F, Köksal G, Demir N, Bekcan S, Kırkağaç M, Gözgözoğlu E, Erbaş S, Deniz H, Maltaş Ö, Arpa H (2005) Water product rearing and policies (in Turkish—no English abstract). Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği VI. Teknik Kongresi, S.791, 3–7 Ocak 2005, Milli Kütüphane-Ankara

  • Çelebi R (2010) The use of irrigation systems for sustainable fish production in Turkey. FAO fisheries technical paper. http://www.cababstractsplus.org/abstracts/Abstract.aspx?AcNo=20053016391. Accessed 16 Jan 2010; 23:35

  • Duman E, Sağlam N, Özdemir Y (2007) An evaluation on water product resources (in Turkish). Turkish-Agric Period 178:12–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Guner U, Harlıoğlu MM (2010) Status of freshwater crayfish distribution in Thrace region of Turkey. Res Fish Sci 19(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlıoğlu MM (2004) The present situation of freshwater crayfish, Astacus leptodactylus (Eschscholtz, 1823) in Turkey. Aquaculture 230:181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlıoğlu MM (2008) The harvest of the freshwater crayfish Astacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz in Turkey: harvest history, impact of crayfish plague, and present distribution of harvested populations. Aquacult Int 16:351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlıoğlu MM (2009) A comparison of the growth and survival of two freshwater crayfish species, Astacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz and Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana) under different temperature and density regimes. Aquacult Int 17:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlıoğlu MM, Güner U (2006) Studies on the recently discovered crayfish, Austropotamobius torrentium (Shrank, 1803), in Turkey: morphological analysis and meat yield. Aquacult Res 37:538–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlıoğlu MM, Güner U (2007) A new record of recently discovered crayfish, Austropotamobius torrentium (Shrank, 1803), in Turkey. Bull Fr Peche Piscic 387:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlıoğlu MM, Holdich DM (2001) Meat yields in the introduced crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus and Astacus leptodactylus, from British waters. Aquacult Res 32:411–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakaş HH, Türkoğlu H (2005) Su ürünlerinin dünyada ve Türkiyede’ki durumu (in Turkish with English abstract). J Agric Fac Harran Univ 9(3):21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Köksal G (1988) Astacus leptodactylus in Europe. In: Holdich DM, Lowery RS (eds) Freshwater crayfish: biology, management and exploitation. Croom Helm, London and Timber Press, Oregon, pp 365–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Köprücü K (2007) Water products production and their use in Turkey (in Turkish). Turkish-Agric Period 178:22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Machino Y, Holdich DM (2006) Distribution of crayfish in Europe and adjacent countries: updates and comments. Freshw Crayfish 15:292–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Rad F (2000) Species diversification in Turkish aquaculture sector. Eurofish magazine 3/2000 issue

  • Rad F (2002) “Country Report”, Proceedings of seminar on Seafood Market Studies for the Introduction of New Aquaculture Products, jointly organized by CIHEAM, The FAO and the EU Concerted Action MASMANAP, 21–22 June 2001, Zaragoza/Spain. In: Cahiers options Mediterraneennes, vol. 59. CIHEAM

  • Trontelj P, Youchi M, Boris S (2005) Phylogenetic and phylogeographic relationships in the crayfish genus Austropotamobius inferred from mitochondrial COI gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 34:212–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • URL 1. http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%C3%BCrkiye%27deki_g%C3%B6ller. Accessed 10 Jan 2010; 11:15

    Google Scholar 

  • URL 2. http://www.igeme.org.tr/Assets/sip/tar/2009_fishery_web_eng.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2010; 13:15

  • URL 3. ftp://ftp.fao.org/FI/DOCUMENT/fcp/en/FI_CP_TR.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2010; 15:40

  • URL 4. http://www.fafishery.org/news_detail.php?id=14. Accessed 24 Jan 2010; 15:55

    Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım Ö (2006) Circumstances of fish meal-oil fabrics in Sinop and their position in Turkish fish meal-oil production. Sci Eng J Fırat Univ 18(2):197–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım Ö (2008) Aquafeed industry in Turkey: its aquafeed projections towards the year 2015. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 8:93–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Yıldız M, Doğan K, Şener E, Bayır A (2009) Structural, technological and productivity analyses of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) farms in the Marmara region, in Turkey. J Appl Ichthyol 26:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz S, Akay AS, Gümüş E (2008) Fisheries sector in Turkish economy and marketing of fishery products. J Akdeniz Univ Agric Fac 21(2):265–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Yücel-Gier G, Uslu O, Küçüksezgin F (2009) Regulating and monitoring marine finfish aquaculture in Turkey. J Appl Ichthyol 25:686–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayşe Gül Harlioğlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harlioğlu, A.G. Present status of fisheries in Turkey. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 21, 667–680 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-011-9204-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-011-9204-z

Keywords

Navigation