Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fishing Rights or Fishing Wrongs?

  • Special Segment: Rights Based Fisheries
  • Published:
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing attention is being paid to overfishing and the biological, economic, and social implications of persistent mismanagement of aquatic natural resources. In this chorus of concern, little attention is focused on sustainable fisheries, and the lessons to be learned from management systems that produce these successes. Although there is no one prescription for sustainability, a range of quota-based management tools have been used to eliminate the race for fish, increasing the incentives for long-term investment and efficiency. Variously referred to as fishing rights, tenure rights, or dedicated access privileges, quota-based fisheries confer a percentage (or quota) of the total allowable catch to named entities over some predetermined period, from short-term auction systems to intergenerational customary sea tenure. Whether a rights-based system stems from a traditional fishing rights system or has been recently introduced into modern commercial fisheries, achieving sustainability in the fishery is dependent on incentivizing the collective – from local communities to national fleets – to actively participate in self-regulation of the resource. Thus criticism of the approach often stems from the observation of the potential for cheating at the individual level (e.g., high grading, excessive discards), and the necessary exclusivity that accompanies any transition in management from open access to club membership. It is also worth noting that the resource in question – the fish – remain a public good, and as such, the public should be compensated – or at least not taxed – for their use. Thus the cost of fishery management, and the windfall profits of fishery conversion, should be shared. Rights-based management is not a silver bullet, and is probably not appropriate for all fisheries; however, the successes of the longline fisheries for Pacific halibut and sablefish in Alaska, the artisanal fisheries for loco in Chile and for spiny lobster in Mexico, and the Australian fisheries for Northern prawns and rock lobster, all clearly indicate that fishing rights should have a central place in the fisheries management toolbox.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J.M. Acheson (1988) Lobster Gangs of Maine University Press of New England Hanover, NH 181

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Acheson L. Taylor (2001) ArticleTitleThe anatomy of the Maine lobster comanagement law Soc. Nat. Resour. 14 425–441

    Google Scholar 

  • T.J. Adams (1998) ArticleTitleThe interface between traditional and modern methods of fishery management in the Pacific Islands Ocean Coastal Manage. 40 127–142

    Google Scholar 

  • L.G. Anderson (1995) ArticleTitleA commentary on the views of environmental groups on access control in fisheries Ocean Coastal Manage. 28 165–188

    Google Scholar 

  • J.H. Annala (1996) ArticleTitleNew Zealand’s ITQ system: Have the first eight years been a success or a failure Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 6 43–62 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00058519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Arnason (1995) The Icelandic Fisheries Fishing News Books Oxford 177

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Arnason (2005) ArticleTitleProperty rights in fisheries: Iceland’s experience with ITQs Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 15 221–241

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Aswani (2005) ArticleTitleCustomary sea tenure in Oceania as a case of rights-based fishery management: Does it work? Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 15 263–285

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Barton (2002) ArticleTitleFisheries and fisheries management in Falkland Islands conservation zones Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst. 12 127–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Beakstead, D. and Brown, W.M. (2005) Provincial income disparities through an urban-rural lens: Evidence from the 2001 census. Analytical Paper. Statistics Canada. 11-624-MIE no. 012.

  • D.W. Bromley (2005) ArticleTitlePurging the frontier from our mind: Crafting a new fisheries policy Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 15 193–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Castilla, J.C., Manríquez, P., Alvarado, J., Rosson, A., Pino, C., Espoz, C., Soto, R., Oliva, D. and Defeo, O. (1998) Artisanal “Caletas” as units of production and co-managers of benthic invertebrates in Chile. In: Jamieson, G.S. and Campell, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the North Pacific Symposium on Invertebrate Stock Assessment and Management. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Vol. 125, pp. 407–413.

  • J.C. Castilla M. Fernandez (1998) ArticleTitleSmall-scale benthic fisheries in Chile: On co-management and sustainable use of benthic invertebrates Ecol. Appl. 8 IssueID1 S124–S132

    Google Scholar 

  • F.T. Christy (1997) Economic waste in fisheries: Impediments to change and conditions for improvement E.K. Pikitch D.D. Huppert M.P. Sissenwine (Eds) Global Trends: Fisheries Management American Fisheries Society Symposium 20 Bethesda 28–39

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Copes (1986) ArticleTitleA critical review of the individual quota as a device in fisheries management Land Econ. 62 IssueID3 278–291

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Defeo J.C. Castilla (2005) ArticleTitleMore than one bag for the world fishery crisis and keys for co-management successes in selected artisanal Latin American shellfisheries Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 15 243–261

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Fujita K. Bonzon (2005) ArticleTitleRights-based fisheries management: An environmentalist’s perspective Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 15 287–289

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Fujita K. Bonzon J. Wilen A. Solow R. Arnason J. Cannon S. Polasky (2004) Rationality of chaos? Global fisheries at a crossroads L.K. Glover S.A. Earle (Eds) Defying Ocean’s End: An Agenda for Action Island Press Washington 139–149

    Google Scholar 

  • J.R. Gauvin J.M. Ward E.E. Burgess (1994) ArticleTitleDescription and evaluation of the wreckfish fishery under individual transferable quotas Mar. Resour. Econ. 9 99–118

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Gelcich G. Edwards-Jones M.J. Kaiser E. Watson (2005) ArticleTitleUsing discourses for policy evaluation: The case of marine common property rights in Chile Soc. Nat. Resour. 18 377–391

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Gonzalez R. Norambuena M. Garcia (2001) Initial allocation of harvesting rights in the Chilean fishery for Patagonian toothfish R. Shotton (Eds) Case Studies on the Allocation of Transferable Quota Rights in Fisheries UN FAO Rome 305–321

    Google Scholar 

  • H.S. Gordon (1954) ArticleTitleThe Economic Theory of a common property resource: The fishery J. Political Econ. 62 124–142 Occurrence Handle10.1086/257497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Hannesson (2005) ArticleTitleRights based fishing: Use rights versus property rights to fish Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 15 209–219

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Hardin (1968) ArticleTitleTragedy of the commons Science 162 1243–1248 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CCaD3sfosFc%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Hilborn T.A. Branch B. Ernst A. Magnusson C.V. Minte-Vera M.D. Scheuerell J.L. Valero (2003) ArticleTitleState of the world’s fisheries Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 28 359–399

    Google Scholar 

  • D.S. Holland J.J.C. Ginter (2001) ArticleTitleCommon property institutions in the Alaskan groundfish fisheries Mar. Policy 25 33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • D.D. Huppert (2005) ArticleTitleAn overview of fishing rights Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 15 175–191

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Ianelli (2005) ArticleTitleAssessment and fisheries management of eastern Bering Sea walleye pollock: Is sustainability luck? Bull. Mar. Sci. 76 IssueID2 321–335

    Google Scholar 

  • J.B.C. Jackson M.X. Kirby W.H. Berger K.A. Bjorndal L.W. Botsford B.J. Bourque R.H. Bradbury R. Cooke J. Erlandson J.A. Estes T.P. Hughes S. Kidwell C.B. Lange H.S. Lenihan J.M. Pandolfi C.H. Peterson R.S. Steneck M.J. Tegner R.R. Warner (2001) ArticleTitleHistorical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems Science 293 629–638 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXls1Khu7o%3D Occurrence Handle11474098

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, F.B. Jr. (1999) Scaring the fish: A critique of the NRC’s justification for individual transferable quotas (ITQs) and a ‘systems analysis’ of their likely effects. A report submitted to Greenpeace. Center for Ecological Economic and Ethical Education.

  • R.E. Johannes (1981) Words of the Lagoon: Fishing and Marine Lore in the Palau District of Micronesia University of California Press Berkley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Johannes (2002) ArticleTitleThe renaissance of community-based marine resource management in Oceania Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33 317–340 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lack, M., Short, K. and Willock, A. (2003) Managing risk and uncertainty in deep-sea fisheries: Lessons from Orange Roughy. TRAFFIC Oceania and WWF Australia.

  • S. Macinko D.W. Bromley (2002) Who Owns America’s Fisheries Island Press Washington, DC 41

    Google Scholar 

  • S.C. Matulich R.C. Mittelhammer C. Reberte (1996) ArticleTitleTowards a more complete model of individual transferable fishing quotas: Implications of incorporating the processing sector J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 31 112–128 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jeem.1996.0035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.J. McCay (1995) ArticleTitleSocial and ecological implications of ITQs: An overview Ocean Coastal Manage. 28 3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Milazzo (1998) Subsidies in World Fisheries – A Re-examination The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank Washington, DC 86

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Research Council (1999a) Sharing the Fish: Toward a National Policy on Individual Fishing Quotas National Academy Press Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Research Council (1999b) The Community Development Quota Program in Alaska National Academy Press Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Research Council (2003) Cooperative Research in the National Marine Fisheries Service National Academy Press Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Orensanz, J.M., Hilborn, R. and Parma, A.M. (2000) Harvesting Methuselah’s clams: Is the geoduck fishery sustainable, or just apparently so? Can. Stock Assess. Secr., Res. Doc. 2000/175. 68 pp.

  • D. Pauly V. Christensen S. Guenette T. Pitcher U.R Sumaila C.J Walters R. Watson D. Zeller (2002) ArticleTitleTowards sustainability in world fisheries Nature 418 689–695 Occurrence Handle10.1038/nature01017 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XlvVyltbg%3D Occurrence Handle12167876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • J. Peña-Torries (1997) ArticleTitleThe political economy of fishing regulations: The case of Chile Mar. Resour. Econ. 12 253–280

    Google Scholar 

  • E.K. Pikitch C. Santora E.A. Babcock A. Bakun R. Bonfil D.O. Conover P. Dayton P. Doukakis D. Fluharty B. Henneman E.D. Houde J. Link P.A. Livingston M. Mangel M.K. McAllister J. Pope K.J. Sainsbury (2004) ArticleTitleEcosystem-based fishery management Science 305 346–347 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1098222 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2czlsVWqsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle15256658

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • K. Ruddle (1989) The organization of traditional inshore fishery management systems in the Pacific P.A. Neher R. Arnason N. Mollett (Eds) Rights Based Fishing Kluwer Academic Publishing Dordrecht, Netherlands 73–85

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Ruddle (1998) ArticleTitleThe context of policy design for existing community-based fisheries management systems in the Pacific Islands Ocean Coastal Manage. 40 105–126

    Google Scholar 

  • D.K. Schreiber (2001) ArticleTitleCo-management without involvement: The plight of fishing communities Fish Fisheries 2 376–384 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1467-2960.2001.00057.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.P. Sissenwine A.A. Rosenberg (1993) ArticleTitleUS fisheries: Status, long-term potential yields, and stock management ideas Oceanus 36 IssueID2 48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • A.D.M. Smith K.J. Sainsbury R.A. Stevens (1999) ArticleTitleImplementing effective fisheries-management systems – management strategy evaluation and the Australian partnership approach ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56 967–979 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jmsc.1999.0540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (UN FAO). (2002) Yearbook of Fishery Statistics. Vol. 91. Rome, 20 pp.

  • US Commission on Ocean Policy (USCOP). (2004) An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century. Final Report. Washington, DC.

  • Virdin, J. and Schorr, D. (2001) Hard facts, hidden problems: A review of current data on fishing subsidies. World Wildlife Fund Technical Paper.

  • B. Warren M. Drouin (2000) ArticleTitleTribal fishing rights Pacific Fish. 21 26–31

    Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Wilen (2005) Property rights and the texture of rents in fisheries D.R. Leal (Eds) Evolving Property Rights in Marine Fisheries Rowan and Littlefield Publishers Inc. Lanham, MD 49–67

    Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Wilen F.R. Homans (1997) Unraveling rent losses in modern fisheries: Production, market, or regulatory inefficiencies? E.K. Pikitch D.D. Huppert M.P. Sissenwine (Eds) Global Trends: Fisheries Management American Fisheries Society Symposium 20 Bethesda, MD 256–263

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia K. Parrish.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hilborn, R., Parrish, J.K. & Litle, K. Fishing Rights or Fishing Wrongs?. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 15, 191–199 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-005-5138-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-005-5138-7

Keywords

Navigation