Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Infrastructure Contracts: Trust and Institutional Updating

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses trust and trust perceptions in infrastructure contracts and supporting institutions. We focus on perceptions of the trustworthiness of the government purchasers of infrastructure services by the supplying companies and by the governments themselves. In particular, we allow for trust updating and trust misalignments, which may give rise to ‘undertrusting’ and ‘overtrusting’. The core of the paper sets out a game theoretic model of contracts with dynamic adjustment of trust perceptions, which we use to explore the impact of trust misalignment both on economic efficiency (measured by expected welfare) and on investment levels. We explore flexible contracts with and without pre-payments, rigid contracts (which do not allow for post-investment renegotiation), and hybrid contracts. We then compare the efficiency of the flexible contracts to that of hybrid contracts using as a criterion the expected welfare implications of each contract. The model is used to shed light on current issues on the sustainability of private investment infrastructure contracts in developed and in developing countries, including the role of regulatory institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J., & Young, L. (2006). Trade and contract enforcement. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 5(1) (Contributions), article 30.

  • Araujo, L., & Ornelas, E. (2007). Trust-based trade. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=642803.

  • Athias, L., & Saussier, S. (2006). Contractual design of toll adjustment provisions in infrastructure contracts. Atom-U, Paris-Sorbonne. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=828944.

  • Aumann R. (1976) Agreeing to disagree. The Annals of Statistics 4: 1236–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolt, C. (2003). Regulating the London underground. Beesley Lecture. Retrieved from Web site http://www.ppparbiter.org.uk.

  • Bolt, C. (2007). Regulating by contract and by licence—The relationship between regulatory form and its effectiveness. CRI Bath and Web site http://www.ppparbiter.org.uk.

  • Braynov S., Sandholm T. (2002) Contracting with uncertain level of trust. Computational intelligence 18(4): 501–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Brux, J. (2008). The dark and blue sides of renegotiation: An application to transport concession contracts. Centre d’ Economie de la Sorbonne, Universitė Paris 1 Panthėon Sorbonne.

  • Greif A. (1993) Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: The Maghribi traders coalition. American Economic Review 83(3): 525–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif A. (2006) Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Guasch J. L. (2004) Granting and renegotiating concession contracts: Doing it right. WBI Development Studies, World Bank Institute, Washington D.C.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guasch J. L., Straub S. (2006) Renegotiation of infrastructure concessions: An overview. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 77(4): 479–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffont J. J. (2005) Regulation and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild S. L. (2002) Competitive bidding for a long-term electricity distribution contract. Review of Network Economics 1(1): 1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay S. (1963) Non contractual relations in business. American Sociological Review 28(1): 55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan J., Woodruff C. (1999) Interfirm relationships and informal credit in Vietnam. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 1285–1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan M.S., Waxman A. (2007) Profit sharing between host countries and multinationals in natural resource extraction: An empirical investigation. Brookings Trade Forum 2007: 149–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, C., & Saussier, S. (2002). Contractual choice and performance: Water supply in France. In E. Brousseau & J. M. Glachant (Eds.), The economics of contracts: Theories and applications (pp. 440–463). Cambridge University Press.

  • Myerson R. B. (1979) An axiomatic derivation of subjective probability, utility, and evaluation functions. Theory and Decision 11: 339–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, P. (2004). An institutional theory of public contracts. ISNIE Conference 2004.

  • Spiller, P. T. (2008). An institutional theory of public contracts: Regulatory implications. National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper 14152. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w14152.

  • Stern J. (2003) Regulation and contracts: Substitutes or complements?. Lessons from UK historical experience. Journal of Policy Reform 6(4): 193–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, J. (2005). Regulation and contracts: The inevitability of discretion. CCRP Workshop, Barcelona, Spain.

  • Tirole J. (2009) Cognition and incomplete contracts. American Economic Review 99(1): 265–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson O. E. (1976) The economics of internal organization: Exit and voice in relation to markets and hierarchies. American Economic Review 66(2): 369–377

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xeni Dassiou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dassiou, X., Stern, J. Infrastructure Contracts: Trust and Institutional Updating. Rev Ind Organ 35, 171–216 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-009-9221-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-009-9221-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation