Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating wind-following and ecosystem services for hydroelectric dams in PJM

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydropower can provide inexpensive, flexible fill-in power to compensate for intermittent renewable generation. Policies for hydropower dams maintain multiple services beyond electric generation, including environmental protection, flood control and recreation. We model the decision of a hydroelectric generator to shift some of its power production capacity away from the day-ahead energy market into a “wind-following” service to smooth the intermittent production of wind turbines. Offering such a service imposes both private and social opportunity costs. Since fluctuations in wind energy output are not perfectly correlated with day-ahead energy prices, a wind-following service will necessarily affect generator revenues. Seasonal wind patterns produce conflicts with the goal of managing rivers for “ecosystem services”—the maintenance or enhancement of downstream ecosystems. We illustrate our decision model using the Kerr Dam in PJM’s territory in North Carolina. We simulate the operation of Kerr Dam over a three-year period that features hydrologic variability from normal water years to extreme drought conditions. We use an optimization framework to estimate reservation prices for Kerr Dam offering wind-following services in the PJM market. Wind-following may be profitable for Kerr Dam at low capacity levels during some time periods if ecosystems services are neglected and if side payments, or reserves-type payments, are provided. Wind-following with ecosystem services yields revenue losses that typically cannot be recovered with reserves market payments. Water release patterns are inconsistent with ecosystem-services goals when Kerr Dam dedicates significant capacity to wind-following, particularly in drought years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. L., & Cardell, J. B. (2008). Reducing the variability of wind power generation for participation in day ahead electricity markets. In Proceedings of the 41st annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS 2008), Waikoloa, HI.

  • Apt J. (2007) The spectrum of power from wind. Journal of Power Sources 169(2): 369–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apt J., Keith D. W., Morgan M. G. (2007) Promoting low-carbon electricity production. Issues in Science & Technology 24: 37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumsack S., Lave L. B., Marija I. (2007) A quantitative analysis of the relationship between congestion and reliability in electric power networks. Energy Journal 28(4): 73–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumsack, S., & Xu, J. (2011, forthcoming). The impact of renewable energy siting decisions on electricity-sector air emissions in the western U.S.. Energy Policy.

  • Bushnell J. (2003) A mixed complementarity model of hydrothermal electricity competition in the western United States. Operations Research 51: 80–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mello, P., Lu, N., & Makarov, Y. (2011). An optimized autoregressive forecast error generator for wind and load uncertainty study. Wind Energy. doi:10.1002/we.460.

  • Denholm P., Kulcinski G. L. (2004) Life cycle energy requirements and greenhouse gas emissions from large scale energy storage systems. Energy Conversion and Management 45: 2153–2172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobesova K., Apt J., Lave L. B. (2005) Are renewables portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy?. Environmental Science & Technology 39(22): 858–8583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, A., Blumsack, S., & Reed, P. (2011). Wind following and ecosystem services for hydroelectric dams. In 30th annual workshop in regulation and competition. Center for Research in Regulated Industries, Skytop PA, May 18–20.

  • Fischer C. (2010) When do renewable portfolio standards reduce electricity prices?. Energy Journal 31(1): 101–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Gonzalez J., Dela Muela R. M. R., Santos L. M., Gonzalez A. M. (2008) Stochastic joint optimization of wind generation and pumped storage units in an electricity market. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 23(2): 460–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hittinger E., Whitacre J., Apt J. (2010) Compensating for wind variability using co-located natural gas generation and energy storage. Energy Systems 1(4): 417–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsley, A., & Wrobel, J. (1999). Efficiency rents of storage plants in peak-load pricing, II: Hydroelectricity. London School of Economics and Political Science. Discussion Paper No. TE/99/372.

  • Kern, J. D., Characklis, G., Doyle, M., Blumsack, S., & Wishunt, R. (2011, forthcoming). The influence of de-regulated electricity markets on hydropower generation and downstream flow regime. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management.

  • Mount, T., Lamadrid, A., & Woo-Young, J. (2011). How will customers pay for the smart grid? In: Proceedings of 30th eastern advanced workshop on regulation and competition, Skytop, PA.

  • National Climate Data Center (NCDC). (2011). Climate division data. State Climate Office of North Carolina. http://www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu/climate/climdiv.php. Accessed 2011

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2011). Palmer drought index long-term meteorological conditions. NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/prelim/drought/pdiimage.html. Accessed 2011.

  • National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL). (2010). Wind integration datasets: Eastern wind dataset. http://www.nrel.gov/wind/integrationdatasets/eastern/methodology.html. Accessed 2010.

  • Newcomer A., Apt J. (2009) Near term implications of a ban on new coal-fired power plants in the US. Environmental Science & Technology 43(11): 3995–4001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomer A., Blumsack S., Apt J., Lave L. B., Morgan M. G. (2008) The short run economic and environmental effects of a carbon tax on U.S. electric generation. Environmental Science & Technology 42: 3139–3144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perekhodtsev, D. (2003). Two essays on problems in electricity deregulation. Carnegie-Mellon University, Ph.D. Dissertation.

  • Richer A., Baumgartner J., Braun D. (1996) A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology 10(4): 1163–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seager R., Tzanova A., Nakamura J. (2009) Drought in the southeastern United States: Causes, variability over the last millennium, and the potential for future hydroclimatic change. Journal of Climate 22: 5021–5045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sioshansi R. (2011) Increasing the value of wind energy with storage. Energy Journal 32(2): 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Sioshansi R., Denholm P., Jenkin T., Weiss J. (2009) Estimating the value of electricity storage in PJM: Arbitrage and some welfare effects. Energy Economics 31(2): 269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suen, J. P., & Eheart, J. W. (2006). Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: Incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime. Water Resources Research, 42.

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2010). Independent statistics and analysis: No. 2 distillate prices by sales type. http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_dist_dcu_nus_a.htm. Accessed 2010.

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2010). Independent statistics and analysis: Natural gas prices. http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/ng_pri_sum_dcu_SNC_a.htm. Accessed 2010.

  • Whisnant, R. B., Characklis, G. W., Doyle, M. W., Flatt, V. B., & Kern, J. D. (2009). Operating policies and administrative discretion at the John. H. Kerr project. Report.

  • Zerriffi H., Dowlatabadi H., Farrell A. (2005) Incorporating stress in electric power systems reliability models. Energy Policy 35(1): 61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seth Blumsack.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernandez, A., Blumsack, S. & Reed, P. Evaluating wind-following and ecosystem services for hydroelectric dams in PJM. J Regul Econ 41, 139–154 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-011-9177-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-011-9177-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation