Abstract
Hydropower can provide inexpensive, flexible fill-in power to compensate for intermittent renewable generation. Policies for hydropower dams maintain multiple services beyond electric generation, including environmental protection, flood control and recreation. We model the decision of a hydroelectric generator to shift some of its power production capacity away from the day-ahead energy market into a “wind-following” service to smooth the intermittent production of wind turbines. Offering such a service imposes both private and social opportunity costs. Since fluctuations in wind energy output are not perfectly correlated with day-ahead energy prices, a wind-following service will necessarily affect generator revenues. Seasonal wind patterns produce conflicts with the goal of managing rivers for “ecosystem services”—the maintenance or enhancement of downstream ecosystems. We illustrate our decision model using the Kerr Dam in PJM’s territory in North Carolina. We simulate the operation of Kerr Dam over a three-year period that features hydrologic variability from normal water years to extreme drought conditions. We use an optimization framework to estimate reservation prices for Kerr Dam offering wind-following services in the PJM market. Wind-following may be profitable for Kerr Dam at low capacity levels during some time periods if ecosystems services are neglected and if side payments, or reserves-type payments, are provided. Wind-following with ecosystem services yields revenue losses that typically cannot be recovered with reserves market payments. Water release patterns are inconsistent with ecosystem-services goals when Kerr Dam dedicates significant capacity to wind-following, particularly in drought years.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, C. L., & Cardell, J. B. (2008). Reducing the variability of wind power generation for participation in day ahead electricity markets. In Proceedings of the 41st annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS 2008), Waikoloa, HI.
Apt J. (2007) The spectrum of power from wind. Journal of Power Sources 169(2): 369–374
Apt J., Keith D. W., Morgan M. G. (2007) Promoting low-carbon electricity production. Issues in Science & Technology 24: 37–44
Blumsack S., Lave L. B., Marija I. (2007) A quantitative analysis of the relationship between congestion and reliability in electric power networks. Energy Journal 28(4): 73–100
Blumsack, S., & Xu, J. (2011, forthcoming). The impact of renewable energy siting decisions on electricity-sector air emissions in the western U.S.. Energy Policy.
Bushnell J. (2003) A mixed complementarity model of hydrothermal electricity competition in the western United States. Operations Research 51: 80–93
De Mello, P., Lu, N., & Makarov, Y. (2011). An optimized autoregressive forecast error generator for wind and load uncertainty study. Wind Energy. doi:10.1002/we.460.
Denholm P., Kulcinski G. L. (2004) Life cycle energy requirements and greenhouse gas emissions from large scale energy storage systems. Energy Conversion and Management 45: 2153–2172
Dobesova K., Apt J., Lave L. B. (2005) Are renewables portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy?. Environmental Science & Technology 39(22): 858–8583
Fernandez, A., Blumsack, S., & Reed, P. (2011). Wind following and ecosystem services for hydroelectric dams. In 30th annual workshop in regulation and competition. Center for Research in Regulated Industries, Skytop PA, May 18–20.
Fischer C. (2010) When do renewable portfolio standards reduce electricity prices?. Energy Journal 31(1): 101–120
Garcia-Gonzalez J., Dela Muela R. M. R., Santos L. M., Gonzalez A. M. (2008) Stochastic joint optimization of wind generation and pumped storage units in an electricity market. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 23(2): 460–468
Hittinger E., Whitacre J., Apt J. (2010) Compensating for wind variability using co-located natural gas generation and energy storage. Energy Systems 1(4): 417–439
Horsley, A., & Wrobel, J. (1999). Efficiency rents of storage plants in peak-load pricing, II: Hydroelectricity. London School of Economics and Political Science. Discussion Paper No. TE/99/372.
Kern, J. D., Characklis, G., Doyle, M., Blumsack, S., & Wishunt, R. (2011, forthcoming). The influence of de-regulated electricity markets on hydropower generation and downstream flow regime. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management.
Mount, T., Lamadrid, A., & Woo-Young, J. (2011). How will customers pay for the smart grid? In: Proceedings of 30th eastern advanced workshop on regulation and competition, Skytop, PA.
National Climate Data Center (NCDC). (2011). Climate division data. State Climate Office of North Carolina. http://www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu/climate/climdiv.php. Accessed 2011
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2011). Palmer drought index long-term meteorological conditions. NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/prelim/drought/pdiimage.html. Accessed 2011.
National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL). (2010). Wind integration datasets: Eastern wind dataset. http://www.nrel.gov/wind/integrationdatasets/eastern/methodology.html. Accessed 2010.
Newcomer A., Apt J. (2009) Near term implications of a ban on new coal-fired power plants in the US. Environmental Science & Technology 43(11): 3995–4001
Newcomer A., Blumsack S., Apt J., Lave L. B., Morgan M. G. (2008) The short run economic and environmental effects of a carbon tax on U.S. electric generation. Environmental Science & Technology 42: 3139–3144
Perekhodtsev, D. (2003). Two essays on problems in electricity deregulation. Carnegie-Mellon University, Ph.D. Dissertation.
Richer A., Baumgartner J., Braun D. (1996) A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology 10(4): 1163–1174
Seager R., Tzanova A., Nakamura J. (2009) Drought in the southeastern United States: Causes, variability over the last millennium, and the potential for future hydroclimatic change. Journal of Climate 22: 5021–5045
Sioshansi R. (2011) Increasing the value of wind energy with storage. Energy Journal 32(2): 1–30
Sioshansi R., Denholm P., Jenkin T., Weiss J. (2009) Estimating the value of electricity storage in PJM: Arbitrage and some welfare effects. Energy Economics 31(2): 269–277
Suen, J. P., & Eheart, J. W. (2006). Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: Incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime. Water Resources Research, 42.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2010). Independent statistics and analysis: No. 2 distillate prices by sales type. http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_dist_dcu_nus_a.htm. Accessed 2010.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2010). Independent statistics and analysis: Natural gas prices. http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/ng_pri_sum_dcu_SNC_a.htm. Accessed 2010.
Whisnant, R. B., Characklis, G. W., Doyle, M. W., Flatt, V. B., & Kern, J. D. (2009). Operating policies and administrative discretion at the John. H. Kerr project. Report.
Zerriffi H., Dowlatabadi H., Farrell A. (2005) Incorporating stress in electric power systems reliability models. Energy Policy 35(1): 61–75
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernandez, A., Blumsack, S. & Reed, P. Evaluating wind-following and ecosystem services for hydroelectric dams in PJM. J Regul Econ 41, 139–154 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-011-9177-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-011-9177-9