Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

This article investigates the impacts of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on a firm’s valuation, cash flow, and risk. Using newly available GRESB ESG performance data from 2019 to 2021 for global equity real estate investment trusts (REITs), we document that REITs with higher ESG performance scores have lower firm value and lower operating cash flow. Moreover, we show that strong ESG performing REITs exhibit higher firm risk. These results suggest that REIT management may overinvest in ESG activities at the expense of shareholder value. We are the first to our knowledge to provide evidence of overinvestment in ESG for REITs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See an article Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, titled “SEC regulation of ESG disclosures”, at the following website: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/05/28/sec-regulation-of-esg-disclosures/, and an article from Morgan Stanley Investment Management, titled “Sustainable finance disclosure regulation”, at the following website: https://www.morganstanley.com/im/en-be/intermediary-investor/about-us/newsroom/press-release/sustainable-finance-disclosure-regulation.html.

  2. See an industry report from Global Sustainable Investment Alliance (GSIA), titled “Global sustainable investment review”, at the following website: http://www.gsi-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GSIR-20201.pdf.

  3. See an article from Financial Times on October 22, 2020, titled “The fallacy of ESG investing”, at the following website: https://www.ft.com/content/9e3e1d8b-bf9f-4d8c-baee-0b25c3113319.

  4. For example, see PIMCO’s climate bond fund: https://www.pimco.com/en-us/investments/mutual-funds/climate-bond-fund/inst.

  5. We use the terms corporate social responsibility (CSR) and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) terms interchangeably as the literature uses both terms. According to The Sustainable Agency, CSR is a company’s framework of sustainability plans and ESG is the assessable outcome of the firm’s sustainability performance. (https://thesustainableagency.com/blog/esg-vs-csr/)

  6. More details about the ratings can be found from the following website: http://www.gresb.com/.

  7. See An and Pivo (2020), Brounen and Kok (2011), Chegut et al. (2014), Eichholtz et al. (2010, 2013), Fuerst and McAllister (2011), and others. Harrison and Seiler (2011a, b) offer a more nuanced view on whether greenness is strictly beneficial by examining the political environment.

  8. See an article from Nareit on September 25, 2020, titled “REITs continue focus on ESG during COVID-19 crisis”, at the following website: https://www.reit.com/news/reit-magazine/september-october-2020/reits-continue-focus-esg-during-covid-19-crisis.

  9. The full real estate assessment can be found at the following website: https://documents.gresb.com/generated_files/real_estate/2020/real_estate/assessment/complete.html#performance-reporting-characteristics.

  10. Cespa and Cestone (2007) also draw from agency theory but instead argue that CEOs invest in ESG to gain favor with non-shareholder stakeholders and entrench themselves.

  11. See a report from BlackRock, titled “Troubled waters”, at the following website: https://www.blackrock.com/institutions/en-gb/insights/blackrock-investment-institute/troubled-waters.

  12. The global real estate transparency index (GRETI) by JLL also provide some information about ESG in the ESG and environmental sustainability practices for the global real estate markets (Newell & Marzuki, 2022). Also see: https://www.us.jll.com/en/trends-and-insights/research/global-real-estate-transparency-index.

  13. See a report from Janus Henderson Investors, titled “ESG in COVID times: doing the REIT thing”, at the following website: https://www.janushenderson.com/en-it/advisor/article/esg-in-covid-times-doing-the-reit-thing/.

  14. See an article from NAREIT on February 01, 2021, titled “How the REIT industry is building diversity”, at the following website:: https://www.reit.com/news/reit-magazine/january-february-2021/how-reits-are-building-diversity.

  15. See Robinson and McIntosh (2022) for a literature review on ESG in commercial real estate.

  16. See Leskinen et al. (2020) for a literature review of green building certification in commercial properties.

  17. See a report from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, titled “Scarlet letters: remarks before the American Enterprise Institute”, at the following website: https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speech-peirce-061819.

  18. See an article from NAREIT, titled “Leader in the Light Awards”, at the following website: https://www.reit.com/nareit/industry-awards/leader-light-award.

  19. A more segmented analysis, which evaluates the subcategories within GRESB scores, would shed light on specific drivers behind our results. Regrettably, we’re constrained by the data access we have from S&P Global, which only furnishes the aggregate score.

  20. Hijjawi et al. (2021) document a steady increase in the ESG combined score for Australian REITs from 2004 to 2019.

  21. Property type refers to REIT’s type of real estate property, which is determined by the tenant’s uses of the property. [S&P Global KeyField: 113,553]. Property types are regrouped into seven categories: office, industrial, retail, hotel, multifamily, health care, diversified and others.

  22. For robustness purpose, we also measure a firm’s total value as the ratio of the market value of a firm divided by total assets (Lamont & Polk, 2002; Beracha et al., 2019b). The untabulated results continue to hold and are available upon request.

  23. For robustness purpose, we also measure a firm’s cash flow as funds from operations scaled by total assets (FFO/TA). FFO is a widely accepted cash flow metrics for North American REITs. while North American REITs normally report their FFO, REITs around the world generally do not report FFO. For REITs do not have a reported FFO in our sample, FFO is calculated as net income + depreciation – Gains on sale + interest. The results are qualitatively similar.

  24. We follow finance (e.g., Cheng et al., 2015) and real estate (e.g., Beracha et al., 2019a; Feng et al., 2022) literature, to compute the annual stock return volatility, firms with less than 60 days of return are excluded in the final sample.

  25. When country-year interacted fixed effects are used, these variables have no variation and are subsumed by the fixed effect.

  26. Results are consistent if we use the ESG performance score without taking the natural logarithm.

  27. Funds from operations (FFO) are not widely reported by Europe and Asia Pacific REITs.

  28. We thank an anonymous reviewer for this comment.

References

  • An, X., & Pivo, G. (2020). Green buildings in commercial mortgage-backed securities: The effects of LEED and Energy Star certification on default risk and loan terms. Real Estate Economics, 48(1), 7–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aroul, R. R., Sabherwal, S., & Villupuram, S. V. (2022). ESG, operational efficiency and operational performance: Evidence from Real Estate Investment trusts. Managerial Finance, 48(8), 1206–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avramov, D., Cheng, S., Lioui, A., & Tarelli, A. (2022). Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2), 642–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77(305), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beracha, E., Feng, Z., & Hardin, W. G. (2019a). REIT operational efficiency: Performance, risk, and return. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 58(3), 408–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beracha, E., Feng, Z., & Hardin, I. I. I. (2019b). REIT operational efficiency and shareholder value. Journal of Real Estate Research, 41(4), 513–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2019). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings (pp. 1–42). MIT Sloan School of Management.

  • Bhargava, V., & Weeks, S. (2022). Short-term REIT performance under pandemic conditions. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 28(1), 62–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brounen, D., & Kok, N. (2011). On the economics of energy labels in the housing market. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62(2), 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brounen, D., Marcato, G., & Op’t Veld, H. (2021). Pricing ESG equity ratings and underlying data in listed real estate securities. Sustainability, 13(4), 2037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, B., Cao, C. X., & Chen, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 52, 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capozza, D. R., & Seguin, P. J. (1999). Focus, transparency and value: The REIT evidence. Real Estate Economics, 27(4), 587–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashman, G. D., Harrison, D. M., & Sheng, H. (2022). Does options trading activity benefit REITs? Journal of Real Estate Research, 45(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/08965803.2022.2107155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cespa, G., & Cestone, G. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(3), 741–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, A. K., Durand, R., Levine, D. I., & Touboul, S. (2016). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1597–1614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chegut, A., Eichholtz, P., & Kok, N. (2014). Supply, demand and the value of green buildings. Urban Studies, 51(1), 22–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, I. H., Hong, H., & Scheinkman, J. A. (2015). Yesterday’s heroes: Compensation and risk at financial firms. The Journal of Finance, 70(2), 839–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, I. H., Hong, H., & Shue, K. (2023). Do managers do good with other people’s money? The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 12(3), 443–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, D. M., Serafeim, G., & Sikochi, A. (2022). Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. The Accounting Review, 97(1), 147–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, X., Anglin, P. M., Gao, Y., & Sun, H. (2021). How do the CEO political leanings affect REIT business decisions? Journal of Real Estate Research, 43(4), 419–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, X., Kang, J. K., & Low, B. S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(1), 87–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, A., & Yönder, E. (2021). Impact of environmental investments on corporate financial performance: Decomposing valuation and cash flow effects. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 66(4), 778–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, A., Sanderford, A. & Wang, C. (2022). Sustainability and private equity real estate returns. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economicshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-022-09914-z

  • Dimson, E., Karakaş, O., & Li, X. (2015). Active ownership. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3225–3268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, D. H., Straska, M., & Waller, H. G. (2019). Shareholder activism in REITs. Real Estate Economics, 47(1), 66–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 621–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmans, A. (2023). The end of ESG. Financial Management, 52(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichholtz, P., Holtermans, R., Kok, N., & Yönder, E. (2019). Environmental performance and the cost of debt: Evidence from commercial mortgages and REIT bonds. Journal of Banking and Finance, 102, 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2010). Doing well by doing good? Green office buildings. American Economic Review, 100(5), 2492–2509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Yonder, E. (2012). Portfolio greenness and the financial performance of REITs. Journal of International Money and Finance, 31(7), 1911–1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2013). The economics of green building. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 50–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichholtz, P., & Yönder, E. (2015). CEO overconfidence, REIT investment activity and performance. Real Estate Economics, 43(1), 139–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichholtz, P., Barron, P., & Yonder, E. (2018). Sustainable REITs: REIT environmental performance and the cost of equity. In D. Parker (Ed.), The Routledge REITs Research Handbook. Routledge.

  • Fan, K. Y., Shen, J., & Hui, E. C. M. (2022). ESG materiality, stock valuation and corporate fundamentals: Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Z., & Wu, Z. (2022). Local economy, asset location and REIT firm growth. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 65(1), 75–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Z., Hardin III, W. G., & Wu, Z. (2022). REIT chief executive officer (CEO) compensation in the new era. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economicshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-022-09892-2

  • Feng, Z., Hardin, W. G., & Wang, C. (2022). Rewarding a long-term investment strategy: REITs. Journal of Real Estate Research, 44(1), 56–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Z., & Wu, Z. (2023). ESG disclosure, REIT debt financing and firm value. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 67(3), 388–422.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, A., Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 585–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuerst, F., & McAllister, P. (2011). Green noise or green value? Measuring the effects of environmental certification on office values. Real Estate Economics, 39(1), 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D., & Seiler, M. (2011a). The political economy of green office buildings. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 29(4/5), 551–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D., & Seiler, M. (2011b). The political economy of green industrial warehouses. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 3(1), 44–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. M., & Sheng, H. (2022). Pandemic proof property companies. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 28(2), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2022.2078531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hijjawi, M., Lee, C. L., & Marzuki, J. (2021). CEO overconfidence and corporate governance in affecting Australian listed construction and property firms’ trading activity. Sustainability, 13(19), 10920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, T. D., Christensen, D. M., & Graffin, S. D. (2017). Higher highs and lower lows: The role of corporate social responsibility in CEO dismissal. Strategic Management Journal, 38(11), 2255–2265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 304–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, O. A., & Polk, C. (2002). Does diversification destroy value? Evidence from the industry shocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 63(1), 51–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leskinen, N., Vimpari, J., & Junnila, S. (2020). A review of the impact of green building certification on the cash flows and values of commercial properties. Sustainability, 12(7), 2729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, W. B., Rachev, S. T., Hu, Y., & Shirvani, A. (2022). Inclusion of ESG ratings in optimization. Advanced REIT Portfolio optimization (pp. 227–245). Springer.

  • Ling, D. C., Wang, C., & Zhou, T. (2020). A first look at the impact of COVID-19 on commercial real estate prices: Asset-level evidence. The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 10(4), 669–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling, D. C., Wang, C., & Zhou, T. (2021). Institutional common ownership and firm value: Evidence from real estate investment trusts. Real Estate Economics, 49(1), 187–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masulis, R. W., & Reza, S. W. (2015). Agency problems of corporate philanthropy. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(2), 592–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milcheva, S. (2022). Volatility and the cross-section of real estate equity returns during Covid-19. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 65(2), 293–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N., Spivey, J., & Florance, A. (2008). Does green pay off? Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 14(4), 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, G., & Marzuki, M. J. (2022). The increasing importance of environmental sustainability in global real estate investment markets. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 40(4), 411–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pivo, G., & Fisher, J. (2010). Income, value, and returns in socially responsible office properties. Journal of Real Estate Research, 32(3), 243–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt, A., Fuerst, F., Rottke, N., & Zietz, J. (2012). Sustainable building certification and the rent premium: A panel data approach. Journal of Real Estate Research, 34(1), 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S., Simons, R., Lee, E., & Kern, A. (2016). Demand for green buildings: Office tenants’ stated willingness-to-pay for green features. Journal of Real Estate Research, 38(3), 423–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S., & McIntosh, M. G. (2022). A literature review of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) in commercial real estate. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 30(1–2), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09277544.2022.2106639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (2001). Corporate governance. Econometrica, 69(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, J. A., Benefield, J. D., & Johnson, K. H. (2010). Green design and the market for commercial office space. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 41(2), 228–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the helpful comments from David Harrison (discussant), participants at the 2022 American Real Estate Society (ARES) Annual Meeting, and the 2022 UF/FSU/UCF Current Issues in Real Estate Conference. The paper was the manuscript prize winner in Sustainable Real Estate at the 2022 ARES Annual Meeting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zifeng Feng.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 10 Definition of variables

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chacon, R.G., Feng, Z. & Wu, Z. Does Investing in ESG Pay Off? Evidence from REITs. J Real Estate Finan Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-024-09979-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-024-09979-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation