Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming of English words

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of phonological syllables in recognition and pronunciation of visual words has been demonstrated in languages with a high degree of spelling-sound correspondence. In Spanish, multisyllabic words with frequent first syllables are named more quickly than those with less frequent first syllables, but receive slower lexical decisions. The latter effect is attributed to lexical competition from other words beginning with the same syllable. We examined syllable frequency effects on naming and lexical decision for 3029 visually presented words in English, a language with a high degree of irregularity in spelling/sound relationships, and in which phonological syllables are less clearly marked in printed words. The results showed facilitative effects of syllable frequency in both tasks, and these were stronger when syllables were defined orthographically than phonologically. The results suggest that activation of lexical candidates based on a syllabic code does not occur rapidly enough to interfere with lexical decision in English.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aichert I., Ziegler W. (2004). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech. Brain and Language 88:148–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez C. J., Carreiras M., de Vega M. (2000). Syllable-frequency effect in visual word recognition: Evidence of sequential-type processing. Psicológica 21:341–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez C. J., Carreiras M., Taft M. (2001). Syllables and morphemes: Contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27:545–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15:802–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18:234–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4:439–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen R. H., Piepenbrock R., Gulikers L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (English Version 2.5) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Balota D. A., Chumbley J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10:340–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balota D. A., Chumbley J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production frequency. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 24:89–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Balota D. A., Cortese M. J., Hutchison K. A., Neely J. H., Nelson D., Simpson G. B., & Treiman R. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. http://elexicon.wustl.edu/, Washington University

  • Balota D. A., Cortese M. J., Sergent-Marshall S. D., Spieler D. H., Yap M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133:283–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber H., Vergara M., Carreiras M. (2004). Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Neuroreport 15:545–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgwaldt S. R., Hellwig F. M., de Groot A. M. B. (2005). Onset entropy matters – Letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages. Reading and Writing 18:211–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand M., Rey A., Peereman R. (2003). Where is the syllable priming effect in visual word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language 48:435–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan L., Westbury C., Burgess C. (2001). Characterizing semantic space: Neighborhood effects in word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8:531–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Carreiras M., Álvarez C. J., de Vega M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language 32:766–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreiras M., Perea M. (2004). Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency. Brain and Language 90:393–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreiras M., Perea M., Grainger J. (1997). Orthographic neighborhood effects on visual word recognition in Spanish: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23:857–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cholin J., Levelt W. J. M., Schiller N. O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition 99:205–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart M., Davelaar E., Jonasson J. T., Besner D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In: S. Dornic (Ed) Attention and performance VI. London: Academic Press, pp. 535–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad M., Jacobs A. M. (2004). Replicating syllable-frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Journal of Language and Cognitive Processes 19:369–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton A. (1981). Syllables and segments in speech production. Linguistics 19:663–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler A., Mehler J., Norris D., Segui J. (1986). The syllable’s differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language 25:385–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot A. M. B., Borgwaldt S., Bos M., van den Eijnden E. (2002). Lexical decision and word naming in bilinguals: Language effects and task effects. Journal of Memory and Language 47:91–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93:283–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell G. S. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language 27:124–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vega M. & Carreiras, M. (1989). The role of graphemic frequency in visual word processing. Paper presented at the 3rd European Conference for Learning and Instruction, Madrid, Spain

  • de Vega M., Carreiras M., Gutiérrez M., Alonso M. L. (1990). Lectura y comprensión: Una perspectiva cognitiva [Reading and comprehension: A cognitive perspective]. Madrid: Alianza Editorial

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez A., Cuetos F., de Vega M. (1993). Efectos diferenciales de la frecuencia silábica: Dependencia del tipo de prueba y características de los estímulos [Differential effects of syllabic frequency: Task and stimulus type dependency]. Estudios de Psicología 50:5–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez A., de Vega M., Cuetos F. (1997). Lexical inhibition from syllabic units in visual word recognition. Language & Cognitive Processes 12:401–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrand L., Segui J., Grainger J. (1996). Masked priming of words and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory and Language 35:708–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrand L., Segui J., Humphreys G. W. (1997). The syllable’s role in word naming. Memory & Cognition 25:458–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster K. I. (2000). The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments. Memory and Cognition 28:1109–1115

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster K. I., Shen D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22:696–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldinger S. D., Luce P. A., Pisoni D. B. (1989). Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language 28:501–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger J., Jacobs A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review 103:518–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger J., Muneaux M., Farioli F., Ziegler J. C. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58A:981–998

    Google Scholar 

  • Graybill F. A., Iyer H. K. (1994). Regression analysis: Concepts and applications. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb P. J., Grainger J., O’Rourke T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14:938–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntsman L. A., Lima S. D. (2002). Orthographic neighbors and visual word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31:289–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutzler F., Bergmann J., Conrad M., Kronbichler M., Stenneken P., Jacobs A. M. (2004). Inhibitory effects of first syllable-frequency in lexical decision: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters 372:179–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutzler F., Conrad M., Jacobs A. M. (2005). Effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming: An eye-movement study. Brain and Language 92:138–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jared D., Seidenberg M. S. (1990). Naming multisyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16:92–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz L., Frost R. (1992). Reading in different orthographics: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In: R. Frost, L. Katz (Eds) Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 67–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly M. H., Bock J. K. (1988). Stress in time. Journal of Experimental Psychology{ Human Perception and Performance 14:389–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucera H., Francis W. N. (Eds) (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown UniversityPress

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacruz I., Folk J. R. (2004). Feedforward and feedback consistency effects for high- and low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57A:1261–1284

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt W. J. M., Roelofs A., Meyer A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt W. J. M., Wheeldon L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition 50:239–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce P. A., Pisoni D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 19:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathey S., Zagar D. (2002). Lexical similarity in visual word recognition: The effect of sublexical units in French. Current Psychology Letters 8:107–121

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland J. L., Elman J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18:1–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickels L., Howard D. (2004). Dissociating effects of number of phonemes, number of syllables, and syllabic complexity on word production un aphasia: It’s the number of phonemes that counts. Cognitive Neuropsychology 21:57–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris D. (1994). SHORTLIST: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 52:189–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paap K. R., McDonald J. E., Schvaneveldt R. W., Noel R. W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In: M. Coltheart (Eds) Attention and performance XII. The Psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 221–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Perea M., Carreiras M. (1995). Efectos de frecuencia silábica en tareas de identificación [Syllable frequency effects in identification tasks]. Psicológica 16:483–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Perea M., Carreiras M. (1996). Efectos de vecindad ortográfica y silábica en la tarea de pronunciación mixta [Effects of orthographic and syllabic neighborhood in mixed pronunciation tasks]. Psicológica 17:425–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Perea M., Carreiras M. (1998). Effects of frequency and syllable neighbourhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception, and Performance 24:134–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinzmetal W., Treiman R., Rho S. H. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language 25:461–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp B. C. (1992). The nature of sublexical orthographic organization: The bigram trough hypothesis examined. Journal of Memory and Language 31:33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller N. O. (1999). Masked syllable priming of English nouns. Brain and Language 68:300–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller N. O. (2000). Single word production in English: The role of subsyllabic units during phonological encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26:512–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In: M. Coltheart (Ed) Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 245–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk E. O. (1982). Syllables. In: H. van der Hulst, N. Smith (Eds) The structure of phonological representations (Part II). Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 337–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson G. B., Kang H. (2004). Syllable processing in alphabetic Korean. Reading and Writing 17:137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spieler D. H., Balota D. A. (2000). Factors influencing word naming in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging 15:225–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoehr K. T., Smith E. E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology 5:71–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoehr K. T., Smith E. E. (1975). The role of orthographic and phonotactic rules in perceiving letter patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 104:21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft M. (1979). Lexical access via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS). Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 18:21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft M. (Ed.). (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Hove, England: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft M. (2001). Processing of orthographic structure by adults of different reading ability. Language and Speech 41:351–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft M. (2002). Orthographic processing of polysyllabic words by native and nonnative English speakers. Brain & Language 81:532–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft M., Forster K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemes and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15:607–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman R., Bowey J. A., Bourassa D. (2002). Segmentation of spoken words in syllables by English-speaking children as compared to adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 83:213–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman R., Zukowski A. (1990). Toward an understanding of English syllabification. Journal of Memory and Language 29:66–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Petten C. (1995). Words and sentences: Event-related brain potential measures. Psychophysiology 32:511–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitevitch M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28:735–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitevich M. S., Sommers M. S. (2003). The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory and Cognition 31:491–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates M., Locker L. Jr., Simpson G. B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11:452–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler J. C., Muneaux M., Grainger J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language 48:779–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler J. C., Perry C. (1998). No more problems in Coltheart’s neighborhood: Resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition 68:B53–B62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler J. C., Stone G. O., Jacobs A. M. (1997). What’s the pronunciation for -OUGH and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feed forward and feedback inconsistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 29:600–618

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA

    Pedro Macizo & Cyma Van Petten

Authors
  1. Pedro Macizo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cyma Van Petten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cyma Van Petten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macizo, P., Van Petten, C. Syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming of English words. Read Writ 20, 295–331 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9032-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9032-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation