Abstract
Objective
Our aim was to cross-culturally validate Chinese Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) scheduled for total knee replacement in Singapore.
Methods
Chinese WOMAC was translated from the original English version following standard guidelines. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire containing the WOMAC (twice within 6 days), the Short Form 36 (SF-36), and the EuroQoL EQ-5D. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), dimensionality using item-to-domain correlations and factor analyses. Convergent and discriminant construct validity was assessed using six each a priori hypotheses.
Results
Chinese WOMAC was well accepted by the patients in the pilot test. The Chinese and English versions were therefore administered to a consecutive sample of 131 Chinese- and 127 English-speaking subjects, respectively, with knee OA. Cronbach’s alpha exceeded 0.7 for all domains except for Chinese pain domain, whereas the ICC exceeded 0.7 for all domains. Hypothesized item-to-domain correlations were observed for all items except for four items in Chinese physical function domain. The factor analyses yielded seven and five factors with eigenvalues of more than 1.0 in the Chinese and English versions, respectively. A total of 10/12 a priori construct validity hypotheses were satisfied for the Chinese version. Weak correlations between WOMAC pain and SF-36 bodily pain and moderate correlation between WOMAC pain and EQ-5D anxiety/depression were observed.
Conclusions
Chinese WOMAC was well accepted and demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties in Singaporean patients with severe knee OA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
O’Reilly, S., & Doherty, M. (2003). Signs, symptoms, and laboratory tests. In K. D. Brandt, M. Doherty, & L.S. Lohmander (Eds.), Osteoarthritis (pp. 197–210). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bellamy, N., & Buchanan, W. W. (1986). A preliminary evaluation of the dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Clinical Rheumatology, 5, 231–241.
Bellamy, N., Buchanan, W. W., Goldsmith, C. H., Campbell, J., & Stitt, L. W. (1988). Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Journal of Rheumatology, 15, 1833–1840.
Thumboo, J., Chew, L. H., & Soh, C. H. (2001). Validation of the Western Ontario and McMaster University osteoarthritis index in Asians with osteoarthritis in Singapore. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 9, 440–446.
Department of Statistics. (2005). Yearbook of Statistics Singapore. Singapore: Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade & Industry, Republic of Singapore.
Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1417–1432.
Barr, S., Bellamy, N., Buchanan, W.W., Chalmers, A., Ford, P. M., Kean, W. F., Kraag, G. R., Gerecz-Simon, E., & Campbell, J. (1994). A comparative study of signal versus aggregate methods of outcome measurement based on the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Journal of Rheumatology, 21, 2106–2112.
Brazier, J. E., Harper, R., Munro, J., Walters, S.J., & Snaith, M. L. (1999). Generic and condition-specific outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford), 38, 870–877.
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Dewey, J. E. (2000). How to score version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey. Lincoln: QualityMetric Inc.
Thumboo, J., Fong, K. Y., Machin, D., Chan, S. P., Leong, K. H., Feng, P. H., Thio, S. T., & Boey, M. L. (2001). A community-based study of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the English (UK) and Chinese (HK) SF-36 in Singapore. Quality of Life Research, 10, 175–188.
Rabin, R., & de Charro, F. (2001). EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Annals of Medicine, 33, 337–343.
Luo, N., Chew, L. H., Fong, K. Y., Koh, D. R., Ng, S. C., Yoon, K. H., Vasoo, S., Li, S. C., & Thumboo, J. (2003). A comparison of the EuroQol-5D and the Health Utilities Index mark 3 in patients with rheumatic disease. Journal of Rheumatology, 30, 2268–2274.
Luo, N., Chew, L. H., Fong, K. Y., Koh, D. R., Ng, S. C., Yoon, K. H., Vasoo, S., Li, S. C., & Thumboo, J. (2003). Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D self-report questionnaire in Chinese-speaking patients with rheumatic diseases in Singapore. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 32, 685–690.
Hays, R. D., Anderson, R. T., & Revicki, D. (1998). Assessing reliability and validity of measurement in clinical trials. In M. J. Staquet, R. D. Hays, & P. M. Fayers (Eds.), Quality of life assessment in clinical trials methods and practice (pp. 169–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2000). Quality of life: Assessment, analysis and interpretation. Chichester: Wiley.
Guccione, A. A., Felson, D. T., & Anderson, J. J. (1990). Defining arthritis and measuring functional status in elders: Methodological issues in the study of disease and physical disability. American Journal of Public Health, 80, 945–949.
Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1989). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Soderman, P., & Malchau, H. (2000). Validity and reliability of Swedish WOMAC osteoarthritis index: A self-administered disease-specific questionnaire (WOMAC) versus generic instruments (SF-36 and NHP). Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 71, 39–46.
Juniper, E. F., Gordon, H. G., & Roman, J. (1996). How to develop and validate a new health-related quality of life instrument. In B. Spilker (EdS.), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials (pp. 49–56). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
Bae, S. C., Lee, H. S., Yun, H. R., Kim, T. H., Yoo, D. H., & Kim, S. Y. (2001). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Korean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) and Lequesne osteoarthritis indices for clinical research. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 9, 746–750.
Kuptniratsaikul, V., & Rattanachaiyanont, M. (2007). Validation of a modified Thai version of the Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index for knee osteoarthritis. Clinical Rheumatology, 26, 1641–1645.
Lequesne, M. G. (1997). The algofunctional indices for hip and knee osteoarthritis. Journal of Rheumatology, 24, 779–781.
Acknowledgements
We thank Mr. William Yeo, Ms. Hwee-Chi Chong, Li Wei, and Dorothy Tai from the Orthopaedic Diagnostic Center for their assistance in recruiting study subjects. This project was funded by an Academic Research Grant from the National University of Singapore, No. R-148-000-059-112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, F., Li, SC., Goeree, R. et al. Validation of Chinese Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in patients scheduled for total knee replacement. Qual Life Res 17, 595–601 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9340-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9340-7