Abstract
The qualitative quantitative issue has been given attention in sociological scholarship for decades. Upon theoretical examination of the basis of separations, the commonly used criteria of subjectivity versus objectivity, systematization, quantification and generalization, do not separate. This suggests that the impetus for the qualitative/quantitative issue is more political than intellectual owing to several factors in the practice of sociology: diverse intellectual heritages, the domination of quantitative sociologists in teaching methods and writing methods text books, the proliferation of computer technology in the past 20 years, and separation of theory and method. Advancing sociological methods means transcending the quantitative/qualitative issue and moving on to consider issues like science, validity, causality and multiverse.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babbie E. (1983). The Practice of Social Research. 3rd edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company
Babbie E. (1992). The Practice of Social Research, 6th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company
Babbie E. (1995). The Practice of Social Research, 7th edn. Toronto, Wadsworth Publishing Company
Babbie E. (2001). The Practice of Social Research, 8th edn. Toronto, Wadsworth Publishing Company
Bogdan R., Ksander M. (1980). Policy data as a social process: A approach to quantitative data. Human Organization 39(4): 302–309
Bryman A. (1984). The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: a question of method or epistemology?. British Journal of Sociology 35(1): 75–92
Burawoy M. (2003). Revisits: an outline of a theory of reflexive. American Sociologal Review 68(5): 645–79
Crombie A.C. (1959). Medieval and Early Modern Science. New York, Doubleday & Company Inc
Dell P. (1980). Researching the family theories of schizophrenia: An in epistemological confusion. Family Process 19(4): 321–335
Denzin N.K. (1989). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
DeVault M. L. (1990). Novel readings: The social organization of intrepretation. American Journal of Sociology 95(4): 887–921
Dooley D. (1995). Social Research Methods. Toronto, Prentice-Hall
Egler F.E. (1970). The Way of Science: A Philosophy of Ecology for the Layman. New York, Hafner Publishing Company
Erzberger C., Prein G. (1997). Triangulation: Validity and empircally-based hypothesis construction. Quality and Quantity 31:141–154
Foucault M. (1980). The History of Sexuality: An Introduction, Vol. 1. New York, Books
Frank P. (1949). Modern Science and Its Philosophy. Cambridge, Harvard University Press
Gartrell G.D., Gartrell J.W. (2002). Positivism in sociological research: USA and UK (1966–1990). British Journal of Sociology 53(4): 639–657
Gilbert L.S. (2002). Going the distance: ‘closeness’ in qualitative data analysis software. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 5(3): 215–228
Goffman E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, Doubleday and Company
Goffman E. (1963). Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Hanson B. (1992). Human rulers: The constructivist question in reliability based on inter-rater agreement. Methodology and Science 25: 102–115
Harding S. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, Cornell University Press
Holzman P.S. (1986). Similarity and collaboration within the sciences. In: Donald W.F., Richard A.S.(eds). Metatheory in Social Science. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, pp. 347–352
Kirchgassler K.U. (1991). Validity – The quest for reality in quantitative and qualitative Research. Quality and Quantity 25(3): 285–295
La Pelle N. (2004). Simplyfying qualitative data using general purpose software tools. Field Methods 16(1): 85–108
Lemert C. (1997). Postmodernism Is Not What You Think. MA, Blackwell
Lofland J., Lofland L.H. (1995). Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis, 3rd edn. Toronto, Wadsworth Publishing Company
Martin J.L. (2003). What is field theory?. American Journal of Sociology 109(1): 1–49
McLaughlin E. (1991). Oppositional poverty: The quantitative/qualitative divide and other dichotomies. Sociological Review 39(2): 292–308
Meijer P. Verloop N., Beijaard D. (2002). Multi-method riangulation in a qualitative study on teachers’ practical knowledge: An attempt to increase internal validity. Quality and Quantity 36(2): 145–167
Morales M. (1995). Uses of qualitative/quantitative terms in social and educational research. Quality and Quantity 29(1): 39–53
Morrow R.A., Brown D.D. (1994). Critical Theory and Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Payne G., Williams M., Chamberlin S. (2004). Methodological in sociology. Sociology 38(1): 153–163
Ragin C.C., Shulman D., Weinberg A., Gran B. (2003). Complexity, generality, and qualitative comparative analysis. Field Methods 14(4): 323–340
Richards T. (2002). An intellectual history of NUD*IST and NVivo. Journal of Social Research Methodology 5(3): 199–214
Smaling A. (1994). The pragmatic dimension: paradigmatic and pragmatic aspects of choosing a qualitative or quantitative method. Quality and Quantity 28(3): 233–249
Smith R.B. (2003). Inferential causal models: Integrating quality & Quality. quality and Quantity. 37(4): 337–361
Watzlawick P. (1984). The Invented Reality. Watzlawick, New York, W.W. Norton & Company
Woodberry R.D. (1998). When surveys and people tell the truth: How surveys church attenders. American Sociologal Review 63(1): 119–22
Woolgar S. (1988). Science: The Very Idea. New York, Tavistock
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hanson, B. Wither Qualitative/Quantitative?: Grounds for Methodological Convergence. Qual Quant 42, 97–111 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9041-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9041-7