Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the distributive impact of institutional change in developing countries. In such economies, property rights systems may preserve the interests of an influential minority, who can control key-markets, access to assets and investment opportunities, especially if they enjoy disproportionate political power. We test this hypothesis using cross-section and panel data methods on a sample of low- and middle-income economies from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Results suggest that: (a) increasing property rights protection increases income inequality; (b) this effect is larger in low-democracy environments; (c) some countries have developed political institutions capable of counterbalancing this effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu, D. (2008). Oligarchic vs. democratic societies. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(1), 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2002). The political economy of the Kuznets curve. Review of Development Economics, 62(2), 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth (vol. 1A, Chap. 6, pp. 385–472). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amendola, A., Easaw, J., & Savoia, A. (2011). Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development (Economics Department Discussion Paper Series No. 11/07). University of Exeter.

  • Anderson, T. W., & Hsiao, C. (1982). Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 18, 570–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (4th ed.). Chichester: Wiley,

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (2001). International data on educational attainment updates and implications. Oxford Economic Papers, 3, 541–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, M. A., & Lake, D. A. (2003). The political economy of growth: democracy and human capital. American Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, N. (1999). Economic freedom and equality: friends or foes? Public Choice, 100, 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. (2010). Property rights and economic development. In D. Rodrik & M. Rosenzweig (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (vol. V, Chap. 68, pp. 4525–4595). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov, C. (2010). Do elites benefit from democracy and foreign aid in developing economies? Journal of Development Economics, 92, 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornschier, V., & Chase-Dunn, C. (1985). Transnational corporations and underdevelopment. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F., & Walton, M. (2007). Efficiency, equity and inequality traps: a research agenda. Journal of Economic Inequality, 5, 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. (2004). Institutional poverty traps. In S. Bowles, S. N. Durlauf, & K. Hoff (Eds.), Poverty traps (Chap. 5, pp. 116–138). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, G. S. F. (2005). Approximating the bias of the LSDV estimator for dynamic unbalanced panel data models. Economics Letters, 87, 361–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bun, M. J. G., & Kiviet, J. F. (2003). On the diminishing returns of higher order terms in asymptotic expansions of bias. Economics Letters, 79, 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. R. (2006). An empirical note on economic freedom and income equality. Public Choice, 130, 163–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelló, A., & Doménech, R. (2002). Human capital inequality and economic growth: some new evidence. Economic Journal, 112, 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143, 67–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, A. (2004). Inequality, democracy and persistence: is there a political Kuznets Curve? Economics & Politics, 16(2), 189–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, A., & Calderón, C. (2000). Institutional quality and income distribution. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48, 761–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, A., & Gradstein, M. (2007). Inequality and institutions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3), 454–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, A., Gradstein, M., & Calderón, C. (2009). Can foreign aid reduce income inequality and poverty? Public Choice, 140, 59–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daudey, E., & Garcia-Peñalosa, C. (2007). The personal and factor distributions of income in a cross-section of countries. Journal of Development Studies, 43(5), 812–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. (2007). Inequality does cause underdevelopment: insights from a new instrument. Journal of Development Economics, 84, 755–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein, M., & Milanovic, B. (2004). Does liberté = egalité? A survey of the empirical links between democracy and inequality with some evidence on the transition economies. Journal of Economic Surveys, 18(4), 515–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J. G., & Lawson, R. A. (2007). Economic freedom of the world: 2007 annual report. Available online at www.freetheworld.com. Accessed on 12th September 2007.

  • Isaksson, A.-S. (2011). Social divisions and institutions: assessing institutional parameter variation. Public Choice, 147(3–4), 331–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, P., & Knack, S. (2002). Polarization, politics, and property rights: links between inequality and growth. Public Choice, 111(1–2), 127–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D. A., & Baum, M. A. (2001). The invisible hand of democracy: political control and the provision of public services. Comparative Political Studies, 34(6), 587–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson-Remer, T. (2010). Security of property rights for whom? (Mimeo). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1661310. Accessed on 10th September 2010.

  • Lee, C.-S., Nielsen, F., & Alderson, A. S. (2007). Income inequality, global economy and the state. Social Forces, 86(1), 77–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Squire, L., & Zou, H. (1998). Explaining international and intertemporal variations in income inequality. Economic Journal, 108, 26–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2006). The Kuznets’ Curve: yesterday and tomorrow. In A. Banerjee, R. Bénabou, & D. Mookherjee (Eds.), Understanding poverty (Chap. 4, pp. 63–72). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. A. (2001). Where does inequality come from? Ideas and implications for Latin America (OECD Development Centre working paper No. 188). December.

  • Rodrik, D. (1999). Democracies pay higher wages. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 54(3), 707–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scully, G. W. (2002). Economic freedom, government policy and the trade-off between equity and growth. Public Choice, 113, 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, H. (2008). An economic or political Kuznets curve. Public Choice, 134, 367–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNU-WIDER, United Nations University—World Institute for Development Economics Research (2007). World income inequality database. Available at http://www.wider.unu.edu/wiid/wiid.htm, version 2b. Accessed on 18th July 2007.

  • Vanhanen, T. (2000). A new dataset measuring democracy, 1810–1998. Journal of Peace Research, 37(2), 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhanen, T. (2005). Democratization: a comparative analysis of 170 countries. Routledge. Data and documentation available at http://www.fsd.uta.fi/english/data/catalogue/FSD1216/. Accessed on 21st April 2008.

  • Vreeland, J. R. (2008). The effect of political regime on civil war. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(3), 401–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2007). World development indicators. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Savoia.

Additional information

In the present paper we outline the main issues, provide and discuss the key empirical results. An extensive discussion of the issues raised in this paper (which also includes a survey of the recent theoretical and empirical literature), together with the complete empirical results are found in Amendola et al. (2011), this is the discussion paper version of this article: http://ideas.repec.org/p/exe/wpaper/1107.html.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amendola, A., Easaw, J. & Savoia, A. Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development. Public Choice 155, 43–60 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9838-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9838-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation