Skip to main content
Log in

Discontinuing the Use of PRN Intramuscular Medication for Agitation in an Acute Psychiatric Hospital

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the impact of eliminating intramuscular PRN medication for agitation on patient and staff safety in an acute psychiatric inpatient setting. The current retrospective chart review investigated the use of PRN medications (oral and intramuscular) to treat acute agitation, including aggression, and related outcomes before and after a mandated change in PRN practice that required real time physician input before administration of intramuscular medications. The use of both oral and intramuscular PRN medications dramatically decreased following implementation of the mandated change in practice. In particular, the use of intramuscular PRNs for agitation decreased by about half. Despite this decrease, the assault rate in the hospital was unchanged, and the utilization of restraint and seclusion continued to decrease. It is possible to reduce the utilization of PRN medications for agitation without broadly compromising safety on acute care psychiatric inpatient units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Usher K, Lindsay D, Sellen J. Mental health nurses’ PRN psychotropic medication administration practices. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 8:383–390, 2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thapa P, Palmer S, Owen R, Huntley A, Clardy J, Miller L. PRN (as-needed) orders and exposure of psychiatric inpatients to unnecessary psychotropic medications. Psychiat Serv. 5:1282–1286, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stein-Parbury J, Reid K; Smith N, Mouhanna D, Lamont F. Use of pro re nata medications in acute inpatient care. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 42:283–292, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Srivastava A. Limited evidence for the effectiveness of p.r.n. Medications among psychiatric inpatients. J Psychiatr Pract. 3:193–201, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hilton MF, Whiteford HA. Pro re nata medication for psychiatric inpatients: time to act. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 42:555–564, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith GM, Davis RH, Altenor A, Tran DP, Wolfe KL, Deegan JA, Bradley J. Psychiatric use of unscheduled medications in the Pennsylvania state hospital system: effects of discontinuing the use of P.R.N. orders. Community Ment Health J. 44:261–270, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. New York State Office of Mental Health; Guidance regarding the use of PRN medications. Office of the Medical Director Guidance Memo. 29 April 2010. http://www.omh.ny.gov/omhweb/advisories/prn_meds.pdf.

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark J. Russ.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hayes, A., Russ, M.J. Discontinuing the Use of PRN Intramuscular Medication for Agitation in an Acute Psychiatric Hospital. Psychiatr Q 87, 25–29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-015-9359-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-015-9359-1

Keywords

Navigation