Abstract
We examined whether schools achieving better than expected educational outcomes for their students influence the risk of drug use and delinquency among urban, racial/ethnic minority youth. Adolescents (n = 2,621), who were primarily African American and Hispanic and enrolled in Chicago public schools (n = 61), completed surveys in 6th (aged 12) and 8th (aged 14) grades. Value-added education was derived from standardized residuals of regression equations predicting school-level academic achievement and attendance from students’ sociodemographic profiles and defined as having higher academic achievement and attendance than that expected given the sociodemographic profile of the schools’ student composition. Multilevel logistic regression estimated the effects of value-added education on students’ drug use and delinquency. After considering initial risk behavior, value-added education was associated with lower incidence of alcohol, cigarette and marijuana use; stealing; and participating in a group-against-group fight. Significant beneficial effects of value-added education remained for cigarette and marijuana use, stealing and participating in a group-against-group fight after adjustment for individual- and school-level covariates. Alcohol use (past month and heavy episodic) showed marginally significant trends in the hypothesized direction after these adjustments. Inner-city schools may break the links between social disadvantage, drug use and delinquency. Identifying the processes related to value-added education in order to improve school environments is warranted given the high costs associated with individual-level interventions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arkes, J. (2007). Does the economy affect teenage substance use? Health Economics, 16, 19–36.
Aveyard, P., Markham, W. A., Lancashire, E., Bullock, A., Macarthur, C., Cheng, K. K., et al. (2004). The influence of school culture on smoking among pupils. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 1767–1780.
Aveyard, P., Markham, W. A., Lancashire, E., Almond, J., Griffiths, R., & Cheng, K. K. (2005). Is inter-school variation in smoking uptake and cessation due to differences in pupil composition? A cohort study. Health & Place, 11, 55–65.
Barnes, G. M., Welte, J. W., & Hoffman, J. H. (2002). Adolescent alcohol abuse: Subgroup differences and relationships to other problem behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1, 79–94.
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. London: Taylor & Francis.
Bishop, J. H. (2004). Enrollment, attendance and engagement --> achievement: Successful strategies for motivating students—Evidence of effectiveness from comparisons of 50 states and 45 nations. CAHRS Working Paper Series, Paper 21. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Bisset, S., Markham, W. A., & Aveyard, P. (2007). School culture as an influencing factor on youth substance use. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, 485–490.
Bursick, R. J. (1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects. Criminology, 26, 519–551.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). Youth risk behavior survey: Centers for disease control and prvention, national center for chronic disease prevention and health promotion.
Chicago Public Schools. (2010). School & citywide reports. Retrieved March 19, 2010, 2010, from https://research.cps.k12.il.us/cps/accountweb/Reports/download.html
Daniels, H., Holst, J., Lunt, I., & Ulsoe-Johansen, L. (1996). A comparative study of the relation between different models of pedagogic practice and constructs of deviance. Oxford Review of Education, 22, 63–77.
Duncan, S. C., Duncan, T. E., & Strycker, L. A. (2002). A multilevel analysis of neighborhood context and youth alcohol and drug problems. Prevention Science, 3, 125–133.
Ennett, S. T., Flewelling, R. L., Lindrooth, R. C., & Norton, E. C. (1997). School and neighborhood characteristics associated with school rates of alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 55–71.
Evans-Whipp, T., Beyers, J. M., Lloyd, S., Lafazia, A. N., Toumbourou, J. W., Arthur, M. W., et al. (2004). A review of school drug policies and their impact on youth substance use. Health Promotion International, 19, 227–234.
Flay, B. R., & Petraitis, J. (1994). The Theory of Triadic Influence: A new theory of health behavior with implications for preventive interventions. Advances in Medical Sociology, 4, 19–44.
Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood—implications for substance-abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64–105.
Hill, D. (1971). Peer group conformity in adolescent smoking and its relationship to affiliation and autonomy needs. Australian Journal of Psychology, 23, 189–199.
Hill, T. D., & Angel, R. J. (2005). Neighborhood disorder, psychological distress, and heavy drinking. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 965–975.
Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. (2009). Monitoring the Future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2008. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74, 262–273.
Komro, K. A., & Toomey, T. L. (2002). Strategies to prevent underage drinking. Alcohol Research & Health, 26, 5–14.
Komro, K. A., Perry, C. L., Veblen-Mortenson, S., Bosma, L. M., Dudovitz, B. S., Williams, C. L., et al. (2004). Brief report: The adaptation of Project Northland for urban youth. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 29, 457–466.
Komro, K. A., Perry, C. L., Veblen-Mortenson, S., Farbakhsh, K., Toomey, T. L., Stigler, M. H., et al. (2008). Outcomes for a randomized controlled trial of a multi-component alcohol use preventive intervention for urban youth: Project Northland Chicago. Addiction, 103, 606–618.
Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1999). Social support and achievement for young adolescents in Chicago: The role of school academic press. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 907–945.
Markham, W. A., & Aveyard, P. (2003). A new theory of health promoting schools based on human functioning, school organization and pedagogic practice. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 1209–1220.
Markham, W. A., Aveyard, P., Bisset, S., Lancashire, E., Bridle, C., & Deakin, S. (2008). Value-added education and smoking uptake in schools: A cohort study. Addiction, 103, 155–161.
Muller, K. E., & Fetterman, B. A. (2002). Regression and ANOVA: An integrated approach using SAS® software. Cary, NC: SAS.
Rose, G. (1992). The strategy of preventive medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sanders, M. G. (1998). Effects of school, family, and community support on the academic achievement of African American adolescents. Urban Education, 33, 385–409.
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.
Szapocznik, J., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1999). An ecodevelopmental framework for organizing risk and protection for drug abuse: A developmental model of risk and protection. In M. Glantz & C. R. Hartel (Eds.), Drug abuse: Origins and interventions (pp. 331–366). Washington, D: American Psychological Association.
Tobler, A. L., Komro, K. A., & Maldonado-Molina, M. M. (2009). Relationship between neighborhood context, family management practices and alcohol use among urban, multi-ethnic, young adolescents. Prevention Science, 10, 313–324.
Tobler, N. S., & Stratton, H. H. (1997). Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: A meta-analysis of the research. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 71–128.
Tobler, N. S., Roona, M. R., Ochshorn, P., Marshall, D. G., Streke, A. V., & Stackpole, K. M. (2000). School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 20, 275–336.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). United States Census 2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). Census Bureau releases population estimates by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin., from http://www.census.gov/PressRelease/www/2003/cb03-16.html
U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). American Fact Finder. Retrieved March 19, 2010, 2010, from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/CTGeoSearchByListServlet?ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U&_lang=en&_ts=287056230877
Wilson, D. B., Gottfredson, D., & Najaka, S. S. (2001). School-based prevention of problem behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17, 247–272.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by grants from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities under grants R01 AA013458 and R01 AA016549 to Kelli A. Komro, Principal Investigator. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Project Northland Chicago research team for their contributions in collecting these data and the participation of students and parents in the Project Northland Chicago trial.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tobler, A.L., Komro, K.A., Dabroski, A. et al. Preventing the Link Between SES and High-Risk Behaviors: “Value-Added” Education, Drug Use and Delinquency in High-Risk, Urban Schools. Prev Sci 12, 211–221 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0206-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0206-9