Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fertigation techniques for use with multiple hydrozones in simultaneous operation

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Site-specific delivery of fertilizer is a useful tool to address differences in crop need. Modern systems with wirelessly networked sensors and valves allow multiple hydrozones to be created more easily than traditional wired systems. This allows irrigation and fertigation rates to be varied across small portions of a field. However, fertigation to multiple hydrozones with different fertilizer requirements may be complex if each zone cannot be fertigated in an independent set. Instead, it might be necessary to operate several fertigation zones simultaneously. This raises a concern over the ability to deliver fertilizer uniformly within each zone. Four fertigation strategies were tested. The conventional method was to fertigate multiple hydrozones at different times. Three site-specific strategies were considered, involving overlapping fertigation phases in multiple hydrozones. Fertilizer distribution uniformity tests were conducted with a 64-emitter drip line to determine which strategy gave the most uniform distribution of fertilizer within a hydrozone. All fertigation techniques performed well, with fertilizer distribution uniformities between 0.88 and 0.96. Selection of the optimum site-specific fertigation strategy will depend on crop needs, scheduling limitations, and system design parameters such as emitter type, fluid travel time, and slope. Similar to conventional fertigation, the main factor in fertilizer distribution uniformity for this study was drip emitter variability. In the presence of sloped terrain, the site-specific control strategy that involved a delay between fertilizer injection and flushing had the least uniform fertilizer application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASABE. (2010). Design and installation of microirrigation systems. Standard EP405.1 APR1988 (R2010). St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Biological and Agricultural Engineers.

  • Barron, J. J., & Ashton, C. (2010). The effect of temperature on conductivity measurement. Reagecon. http://www.reagecon.com/resources/conductivity.html. Accessed 13 June 2011.

  • Bracy, R. P., Parish, R. L., & Rosendale, R. M. (2003). Fertigation uniformity affected by injector type. Horticulture Technology, 13(1), 103–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, R. W., & Delwiche, M. J. (2009). Wireless mesh network for irrigation control and sensing. Transactions of the ASABE, 52(3), 971–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delwiche, M., Coates, R., Brown, P., Evans, R., Oki, L., & Hanson, B. (2010). Site-specific fertilizer application in orchards, nurseries, and landscapes. Final report for project #06-0600. California Department of Food and Agriculture-Fertilizer Research and Education Program, Sacramento.

  • Hanson, B., O’Connell, N., Hopmans, J., Simunek, J., & Beede, R. (2006). Fertigation with microirrigation. Oakland: University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources (publication 21620).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, M.A., Martínez, F., Bou, V., Barolín, H. (2010). Analysis, assessment, and improvement of fertilizer distribution in pressure irrigation systems. Irrigation Science. doi: 10.1007/s00271-010-0215-7.

  • Li, J., Meng, Y., & Li, B. (2007). Field evaluation of fertigation uniformity as affected by injector type and manufacturing variability of emitters. Irrigation Science, 25, 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwankl, L., & Prichard, T. (2001). Chemigation in tree and vine microirrigation systems. Oakland: University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources (publication 21599).

    Google Scholar 

  • Styles, S. W., Burt, C. M., Gaudi, F., & Orvis, S. (2008). Accuracy of global microirrigation distribution and uniformity estimates. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 134(3), 292–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UC Davis Analytical Lab. (2010). Methods of analyses—Water and waste water: 835 soluble elements. UC Davis Analytical Laboratory. http://anlab.ucdavis.edu/analyses/water/835. Accessed 16 November 2010.

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was partially funded by the Fertilizer Research and Education Program and the Specialty Crops Block Grant Program of the California Department of Food and Agriculture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Delwiche.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coates, R.W., Sahoo, P.K., Schwankl, L.J. et al. Fertigation techniques for use with multiple hydrozones in simultaneous operation. Precision Agric 13, 219–235 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-011-9239-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-011-9239-0

Keywords

Navigation