Abstract
Ride-sharing has received great attention recently and is considered to be a sustainable transportation mode. Understanding the determinants of the consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services is critical to promote such services. In this research, an extended technology acceptance model is used as a theoretical research framework. This extension was implemented by incorporating three new constructs: personal innovativeness, environmental awareness, and perceived risk. The model was empirically tested using questionnaire survey data collected from 426 participants. The results indicate that personal innovativeness, environmental awareness, and perceived usefulness are positively associated with consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services, while perceived risk is negatively associated with the intention and perceived usefulness. The analysis shows that, contrary to our expectations, the perceived ease of use has no significant effect on intention to use ride-sharing services. In addition, personal innovativeness is positively related to perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use but negatively related to perceived risk. Based on these results, implications for practice and suggestions for further research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agag, G., El-Masry, A.A.: Understanding consumer intention to participate in online travel community and effects on consumer intention to purchase travel online and WOM: an integration of innovation diffusion theory and TAM with trust. Comput. Hum. Behav. 60, 97–111 (2016)
Agatz, N., Erera, A., Savelsbergh, M., Wang, X.: Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: a review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223(2), 295–303 (2012)
Ahn, M., Kang, J., Hustvedt, G.: A model of sustainable household technology acceptance. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 40(1), 83–91 (2016)
Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)
Aldás-Manzano, J., Lassala-Navarré, C., Ruiz-Mafé, C., Sanz-Blas, S.: The role of consumer innovativeness and perceived risk in online banking usage. Int. J. Bank Mark. 27(1), 53–75 (2009)
Bansal, G.: E-book usage: role of environmental consciousness, personality and past usage. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 52(2), 93–104 (2011)
Bhatti, T.: Exploring factors influencing the adoption of mobile commerce. J. Internet Bank. Commer. 12, 1–13 (2007)
Briz-Ponce, L., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: An empirical assessment of a technology acceptance model for apps in medical education. J. Med. Syst. 39(11), 176 (2015)
Caulfield, B.: Estimating the environmental benefits of ride-sharing: a case study of Dublin. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 14(7), 527–531 (2009)
Chan, N.D., Shaheen, S.A.: Ridesharing in North America: past, present, and future. Transp. Rev. 32(1), 93–112 (2012)
Chen, L.D.: A model of consumer acceptance of mobile payment. Int. J. Mobile Commun. 6(1), 32–52 (2008)
Chen, S.C., Hung, C.W.: Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: an extension of theory of planned behavior. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 112, 155–163 (2016)
Chen, S.Y., Lu, C.C.: A model of green acceptance and intentions to use bike-sharing: YouBike users in Taiwan. Netw. Spat. Econ. 16(4), 1103–1124 (2016)
Cheng, M.: Sharing economy: a review and agenda for future research. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 57, 60–70 (2016)
Cheng, Y.H., Huang, T.Y.: High speed rail passengers’ mobile ticketing adoption. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 30, 143–160 (2013)
Cheung, R., Vogel, D.: Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: an extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Comput. Educ. 63, 160–175 (2013)
Chiu, C.M., Wang, E.T.G.: Understanding web-based learning continuance intention: the role of subjective task value. Inf. Manag. 45, 194–201 (2008)
Collura, J.: Evaluating ride-sharing programs: massachusetts’ experience. J. Urb. Plan. Dev. 120(1), 28–47 (1994)
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989)
Daziano, R.A., Bolduc, D.: Incorporating pro-environmental preferences towards green automobile technologies through a Bayesian hybrid choice model. Transp. A 9(1), 74–106 (2013)
Featherman, M.S., Pavlou, P.A.: Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59(4), 451–474 (2003)
Feeney, M.: Is ridesharing safe? Policy Anal. 767, 2–7 (2015)
Fellows, N.T., Pitfield, D.E.: An economic and operational evaluation of urban car-sharing. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 5(1), 1–10 (2000)
Fleischer, A., Wahlin, C.: Want to take a ride with me? The intention of Generation Y to use Uber. Transp. Rev. 18(2), 138–162 (2016)
Fishman, E., Washington, S., Haworth, N.: Bike share: a synthesis of the literature. Transp. Rev. 33(2), 148–165 (2013)
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50 (1981)
Fransson, N., Gärling, T.: Environmental concern: conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. J. Environ. Psychol. 19(4), 369–382 (1999)
Frenken, K., Schor, J.: Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 23, 3–10 (2017)
Furuhata, M., Dessouky, M., Ordóñez, F., Brunet, M.E., Wang, X., Koenig, S.: Ridesharing: the state-of-the-art and future directions. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 57, 28–46 (2013)
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W.: Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of TAM and trust. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 50(3), 307–321 (2003)
Gefen, D., Straub, D.W.: Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega 32(6), 407–424 (2004)
Girod, B., Mayer, S., Nägele, F.: Economic versus belief-based models: shedding light on the adoption of novel green technologies. Energy Policy 101, 415–426 (2017)
Grybaitė, V., Stankevičienė, J.: Motives for participation in the sharing economy–evidence from Lithuania. Ekonomia i Zarzadzanie 8(4), 7–17 (2016)
Ha, S., Stoel, L.: Consumer e-shopping acceptance: antecedents in a technology acceptance model. J. Bus. Res. 62(5), 565–571 (2009)
Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., Ukkonen, A.: The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67(9), 2047–2059 (2016)
Hair, J.F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.: Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edn. Pearson, New Jersey (2006)
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.: Multivariate data analysis, vol. 5(3), pp. 207–219. Prentice hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (1998)
Heinrichs, H.: Sharing economy: a potential new pathway to sustainability. Gaia 22(4), 228 (2013)
Hong, S.J.: Assessing economic value of reducing perceived risk in the sharing economy: the case of ride-sharing services. J. Public Transp. 13(4), 61–72 (2017)
Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., O’Brien, G.: Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustain. Dev. 13(1), 38–52 (2005)
Hubert, M., Blut, M., Brock, C., Backhaus, C., Eberhardt, T.: Acceptance of smartphone-based mobile shopping: mobile benefits, customer characteristics, perceived risks, and the impact of application context. Psychol. Mark. 34(2), 175–194 (2017)
Huang, H.J., Yang, H., Bell, M.G.: The models and economics of carpools. Ann. Reg. Sci. 34(1), 55–68 (2000)
Jarvenpaa, S., Tractinsky, N., Vitale, M.: Consumer trust in an internet store. Inf. Technol. Manag. 1(1/2), 45–71 (2000)
Kahn, M.E.: Do greens drive Hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 54(2), 129–145 (2007)
Kelly, K.L.: Casual carpooling-enhanced. J. Pub. Transp. 10(4), 6 (2007)
Kim, C., Mirusmonov, M., Lee, I.: An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(3), 310–322 (2010)
Kim, D.J., Ferrin, D.L., Rao, H.R.: A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: the role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decis. Support Syst. 44(2), 544–564 (2008)
Kim, H., Choi, K.H., Kim, K.J., Park, E.: From owning to sharing: understanding the emergence of social sharing services. Program 51(2), 102–115 (2017)
Koivisto, K., Makkonen, M., Frank, L., Riekkinen, J.: Extending the technology acceptance model with personal innovativeness and technology readiness: a comparison of three models. In: BLED 2016: Proceedings of the 29th Bled eConference “Digital Economy”, ISBN 978-961-232-287-8 (2016)
Kuo, Y.F., Yen, S.N.: Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use 3G mobile value-added services. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(1), 103–110 (2009)
Laforet, S., Li, X.: Consumers’ attitudes towards online and mobile banking in China. Int. J. Bank Mark. 23(5), 362–380 (2005)
Lee, C., Rahafrooz, M., Lee, O.K.D.: What are the concerns of using a Ride-Sharing service? An investigation of Uber. Sustain. Dev. 21(5), 28–42 (2017)
Lee, D.Y., Lehto, M.R.: User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Comput. Educ. 61, 193–208 (2013)
Lee, M.C.: Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: an integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 8(3), 130–141 (2009)
Legris, P., Ingham, J., Collerette, P.: Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 40(3), 191–204 (2003)
Lewis, W., Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V.: Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: an empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Q. 1, 657–678 (2003)
Liu, J., Kockelman, K.M., Boesch, P.M., Ciari, F.: Tracking a system of shared autonomous vehicles across the Austin Texas network using agent-based simulation. Transportation 44, 1–18 (2017)
Liu, X., Wei, K.K.: An empirical study of product differences in consumers’ E-commerce adoption behavior. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2(3), 229–239 (2003)
Lu, C.S., Lai, K.H., Cheng, T.C.E.: Application of structural equation modeling to evaluate the adoption of Internet services in liner shipping. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 180(2), 845–867 (2007)
Lu, J., Yao, J.E., Yu, C.S.: Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 14(3), 245–268 (2005)
Luo, X., Li, H., Zhang, J., Shim, J.P.: Examining multi-dimensional trust and multi-faceted risk in initial acceptance of emerging technologies: an empirical study of mobile banking services. Decis. Support Syst. 49(2), 222–234 (2010)
Mallat, N., Rossi, M., Tuunainen, V.K., Öörni, A.: The impact of use context on mobile services acceptance: the case of mobile ticketing. Inf. Manag. 46(3), 190–195 (2009)
Martins, C., Oliveira, T., Popovič, A.: Understanding the Internet banking adoption: a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 34(1), 1–13 (2014)
Meelen, T., Frenken, K.: Stop saying Uber is part of the sharing economy. Fast Co. 14, 15–23 (2015)
Morency, C.: The ambivalence of ridesharing. Transportation 34(2), 239–253 (2007)
Park, C.K., Kim, H.J., Kim, Y.S.: A study of factors enhancing smart grid consumer engagement. Energy Policy 72, 211–218 (2014)
Parsons, A.: The sharing economy: a short introduction to its political evolution. Ecol. Econ. 12, 149–159 (2014)
Prieto, J.C.S., Migueláñez, S.O., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: ICTs integration in education: mobile learning and the technology acceptance model (TAM). In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, pp. 683–687. ACM (2014)
Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of innovations, vol. 12. Greenwood Press, New York (1995)
Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of innovations, vol. 551. Free Press, New York (2003)
Schor, J.: Debating the sharing economy. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 4(3), 7–22 (2016)
Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., Kinnear, N.: The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 48, 39–49 (2013)
Serenko, A.: A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification. Interact. Comput. 20(4–5), 461–472 (2008)
Stiglic, M., Agatz, N., Savelsbergh, M., Gradisar, M.: The benefits of meeting points in ride-sharing systems. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 82, 36–53 (2015)
Tan, G.W.H., Ooi, K.B., Leong, L.Y., Lin, B.: Predicting the drivers of behavioral intention to use mobile learning: a hybrid SEM-Neural Networks approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 36, 198–213 (2014)
Teubner, T., Flath, C.M.: The economics of multi-hop ride sharing. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 57(5), 311–324 (2015)
Van der Heijden, H., Verhagen, T., Creemers, M.: Understanding online purchase intentions: contributions from technology and trust perspectives. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 12(1), 41–48 (2003)
Venkatesh, V.: Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inf. Syst. Res. 11(4), 342–365 (2000)
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000)
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)
Wang, R.: Shaping carpool policies under rapid motorization: the case of Chinese cities. Transp. Policy 18(4), 631–635 (2011)
Wang, S., Fan, J., Zhao, D., Yang, S., Fu, Y.: Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation 43(1), 123–143 (2016)
Wang, S., Li, J., Zhao, D.: The impact of policy measures on consumer intention to adopt electric vehicles: evidence from China. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 105, 14–26 (2017)
Wang, Y.S., Lin, H.H., Luarn, P.: Predicting consumer intention to use mobile service. Inf. Syst. J. 16(2), 157–179 (2006)
Wosskow, D.: Unlocking the sharing economy: an independent review. Econ. Aff. 11(3), 31–45 (2014)
Wu, C.S., Cheng, F.F., Yen, D.C., Huang, Y.W.: User acceptance of wireless technology in organizations: a comparison of alternative models. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 33(1), 50–58 (2011)
Wu, J.H., Wang, S.C.: What drives mobile commerce?: an empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 42(5), 719–729 (2005)
Yen, D.C., Wu, C.S., Cheng, F.F., Huang, Y.W.: Determinants of users’ intention to adopt wireless technology: an empirical study by integrating TTF with TAM. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(5), 906–915 (2010)
Yu, J., Ha, I., Choi, M., Rho, J.: Extending the TAM for a t-commerce. Inf. Manag. 42(7), 965–976 (2005)
Zhu, G., Li, H., Zhou, L.: Enhancing the development of sharing economy to mitigate the carbon emission: a case study of online ride-hailing development in China. Nat. Hazards 8, 1–23 (2017a)
Zhu, G., So, K.K.F., Hudson, S.: Inside the sharing economy: understanding consumer motivations behind the adoption of mobile applications. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 29(9), 2218–2239 (2017b)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71601174) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2040150015). The authors would like to express their gratitude to the usable answers of survey respondents and valuable comments of the anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Constructs and measurement items.
Construct | Code | Measurement item |
---|---|---|
Personal innovativeness | PI1 | If I heard about a new thing/technology, I would look for ways to experiment with it |
PI2 | Among my peers, I am usually the first one to try the new thing/technology | |
PI3 | I like to experience a new thing/technology | |
Perceived ease of use | PEU1 | If I wanted to use ride-sharing services, it would be easy to me |
PEU2 | If I wanted to use ride-sharing services, it would be simple to me | |
PEU3 | If I wanted to use ride-sharing services, I would have no problems | |
Perceived usefulness | PU1 | Using ride-sharing services would enable me to get to my destination more quickly |
PU2 | Using ride-sharing services would improve my commute performance | |
PU3 | Using ride-sharing services would make my tasks easier | |
PU4 | Using ride-sharing services can mitigate traffic congestion | |
PU5 | Using ride-sharing services can reduce greenhouse gas emission and energy consumption | |
Perceived risk | PR1 | I’m concerned that my personal information will be shared or sold to others when enter the ride-sharing services platform |
PR2 | I’m concerned that ride-sharing services platform collects too much personal information about me | |
PR3 | I’m concerned that use ride-sharing with strangers through a same ride-sharing platform is not safe | |
PR4 | I’m concerned that share a car with strangers by using ride-sharing services can’t ensure my personal and property safety | |
Behavioral intention | BI1 | I plan to use ride-sharing services |
BI2 | I intend to use ride-sharing services | |
BI3 | I predict that I will use ride-sharing services as long as I have access to it | |
Environmental awareness | EA1 | I consider the potential environmental impact of my actions when making many of my decisions |
EA2 | I am concerned about wasting the resources of our planet | |
EA3 | I would like to describe myself as environmentally responsible | |
EA4 | I am willing to be inconvenienced in order to take actions that are more environmentally friendly |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Wang, S., Wang, J. et al. An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model. Transportation 47, 397–415 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9893-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9893-4