Abstract
Due to a variety of reasons, the previous century is characterized by an extraordinary growth in car use that has continued into the current century. This has resulted in serious environmental repercussions. Despite technological advancements, the externalities remain an ecological threat that can not be discarded by policy makers. Therefore, it is essential that policy makers focus on reducing car use and on stimulating the shift towards more environment-friendly transport modes. In this study, Q-methodology is adopted as the technique to segment people, and to ascertain which approaches and determinants matter to medium distance travel. Segmentation is important, as policy measures will be more efficient and effective if they are fine-tuned on specific target groups. The analysis revealed that four discourses preponderate the paradigm of environmentally sustainable transport: travelers who use public transport as a dominant alternative, car-dependent travelers, travelers with a positive perception of using public transport, and travelers with a preference for car use. Concerning rational, economic motives, individuals evaluate travel time reliability as most important. To increase the reliability policy makers should consider the use of separate bus lanes and traffic light manipulation. In addition, public transport can be made even more attractive, when costs of cars are made more variable by road or congestion charging. When the s motives are discussed, the differences between the different groups of travelers were more pronounced. Next to increasing the benefits of using public transport, policy makers should also pay attention to removing psycho-social barriers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anable, J.: ‘Complacent car addicts’ or ‘aspiring environmentalists’? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Transp Policy 12, 65–78 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2004.11.004
Anable, J., Gatersleben, B.: All work and no play? The role of instrumental and affective factors in work and leisure journeys by different travel modes. Transp. Res. Part A 39, 163–181 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.09.008
Armitage, C.J., Conner, M.: Social cognition models and health behaviour: a structured review. Psychol Health 15, 173–189 (2000)
Bamberg, S.: Is a stage model a useful approach to explain car drivers’ willingness to use public transportation? J Appl Soc Psychol 37, 1757–1783 (2007). doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00236.x
Bamberg, S., Rölle, D., Weber, C.: Does habitual car use not lead to more resistance to change of travel mode? Transp 30, 97–108 (2003). doi:10.1023/A:1021282523910
Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M., Blöbaum, A.: Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: two field studies. J Environ Psychol 27, 190–203 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.04.001
Barry, J., Proops, J.: Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecol Econ 28, 337–345 (1999). doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00053-6
Brown, S.R.: A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subj 16, 91–138 (1993)
Donner, J.C.: Using Q-sorts in participatory processes: an introduction to the methodology. In: Krueger, R.A., Casey, M.A., Donner, J.C., Kirsch, S., Maack, J.N. (eds.) Social analysis: selected tools and techniques, pp. 24–49. Social Development Department, The World Bank, Washington DC (2001)
Ellaway, A., Macintyre, S., Hiscock, R., Kearns, A.: In the driving seat: psychosocial benefits from private motor vehicle transport compared to public transport. Transp. Res. Part F 6, 217–231 (2003). doi:10.1016/S1369-8478(03)00027-5
Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., Nordlund, A.M.: Acceptability of single and combined transport policy measures: the importance of environmental and policy specific beliefs. Transp. Res. Part A 42, 1117–1128 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.tra.2008.03.006
Gärling, T., Schuitema, G.: Travel demand management targeting reduced private car use: effectiveness, public acceptability and political feasibility. J Soc Issues 63, 139–153 (2007). doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00500.x
Guiver, J.: Modal talk: discourse analysis of how people talk about bus and car travel. Transp. Res. Part A 41, 233–248 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.004
Haustein, S., Hunecke, M.: Reduced use of environmentally friendly modes of transportation caused by perceived mobility necessities: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 37, 1856–1883 (2007). doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00241.x
Heath, Y., Gifford, R.: Extending the theory of planned behavior: predicting the use of public transportation. J Appl Soc Psychol 32, 2154–2189 (2002). doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02068.x
Hensher, D.A.: Climate change, enhanced greenhouse gas emissions and passenger transport: what can we do to make a difference? Transp. Res. Part D 13, 95–111 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.trd.2007.12.003
Hiscock, R., Macintyre, S., Kearns, A., Ellaway, A.: Means of transport and ontological security: do cars provide psycho-social benefits to their users? Transp. Res. Part D 7, 119–135 (2002). doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00015-3
Huey, J., Everett, P.: Immediate benefits: the reason for the car’s success and transit’s failure. Transp Res Rec 1521, 65–70 (1996). doi:10.3141/1521-09
Johansson, M.V., Heldt, T., Johansson, P.: The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transp. Res. Part A 40, 507–525 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.tra.2005.09.001
Kaufmann, V.: Modal practices: from the rationales behind car & public transport use to coherent transport policies: case studies in France & Switzerland. World Transp Policy Pract 6, 8–17 (2000)
Kenniscentrum Statistiek.: Mobility figures (In Dutch: Mobiliteitscijfers). http://aps.vlaanderen.be/statistiek/cijfers/stat_cijfers_mobiliteit.htm (2008). Accessed 7 May 2008
Kingham, S., Dickinson, J., Copsey, S.: Travelling to work: will people move out of their cars. Transp Policy 8, 151–160 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(01)00005-1
Kuppam, A., Pendyala, R., Rahman, S.: Analysis of the role of traveler attitudes and perceptions in explaining mode-choice behavior. Transp Res Rec 1676, 68–76 (1999). doi:10.3141/1676-09
Marshall, S., Banister, D.: Travel reduction strategies: intentions and outcomes. Transp. Res. Part A 34, 321–338 (2000). doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00034-8
McKeown, B., Thomas, D.: Q methodology. Sage, Newbury Park (1988)
Mobiliteitscel.: Mobility Plan Flanders: Towards Sustainable Mobility in Flanders (In Dutch: Ontwerp mobiliteitsplan Vlaanderen: Naar een duurzame mobiliteit in Vlaanderen). Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap, Departement Leefmilieu en Infrastructuur, Brussels (2001)
Nilsson, M., Küller, R.: Travel behaviour and environmental concern. Transp. Res. Part D 5, 211–234 (2000). doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00034-6
Nordlund, A.M., Garvill, J.: Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. J Environ Psychol 23, 339–347 (2003). doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00037-9
OECD: Communicating environmentally sustainable transport: the role of soft measures. OECD, Paris (2004)
Rajé, F.: Using Q methodology to develop more perceptive insights on transport and social inclusion. Transp Policy 14, 467–477 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.006
Schmolck, P.: PQMethod 2.11. http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/~schmolck/qmethod/downpqx.htm (2002). Accessed 4 Mar 2009
Steg, L.: Can public transport compete with the private car? IATSS Res 27, 27–35 (2003)
Steg, L., Vlek, C., Slotegraaf, G.: Instrumental-reasoned and symbolic-affective motives for using a motor car. Transp. Res. Part F 4, 151–169 (2001). doi:10.1016/S1369-8478(01)00020-1
Stephenson, W.: The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1953)
Tertoolen, G., van Kreveld, D., Verstraten, B.: Psychological resistance against attempts to reduce private car use. Transp. Res. Part A 32, 171–181 (1998). doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(97)00006-2
van Exel, N.J.A., de Graaf, G., Rietveld, P.: Getting from A to B: operant approaches to travel decision making. Operant Subj 27, 194–216 (2004)
Watts, S., Stenner, P.: Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation. Qual Res Psychol 2, 67–91 (2005)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Katrien Declercq, Els Hannes and Kris Brijs for their contribution to this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cools, M., Moons, E., Janssens, B. et al. Shifting towards environment-friendly modes: profiling travelers using Q-methodology. Transportation 36, 437–453 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-009-9206-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-009-9206-z