Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biomass accumulation and carbon storage of four different aged Sonneratia apetala plantations in Southern China

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to examine plant biomass accumulation and carbon (C) storage in four different aged Sonneratia apetala plantations in the Leizhou Bay in South China. The allometric equations using diameter at breast height (DBH) and height (H) were developed to quantify plant biomass. The total forest biomass (TFB) of S. apetala plantation at 4, 5, 8, and 10 years old was 47.9, 71.7, 95.9, and 108.1 Mg ha−1, respectively. The forest biomass C storage in aboveground (AGB) and roots at 4, 5, 8, and 10-year plantation was 19.9, 32.6, 42.0, 49.0 Mg ha−1, respectively. Soil organic C (SOC) on the top 20 cm of sediments increased by 0.3, 6.8, 27.4, and 35.0 Mg ha−1after 4, 5, 8, and 10 years of reforestation, respectively. The average annual rate of total carbon storage (TCS) accumulation at 4, 5, 8, and 10-year S. apetala plantation was 5.0, 7.9, 8.7, and 8.4 Mg ha−1 yr−1, respectively. The TCS values in this study were underestimated because we only estimated SOC storage on the top 20-cm sediments in these plantations. This study suggests these young S. apetala plantations have the characteristics of fast growth, high biomass accumulation, and high C storage capacity, especially in sediments. They sequestrated C at a high but varying rate over time. The large-scale reforestation of S. apetala plantations in the open coastal mudflats in southern China has great potential to sequestrate more C as well as restore the degraded coastal land. The potential ecological issues associated with the increasing monoculture plantations were discussed. More long-term monitoring and research are needed to further evaluate biomass and C accumulation of S. apetala plantations over time as well as how the increasing distribution of this monoculture plantation will influence the few native mangrove remnants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AGB:

Aboveground biomass

AGCS:

Aboveground C storage

BGB:

Belowground biomass

BGCS:

Belowground C storage

C:

Carbon

DBH:

Diameter at breast height

H:

Height

SOC:

Soil organic C

TFB:

Total forest biomass

TCS:

Total carbon storage

References

  • Bledsoe CS, Fahey TJ, Day FP, Ruess RW (1999) Measurement of static root paratmeters—biomass, length, and distribution in the soil profile. In: Robertson GP, Coleman DC, Bledsoe CS, Sollins P (eds) Standard Soil Methods for Long-Term Ecological Research. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouillon S, Borges AV, Castaneda-Moya E, Diele K, Dittmar T, Duke NC, Lee SY, Marchand C, Middelburg JJ, Rivera-Monroy VH, Smith TJ III, Twilley RR (2008) Mangrove production and carbon sinks: a revision of global budget estimates. Global Biogeochem Cycles 22:GB2013. doi:10.1029/2007GB003052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosire JO, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Walton M, Crona BI, Lewis RR III, Field C, Kairo JG, Koedam N (2008) Functionality of restored mangroves: a review. Aquat Bot 89:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, Baumgardner GA (1997) Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests. Oecologia 111:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, Naylor RL, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL, Hooper DU, Lavore S, Sala OE, Hobbie SE, Mack MC, Diaz S (2000) Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Tian HQ, Liu M, Melillo J, Pan S, Zhang C (2006) Effects of land-use change on terrestrial carbon dynamics in the southern USA. J Environ Qual 35:1533–1547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan RS, Chapman CA (2003) Consequences of plantation harvest during tropical forest restoration in Uganda. For Ecol Manage 173:235–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field CD (1998) Rehabilitation of mangrove ecosystems: an overview. Mar Pollut Bull 37:383–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Formard F (1998) Structure, above-ground biomass and dynamics of mangrove ecosystems: new data from French Guiana. Oecologia 115:39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto K (2004) Below-ground carbon sequestration of mangrove forests in the Asia-Pacific region. In: Vannucci M (ed) Mangrove Management and Conservation: Present and Future. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto K, Miyagi T, Murofushi T, Adachi H, Murofushi T, Hiraide M, Kumada T, Tuan MS, Phuong DX, Nam VN, Hong PN (2000) Belowground carbon sequestration of mangrove forests in Southern Vietnam. In: Miyagi T (ed) Organic Material and Sea-level Change in Mangrove Habitat. Tohoku-Gakuin University, Sendai, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Guangdong Provincial Government (GPG) (2005) The decision on expediting to establish forestry ecological province. Guangdong Provincial Government, China, Guangzhou

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996) A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomass. Oecologia 108:389–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdal L, Bauwens B, Baritz R, Hagedorn F, Johnson DW, Minkkinen K, Byrne KA (2007) How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137:253–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jayatissa LP, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Koedam N (2002) A review of the floral composition and distribution of mangroves in Sri Lanka. Bot J Linnean Soc 138:29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komiyama A, Ong JE, Poungparn S (2008) Allometry, biomass, and productivity of mangrove forests: a review. Aquat Bot 89:128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen E, Bouillon S, Dittmar T, Marchand C (2008) Organic carbon dynamics in mangrove ecosystems: a review. Aquat Bot 89:201–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liao WB, Zheng DZ, Zeng SF (1990) Study on the biomass of Sonneratia carseolaria community. J For Res 3:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao WB, Zheng DZ, Li YD (1999) Above ground biomass and nutrient accumulation and distribution in different type Sonneratia carseolaria- Kandelia candel mangrove plantations. Chinese J of Appl Ecol 10:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin P (1999) Mangrove ecosystem in China. Science, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin KY, Zhang QM, Ren H (2006) Mangrove resource and sustainable development at Zhanjiang. Ecol Sci 23:23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugo AE (1997) The apparent paradox of reestablishing species richness on degraded lands with tree monocultures. For Ecol Manage 99:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugo AE (1999) Mangrove forests: a tough system to invade but an easy one to rehabilitate. Mar Pollut Bull 37:427–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macintosh DJ, Ashton EC, Havanon S (2002) Mangrove rehabilitation and intertidal biodiversity: a study in the Ranong mangrove ecosystem, Thailand. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 55:331–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao SY, Chen GZ, Chen ZT (1998) Biomasses and distribution patterns of mangrove populations in Zhanjiang Nature Reserve, Guangdong, China. Guihaia 18:16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Norisade M, Hitsuma G, Kuroda K (2005) Acacia mangium, a nurse tree candidate for reforestation on degraded sandy soils in the Malay Peninsula. For Sci 51:498–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrotta JA, Turnbull JW, Jones N (1997) Catalyzing native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. For Ecol Manage 99:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren H, Peng SL (2001) An introduction to restoration ecology. Science, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren H, Yu Z (2008) Biomass changes of an Acacia mangium plantation in southern China. J Trop For Sci 20:105–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren H, Jian SG, Lu HF (2008) Restoration of mangrove plantations and colonisation by native species in Leizhou bay, South China. Ecol Res 23:401–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snedaker SC eds (1984) The mangrove ecosystem: research methods. UNESCO, Paris, France

  • Soares MLG (1997) Estudo da biomassa aerea de manguezais do sudeste do Brasil- analise de modelos. PhD thesis, Instituto Oceanografico, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil

  • Soares MLG, Nivelli YS (2005) Above-ground biomass of mangrove species. I. Analysis of models. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 65:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun HL eds (1996) Standard methods for observation and analysis in Chinese Ecosystem Research Network. Standards Press of China. Beijing, China

  • Swamy SL, Kushwaha SK, Puri S (2004) Tree growth, biomass, allometry and nutrient distribution in Gmelina arborea stands grown in red lateritic soils of Central India. Biomass Bioenergy 26:305–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamooh F, Huxham F, Karachi M, Mencuccini M, Kairo M, Jirui JG (2008) Below-ground root yield and distribution in natural and replanted mangrove forests at Gazi bay, Kenya. For Eco and Manage 256:1290–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twilley RR, Chen RH, Hargis T (1992) Carbon sinks in mangroves and their implications to carbon budget of tropical coastal ecosystems. Water Air Soil Pollut 64:265–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WQ, Wang M (2007) The mangroves of China. Science, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang FG, Xin FW, Ye FG (2004) The invasive plants in Macau. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni 43:105–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, ML, Fortuna S (2003) Status and trends in mangrove area extent worldwide. Forest Resource Assessment Working Paper 63. Forestry Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

  • Yin Y, Fan HQ, Su XJ (1993) Study on the biomass of Avicennia marina community. Journal of Guangxi Academy of Sciences 9:19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Zan QJ, Wang YJ, Liao WB (2001) Biomass and net productivity of Sonneratia carseolaria- Sonneratia apetala mangrove forest. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research 15:391–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Zan QJ, Wang BS, Wang YJ, Li MG (2003) Ecological assessment on the introduced Sonneratia caseolaris and S. apetala at the mangrove forest of Shenzhen Bay, China. Acta Botanica Sinica 45:544–551

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Jian Shuguang, Lu Hongfang, Zhang Jinping, and Wang RuiJiang at the South China Botanical Garden and all staffs Administration of Zhanjiang Mangrove National Natural Reserve for field assistance during the study. This research was financially supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2009CB421101, 2007BAC28B04). Dr. Hua Chen is supported in part by the National Science Foundation grant (DBI-0821649).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua Chen.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Johan Six.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ren, H., Chen, H., Li, Z. et al. Biomass accumulation and carbon storage of four different aged Sonneratia apetala plantations in Southern China. Plant Soil 327, 279–291 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0053-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0053-7

Keywords

Navigation