Abstract
This article evaluates four general models of historical change processes which have emerged in various fields in the social sciences – namely stochastic, historical narrative, path dependency and process sequencing – and their application to the study of public policy-making. The article sets out and assesses the merits and evidence for each, both in general social research and in the policy sciences. The article suggests that more work needs to be done examining the assumptions and presuppositions of each model before it can be concluded that any represents the general case in policy processes. However, since neither the irreversible linear reality assumed by narrative models, nor the random and chaotic world assumed by stochastic models, nor the contingent turning points and irreversible trajectories required of the path dependency model are found very often in policy-making, these models are likely to remain less significant than process-sequencing models in describing the overall general pattern of policy dynamics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, A. (1988). ‘Transcending General Linear Reality,’ Sociological Theory 6: 169–186.
Abbott, A. (1990). ‘Conceptions of Time and Events in Social Science Methods,’ Historical Methods 23: 140–151.
Abbott, A. (1992). ‘From Causes to Events: Notes on Narrative Positivism,’ Sociological Methods and Research 20: 428–455.
Abbott, A. (1997). ‘On the Concept of Turning Point,’ Comparative Social Research 16: 85–105.
Abbott, A. (2001). Time Matters: On Theory and Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Adorno, T. W., et al. (1976). The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. London: Heinemann.
Almond, G. A. and S. J. Genco (1997). ‘Clouds, Clocks and the Study of Politics,’ World Politics 29: 489–522.
Aminzade, R. (1992). ‘Historical Sociology and Time,’ Sociological Methods and Research 20: 456–480.
Arthur, W. B. (1988). ‘Self-Reinforcig – Mechanisms in Economics,’ in P. W. Anderson, K. J. Arrow and D. Pines, eds., The Economy as an Evolving Complex System. Redwood City: Addison Wesley.
Arthur, W. B. (1989). ‘Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events,’ The Economic Journal 99: 116–131.
Bachrach, P. and M. S. Baratz (1970). Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice. New York, Oxford University Press.
Baumgartner, F. R. and B. D. Jones (1991). ‘Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems,’ Journal of Politics 53: 1044–1074.
Baumgartner, F. R. and B. D. Jones (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, F. R. and B. D. Jones (2002). ‘Positive and Negative Feedback in Politics,’ in F. R. Baumgartner and B. D. Jones, eds., Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bernstein, S., et al. (2000). ‘God Gave Physics the Easy Problems: Adapting Social Science to an Unpredictable World,’ European Journal of International Relations 6: 43–76.
Berry, W. T. (1990). ‘The Confusing Case of Budgetary Incrementalism: Too Many Meanings for a Single Concept,’ Journal of Politics 52: 167–196.
Bevan, G. and R. Robinson (2005). ‘The Interplay between Economic and Political Logics: Path Dependency in Health Care in England,’ Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 30: 53–78.
Burt, S. (1990). ‘Canadian Women's Groups in the 1980s: Organizational Development and Policy Influence,’ Canadian Public Policy 16: 17–28.
Buthe, T. (2002). ‘Taking Temporarility Seriously: Modeling History and the Use of Narratives as Evidence,’ American Political Science Review 96: 481–493.
Calhoun, C. (1998). ‘Explanation in Historical Sociology: Narrative, General Theory, and Historically Specific Theory,’ American Journal of Sociology 104: 846–871.
Caro, R. A. (2002). Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Cashore, B. and M. Howlett (2006). ‘Behavioural Thresholds and Institutional Rigidities As Explanations of Punctuated Equilibrium Processes in Pacific Northwest Forest Policy Dynamics,’ in R. Repetto, eds., Punctuated Equilibrium and the Dynamics of U.S. Environmental Policy.. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Clemens, E. S. (1999). ‘Continuity and Coherence: Periodization and the Problem of Institutional Change,’ in F. Engelstad and R. Kalleberg, eds., Social Time and Social Change. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Coleman, W. D., G. D. Skogstad, and M. Atkinson. (1996). ‘Paradigm Shifts and Policy Networks: Cumulative Change in Agriculture,’ Journal of Public Policy 16: 273–302.
Courchene, T. J. (1993). ‘Path-Dependency, Positive Feedback and Paradigm Warp: A Schumpeterian Approach to the Social Order,’ in E. B. Reynolds, eds. Income Security in Canada: Changing Needs, Changing Means. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy, pp. 43–82.
Cox, R. H. (1992). ‘Can Welfare States Grow in Leaps and Bounds? Non-Incremental Policymaking in the Netherlands,’ Governance 5: 68–87.
Cox, R. H. (2004). ‘The Path-Dependency of an Idea: Why Scandinavian Welfare States Remain Distinct,’ Social Policy and Administration 38: 204–219.
Czarniawska, B. (2004a). ‘The Uses of Narrative in Social Science Research,’ in Melissa Hardy and Alan Bryman, eds. Handbook of Data Analysis. London: Sage Publications, pp. 649–666.
Czarniawska, B. (1998). A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies. London: Sage Publications.
Czarniawska, B. (2002). A Tale of Three Cities: On the Glocalization of City Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Czarniawska, B. (2004b). Narratives in Social Science Research. London: Sage Publications.
Czarniawska, B. (2004c). ‘On Time, Space, and Action Nets,’ Organization 11: 773–791.
David, P. A. (1985). ‘Clio and the Economics of QWERTY,’ The American Economic Review 75: 332–337.
David, P. A. (1986). ‘Understanding the Economics of QWERTY: The Necessity of History,’ in W. N. Parker, ed. Economic History and the Modern Economist. London, Basil Blackwell, pp. 30–49.
Deeg, R. (2005). ‘Path Dependency, Institutional Complementarity and Change in National Business Systems,’ in G. Morgan, R. Whitley and E. Moen, eds., Changing Capitalisms? Internationalization, Institutional Change, and Systems of Economic Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 21–52.
Deeg, R. (2001). ‘Institutional Change and the Uses and Limits of Path Dependency: The Case of German Finance,’ Koln: Max Planck Institute fur Gesellschaftsforschung MPIfG, Discussion Paper January 6, 2001.
Dobrowolsky, A. and D. Saint-Martin (2005). ‘Agency, Actors and Change in a Child-Focused Future: ‘Path Dependency’ Problematised,’ Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 43: 1–33.
Edelman, M. J. (1964). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Edelman, M. J. (1988). Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Eldredge, N. and S. J. Gould (1972). ‘Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism,’ in T. J. M. Schopf, eds. Paleobiology. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper, pp. 82–115.
Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foucault, M. (1972). ‘The Discourse on Language,’ in: The Archaeology of Knowledge New York: Pantheon, pp. 215–235.
Gadamer, H. (1989). Truth and Method. New York: Crossroad.
Gains, F., P. C. John, and G. Stoker (2005). ‘Path Dependency and the Reform of English Local Government,’ Public Administration 83: 25–45.
George, A. and A. Bennett (2005). ‘Process Tracing and Historical Explanation,’ in A. George and A. Bennett, eds. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gersick, C. J. (1991). ‘Revolutionary Change Theories: A Multilevel Exploration of the Punctuated Equilibrium Paradigm,’ Academy of Management Review 16: 10–36.
Gould, S. J. and N. Eldredge (1977). ‘Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered,’ Paleobiology 3: 115–151.
Greener, I. (2002a). ‘Theorizing Path-Dependency: How Does History Come to Matter in Organizations?’ Management Decision 40: 614–619.
Greener, I. (2002b). ‘Understanding NHS Reform: The Policy-Transfer, Social Learning and Path Dependency Perspectives,’ Governance 15: 161–183.
Greener, I. (2005). ‘The Potential of Path Dependence in Political Studies,’ Politics 25: 62–72.
Griffin, L. J. (1992). ‘Temporality, Events and Explanation in Historical Sociology,’ Sociological Methods and Research 20: 403–427.
Griffin, L. J. (1993). ‘Narrative, Event-Structure Analysis, and Causal Interpretation in Historical Sociology,’ American Journal of Sociology 98: 1094–1133.
Hacker, J. S. (2002). The Divided Welfare State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, P. A., ed. (1989). The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hall, P. A. (1990). ‘Policy Paradigms, Experts, and the State: The Case of Macroeconomic Policy-Making in Britain,’ in S. Brooks and A. G. Gagnon, eds. Social Scientists, Policy, and the State. New York: Praeger, pp. 53–78.
Hall, P. A. (1992). ‘The Change from Keynesianism to Monetarism: Institutional Analysis and British Economic Policy in the 1970s,’ in S. Steinmo, K. Thelen and F. Longstreth, eds. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 90–114.
Hall, P. A. (1993). ‘Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policy Making in Britain,’ Comparative Politics 25: 275–296.
Hall, P. A. and R. C. R. Taylor (1996). ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms,’ Political Studies 44: 936–957.
Haydu, J. (1998). ‘Making Use of the Past: Time Periods as Cases to Compare and As Sequences of Problem Solving,’ American Journal of Sociology 104: 339–371.
Holzinger, K. and C. Knill (2002). ‘Path Dependencies in European Integration,’ Pubic Administration 80: 125–152.
Howlett, M. (1998). ‘Predictable and Unpredictable Policy Windows: Issue, Institutional and Exogenous Correlates of Canadian Federal Agenda-Setting,’ Canadian Journal of Political Science 31: 495–524.
Ihde, D. (1974). The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
John, P. and H. Margetts (2003). ‘Policy Punctuations in the UK: Fluctuations and Equilibria in Central Government Expenditure Since 1951,’ Public Administration 81: 411–432.
Jones, B. D., F. R. Baumgartner, and J. L. True (1998). ‘Policy Punctuations: U.S. Budget Authority, 1947–1995,’ The Journal of Economic Literature 60: 1–33.
Jones, B. D. and F. R. Baumgartner (2005). ‘A Model of Choice for Public Policy,’ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15: 325–351.
Jones, B. D., T. Sulkin, and H. A. Larsen (2003). ‘Policy Punctuations in American Political Institutions,’ American Political Science Review 97: 151–169.
Kato, J (1996). ‘Review Article: Institutions and Rationality in Politics – Three Varieties of Neo-Institutionalists,’ British Journal of Political Science 26: 553–582.
Kay, A (2005). ‘A Critique of the Use of Path Dependency in Policy Studies,’ Public Administration 83: 553–571.
Keeler, J. T. S. (1993). ‘Opening the Window for Reform: Mandates, Crises and Extraordinary Policy-Making,’ Comparative Political Studies 25: 433–486.
Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston: HarperCollins College Publishers.
Kline, D. (2001). ‘Positive Feedback, Lock-In and Environmental Policy,’ Policy Sciences 34: 95–107.
Law, J. (2000). ‘On the Subject of the Object: Narrative, Technology, and Interpellation,’ Configurations 8: 1–29.
Lieberman, E. S. (2001). ‘Causal Inference in Historical Institutional Analysis: A Specification of Periodization Strategies,’ Comparative Political Studies 34: 1011–1035.
Lieberman, R. C. (2002). ‘Ideas, Institutions and Political Order: Explaining Political Change,’ American Political Science Review 96: 697–712.
Liebowitz, S. J. and S. E. Margolis (1990). ‘The Fable of the Keys,’ Journal of Law and Economics 33: 1–25.
Liebowitz, S. J. and S. E. Margolis (1995). ‘Policy and Path Dependence: From QWERTY to Windows 95,’ Regulation 18: 33–41.
Lindner, J. and B. Rittberger (2003). ‘The Creation, Interpretation and Contestation of Institutions – Revisiting Historical Institutionalism,’ Journal of Common Market Studies 41: 445–473.
Lindner, J. (2003). ‘Institutional Stability and Change: Two Sides of the Same Coin,’ Journal of European Public Policy 10: 912–935.
List, C. (2004). ‘A Model of Path-Dependence in Decisions Over Multiple Propositions,’ American Political Science Review 98: 495–513.
Lustick, I. S. (1996). ‘History, Historiography, and Political Science: Multiple Historical Records and the Problem of Selection Bias,’ American Political Science Review 90: 605–618.
Lyotard, J. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Mahoney, J. (2000). ‘Path Dependence in Historical Sociology,’ Theory and Society 29: 507–548.
Mahoney, J. and D. Rueschemeyer, ed. (2003). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McNamara, K. R. (1998). The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the European Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Morgan, G. and I. Kubo (2005). ‘Beyond Path Dependency? Constructing New Models for Institutional Change: The Case of Capital Markets in Japan,’ Socio-Economic Review 3: 55–82.
Nee, V. and Y. Cao (1999). ‘Path Dependent Societal Transformation: Stratification in Hybrid Mixed Economies,’ Theory and Society 28: 799–834.
Nownes, A. J. (1995). ‘The Other Exchange: Public Interest Groups, Patrons, and Benefits,’ Social Science Quarterly 76: 381–401.
Nownes, A. J. (2000). ‘Policy Conflict and the Structure of Interest Communities,’ American Politics Quarterly 28: 309–327.
Nownes, A. J. and A. J. Cigler (1995). ‘Public Interest Groups and the Road to Survival,’ Polity 27: 380–404.
Nownes, A. J. and G. Neeley (1996). ‘Toward an Explanation for Public Interest Group Formation and Proliferation: “Seed Money,” Disturbances, Entrepreneurship, and Patronage,’ Policy Studies Journal 24: 74–92.
Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Ospina, S. M. and J. Dodge (2005). ‘It's About Time: Catching Method Up to Meaning – The Usefulness of Narrative Inquiry in Public Administration Research,’ Public Administration Review 65: 143–157.
Pierson, P. (2000a). ‘Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,’ American Political Science Review 94: 251–267.
Pierson, P. (2000b). ‘Not just what, but when: Timing and sequence in political processes,’ Studies in American Political Development 14: 72–92.
Pierson, P. (2000c). ‘The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change,’ Governance 13: 475–499.
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Raadschelders, J. C. N. (1998). ‘Evolution, Institutional Analysis and Path Dependency: An Administrative-History Perspective on Fashionable Approaches and Concepts,’ International Review of Administrative Sciences 64: 565–582.
Rahnema, S. and M. Howlett (2002). ‘Impediments to Industrial Policy: Overcoming Path Dependency in Canada's Post Staples Transition,’ Journal of Australian Political Economy 49: 114–135.
Rayner, J. and M. Howlett, et al. (2001). ‘Privileging the Sub-Sector: Critical Sub-Sectors and Sectoral Relationships in Forest Policy-Making,’ Forest Policy and Economics 2: 319–332.
Rico, A. and J. Costa-Font (2005). ‘Power Rather than Path Dependency? The Dynamics of Institutional Change under Health Care Federalism,’ Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 30: 231–252.
Rona-Tas, A. (1998). ‘Path Dependence and Capital Theory: Sociology of the Post-Communist Economic Transformation,’ East European Politics and Societies 12: 107–131.
Sabatier, P. A. (1988). ‘An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein,’ Policy Sciences 21: 129–160.
Saldana, J. (2003). Longitudinal Qualitative Research: Analyzing Change Through Time. New York: Altamira, 2003.
Schlager, E. (1999). ‘A Comparison of Frameworks, Theories, and Models of Policy Processes,’ in P. Sabatier ed. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press, p.252.
Schön, D. and M. Rein (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
Schwartz, H. (no date). ‘Down the Wrong Path: Path Dependence, Increasing Returns, and Historical Institutionalism,’ Available at http://www.people.virginia.edu/~hms2f/Path.pdf
Skocpol, T., M. Ganz, et al. (2000). ‘A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States,’ American Political Science Review 94: 527–546.
Somers, M. R. (1996). ‘Where is Sociology after the Historic Turn? Knowledge Cultures, Narrativity, and Historical Epistemologies,’ in T. J. McDonald, eds. The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 53–89.
Steinmo, S., K. Thelen, and F. Longstreth, ed. (1992). Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stinchcombe, A. (1968). Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
Thelen, K. (2003). ‘How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis,’ in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer, eds. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–240.
Thompson, W. B. (2001). ‘Policy Making Through Thick and Thin: Thick Description as a Methodology for Communications and Democracy,’ Policy Sciences 34: 63–77.
Torfing, J. (2001). ‘Path-Dependent Danish Welfare Reforms: The Contribution of the New Institutionalisms to Understanding Evolutionary Change,’ Scandinavian Political Studies 24: 277–309.
Traweek, S. (1992). ‘Border Crossings: Narrative Strategies in Science Studies and among Physicists in Tsukuba Science City, Japan,’ in Andrew Pickering ed. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 429–466.
True, J. L. (2000). ‘Avalanches and Incrementalism: Making Policy and Budgets in the United States,’ American Review of Public Administration 30: 3–18.
True, J. L., B. D. Jones, and F. R. Baumgartner (1999). ‘Punctuated-Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in American Policymaking,’ in P. A. Sabatier, ed. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 97–115.
Wilsford, D. (1994). ‘Path Dependency, or Why History Makes It Difficult but Not Impossible to Reform Health Care Systems in A Big Way,’ Journal of Public Policy 14: 251–284.
Yanow, D. (1996). How Does a Policy Mean? Interpreting Policy and Organizational Actions. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Yanow, D. (1999). Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Howlett, M., Rayner, J. Understanding the historical turn in the policy sciences: A critique of stochastic, narrative, path dependency and process-sequencing models of policy-making over time. Policy Sci 39, 1–18 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-005-9004-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-005-9004-1