Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spacecraft motion around artificial equilibrium points

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main goal of this paper is to describe the motion of a spacecraft around an artificial equilibrium point in the circular restricted three-body problem. The spacecraft is under the gravitational influence of the Sun and the Earth, as primary and secondary bodies, subjected to the force due to the solar radiation pressure and some extra perturbations. Analytical solutions for the equations of motion of the spacecraft are found using several methods and for different extra perturbations. These solutions are strictly valid at the artificial equilibrium point, but they are used as approximations to describe the motion around this artificial equilibrium point. As an application of the method, the perturbation due to the gravitational influence of Jupiter and Venus is added to a spacecraft located at a chosen artificial equilibrium point, near the \(L_3\) Lagrangian point of the Sun–Earth system. The system is propagated starting from this point using analytical and numerical solutions. Comparisons between analytical–analytical and analytical–numerical solutions for several kinds of perturbations are made to guide the choice of the best analytical solution, with the best accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams, K.E.: Overcoming Genesis mission design challenges. Acta Astronaut. 52, 281–287 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tantardini, M., Fantino, E., Ren, Y., Pergola, P., Gomez, G., Masdemont, J.: Spacecraft trajectories to the \(L_3\) point of the Sun–Earth three-body problem. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 108(3), 215–232 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang, Y., et al.: Order and chaos near equilibrium points in the potential of rotating highly irregular-shaped celestial bodies. Nonlinear Dyn. 83, 231 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gomez, G., Jorba, A., Masdemont, J., Simo, C.: Study of the transfer from the Earth to a halo orbit around the equilibrium point \(L_1\). Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 56(4), 541–562 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Jorba, A., Masdemont, J.: Dynamics in the centre manifold of the collinear points of the restricted three body problem. Physica D 132, 189–213 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gomez, G., Masdemont, J., Simo, C.: Quasi-halo orbits associated with libration points. J. Astronaut. Sci. 46, 135–176 (1998)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Koon, W.S., Lo, M.W., Marsden, J.E., Ross, S.D.: Heteroclinic connections between periodic orbits and resonance transition in celestial mechanics. Chaos 10(2), 427–469 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Llibre, J., Martinez, R., Simo, C.: Transversality of the invariant manifolds associated to the Lyapunov family of periodic orbits near \(L_2\) in the restricted three-body problem. J. Differ. Equ. 48, 104–156 (1985)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrabes, E., Olle, M.: Invariant manifolds of \(L_3\) and horseshoe motion in the restricted three-body problem. Nonlinearity 19, 2065–2090 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Prado, A.F.B.A., Broucke, R.A.: Transfer orbits in the restricted problem. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 18(3), 593–598 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hou, X., Tang, J., Liu, L.: Transfer to the Collinear Libration Point \(L_3\) in the Sun–Earth + Moon System. Nasa Technical Report. 20080012700 (2007)

  12. McInnes, C.R., McDonald, A.J.C., Simmons, J.F.L., MacDonald, E.W.: Solar sail parking in restricted three-body systems. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 17(2), 399–406 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Aliasi, G., Mengali, G., Quarta, A.A.: Artificial equilibrium points for a generalized sail in the circular restricted three-body problem. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 110(4), 343–368 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Ammar, M.K.: The effect of solar radiation pressure on the Lagrangian points in the elliptic restricted three-body problem. Astrophys. Space Sci. 313, 393 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsiolkovsky, K.E.: Extension of man into outer space. In: Proceedings of Symposium Jet Propulsion, vol. 2. United Scientific and Technical Presses (1936)

  16. Tsander, K.: From a Scientific Heritage. NASA Technical Translation No. TTf-541, NASA, Washington (1967)

  17. Forward, R.L.: Statite—a spacecraft that does not orbit. J. Spacecr. Rockets 28(5), 606–611 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aliasi, G., Mengali, G., Quarta, A.A.: Artificial equilibrium points for a generalized sail in the elliptic restricted three-body problem. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 114, 181200 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Bombardelli, C., Pelaez, J.: On the stability of artificial equilibrium points in the circular restricted three-body problem. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 109(1), 1326 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Ranjana, K., Kumar, V.: On the artificial equilibrium points in a generalized restricted problem of three bodies. Int. J. Astron. Astrophys. 3, 508–516 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Salazar, F.J.T., McInnes, C.R., Winter, O.C.: Intervening in Earth’s climate system through space-based solar reflectors. Adv. Space Res. 58, 17–29 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McInnes, C.R.: Space-based geoengineering: challenges and requirements. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 224(3), 571–580 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Morimoto, M.Y., Yamakawa, H., Uesugi, K.: Artificial equilibrium points in the low-thrust restricted three-body problem. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 30(5), 1563–1567 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li, J., Post, M.A., Vukovich, G.: Orbit and attitude stability criteria of solar sail on the displaced orbit. AAS 15, 604 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Janhunen, P., Sandroos, A.: Simulation study of solar wind push on a charged wire: basis of solar wind electric sail propulsion. Ann. Geophys. 25, 755–767 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mengali, G., Quarta, A.A.: Non-Keplerian orbits for electric sails. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 105, 179195 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Symon, K.R.: Mechanics, 2nd edn. Campus Ltda, Rio de Janeiro (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Boyce, W.E., DiPrima, R.C.: Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems, 7th edn. Wiley, New York (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. McInnes, Colin R.: Solar Sailing Technology, Dynamics and Mission Applications. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Luzum, B., et al.: The IAU 2009 system of astronomical constants: the report of the IAU working group on numerical standards for Fundamental Astronomy. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 110, 293 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?planets. Accessed 16 Dec 2016

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support from CAPES—Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel; from CNPQ—National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Grants 305834/2013-4, 406841/2016-0 and 301338/2016-7; and from FAPESP—São Paulo Research Foundation, Grants 2016/14665-2, 2016/24561-0, 2014/22293-2 and 2014/22295-5.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil

    A. K. de Almeida Jr., A. F. B. A. Prado & D. M. Sanchez

  2. Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, SP, Brazil

    T. Yokoyama

Authors
  1. A. K. de Almeida Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. F. B. A. Prado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Yokoyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. M. Sanchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. de Almeida Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Almeida, A.K., Prado, A.F.B.A., Yokoyama, T. et al. Spacecraft motion around artificial equilibrium points. Nonlinear Dyn 91, 1473–1489 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3959-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3959-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation