Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of earthquake mitigation measures to reduce economic and human losses: a case study to residential property owners in the metropolitan area of Shiraz, Iran

Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Iran is located in a highly seismic active region, and building structures, therefore, need to be designed and constructed to withstand major earthquakes. Structural mitigation measures are now seen as one key element to reduce economic as well as human losses for today and in the future. However, the costs and benefits of various options are difficult to be assessed and usually done without considering both human and economic aspects. This paper should fill part of this gap and performs an in-depth earthquake risk analysis for Shiraz city, in Iran. Additionally, the effects of different mitigation measures for buildings and corresponding changes in risk levels have been investigated. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis is used to prepare the hazard curves, to be used in the probabilistic cost-benefit analysis of buildings to investigate the effects of using different strengthening strategies. Regarding the importance of the assessment of human casualties during earthquakes, additional cost-benefit ratios were calculated by considering the value of statistical life and performing sensitivity analysis. The results show that considering the value of statistical life in cost-benefit analysis can significantly increase the structural cost-benefit ratios. This has important implications for the decision support as well as policy making side in Iran, and we conclude with suggestions how these issues could be addressed in the future using a risk-layering approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambraseys NN, Douglas J, Sarma SK (2005) Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bull Earthq Eng 3(1):1–53. doi:10.1007/s10518-005-0183-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Applied Technology Council (ATC) (1985) ATC-13 earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatley T (1989) Towards a moral philosophy of natural disaster mitigation. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 7(1):5–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Joyner WB and Fumal TE (1993) Estimation of response spectra and peak ground accelerations from Western North American earthquakes: an inteim report, USGS open file report, p 93–509

  • Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Shiraz population census data, Iran http://www.cbi.ir/

  • Coburn A, Spence R (2002) Earthquake protection”, second edition, Copyright© 2002. Wiley. ISBN: 0-471-49614-6

  • Cropper M, Sahin S (2009) Valuing mortality and morbidity in the context of disaster risks, The World Bank, Development Research Group, Sustainable Rural and Urban Development Team

  • Douglas J (2006) Errata of and addition to ground motion estimation equation 1968–2003, BRGM/RP-54603-FR

  • Erdik M, Cagnan Z, Zulfikar C, Sesetyan K, M. Demircioglu B, Durukal E, Kariptas C (2008) Development of rapid earthquake loss assessment methodologies for Euro-med region. In: Proceeding of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China. Accessed 12–17 October 2008

  • ERN-AL (2011) Probabilistic modelling of disaster risk at global level: development of a methodology and implementation of case studies. Phase 1A: Colombia, Mexico, Nepal. Prepared by the Consortium Evaluación de Riesgos Naturales—América Latina. www.preventionweb.net/english/hyogo/gar/2011/en/bgdocs/ERN-AL_2011.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2014

  • Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner GK, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) (2012) A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara H, Morikawa N (2012) Seismic hazard assessment for Japan after, the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Mega thrust earthquake (Mw9.0) In: Proceedings of the international symposium on engineering lessons learned from the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake, Tokyo, Japan. Accessed 1–4 March 2012

  • Ghafory-Ashtiany M (2010) Earthquake Risk Management Insurance. In: Proceeding of UNESCO-RELEMR seismicity and earthquake engineering in the extended Mediterranean Region Workshop, Ankara, Istanbul. Accessed 21–24 June 2010

  • Ghodrati Amiri G, Mahdavian A, Manouchehri Dana F (2007) Attenuation relationships for Iran. J Earthq Eng 11(4):469–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Assessment Report (GAR) on Disaster Risk Reduction (2011, 2013 & 2015) UNISDR Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction

  • Grossi P, Kunreuther H (2005) Catastrophe modeling: a new approach to managing risk. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • HAZUS-FEMA Technical Manual (2003) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, Earthquake model, HAZUS-MH MR4, Washington D.C.

  • Hallegatte s, Przyluski V (2010) The Economics of natural disasters: concepts and methods, policy research working paper 5507. The World Bank, Washington D.C.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hessami K, Jamali F, Tabassi H (2003) Active fault maps of Iran, Seismotectonic Department, Seismology Research Center, Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Iran

  • Hochrainer-Stigler S, Kunreuther H, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Mechler R, Michel-Kerjan E, Muir-Wood R, Ranger N, Vaziri P, Young M (2011) The costs and benefits of reducing risk from natural hazards to residential structures in developing countries, working paper # 2011-01, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2012) Summary for policymakers. In: Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation

  • International Institute of earthquake engineering and seismology (IIEES) (2013), Earthquake database, Iran. (www.iiees.ac.ir)

  • Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) (2000) The study on seismic microzoning of the greater Tehran area in the Islamic Republic of Iran, final report to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tokyo

  • Kull D, Mechler R, Hochrainer-Stigler S (2013) Probabilistic cost-benefit analysis of disaster risk management in the development context. Disasters 37(3):374–400. doi:10.1111/disa.12002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnerooth-Bayer J, Hochrainer-Stigler S (2014) Financial instruments for disaster risk management and climate change adaptation. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-1035-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugeri N, Kundzewicz ZB, Genovese E, Hochrainer-Stigler S, Radziejewski M (2010) River flood risk and adaptation in Europe—assessment of the present status. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 15(7):621–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansouri B, Amini-Hosseini K (2012) Development of residential building stock and population databases and modeling the residential occupancy rate for Iran. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000109

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansouri B, Ghafory-Ashtiany M, Amini-Hosseini K, Nourjou R, Mousavie M (2010) Building seismic loss model for Tehran. Earthq Spectra 26(1):153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mechler R (2005) Cost-benefit analysis of natural disaster risk management in developing countries. GTZ Working Paper. Sector Cooperation

  • Michel-Kerjan E, Hochrainer-Stigler S, Kunreuther H, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Mechler R, Muir-Wood R, Ranger N, Vaziri P, Young M (2012) Catastrophe risk models for evaluating disaster risk reduction investments in developing countries, working paper # 2012-07, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

  • Motamed H, Khazai B, Ghafory-Ashtiany M, Amini-Hosseini K (2012) An automated model for optimizing budget allocation in earthquake mitigation scenarios. Nat Hazards. doi: 10.1007/s11069-011-0035-y

  • Murakami HO (1992) A simulation model to estimate human loss for occupants of collapsed buildings in an earthquake. In: Proceedings of the tenth world conference on earthquake engineering, Madrid, Spain, pp. 5969–5974. Accessed 19–24 July 1992

  • Pakdel-Lahiji N, Hochrainer-Stigler S, Ghafory-Ashtiany M, Sadeghi M (2014) Consequences of financial vulnerability and insurance loading for the affordability of earthquake insurance systems: evidence from Iran. Geneva papers on risk and insurance—issues and practice

  • Pomonis A, Gaspari M (2013) Earthquake loss estimation and benefit-cost analysis of mitigation measures for buildings in Greece: case study of Pylos town. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 54

  • Sadeghi M. (2013) Earthquake risk modeling for the evaluation of different mitigation measures to reduce losses to property owners in the metropolitan area of Shiraz. In: Proceedings of the YSSP late summer workshop 2013, Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, p 19. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/education/yssp/YSSP2013_Proceedings.pdf

  • Sadeghi M, Hochrainer-Stigler S, Ghafory-Ashtiany M, Pakdel-Lahiji N (2014) Earthquake risk modeling for the evaluation of losses to property owners in the metropolitan area of Shiraz. In: Proceedings of the 10th U.S. national conference in earthquake engineering, Anchorage, AK: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute

  • Shiraz Municipal Yearbook (2013) Shiraz Municipality publication, Shiraz, Iran

  • Smyth AW, Altay G, Deodatis G, Erdik M, Franco G, Gulkan P, Kunreuther H, Lus H, Mete E, Seeber N, Yuzugullu O (2004) Probabilistic benefit cost analysis for earthquake damage mitigation: evaluating measures for apartment houses in Turkey. Earthq Spectra 20(1):171–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence R, So E, Scawthorn C (2011) Human casualties in earthquakes: progress in modelling and mitigation, vol 29. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Center of Iran (2013) Shiraz population census data, Iran (www.amar.org.ir)

  • Viscusi WK (1993) The value of risks to life and health. J Econ Lit 31(4):1912–1946

    Google Scholar 

  • World Development Report (2014) risk and opportunity, managing risk for development international bank for reconstruction and development. The World Bank, Washington D.C. doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-9903-3

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper represents the partial results of the Young Scientist Summer Program (YSSP 2013) at International Institute of Applied System Analysis (IIASA). The authors would like to thank Dr. Joanne Linnerooth-Bayer, Prof. Georg Pflug, Dr. Abdoreza Sarvghad-Moghadam and Dr. Kiarash Naserassadi for their support and guidance of this study. The author would like to express their appreciation to Municipal of Shiraz (Mr. Pakfetrat and Mr. Amini) for providing the city’s inventory database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Sadeghi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 730 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadeghi, M., Hochrainer-Stigler, S. & Ghafory-Ashtiany, M. Evaluation of earthquake mitigation measures to reduce economic and human losses: a case study to residential property owners in the metropolitan area of Shiraz, Iran. Nat Hazards 78, 1811–1826 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1801-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1801-z

Keywords

Navigation