Skip to main content
Log in

Broad-Coverage Parsing with Neural Networks

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subsymbolic systems have been successfully used to model several aspects of human language processing. Such parsers are appealing because they allow revising the interpretation as words are incrementally processed. Yet, it has been very hard to scale them up to realistic language due to training time, limited memory, and the difficulty of representing linguistic structure. In this study, we show that it is possible to keep track of long-distance dependencies and to parse into deeper structures than before based on two techniques: a localist encoding of the input sequence and a dynamic unrolling of the network according to the parse tree. With these techniques, the system can nonmonotonically parse a corpus of realistic sentences into parse trees labelled with grammatical tags from a broad-coverage Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar of English.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J Allen M.S. Seidenberg (1999) The emergence of grammaticality in connectionist networks B MacWhinney (Eds) Emergence of Language Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum 115–151

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Miikkulainen (1997) ArticleTitleDyslexic and category-specific impairments in a self-organizing feature map model of the lexicon Brain and Language 59 334–366

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Miikkulainen (1993) Subsymbolic Natural Language Processing: An Integrated Model of Scripts, Lexicon and Memory MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  4. W.C. Morris G.W Cottrell J.L. Elman (2000) A connectionist simulation of the empirical acquisition of grammatical relations. S. Wermter R. Sun (Eds) Hybrid Neural Systems Springer-Verlag Verlag 175–193

    Google Scholar 

  5. D.C. Plaut T. Shallice (1993) ArticleTitlePerseverative and semantic influences on visual object naming errors in optic aphasia: A connectionist account Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5 IssueID1 89–117

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.F. St. John J.L McClelland (1990) ArticleTitleLearning and applying contextual constraints in sentence comprehension Artificial Intelligence 46 217–258

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Bengio P. Simard P. Frasconi (1994) ArticleTitleLearning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 5 IssueID2 157–166

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Berg (1992) A connectionist parser with recursive sentence structure and lexical disambiguation W. Swartout (Eds) Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence Cambridge MA, MIT Press 32–37

    Google Scholar 

  9. E.K. Ho L. Chan (2001) ArticleTitleAnalyzing holistic parsers:Implications for robust parsing and systematicity Neural Computation 13 IssueID5 1137–1170

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sharkey, N.E. and Sharkey, A.J.C.: A modular design for connectionist parsing, In: M. Drossaers and A. Nijholt, (eds.), Twente Workshop on Language Technology 3: Connectionism and Natural Language Processing, pp. 87–96, Enschede, the Netherlands, 1992. Department of Computer Science, University of Twente.

  11. P.C.R. Lane J.B.H. Henderson (2001) ArticleTitleIncremental syntactic parsing of natural language corpora with simple synchrony networks IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 13 IssueID2 219–231

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mayberry, M.R. III and Miikkulainen, R.: Combining maps and distributed representations for shift-reduce parsing, In: S. Wermter and R. Sun, (eds.), Hybrid Neural Systems, pp. 144–157. Springer-Verlag, 2000.

  13. Hammerton, J.: Clause identification with long short-term memory, In: W. Daelemans and R. Zajac, (eds), Proceedings of CoNLL-2001 pp. 61--63, 2001.

  14. S. Lawrence C.L. Giles S. Fong (2000) ArticleTitleNatural language grammatical inference with recurrent neural networks IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 12 IssueID1 126–140

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.H. Christiansen N. Chater (1999) ArticleTitleToward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance Cognitive Science 23 IssueID2 157–205

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.L. Elman (1990) ArticleTitleFinding structure in time Cognitive Science 14 179–211

    Google Scholar 

  17. D.J. Chalmers (1990) ArticleTitleSyntactic transformations on distributed representations Connection Science 2 53–62

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.B. Pollack (1990) ArticleTitleRecursive distributed representations Artificial Intelligence 46 77–105

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Goller A. Küchler (1996) ArticleTitleLearning task-dependent distributed representations by backpropagation through structure IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 1 347–352

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Pollard I.A. Sag (1994) Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Studies in Contemporary Linguistics The University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Munro C. Cosic M. Tabasko (1991) ArticleTitleA network for encoding, decoding and translating locative prepositions Connection Science 3 225–240

    Google Scholar 

  22. Touretzky, D.S.: Connectionism and compositional semantics. In: J. Barnden and J. Pollack, (eds), High-Level Connectionist Models,, volume1 of Advances in Connectionist and Neural Computation Theory, Barnden, J. A., series (ed.), pp. 17--31.Norwood: NJ, Ablex, 1991.

  23. R.J. Williams D. Zipser (1989) ArticleTitleA learning algorithm for continually running fully recurrent neural networks Neural Computation 1 270–280

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Copestake J. Carroll R. Malouf S. Oepen (1999) The (New) LKB System Stanford University CSLI

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marshall R. Mayberry III.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mayberry, M.R., Miikkulainen, R. Broad-Coverage Parsing with Neural Networks. Neural Process Lett 21, 121–132 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-004-3423-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-004-3423-4

Keywords

Navigation