Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhanced sensitivity of electrocorticography during awake craniotomy using a novel circular grid electrode

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Awake craniotomy with intraoperative functional brain mapping (FBM) bedside neurological testing is an important technique used to optimize resective brain surgeries near eloquent cortex. Awake craniotomy performed with electrocorticography (ECoG) and direct electrical stimulation (DES) for FBM can delineate eloquent cortex from lesions and epileptogenic regions. However, current electrode technology demonstrates spatial limitations. Our group has developed a novel circular grid with the goal of improving spatial recording of ECoG to enhance detection of ictal and interictal activity.

Methods

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board at Mayo Clinic Florida. We analyzed patients undergoing awake craniotomy with ECoG and DES and compared ECoG data obtained using the 22 contact circular grid to standard 6 contact strip electrode.

Results

We included 144 cases of awake craniotomy with ECoG, 73 using circular grid and 71 with strip electrode. No significant differences were seen regarding preoperative clinical and demographic data, duration of ECoG recording (p = 0.676) and use of DES (p = 0.926). Circular grid was more sensitive in detecting periodic focal epileptiform discharges (PFEDs) (p = 0.004), PFEDs plus (p = 0.032), afterdischarges (ADs) per case (p = 0.022) at lower minimum (p = 0.012) and maximum (p < 0.0012) intensity stimulation, and seizures (p = 0.048). PFEDs (p < 0.001), PFEDs plus (p < 0.001), and HFOs (p < 0.001) but not ADs (p = 0.255) predicted electrographic seizures.

Conclusion

We demonstrate higher sensitivity in detecting ictal and interictal activity on ECoG during awake craniotomy with a novel circular grid compared to strip electrode, likely due to better spatial sampling during ECoG. We also found association between PFEDs and intraoperative seizures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Benedictis A, Moritz-Gasser S, Duffau H (2010) Awake mapping optimizes the extent of resection for low-grade gliomas in eloquent areas. Neurosurgery 66(6):1074–1084. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000369514.74284.78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Freund BE, Sherman WJ, Sabsevitz DS, et al (2023) Can we improve electrocorticography using a circular grid array in brain tumor surgery? Biomed Phys Eng Express 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ad05dd

  3. Mamani R, Jacobo JA, Mejia S, Nuñez-Velasco S, Aragon-Arreola J, Moreno S (2020) Analysis of intraoperative seizures during bipolar brain mapping in eloquent areas: intraoperative seizures in brain mapping. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nossek E, Matot I, Shahar T et al (2013) Intraoperative seizures during awake craniotomy: incidence and consequences: analysis of 477 patients. Neurosurgery 73(1):135–140. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000429847.91707.97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Robertson FC, Ullrich NJ, Al-sayegh H, Goumnerova LC (2018) The impact of intraoperative electrocorticography on seizure outcome after resection of pediatric brain tumors: a cohort study. Neurosurgery 85:375–383. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Englot DJ, Berger MS, Barbaro NM, Chang EF (2011) Predictors of seizure freedom after resection of supratentorial low-grade gliomas. J Neurosurg 115(2):240–244. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.3.JNS1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goel K, Pek V, Shlobin NA et al (2022) Clinical utility of intraoperative electrocorticography for epilepsy surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.17472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. ReFaey K, Chaichana KL, Feyissa AM et al (2020) A 360° electronic device for recording high-resolution intraoperative electrocorticography of the brain during awake craniotomy. J Neurosurg 133(2):443–450. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.4.JNS19261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feyissa AM, Worrell GA, Tatum WO et al (2019) Potential influence of IDH1 mutation and MGMT gene promoter methylation on glioma-related preoperative seizures and postoperative seizure control. Seizure 69(April):283–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2019.05.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Domingo RA, Vivas-Buitrago T, De Biase G et al (2021) Intraoperative seizure detection during active resection of glioblastoma through a novel hollow circular electrocorticography array. Oper Neurosurg 21(2):E147–E152. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opab110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tatum WO, McKay JH, ReFaey K et al (2020) Detection of after-discharges during intraoperative functional brain mapping in awake brain tumor surgery using a novel high-density circular grid. Clin Neurophysiol 131(4):828–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.12.416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tatum WO, Feyissa AM, ReFaey K et al (2019) Periodic focal epileptiform discharges. Clin Neurophysiol 130(8):1320–1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.04.718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Klink NEC, Zweiphenning WJEM, Ferrier CH et al (2021) Can we use intraoperative high-frequency oscillations to guide tumor-related epilepsy surgery? Epilepsia 62(4):997–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.16845

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Abecassis ZA, Ayer AB, Templer JW, Yerneni K, Murthy NK, Tate MC (2021) Analysis of risk factors and clinical sequelae of direct electrical cortical stimulation–induced seizures and afterdischarges in patients undergoing awake mapping. J Neurosurg 134(5):1610–1617. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.3.JNS193231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Feyissa AM, Worrell GA, Tatum WO et al (2018) High-frequency oscillations in awake patients undergoing brain tumor-related epilepsy surgery. Neurology 90(13):e1119–e1125. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005216

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Freund B, Gugger JJ, Reynolds A, Tatum WO, Claassen J, Kaplan PW (2018) Clinical and electrographic correlates of bilateral independent periodic discharges. J Clin Neurophysiol 35(3):234. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guragain H, Cimbalnik J, Stead M et al (2018) Spatial variation in high-frequency oscillation rates and amplitudes in intracranial EEG. Neurology 90(8):E639–E646. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004998

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eseonu CI, Rincon-torroella J, Refaey K et al (2017) Awake craniotomy vs craniotomy under general anesthesia for perirolandic gliomas: evaluating perioperative complications and extent of resection. Neurosurgery 81(3):481–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Freund BE, Feyissa AM, Khan A, et al (2023) Early postoperative seizures following awake craniotomy and functional brain mapping for lesionectomy. World Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; or the creation of new software used in the work: BEF, AF, and WOT Drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content: All authors. Approved the version to be published: All authors. Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved: All authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brin E. Freund.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Dr. Tatum is the designer of the circular grid and Dr. Quinones-Hinojosa is one of the co-developers (Patent Application PCT/US2018/039956).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freund, B.E., Feyissa, A.M., Khan, A. et al. Enhanced sensitivity of electrocorticography during awake craniotomy using a novel circular grid electrode. J Neurooncol 165, 313–320 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04495-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04495-0

Keywords

Navigation