Abstract
Question
Should patients with previously diagnosed malignant glioma who are suspected of experiencing progression of the neoplasm process undergo repeat open surgical resection?
Target population
These recommendations apply to adults with previously diagnosed malignant glioma who are suspected of experiencing progression of the neoplastic process and are amenable to surgical resection.
Recommendations
Level II
Repeat cytoreductive surgery is recommended in symptomatic patients with locally recurrent or progressive malignant glioma. The median survival in these patient diagnosed with glioblastoma is expected to range from 6 to 17 months following a second procedure.
It is recommended that the following preoperative factors be considered when evaluating a patient for repeat operation: location of recurrence in eloquent/critical brain regions, Karnofsky Performance Status and tumor volume.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Darefsky AS, King JT Jr, Dubrow R (2012) Adult glioblastoma multiforme survival in the temozolomide era: a population-based analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. Cancer 118:2163–2172
Easaw JC, Mason WP, Perry J et al (2011) Canadian recommendations for the treatment of recurrent or progressive glioblastoma multiforme. Curr Oncol (Toronto Ont) 18:e126–e136
Koshy M, Villano JL, Dolecek TA et al (2012) Improved survival time trends for glioblastoma using the SEER 17 population-based registries. J Neurooncol 107:207–212
Olson JJ, Fadul CE, Brat DJ, Mukundan S, Ryken TC (2009) Management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma: guidelines development, value and application. J Neurooncol 93:1–23
Olson JJ, Ryken T (2008) Guidelines for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma: introduction. J Neurooncol 89:255–258
Zuniga RM, Torcuator R, Jain R et al (2009) Efficacy, safety and patterns of response and recurrence in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan. J Neurooncol 91:329–336
Ammirati M, Galicich JH, Arbit E, Liao Y (1987) Reoperation in the treatment of recurrent intracranial malignant gliomas. Neurosurgery 21:607–614
Barker FG, 2nd et al (1998) Survival and functional status after resection of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Neurosurgery 42:709–720; discussion 720–723
Berger MS, Tucker A, Spence A, Winn HR (1992) Reoperation for glioma. Clin Neurosurg 39:172–186
Boiardi A et al (1999) Locally delivered chemotherapy and repeated surgery can improve survival in glioblastoma patients. Ital J Neurol Sci 20:43–48
Brem H et al (1995) The safety of interstitial chemotherapy with BCNU-loaded polymer followed by radiation therapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed malignant gliomas: phase I trial. J Neurooncol 26:111–123
Carson KA, Grossman SA, Fisher JD, Shaw EG (2007) Prognostic factors for survival in adult patients with recurrent glioma enrolled onto the new approaches to brain tumor therapy CNS consortium phase I and II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 25:2601–2606
Daneyemez M, Gezen F, Canakci Z, Kahraman S (1998) Radical surgery and reoperation in supratentorial malignant glial tumors. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 41:209–213
Darakchiev BJ, Albright RE, Breneman JC, Warnick RE (2008) Safety and efficacy of permanent iodine-125 seed implants and carmustine wafers in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurosurg 108:236–242
Dirks P, Bernstein M, Muller PJ, Tucker WS (1993) The value of reoperation for recurrent glioblastoma. Can J Surg 36(3):271–275
Durmaz R et al (1997) Management of glioblastoma multiforme: with special reference to recurrence. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 99:117–123
Guyotat J et al (2000) Is reoperation for recurrence of glioblastoma justified? Oncol Rep 7:899–904
Harsh GR 4th et al (1987) Reoperation for recurrent glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma. Neurosurgery 21:615–621
Hau, P, Baumgart U, Pfeifer K et al (2003) Salvage therapy in patients with glioblastoma: is there any benefit? Cancer 98:2678–2686
Helseth R, Helseth E, Johannesen TB et al (2010) Overall survival, prognostic factors, and repeated surgery in a consecutive series of 516 patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Acta Neurol Scand 122:159–167
Landy HJ et al (1994) Retreatment of intracranial gliomas. South Med J 87:211–214
Mandl ES, Dirven CM, Buis DR, Postma TJ, Vandertop WP (2008) Repeated surgery for glioblastoma multiforme: only in combination with other salvage therapy. Surg Neurol 69:506–509; discussion 509
Moser RP (1988) Surgery for glioma relapse. Factors that influence a favorable outcome. Cancer 62:381–390
Muhling M, Krage J, Hussein S, Samii M (1999) Indication for repeat surgery of glioblastoma: influence of progress of disease. Front Radiat Ther Oncol 33:192–201
Olson JJ et al (2008) Phase I analysis of BCNU-impregnated biodegradable polymer wafers followed by systemic interferon alfa-2b in adults with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol 90:293–299
Park JK et al (2010) Scale to predict survival after surgery for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol 28:3838–3843
Pinsker M, Lumenta C (2001) Experiences with reoperation on recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Zentralbl Neurochir 62:43–47
Pool JL (1968) The management of recurrent gliomas. Clin Neurosurg 15:265–287
Rostomily RC et al (1994) Multimodality management of recurrent adult malignant gliomas: results of a phase II multiagent chemotherapy study and analysis of cytoreductive surgery. Neurosurgery 35:378–388; discussion 388
Salcman M, Kaplan RS, Ducker TB, Abdo H, Montgomery E (1982) Effect of age and reoperation on survival in the combined modality treatment of malignant astrocytoma. Neurosurgery 10:454–463
Shrieve DC et al (1999) Treatment of patients with primary glioblastoma multiforme with standard postoperative radiotherapy and radiosurgical boost: prognostic factors and long-term outcome. J Neurosurg 90:72–77
Sipos L, Afra D (1997) Re-operations of supratentorial anaplastic astrocytomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139:99–104
Soults CB, Canute GS, Ryken TC (1998) Evidence-based review of the role of reoperation in the management of malignant glioma. Neurosurg Focus 4:e11
Stromblad LG, Anderson H, Malmstrom P, Salford LG (1993) Reoperation for malignant astrocytomas: personal experience and a review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg 7:623–633
Subach BR et al (1999) Morbidity and survival after 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea wafer implantation for recurrent glioblastoma: a retrospective case-matched cohort series. Neurosurgery 45:17–22; discussion 22–23
Vick NA, Ciric IS, Eller TW, Cozzens JW, Walsh A (1989) Reoperation for malignant astrocytoma. Neurology 39:430–432
Wallner KE, Galicich JH, Krol G, Arbit E, Malkin MG (1989) Patterns of failure following treatment for glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 16:1405–1409
Young B et al (1981) Reoperation for glioblastoma. J Neurosurg 55:917–921
Brem H et al (1995) Placebo-controlled trial of safety and efficacy of intraoperative controlled delivery by biodegradable polymers of chemotherapy for recurrent gliomas. The Polymer-brain Tumor Treatment Group. Lancet 345:1008–1012
Wallner KE et al (1989) Inability of computed tomography appearance of recurrent malignant astrocytoma to predict survival following reoperation. J Clin Oncol 7:1492–1496
Haller JW, Ryken TC, Vannier MW (2001) Image-guided therapy: infrastructure for practical applications. Acad Radiol 8:888–897
Amin V et al (2008) Therapy planning and monitoring of tissue ablation by high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) using imaging and simulation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008:4471
Stummer W et al (2008) Extent of resection and survival in glioblastoma multiforme: identification of and adjustment for bias. Neurosurgery 62:564–576; discussion 564–576
Nabavi A et al (2009) Five-aminolevulinic acid for fluorescence-guided resection of recurrent malignant gliomas: a phase ii study. Neurosurgery 65:1070-1076; discussion 1076–1077
Assem M et al (2012) Enhancing diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic outcome prediction of gliomas using genomics. OMICS 16:113–122
Foltz G et al (2006) Genome-wide analysis of epigenetic silencing identifies BEX1 and BEX2 as candidate tumor suppressor genes in malignant glioma. Cancer Res 66:6665–6674
Foltz G et al (2009) DNA methyltransferase-mediated transcriptional silencing in malignant glioma: a combined whole-genome microarray and promoter array analysis. Oncogene 28:2667–2677
Shah N et al (2011) Comprehensive analysis of MGMT promoter methylation: correlation with MGMT expression and clinical response in GBM. PLoS One 6:e16146
Solomon DA et al (2008) Mutational inactivation of PTPRD in glioblastoma multiforme and malignant melanoma. Cancer Res 68:10300–10306
Solomon DA et al (2009) Sample type bias in the analysis of cancer genomes. Cancer Res 69:5630–5633
Zaheer A, Sahu SK, Ryken TC, Traynelis VC (2007) Cis-parinaric acid effects, cytotoxicity, c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase, forkhead transcription factor and Mn-SOD differentially in malignant and normal astrocytes. Neurochem Res 32:115–124
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the AANS/CNS Joint Guidelines Committee for their review, comments and suggestions, the contributions of Laura Mitchell, CNS Guidelines Manager for organizational assistance, Maxine Brown for searching for and retrieving literature and Amy Allison for reference library consultations. We would also like to acknowledge the following individual JGC members for their contributions throughout the review process: Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, MD, FAANS, FACS, FAHA, Martina Stippler, MD, Alexander Khalessi, MD, Isabelle Germano, MD, Sean D. Christie, MD, FRCS (C), Gregory J. Zipfel, MD, Zachary Litvack, MD, MCR, Ann Marie Flannery, MD, Patricia B Raksin, MD, Joshua M. Rosenow, MD, FACS, Steven Casha, MD, PhD, Julie G. Pilitsis, MD, PhD, Gabriel Zada, MD, Adair Prall, Krystal Tomei, MD, Gregory W Hawryluk, MD.
Conflict of interest (COI)
Task Force members report potential COIs prior to beginning work on the guideline and at the time of publication. COI disclosures are reviewed by the Task Force Chair and taken into consideration when determining writing assignments. Resolution of potential COIs included Task Force members were assigned to chapters that did not involve or in any way relate to the potential COIs disclosed.
Disclaimer of liability
The information in these guidelines reflects the current state of knowledge at the time of completion. The presentations are designed to provide an accurate review of the subject matter covered. These guidelines are disseminated with the understanding that the recommendations by the authors and consultants who have collaborated in their development are not meant to replace the individualized care and treatment advice from a patient’s physician(s). If medical advice or assistance is required, the services of a physician should be sought. The proposals contained in these guidelines may not be suitable for use in all circumstances. The choice to implement any particular recommendation contained in these guidelines must be made by a managing physician in light of the situation in each particular patient and on the basis of existing resources.
Funding source
These guidelines were funded exclusively by the CNS and Tumor Section of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons whom received no funding from outside commercial sources to support the development of this document unless otherwise stated in this section.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ryken, T.C., Kalkanis, S.N., Buatti, J.M. et al. The role of cytoreductive surgery in the management of progressive glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 118, 479–488 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1336-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1336-7